Current Events > Do you like this trend: reviving decades-old shows w/ sequels set decades later?

(+) Yeah! (+)

Knowledge_King posted...

No. They're void of creativity and only server to mess up the former series. Samurai Jack is only acceptable because it never got to finish and get to the logical conclusion.

same can be said for Star Wars. story didn't really end with Return of the Jedi. the Empire didn't 100% collapse just cause they killed the Emperor. there was still an entire government that existed. And anyone who knows about the Star Wars lore, knows that you can never defeat the dark side forever. the galaxy is a cycle of light side and dark side ruling back and forth.

TheDarkCircle posted...

EverHeardOfIt posted...

TheDarkCircle posted...

Says who?

EverHeardOfIt posted...

Every revival I've seen so far has been great tbh

Proof?

do you want to scan my brain

Knowledge_King posted...

No. They're void of creativity and only server to mess up the former series.

--someone who's never seen twin peaks

blimp

Twin Peaks was supposed to be revisited 25 years later. It was even mentioned by one of the characters in the original run.

So, take Twin Peaks the fuck outta your list!
---

Eat More Beef posted...

Twin Peaks was supposed to be revisited 25 years later. It was even mentioned by one of the characters in the original run.

So, take Twin Peaks the fuck outta your list!

I don't see how it's not a revival just cause there's an in-show justification for why it's back on.

Will and Grace soon.

Scrubs will be back
---

And yeah, creative works have been riding off nostalgia and old content for, like, five or six years now. Or at least it feels more heavily pronounced in the last five or so years anyway.
---