Current Events > Friendly Reminder: Life is Strange is a Square Enix IP

Topic List	Page List: 1
SSJ2Gogeto 09/14/17 1:52:29 AM #1:	You know, this gives me chills down my spine every time I'm reminded of this, it's just kinda weird that it's technically a Square Enix game. --- Revolver Ocelot <cite>SSJ2Gogeto posted [p:886570351] in Friendly R... [t:75773094]...</cite> <quote>You know, this gives me chills down my spine every time I'm reminded of this, it's just kinda weird that it's technically a Square Enix game.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TheMarthKoopa 09/14/17 1:53:19 AM #2:	ok <cite>TheMarthKoopa posted [p:886570379] in Friendly R... [t:75773094]...</cite> <quote>ok</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
NibeIungsnarf 09/14/17 1:54:13 AM #3:	That's nice. <cite>NibeIungsnarf posted [p:886570411] in Friendly R... [t:75773094]...</cite> <quote>That's nice.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
UncleBourbon33 09/14/17 1:54:33 AM #4:	Life is strange is shit. --- http://i.imgur.com/HtxqKRp.gif <cite>UncleBourbon33 posted [p:886570424] in Friendly R... [t:75773094]...</cite> <quote>Life is strange is shit.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
discodancer77 09/14/17 1:55:01 AM #5:	How is it? It's like $7 on psn <cite>discodancer77 posted [p:886570434] in Friendly R... [t:75773094]...</cite> <quote>How is it? It's like $7 on psn</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DragonJumpKick 09/14/17 1:55:05 AM #6:	Is max going to be a guest character in dissidia --- Cemith's dick is a tyrant "wtf do you know how girls work you virgin" - robellr13 <cite>DragonJumpKick posted [p:886570436] in Friendly R... [t:75773094]...</cite> <quote>Is max going to be a guest character in dissidia</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zack_Attackv1 09/14/17 1:55:43 AM #7:	As is my Amazon Queen. Your point? --- http://i.imgur.com/Lq5kBhN.jpg http://i.imgur.com/tmxM83w.jpg <cite>Zack_Attackv1 posted [p:886570451] in Friendly R... [t:75773094]...</cite> <quote>As is my Amazon Queen. Your point?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Kisai 09/14/17 1:56:45 AM #8:	Just because it's published by Square doesn't mean it's created by Square's people. Same with Kane & Lynch, or Tomb Raider. --- WHO MODS THE MODERATORS? <cite>Kisai posted [p:886570501] in Friendly R... [t:75773094]...</cite> <quote>Just because it's published by Square doesn't mean it's created by Square's people. Same with Kane & Lynch, or Tomb Raider.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SSJ2Gogeto 09/14/17 1:56:50 AM #9:	discodancer77 posted... How is it? It's like $7 on psn Don't listen to the morons who never played it. Try out the first episode since it's free. See how you like it. And don't search up the game. You'll get spoiled I say it's good. --- Revolver Ocelot <cite>SSJ2Gogeto posted [p:886570505] in Friendly R... [t:75773094]...</cite> <quote><cite>discodancer77 posted...</cite> <quote>How is it? It's like $7 on psn</quote> Don't listen to the morons who never played it. Try out the first episode since it's free. See how you like it. And don't search up the game. You'll get spoiled I say it's good.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SSJ2Gogeto 09/14/17 1:57:52 AM #10:	Kisai posted... Just because it's published by Square doesn't mean it's created by Square's people. Same with Kane & Lynch, or Tomb Raider. Uh yeah but I never said it was developed by Square Enix. The franchise is still owned by them through. --- Revolver Ocelot <cite>SSJ2Gogeto posted [p:886570547] in Friendly R... [t:75773094]...</cite> <quote><cite>Kisai posted...</cite> <quote>Just because it's published by Square doesn't mean it's created by Square's people. Same with Kane & Lynch, or Tomb Raider.</quote> Uh yeah but I never said it was developed by Square Enix. The franchise is still owned by them through.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Foppe 09/14/17 1:59:52 AM #11:	Does Square really own it? Publishing != owning. --- GameFAQs isn't going to be merged in with GameSpot or any other site. We're not going to strip out the soul of the site. -CJayC <cite>Foppe posted [p:886570615] in Friendly R... [t:75773094]...</cite> <quote>Does Square really own it? Publishing != owning.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LepartialJury 09/14/17 2:00:06 AM #12:	Kisai posted... Just because it's published by Square doesn't mean it's created by Square's people. Same with Kane & Lynch, or Tomb Raider. Fire emblem, Ace Attorney, and Bravely Default games aren't developed by Nintendo but they're considered Nintendo games --- Simple-straight-narrow <cite>LepartialJury posted [p:886570629] in Friendly R... [t:75773094]...</cite> <quote><cite>Kisai posted...</cite> <quote>Just because it's published by Square doesn't mean it's created by Square's people. Same with Kane & Lynch, or Tomb Raider.</quote> Fire emblem, Ace Attorney, and Bravely Default games aren't developed by Nintendo but they're considered Nintendo games</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SSJ2Gogeto 09/14/17 2:01:36 AM #13:	Foppe posted... Does Square really own it? Publishing != owning. Yes, they do. Look it up. --- Revolver Ocelot <cite>SSJ2Gogeto posted [p:886570677] in Friendly R... [t:75773094]...</cite> <quote><cite>Foppe posted...</cite> <quote>Does Square really own it? Publishing != owning.</quote> Yes, they do. Look it up.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Foppe 09/14/17 2:01:42 AM #14:	...pretty sure that most people sees the Ace Attorney games as Capcom games... --- GameFAQs isn't going to be merged in with GameSpot or any other site. We're not going to strip out the soul of the site. -CJayC <cite>Foppe posted [p:886570683] in Friendly R... [t:75773094]...</cite> <quote>...pretty sure that most people sees the Ace Attorney games as Capcom games...</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
NibeIungsnarf 09/14/17 2:01:53 AM #15:	Question: Does the concept of a Rachel Amber prequel sound insanely unappealing to anyone else? I don't want to get to know Rachel Amber as a character. She's not supposed to be a character. She's the beacon all the actual characters swarm around. She's an ideal, not a literal person. To know her as a person sort of ruins her as what she is in LiS. I have no desire to play Before the Storm for this fact. <cite>NibeIungsnarf posted [p:886570692] in Friendly R... [t:75773094]...</cite> <quote>Question: Does the concept of a Rachel Amber prequel sound insanely unappealing to anyone else? I don't want to get to know Rachel Amber as a character. She's not supposed to be a character. She's the beacon all the actual characters swarm around. She's an ideal, not a literal person. To know her as a person sort of ruins her as what she is in LiS. I have no desire to play Before the Storm for this fact.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Kisai 09/14/17 2:02:38 AM #16:	LepartialJury posted... Kisai posted... Just because it's published by Square doesn't mean it's created by Square's people. Same with Kane & Lynch, or Tomb Raider. Fire emblem, Ace Attorney, and Bravely Default games aren't developed by Nintendo but they're considered Nintendo games Who considers them Nintendo games? Why would they be considered Nintendo games? Does Nintendo have any rights to licensing or anything for those two games? --- WHO MODS THE MODERATORS? <cite>Kisai posted [p:886570725] in Friendly R... [t:75773094]...</cite> <quote><cite>LepartialJury posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Kisai posted...</cite> <quote>Just because it's published by Square doesn't mean it's created by Square's people. Same with Kane & Lynch, or Tomb Raider.</quote> Fire emblem, Ace Attorney, and Bravely Default games aren't developed by Nintendo but they're considered Nintendo games</quote> Who considers them Nintendo games? Why would they be considered Nintendo games? Does Nintendo have any rights to licensing or anything for those two games?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Foppe 09/14/17 2:02:38 AM #17:	SSJ2Gogeto posted... Foppe posted... Does Square really own it? Publishing != owning. Yes, they do. Look it up. Link it. --- GameFAQs isn't going to be merged in with GameSpot or any other site. We're not going to strip out the soul of the site. -CJayC <cite>Foppe posted [p:886570726] in Friendly R... [t:75773094]...</cite> <quote><cite>SSJ2Gogeto posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Foppe posted...</cite> <quote>Does Square really own it? Publishing != owning.</quote> Yes, they do. Look it up.</quote> Link it.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Darmik 09/14/17 2:02:47 AM #18:	NibeIungsnarf posted... Question: Does the concept of a Rachel Amber prequel sound insanely unappealing to anyone else? I don't want to get to know Rachel Amber as a character. She's not supposed to be a character. She's the beacon all the actual characters swarm around. She's an ideal, not a literal person. To know her as a person sort of ruins her as what she is in LiS. I have no desire to play Before the Storm for this fact. Before the Storm is pretty good so far tbh. Adds a lot to Chloe's character and motivations during season 1. --- Kind Regards, Darmik <cite>Darmik posted [p:886570734] in Friendly R... [t:75773094]...</cite> <quote><cite>NibeIungsnarf posted...</cite> <quote>Question: Does the concept of a Rachel Amber prequel sound insanely unappealing to anyone else? I don't want to get to know Rachel Amber as a character. She's not supposed to be a character. She's the beacon all the actual characters swarm around. She's an ideal, not a literal person. To know her as a person sort of ruins her as what she is in LiS. I have no desire to play Before the Storm for this fact.</quote> Before the Storm is pretty good so far tbh. Adds a lot to Chloe's character and motivations during season 1.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SSJ2Gogeto 09/14/17 2:03:10 AM #19:	NibeIungsnarf posted... Question: Does the concept of a Rachel Amber prequel sound insanely unappealing to anyone else? I don't want to get to know Rachel Amber as a character. She's not supposed to be a character. She's the beacon all the actual characters swarm around. She's an ideal, not a literal person. To know her as a person sort of ruins her as what she is in LiS. I have no desire to play Before the Storm for this fact. She's hot dude. Why wouldn't u play the game. --- Revolver Ocelot <cite>SSJ2Gogeto posted [p:886570750] in Friendly R... [t:75773094]...</cite> <quote><cite>NibeIungsnarf posted...</cite> <quote>Question: Does the concept of a Rachel Amber prequel sound insanely unappealing to anyone else? I don't want to get to know Rachel Amber as a character. She's not supposed to be a character. She's the beacon all the actual characters swarm around. She's an ideal, not a literal person. To know her as a person sort of ruins her as what she is in LiS. I have no desire to play Before the Storm for this fact.</quote> She's hot dude. Why wouldn't u play the game.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Darmik 09/14/17 2:03:49 AM #20:	LepartialJury posted... Kisai posted... Just because it's published by Square doesn't mean it's created by Square's people. Same with Kane & Lynch, or Tomb Raider. Fire emblem, Ace Attorney, and Bravely Default games aren't developed by Nintendo but they're considered Nintendo games Nintendo owns Fire Emblem. Capcom own the other two. Capcom published Ace Attorney on mobile. --- Kind Regards, Darmik <cite>Darmik posted [p:886570769] in Friendly R... [t:75773094]...</cite> <quote><cite>LepartialJury posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Kisai posted...</cite> <quote>Just because it's published by Square doesn't mean it's created by Square's people. Same with Kane & Lynch, or Tomb Raider.</quote> Fire emblem, Ace Attorney, and Bravely Default games aren't developed by Nintendo but they're considered Nintendo games</quote> Nintendo owns Fire Emblem. Capcom own the other two. Capcom published Ace Attorney on mobile.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SSJ2Gogeto 09/14/17 2:03:54 AM #21:	Foppe posted... SSJ2Gogeto posted... Foppe posted... Does Square really own it? Publishing != owning. Yes, they do. Look it up. Link it. No. Do it yourself. It's not hard. --- Revolver Ocelot <cite>SSJ2Gogeto posted [p:886570772] in Friendly R... [t:75773094]...</cite> <quote><cite>Foppe posted...</cite> <quote><cite>SSJ2Gogeto posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Foppe posted...</cite> <quote>Does Square really own it? Publishing != owning.</quote> Yes, they do. Look it up.</quote> Link it.</quote> No. Do it yourself. It's not hard.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SSJ2Gogeto 09/14/17 2:05:33 AM #22:	Darmik posted... LepartialJury posted... Kisai posted... Just because it's published by Square doesn't mean it's created by Square's people. Same with Kane & Lynch, or Tomb Raider. Fire emblem, Ace Attorney, and Bravely Default games aren't developed by Nintendo but they're considered Nintendo games Nintendo owns Fire Emblem. Capcom own the other two. Capcom published Ace Attorney on mobile. A better example would be The Wonderful 101/Bayonetta which was developed by Platinum but owned by Nintendo/Sega respectively. --- Revolver Ocelot <cite>SSJ2Gogeto posted [p:886570826] in Friendly R... [t:75773094]...</cite> <quote><cite>Darmik posted...</cite> <quote><cite>LepartialJury posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Kisai posted...</cite> <quote>Just because it's published by Square doesn't mean it's created by Square's people. Same with Kane & Lynch, or Tomb Raider.</quote> Fire emblem, Ace Attorney, and Bravely Default games aren't developed by Nintendo but they're considered Nintendo games</quote> Nintendo owns Fire Emblem. Capcom own the other two. Capcom published Ace Attorney on mobile.</quote> A better example would be The Wonderful 101/Bayonetta which was developed by Platinum but owned by Nintendo/Sega respectively.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
GiftedACIII 09/14/17 2:06:38 AM #23:	Darmik posted... LepartialJury posted... Kisai posted... Just because it's published by Square doesn't mean it's created by Square's people. Same with Kane & Lynch, or Tomb Raider. Fire emblem, Ace Attorney, and Bravely Default games aren't developed by Nintendo but they're considered Nintendo games Nintendo owns Fire Emblem. Capcom own the other two. Capcom published Ace Attorney on mobile. Square Enix owns Bravely Default --- </topic> <cite>GiftedACIII posted [p:886570859] in Friendly R... [t:75773094]...</cite> <quote><cite>Darmik posted...</cite> <quote><cite>LepartialJury posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Kisai posted...</cite> <quote>Just because it's published by Square doesn't mean it's created by Square's people. Same with Kane & Lynch, or Tomb Raider.</quote> Fire emblem, Ace Attorney, and Bravely Default games aren't developed by Nintendo but they're considered Nintendo games</quote> Nintendo owns Fire Emblem. Capcom own the other two. Capcom published Ace Attorney on mobile.</quote> Square Enix owns Bravely Default</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Foppe 09/14/17 2:07:46 AM #24:	SSJ2Gogeto posted... Foppe posted... SSJ2Gogeto posted... Foppe posted... Does Square really own it? Publishing != owning. Yes, they do. Look it up. Link it. No. Do it yourself. It's not hard. You claim it, the burden of proof is on you. --- GameFAQs isn't going to be merged in with GameSpot or any other site. We're not going to strip out the soul of the site. -CJayC <cite>Foppe posted [p:886570890] in Friendly R... [t:75773094]...</cite> <quote><cite>SSJ2Gogeto posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Foppe posted...</cite> <quote><cite>SSJ2Gogeto posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Foppe posted...</cite> <quote>Does Square really own it? Publishing != owning.</quote> Yes, they do. Look it up.</quote> Link it.</quote> No. Do it yourself. It's not hard.</quote> You claim it, the burden of proof is on you.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Cookie Bag 09/14/17 2:08:54 AM #25:	UncleBourbon33 posted... Life is strange is shit. --- https://i.imgtc.com/8dguHIr.png <cite>Cookie Bag posted [p:886570918] in Friendly R... [t:75773094]...</cite> <quote><cite>UncleBourbon33 posted...</cite> <quote>Life is strange is shit.</quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SSJ2Gogeto 09/14/17 2:09:36 AM #26:	Foppe posted... SSJ2Gogeto posted... Foppe posted... SSJ2Gogeto posted... Foppe posted... Does Square really own it? Publishing != owning. Yes, they do. Look it up. Link it. No. Do it yourself. It's not hard. You claim it, the burden of proof is on you. Nah. I'm right but I'm not gonna bother linking it. --- Revolver Ocelot <cite>SSJ2Gogeto posted [p:886570946] in Friendly R... [t:75773094]...</cite> <quote><cite>Foppe posted...</cite> <quote><cite>SSJ2Gogeto posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Foppe posted...</cite> <quote><cite>SSJ2Gogeto posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Foppe posted...</cite> <quote>Does Square really own it? Publishing != owning.</quote> Yes, they do. Look it up.</quote> Link it.</quote> No. Do it yourself. It's not hard.</quote> You claim it, the burden of proof is on you.</quote> Nah. I'm right but I'm not gonna bother linking it.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
pkmnlord 09/14/17 1:02:02 PM #27:	NibeIungsnarf posted... Question: Does the concept of a Rachel Amber prequel sound insanely unappealing to anyone else? I don't want to get to know Rachel Amber as a character. She's not supposed to be a character. She's the beacon all the actual characters swarm around. She's an ideal, not a literal person. To know her as a person sort of ruins her as what she is in LiS. I have no desire to play Before the Storm for this fact. Nah fuck all that BS you just said, I was pissed that you never end up meeting Rachel in LiS and her fate just turned out to be anti-climactic. The developers already ruined what she was in LiS by having her just end up ~~dead~~. So Before the Storm is at least some compensation. --- http://i.imgur.com/MP7ZznH.jpg <cite>pkmnlord posted [p:886591973] in Friendly R... [t:75773094]...</cite> <quote><cite>NibeIungsnarf posted...</cite> <quote>Question: Does the concept of a Rachel Amber prequel sound insanely unappealing to anyone else? I don't want to get to know Rachel Amber as a character. She's not supposed to be a character. She's the beacon all the actual characters swarm around. She's an ideal, not a literal person. To know her as a person sort of ruins her as what she is in LiS. I have no desire to play Before the Storm for this fact.</quote> Nah fuck all that BS you just said, I was pissed that you never end up meeting Rachel in LiS and her fate just turned out to be anti-climactic. The developers already ruined what she was in LiS by having her just end up dead. So Before the Storm is at least some compensation.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#28	Post #28 was unavailable or deleted.
#29	Post #29 was unavailable or deleted.
Drrobotniks 09/14/17 1:05:05 PM #30:	Cookie Bag posted... UncleBourbon33 posted... Life is strange is awesome. <cite>Drrobotniks posted [p:886592127] in Friendly R... [t:75773094]...</cite> <quote><cite>Cookie Bag posted...</cite> <quote><cite>UncleBourbon33 posted...</cite> <quote>Life is strange is awesome.</quote></quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1

Current Events > Friendly Reminder: Life is Strange is a Square Enix IP (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > Friendly Reminder: Life is Strange is a Square Enix IP