Current Events > Hurricane vs Nuclear Bomb whats more powerful?

Topic List
Page List: 1
assassinCrash
08/31/17 2:54:06 PM
#1:


Ropic
---
If you have a sig don't post in my topics
... Copied to Clipboard!
Muffinz0rz
08/31/17 2:54:38 PM
#2:


Nuclear hurricane
---
Not changing this sig until Pat Benatar is in Super Smash Bros. (Started 8/31/2010)
... Copied to Clipboard!
SwatterXX
08/31/17 3:35:34 PM
#3:


Nuke.
... Copied to Clipboard!
jayj420
08/31/17 3:37:20 PM
#4:


Muffinz0rz posted...
Nuclear hurricane

SwatterXX posted...
Nuke.

fake news
---
"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." - George Orwell
... Copied to Clipboard!
Yaridovich
08/31/17 3:37:30 PM
#5:


God help us if a hurricane ever learns where the bombs are
---
Posted with GameRaven 3.2.2
... Copied to Clipboard!
Mernardi
08/31/17 3:37:39 PM
#6:


Muffinz0rz posted...
Nuclear hurricane

Nuclear Sharknado would be more devastating
---
Chaos is a ladder
... Copied to Clipboard!
Sir Will
08/31/17 3:41:34 PM
#7:


Hurricane easily.
---
River Song: Well, I was off to this gay gypsy bar mitzvah for the disabled when I thought 'Gosh, the Third Reich's a bit rubbish, I think i'll kill the Fuhrer'
... Copied to Clipboard!
PrettyBoyFloyd
08/31/17 4:02:23 PM
#8:


Do you mean the initial blast radius or the fallout radius ?
---
The Evil Republicans - Est.2004 - WoT
[Government Destabilizing Branch]
... Copied to Clipboard!
ChromaticAngel
08/31/17 4:11:37 PM
#9:


... Copied to Clipboard!
darkphoenix181
08/31/17 4:16:31 PM
#10:


the hurricane learns of the launch codes

floods washington

and punches the code in via high powered winds


now the world is at the mercy of Hurricane Kim
---
sigless user is me or am I?
... Copied to Clipboard!
#11
Post #11 was unavailable or deleted.
K181
08/31/17 4:18:10 PM
#12:


A hurricane is more powerful, but a nuke is much, much more focused. If you could somehow compress all the energy of a hurricane into the area of a nuclear blast, it would be absolutely gargantuan in nature.
---
The poster formerly known as Kakarot181: July 2, 2002 - March 14, 2012.
Irregardless, for all intensive purposes, I could care less.
... Copied to Clipboard!
JosefuJustice11
08/31/17 4:20:55 PM
#13:


I'm not gonna joke about this. Nukes are much worse

They obliterate everything. What happened to Hiroshima and Nagasaki should've taught us this.
---
I felt like I was watching a dream I'd never wake up from... Before I knew it, the dream was all over.
... Copied to Clipboard!
PrettyBoyFloyd
08/31/17 4:21:23 PM
#14:


K181 posted...
A hurricane is more powerful, but a nuke is much, much more focused. If you could somehow compress all the energy of a hurricane into the area of a nuclear blast, it would be absolutely gargantuan in nature.

What about the Tsar Bomba ?

That thing was originally intended to be a 100 megatons but scaled down to about 50 megatons.
---
The Evil Republicans - Est.2004 - WoT
[Government Destabilizing Branch]
... Copied to Clipboard!
LightHawKnight
08/31/17 4:24:55 PM
#15:


JosefuJustice11 posted...
I'm not gonna joke about this. Nukes are much worse

They obliterate everything. What happened to Hiroshima and Nagasaki should've taught us this.


Not to mention those nukes are like fire crackers compared to modern nuke.
---
The Official Odin of the Shin Megami Tensei IV board.
"You know how confusing the whole good-evil concept is for me."
... Copied to Clipboard!
K181
08/31/17 4:28:11 PM
#16:


PrettyBoyFloyd posted...
K181 posted...
A hurricane is more powerful, but a nuke is much, much more focused. If you could somehow compress all the energy of a hurricane into the area of a nuclear blast, it would be absolutely gargantuan in nature.

What about the Tsar Bomba ?

That thing was originally intended to be a 100 megatons but scaled down to about 50 megatons.


Well, according to this....

http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/tcfaq/C5c.html

A fully developed hurricane can release heat energy at a rate of 5 to 20x1013 watts and converts less than 10% of the heat into the mechanical energy of the wind. The heat release is equivalent to a 10-megaton nuclear bomb exploding every 20 minutes.


Damn.
---
The poster formerly known as Kakarot181: July 2, 2002 - March 14, 2012.
Irregardless, for all intensive purposes, I could care less.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Sir Will
08/31/17 4:28:38 PM
#17:


JosefuJustice11 posted...
I'm not gonna joke about this. Nukes are much worse

They obliterate everything. What happened to Hiroshima and Nagasaki should've taught us this.

Worse, but not more powerful. Just that hurricanes are much more spread out, last longer, and the energy is in different forms.
---
River Song: Well, I was off to this gay gypsy bar mitzvah for the disabled when I thought 'Gosh, the Third Reich's a bit rubbish, I think i'll kill the Fuhrer'
... Copied to Clipboard!
KILBOTz
08/31/17 4:32:32 PM
#18:


http://science.howstuffworks.com/environmental/energy/energy-hurricane-volcano-earthquake1.htm

If we crunch the numbers for an average hurricane (1.5 cm/day of rain, circle radius of 665 km), we get a gigantic amount of energy: 6.0 x 10^14 Watts or 5.2 x 10^19 Joules/day!

This is equivalent to about 200 times the total electrical generating capacity on the planet! NASA says that "during its life cycle a hurricane can expend as much energy as 10,000 nuclear bombs!" And we're just talking about average hurricanes here, not Katrina.

---
... Copied to Clipboard!
JosefuJustice11
08/31/17 4:33:10 PM
#19:


LightHawKnight posted...
JosefuJustice11 posted...
I'm not gonna joke about this. Nukes are much worse

They obliterate everything. What happened to Hiroshima and Nagasaki should've taught us this.


Not to mention those nukes are like fire crackers compared to modern nuke.

Exactly. It's funny how the world continued to develop it's nuclear arsenal when those were already more powerful then any military could ever need.
---
I felt like I was watching a dream I'd never wake up from... Before I knew it, the dream was all over.
... Copied to Clipboard!
JosefuJustice11
08/31/17 4:36:37 PM
#20:


Sir Will posted...
JosefuJustice11 posted...
I'm not gonna joke about this. Nukes are much worse

They obliterate everything. What happened to Hiroshima and Nagasaki should've taught us this.

Worse, but not more powerful. Just that hurricanes are much more spread out, last longer, and the energy is in different forms.

I wasn't trying to say nukes are more powerful then a hurricane.

Just that the devastation it causes is far worse. Even if it's a more focused area.
---
I felt like I was watching a dream I'd never wake up from... Before I knew it, the dream was all over.
... Copied to Clipboard!
ChromaticAngel
08/31/17 5:29:07 PM
#21:


JosefuJustice11 posted...
Sir Will posted...
JosefuJustice11 posted...
I'm not gonna joke about this. Nukes are much worse

They obliterate everything. What happened to Hiroshima and Nagasaki should've taught us this.

Worse, but not more powerful. Just that hurricanes are much more spread out, last longer, and the energy is in different forms.

I wasn't trying to say nukes are more powerful then a hurricane.

Just that the devastation it causes is far worse. Even if it's a more focused area.


No. I disagree. Nukes cause all their destruction at once. Hurricanes go on for hours.

Strictly speaking, on the grand scheme of things, man will never be better at killing man than mother nature. Add in astronomical events like gamma ray bursts, solar flares, asteroids, etc, and nukes are like spitballs in comparison.
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
JosefuJustice11
08/31/17 5:43:06 PM
#22:


ChromaticAngel posted...
JosefuJustice11 posted...
Sir Will posted...
JosefuJustice11 posted...
I'm not gonna joke about this. Nukes are much worse

They obliterate everything. What happened to Hiroshima and Nagasaki should've taught us this.

Worse, but not more powerful. Just that hurricanes are much more spread out, last longer, and the energy is in different forms.

I wasn't trying to say nukes are more powerful then a hurricane.

Just that the devastation it causes is far worse. Even if it's a more focused area.


No. I disagree. Nukes cause all their destruction at once. Hurricanes go on for hours.

Strictly speaking, on the grand scheme of things, man will never be better at killing man than mother nature. Add in astronomical events like gamma ray bursts, solar flares, asteroids, etc, and nukes are like spitballs in comparison.

But that nuke could be targeted at a big city full of millions of people and wipe them all out at once in one fell swoop. I'm judging the devastation by the loss off life in the shortest time possible.
---
I felt like I was watching a dream I'd never wake up from... Before I knew it, the dream was all over.
... Copied to Clipboard!
ChromaticAngel
08/31/17 5:52:46 PM
#23:


JosefuJustice11 posted...
But that nuke could be targeted at a big city full of millions of people and wipe them all out at once in one fell swoop. I'm judging the devastation by the loss off life in the shortest time possible.


the nukes destroyed as much as they did because they were basically surprise attacks. Nobody was expecting that kind of devestation from a tiny plane.

if you gave people 5 days notice to evacuate or get nuked, the nuke would kill a lot less people.
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
JosefuJustice11
08/31/17 6:02:33 PM
#24:


ChromaticAngel posted...
JosefuJustice11 posted...
But that nuke could be targeted at a big city full of millions of people and wipe them all out at once in one fell swoop. I'm judging the devastation by the loss off life in the shortest time possible.


the nukes destroyed as much as they did because they were basically surprise attacks. Nobody was expecting that kind of devestation from a tiny plane.

if you gave people 5 days notice to evacuate or get nuked, the nuke would kill a lot less people.

I understand that and circumstance plays a big part.

But a modern nuke would be way more powerful and affect a larger area. And in the event that the plane carrying the nuke goes undetected they could set it off with no time for preparation.

Not to mention the lasting effects of the radioactive contamination left behind in it's wake. Everything is obliterated and the area is devastated.
---
I felt like I was watching a dream I'd never wake up from... Before I knew it, the dream was all over.
... Copied to Clipboard!
ChromaticAngel
08/31/17 6:05:40 PM
#25:


JosefuJustice11 posted...
ChromaticAngel posted...
JosefuJustice11 posted...
But that nuke could be targeted at a big city full of millions of people and wipe them all out at once in one fell swoop. I'm judging the devastation by the loss off life in the shortest time possible.


the nukes destroyed as much as they did because they were basically surprise attacks. Nobody was expecting that kind of devestation from a tiny plane.

if you gave people 5 days notice to evacuate or get nuked, the nuke would kill a lot less people.

I understand that and circumstance plays a big part.

But a modern nuke would be way more powerful and affect a larger area. And in the event that the plane carrying the nuke goes undetected they could set it off with no time for preparation.

Not to mention the lasting effects of the radioactive contamination left behind in it's wake. Everything is obliterated and the area is devastated.


If everyone stayed in Houston, Victoria, and other cities hit hard by Harvey, and just allowed themselves to get hit full on, I guarantee the death toll would make nukes mad jelly.
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
JosefuJustice11
08/31/17 6:11:51 PM
#26:


ChromaticAngel posted...
JosefuJustice11 posted...
ChromaticAngel posted...
JosefuJustice11 posted...
But that nuke could be targeted at a big city full of millions of people and wipe them all out at once in one fell swoop. I'm judging the devastation by the loss off life in the shortest time possible.


the nukes destroyed as much as they did because they were basically surprise attacks. Nobody was expecting that kind of devestation from a tiny plane.

if you gave people 5 days notice to evacuate or get nuked, the nuke would kill a lot less people.

I understand that and circumstance plays a big part.

But a modern nuke would be way more powerful and affect a larger area. And in the event that the plane carrying the nuke goes undetected they could set it off with no time for preparation.

Not to mention the lasting effects of the radioactive contamination left behind in it's wake. Everything is obliterated and the area is devastated.


If everyone stayed in Houston, Victoria, and other cities hit hard by Harvey, and just allowed themselves to get hit full on, I guarantee the death toll would make nukes mad jelly.

That's because people can prepare ahead of time for hurricanes. Nukes are not more powerful but can be more devastating for the fact that they can be specifically targeted without warning and contaminate an area for years to come.
---
I felt like I was watching a dream I'd never wake up from... Before I knew it, the dream was all over.
... Copied to Clipboard!
EverDownward
08/31/17 6:37:27 PM
#27:


Muffinz0rz posted...
Nuclear hurricane

Can...can you do that? Just put those things together?
---
http://i.imgur.com/DKNJbBm.jpg
Official Praying Monk from the Sky Temple of the MKX boards
... Copied to Clipboard!
ChromaticAngel
08/31/17 8:41:00 PM
#28:


EverDownward posted...
Muffinz0rz posted...
Nuclear hurricane

Can...can you do that? Just put those things together?

ChromaticAngel posted...
Nuclicane, A SyFy original premiering soon.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=keFbR7PkIy0

---
... Copied to Clipboard!
The Wheelman1
08/31/17 11:44:50 PM
#29:


A nuke can kill more people than a hurricane ever could.
---
XBox Live GT: MastaMez PSN: KoolMez
http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=TheWheelman1
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1