Poll of the Day > Uncircumcised guys be like

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3
Duck-I-Says 08/29/17 4:27:46 PM #102:	RCtheWSBC posted... Only problem I see here is if she isn't cumming at all, either. Then you've truly fucked up Hasn't been a problem, thankfully, but in my experience more women are bothered by taking too long/not cumming at all than not. I'm pretty tapped out talking about my obnoxiously insensitive dick on a public forum though, so let's focus on Rampart. <cite>Duck-I-Says posted [p:885670718] in Uncircumci... [t:75717863]...</cite> <quote><cite>RCtheWSBC posted...</cite> <quote>Only problem I see here is if she isn't cumming at all, either. Then you've truly fucked up</quote> Hasn't been a problem, thankfully, but in my experience more women are bothered by taking too long/not cumming at all than not. I'm pretty tapped out talking about my obnoxiously insensitive dick on a public forum though, so let's focus on Rampart.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Dikitain 08/29/17 4:36:53 PM #103:	Blightzkrieg posted... Blightzkrieg posted... If evolution is about getting better and better why didn't humans naturally evolve circumcised penises? We kind of have. Compare human foreskin to other animals and it is a lot thinner and less protective. Evolution takes millions of years, and our need for a foreskin has only been done away with for a few thousand at most. It is the same reason our toes are smaller and less functional then an ape: We still have them because we haven't fully evolved away from them, but they are not as useful as our ancestors are. --- I am a senior software engineer. If you see me post here, I am tired of writing TPS reports. <cite>Dikitain posted [p:885671184] in Uncircumci... [t:75717863]...</cite> <quote><cite>Blightzkrieg posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Blightzkrieg posted...</cite> <quote>If evolution is about getting better and better why didn't humans naturally evolve circumcised penises?</quote></quote> We kind of have. Compare human foreskin to other animals and it is a lot thinner and less protective. Evolution takes millions of years, and our need for a foreskin has only been done away with for a few thousand at most. It is the same reason our toes are smaller and less functional then an ape: We still have them because we haven't fully evolved away from them, but they are not as useful as our ancestors are.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
mooreandrew58 08/29/17 7:05:49 PM #104:	Blightzkrieg posted... green dragon posted... Cuz evolution isn't about "better". It's about getting traits that help you survive a particular environment More attractive penises allow for better chances at attracting a mate. Pretty simple stuff. probably no woman cared until some religious nutjob went and made it the norm. people like whats "normal" even if it isn't natural. believe circumcision in america anyways was pushed off as a way to stop masturbating, heard the dude had a similar idea for women but it never went over, thank god because I understand it was a much more painful thing. if memory serves correct it was the dude who owned Kellog's cereal way back in the day who started this in America. --- Cid- "looks like that overgrown lobster just got served!" Bartz-"with cheese biscuts AND mashed potatoes!" <cite>mooreandrew58 posted [p:885679470] in Uncircumci... [t:75717863]...</cite> <quote><cite>Blightzkrieg posted...</cite> <quote><cite>green dragon posted...</cite> <quote>Cuz evolution isn't about "better". It's about getting traits that help you survive a particular environment</quote> More attractive penises allow for better chances at attracting a mate. Pretty simple stuff.</quote> probably no woman cared until some religious nutjob went and made it the norm. people like whats "normal" even if it isn't natural. believe circumcision in america anyways was pushed off as a way to stop masturbating, heard the dude had a similar idea for women but it never went over, thank god because I understand it was a much more painful thing. if memory serves correct it was the dude who owned Kellog's cereal way back in the day who started this in America.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zikten 08/29/17 7:25:43 PM #105:	mooreandrew58 posted... if memory serves correct it was the dude who owned Kellog's cereal way back in the day who started this in America. yes probably why he pushed the "eat cornflakes" part of his plan <cite>Zikten posted [p:885680672] in Uncircumci... [t:75717863]...</cite> <quote><cite>mooreandrew58 posted...</cite> <quote>if memory serves correct it was the dude who owned Kellog's cereal way back in the day who started this in America.</quote> yes probably why he pushed the "eat cornflakes" part of his plan</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
wwinterj25 08/29/17 10:46:31 PM #106:	Duck-I-Says posted... I'm not convinced of that. I'm cut and I wish I wasn't because That's why I said most. I'm aware some folk wish things were different. Duck-I-Says posted... It's something that shouldn't be done until the individual is old enough to decide for themselves (18) or there's some other medical condition that requires it. I agree with this. I mean if for whatever reason I want to be cut I can be. It's hard to replace a foreskin once you've had the cut and doing that to a baby means you've forced a choice upon them they might not want. Assuming it's not because of a medical condition of course. --- One who knows nothing can understand nothing. http://psnprofiles.com/wwinterj - http://i.imgur.com/kDysIcd.gif <cite>wwinterj25 posted [p:885692272] in Uncircumci... [t:75717863]...</cite> <quote><cite>Duck-I-Says posted...</cite> <quote>I'm not convinced of that. I'm cut and I wish I wasn't because</quote> That's why I said most. I'm aware some folk wish things were different. <cite>Duck-I-Says posted...</cite> <quote>It's something that shouldn't be done until the individual is old enough to decide for themselves (18) or there's some other medical condition that requires it.</quote> I agree with this. I mean if for whatever reason I want to be cut I can be. It's hard to replace a foreskin once you've had the cut and doing that to a baby means you've forced a choice upon them they might not want. Assuming it's not because of a medical condition of course.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
helIy 08/29/17 10:49:48 PM #107:	wwinterj25 posted... It's hard to replace a foreskin once you've had the cut impossible is hard, yeah --- depressed again morning comes too fast and i'm tired of the routine <cite>helIy posted [p:885692449] in Uncircumci... [t:75717863]...</cite> <quote><cite>wwinterj25 posted...</cite> <quote> It's hard to replace a foreskin once you've had the cut</quote> impossible is hard, yeah</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Syntheticon 08/30/17 1:52:17 AM #108:	RCtheWSBC posted... thecolorgreen posted... Which one feels better tho? The one attached to the man who knows how to fuck well. slow clap Finally some sense-the weird thing about this argument is that while they might look different initially, if you're using a condom, they're identical when in use. If you're running around barebacking everyone, circumcision is the least of your problems... --- Mod me? You don't even know me! <cite>Syntheticon posted [p:885700108] in Uncircumci... [t:75717863]...</cite> <quote><cite>RCtheWSBC posted...</cite> <quote><cite>thecolorgreen posted...</cite> <quote>Which one feels better tho?</quote> The one attached to the man who knows how to fuck well.</quote> slow clap Finally some sense-the weird thing about this argument is that while they might look different initially, if you're using a condom, they're identical when in use. If you're running around barebacking everyone, circumcision is the least of your problems...</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Yellow 08/30/17 1:53:41 AM #109:	Uncircumcised guys be like "Sex is five times better than you'll ever know." Lmao XD XD <cite>Yellow posted [p:885700153] in Uncircumci... [t:75717863]...</cite> <quote>Uncircumcised guys be like "Sex is five times better than you'll ever know." Lmao XD XD</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
majin nemesis 08/30/17 2:48:09 AM #110:	Dikitain posted... Blightzkrieg posted... Blightzkrieg posted... If evolution is about getting better and better why didn't humans naturally evolve circumcised penises? We kind of have. Compare human foreskin to other animals and it is a lot thinner and less protective. Evolution takes millions of years, and our need for a foreskin has only been done away with for a few thousand at most. It is the same reason our toes are smaller and less functional then an ape: We still have them because we haven't fully evolved away from them, but they are not as useful as our ancestors are. lol no the foreskin is needed there that's way we still have it even after we started using clothes which is why it didn't get thicker but it's still there because it's needed and the toes are absolotely needed for you to walk properely which is way they are still there too mooreandrew58 posted... Blightzkrieg posted... green dragon posted... Cuz evolution isn't about "better". It's about getting traits that help you survive a particular environment More attractive penises allow for better chances at attracting a mate. Pretty simple stuff. probably no woman cared until some religious nutjob went and made it the norm. people like whats "normal" even if it isn't natural. believe circumcision in america anyways was pushed off as a way to stop masturbating, heard the dude had a similar idea for women but it never went over, thank god because I understand it was a much more painful thing. if memory serves correct it was the dude who owned Kellog's cereal way back in the day who started this in America. it's also because foreskins are used by companies to profit of them http://thinkaboutnow.com/2016/03/3-wayscorporationsprofitoffbaby-foreskin14/ this type of stuff is why america pushes circusion <cite>majin nemesis posted [p:885701677] in Uncircumci... [t:75717863]...</cite> <quote><cite>Dikitain posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Blightzkrieg posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Blightzkrieg posted...</cite> <quote>If evolution is about getting better and better why didn't humans naturally evolve circumcised penises?</quote></quote> We kind of have. Compare human foreskin to other animals and it is a lot thinner and less protective. Evolution takes millions of years, and our need for a foreskin has only been done away with for a few thousand at most. It is the same reason our toes are smaller and less functional then an ape: We still have them because we haven't fully evolved away from them, but they are not as useful as our ancestors are.</quote> lol no the foreskin is needed there that's way we still have it even after we started using clothes which is why it didn't get thicker but it's still there because it's needed and the toes are absolotely needed for you to walk properely which is way they are still there too <cite>mooreandrew58 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Blightzkrieg posted...</cite> <quote><cite>green dragon posted...</cite> <quote>Cuz evolution isn't about "better". It's about getting traits that help you survive a particular environment</quote> More attractive penises allow for better chances at attracting a mate. Pretty simple stuff.</quote> probably no woman cared until some religious nutjob went and made it the norm. people like whats "normal" even if it isn't natural. believe circumcision in america anyways was pushed off as a way to stop masturbating, heard the dude had a similar idea for women but it never went over, thank god because I understand it was a much more painful thing. if memory serves correct it was the dude who owned Kellog's cereal way back in the day who started this in America.</quote> it's also because foreskins are used by companies to profit of them http://thinkaboutnow.com/2016/03/3-wayscorporationsprofitoffbaby-foreskin14/ this type of stuff is why america pushes circusion</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
wwinterj25 08/30/17 3:20:00 AM #111:	helIy posted... impossible is hard, yeah Wasn't sure if it is actually possible these days and couldn't be bothered to look. --- One who knows nothing can understand nothing. http://psnprofiles.com/wwinterj - http://i.imgur.com/kDysIcd.gif <cite>wwinterj25 posted [p:885702438] in Uncircumci... [t:75717863]...</cite> <quote><cite>helIy posted...</cite> <quote>impossible is hard, yeah</quote> Wasn't sure if it is actually possible these days and couldn't be bothered to look.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Dikitain 08/30/17 10:59:45 AM #112:	majin nemesis posted... Dikitain posted... Blightzkrieg posted... Blightzkrieg posted... If evolution is about getting better and better why didn't humans naturally evolve circumcised penises? We kind of have. Compare human foreskin to other animals and it is a lot thinner and less protective. Evolution takes millions of years, and our need for a foreskin has only been done away with for a few thousand at most. It is the same reason our toes are smaller and less functional then an ape: We still have them because we haven't fully evolved away from them, but they are not as useful as our ancestors are. lol no the foreskin is needed there that's way we still have it even after we started using clothes which is why it didn't get thicker but it's still there because it's needed and the toes are absolotely needed for you to walk properely which is way they are still there too I feel like you reacted instinctively and didn't even think about what I just said. Evolution takes millions of years, not thousands. So we are still going to have foreskins because the need for them has existed more recently then evolution would account for it. Hence, thinner but not necessarily gone. And toes are not needed to walk properly, but our feet did elongate to accommodate. --- I am a senior software engineer. If you see me post here, I am tired of writing TPS reports. <cite>Dikitain posted [p:885714447] in Uncircumci... [t:75717863]...</cite> <quote><cite>majin nemesis posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Dikitain posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Blightzkrieg posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Blightzkrieg posted...</cite> <quote>If evolution is about getting better and better why didn't humans naturally evolve circumcised penises?</quote></quote> We kind of have. Compare human foreskin to other animals and it is a lot thinner and less protective. Evolution takes millions of years, and our need for a foreskin has only been done away with for a few thousand at most. It is the same reason our toes are smaller and less functional then an ape: We still have them because we haven't fully evolved away from them, but they are not as useful as our ancestors are.</quote> lol no the foreskin is needed there that's way we still have it even after we started using clothes which is why it didn't get thicker but it's still there because it's needed and the toes are absolotely needed for you to walk properely which is way they are still there too</quote> I feel like you reacted instinctively and didn't even think about what I just said. Evolution takes millions of years, not thousands. So we are still going to have foreskins because the need for them has existed more recently then evolution would account for it. Hence, thinner but not necessarily gone. And toes are not needed to walk properly, but our feet did elongate to accommodate.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Renraku_San 08/30/17 11:10:27 AM #113:	Ew, if a girl has ever hooked up with an uncircumsized dog heathen penis, I refuse to get intimate with them. --- I worship Jesus Christ and am 100% proud to be Christian! I read the Bible every day, you should too! <cite>Renraku_San posted [p:885714942] in Uncircumci... [t:75717863]...</cite> <quote>Ew, if a girl has ever hooked up with an uncircumsized dog heathen penis, I refuse to get intimate with them.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tropic_Sunset 08/30/17 11:17:00 AM #114:	Duck-I-Says posted... Try literally not cumming during an encounter and her attitude will change. Done that too, and this is a fair point. But "lasting longer" and "not cumming" are different things. --- "Nostalgia is a hell of a drug." -Magus 10 <cite>Tropic_Sunset posted [p:885715241] in Uncircumci... [t:75717863]...</cite> <quote><cite>Duck-I-Says posted...</cite> <quote>Try literally not cumming during an encounter and her attitude will change. </quote> Done that too, and this is a fair point. But "lasting longer" and "not cumming" are different things.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
majin nemesis 08/30/17 6:54:02 PM #115:	Dikitain posted... majin nemesis posted... Dikitain posted... Blightzkrieg posted... Blightzkrieg posted... If evolution is about getting better and better why didn't humans naturally evolve circumcised penises? We kind of have. Compare human foreskin to other animals and it is a lot thinner and less protective. Evolution takes millions of years, and our need for a foreskin has only been done away with for a few thousand at most. It is the same reason our toes are smaller and less functional then an ape: We still have them because we haven't fully evolved away from them, but they are not as useful as our ancestors are. lol no the foreskin is needed there that's way we still have it even after we started using clothes which is why it didn't get thicker but it's still there because it's needed and the toes are absolotely needed for you to walk properely which is way they are still there too I feel like you reacted instinctively and didn't even think about what I just said. Evolution takes millions of years, not thousands. So we are still going to have foreskins because the need for them has existed more recently then evolution would account for it. Hence, thinner but not necessarily gone. And toes are not needed to walk properly, but our feet did elongate to accommodate. yes they are Renraku_San posted... Ew, if a girl has ever hooked up with an uncircumsized dog heathen penis, I refuse to get intimate with them. you're just mad you don't have a foreskin i feel sorry for you <cite>majin nemesis posted [p:885740450] in Uncircumci... [t:75717863]...</cite> <quote><cite>Dikitain posted...</cite> <quote><cite>majin nemesis posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Dikitain posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Blightzkrieg posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Blightzkrieg posted...</cite> <quote>If evolution is about getting better and better why didn't humans naturally evolve circumcised penises?</quote></quote> We kind of have. Compare human foreskin to other animals and it is a lot thinner and less protective. Evolution takes millions of years, and our need for a foreskin has only been done away with for a few thousand at most. It is the same reason our toes are smaller and less functional then an ape: We still have them because we haven't fully evolved away from them, but they are not as useful as our ancestors are.</quote> lol no the foreskin is needed there that's way we still have it even after we started using clothes which is why it didn't get thicker but it's still there because it's needed and the toes are absolotely needed for you to walk properely which is way they are still there too</quote> I feel like you reacted instinctively and didn't even think about what I just said. Evolution takes millions of years, not thousands. So we are still going to have foreskins because the need for them has existed more recently then evolution would account for it. Hence, thinner but not necessarily gone. And toes are not needed to walk properly, but our feet did elongate to accommodate.</quote> yes they are <cite>Renraku_San posted...</cite> <quote>Ew, if a girl has ever hooked up with an uncircumsized dog heathen penis, I refuse to get intimate with them.</quote> you're just mad you don't have a foreskin i feel sorry for you</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
wwinterj25 08/30/17 8:23:46 PM #116:	Renraku_San posted... Ew, if a girl has ever hooked up with an uncircumsized dog heathen penis, I refuse to get intimate with them. Do you like ask girls how their ex's penises looked before doing the dirty(or not) then? --- One who knows nothing can understand nothing. http://psnprofiles.com/wwinterj - http://i.imgur.com/kDysIcd.gif <cite>wwinterj25 posted [p:885745651] in Uncircumci... [t:75717863]...</cite> <quote><cite>Renraku_San posted...</cite> <quote>Ew, if a girl has ever hooked up with an uncircumsized dog heathen penis, I refuse to get intimate with them.</quote> Do you like ask girls how their ex's penises looked before doing the dirty(or not) then?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Renraku_San 08/31/17 1:09:52 PM #117:	wwinterj25 posted... Renraku_San posted... Ew, if a girl has ever hooked up with an uncircumsized dog heathen penis, I refuse to get intimate with them. Do you like ask girls how their ex's penises looked before doing the dirty(or not) then? Yes, and they must provide pictures as evidence that they were in fact circumsized. --- I worship Jesus Christ and am 100% proud to be Christian! I read the Bible every day, you should too! <cite>Renraku_San posted [p:885783064] in Uncircumci... [t:75717863]...</cite> <quote><cite>wwinterj25 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Renraku_San posted...</cite> <quote>Ew, if a girl has ever hooked up with an uncircumsized dog heathen penis, I refuse to get intimate with them.</quote> Do you like ask girls how their ex's penises looked before doing the dirty(or not) then?</quote> Yes, and they must provide pictures as evidence that they were in fact circumsized.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
WarGreymon77 08/31/17 6:21:55 PM #118:	Is the OP supposed to be complimenting or insulting circumcision? <cite>WarGreymon77 posted [p:885800141] in Uncircumci... [t:75717863]...</cite> <quote>Is the OP supposed to be complimenting or insulting circumcision?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3

Poll of the Day > Uncircumcised guys be like (+) Yeah! (+)

Poll of the Day > Uncircumcised guys be like