Current Events > School official orders boy to undress with girl and make it 'seem natural'.

(+) Yeah! (+)

"A teenage boy was told by school leaders that he had to “tolerate” undressing in front of a female student and to make it as “natural” as possible."

"Last Fall, the teen boy was standing in his underwear inside a locker room at Boyertown Area High School preparing to change for a physical education class."

“He suddenly realized there was a member of the opposite sex changing with him in the locker room, who was at the time, wearing nothing but shorts and a bra."

“Dr. Foley told Joel Doe to ‘tolerate’ it and to make it as ‘natural’ as he possibly can."

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017/03/22/school-orders-boy-to-tolerate-undressing-with-girl-and-make-it-natural.html
---

That seems weird tbh
---

sktgamer_13dude posted...

That seems weird tbh

There's a lot of weird stuff going on these days.
---

What the fuck
---

The article said he was told he could use the nurses office instead if he preferred to.

Was it just a regular girl? If so that is strange but as a teenage boy I would not have been complaining
---

Garbage title.

The other person was also a boy.
---

What the actual fuck?

Capn Circus posted...

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/

---

Capn Circus posted...

sktgamer_13dude posted...

That seems weird tbh

There's a lot of weird stuff going on these days.

Like having a reality TV host be President.
---

Ryangrad posted...

Garbage title.

The other person was also a boy.

well, it is fox news.

it's also 5 months old. I guess when it's "shit on trans people day", the topics don't have to be timely.
---

Medussa posted...

Ryangrad posted...

Garbage title.

The other person was also a boy.

well, it is fox news.

it's also 5 months old. I guess when it's "shit on trans people day", the topics don't have to be timely.

It's also TC posting this. So this is very likely a false outrage topic. Doesn't help the "article" is from the opinion section of foxnews.
---

Tmaster148 posted...

Medussa posted...

Ryangrad posted...

Garbage title.

The other person was also a boy.

well, it is fox news.

it's also 5 months old. I guess when it's "shit on trans people day", the topics don't have to be timely.

It's also TC posting this. So this is very likely a false outrage topic. Doesn't help the "article" is from the opinion section of foxnews.

You can search the story online yourselves if you don't find the source I chose to be believable.

It happened. A girl (who is a boy in their mind) was getting dressed with actual boys (within their mind and body) and an official told him to make it look as natural as possible.

Really sick stuff.
---

I thought this was going to be about an underwater weighing test.
---

I'm sure you posted this exact topic five months ago too.
I bet the kid you feel sorry for moved on with his life quite some time ago.
---

A guy should be able to be undress in front of a girl without it being weird? Lol what?
---

SmidgeIsntBack posted...

I'm sure you posted this exact topic five months ago too.
I bet the kid you feel sorry for moved on with his life quite some time ago.

I'm sure I did. And no, this hasn't came to a legal finalization yet. The things he had to see, and instructed to pretend it was 'natural'--- absolutely ridiculous. No young boy should ever be subjected and encouraged to participate and normalize what was happening in that locker room.
---

Ryangrad posted...

Garbage title.

The other person was also a boy.

Lol no
---

What a dishonest title.
---

Dragonblade01 posted...

What a dishonest title.

Absolutely not. When one is a minor attending a public school, students' rights are entrusted upon the administration. When the administration instructs, or suggests, for a male student to undress with a girl in a male locker room and make it seem "as natural as possible"---a whole host of legal issues can arise, and rightly so.
---

This is why hate groups in Pennsylvania are rising.
---

there is no girl involved, though.

cyril, don't be shitty.
---

Capn Circus posted...

Dragonblade01 posted...

What a dishonest title.

Absolutely not. When one is a minor attending a public school, students' rights are entrusted upon the administration. When the administration instructs, or suggests, for a male student to undress with a girl in a male locker room and make it seem "as natural as possible"---a whole host of legal issues can arise, and rightly so.

You know exactly what this is about, so to portray it as though a boy was told to undress in front of some random girl is being willfully dishonest.
---

Dragonblade01 posted...

What a dishonest title.

Also an old story that I've seen posted before

Capn Circus posted...

No young boy should ever be subjected and encouraged to participate and normalize what was happening in that locker room.

Changing clothes?

That's about as normal as it gets, honestly.
---

Capn Circus posted...

SmidgeIsntBack posted...

I'm sure you posted this exact topic five months ago too.
I bet the kid you feel sorry for moved on with his life quite some time ago.

I'm sure I did.

I'll be honest, I skipped the article and gave you the benefit of a doubt and assumed this was an update on the story.
But nah you just copy/pasted your old topic because you couldn't wait for new material to try (and fail) to get CE riled up over.
---

"Progress"
---

SmidgeIsntBack posted...

Capn Circus posted...

SmidgeIsntBack posted...

I'm sure you posted this exact topic five months ago too.
I bet the kid you feel sorry for moved on with his life quite some time ago.

I'm sure I did.

I'll be honest, I skipped the article and gave you the benefit of a doubt and assumed this was an update on the story.
But nah you just copy/pasted your old topic because you couldn't wait for new material to try (and fail) to get CE riled up over.

How can you say you gave me the benefit of the doubt when you said "I'm sure you posted this exact topic"? And without reading the article? Something doesn't match up here...
---

TC is a known bigot
---

Dragonblade01 posted...

Capn Circus posted...

Dragonblade01 posted...

What a dishonest title.

Absolutely not. When one is a minor attending a public school, students' rights are entrusted upon the administration. When the administration instructs, or suggests, for a male student to undress with a girl in a male locker room and make it seem "as natural as possible"---a whole host of legal issues can arise, and rightly so.

You know exactly what this is about, so to portray it as though a boy was told to undress in front of some random girl is being willfully dishonest.

We all know what it is about. It doesn't make my title invalid. Given their age and description of events (the girl wearing a bra) it's guaranteed my topic title is extremely accurate.

I'm sure you can always fall back on some sort of "You are whatever you are if you think you are, therefor it's true"--- but no one is going to really buy that except a few select users on CE, and even they know it isn't true.
---

Capn Circus posted...

Dragonblade01 posted...

Capn Circus posted...

Dragonblade01 posted...

What a dishonest title.

Absolutely not. When one is a minor attending a public school, students' rights are entrusted upon the administration. When the administration instructs, or suggests, for a male student to undress with a girl in a male locker room and make it seem "as natural as possible"---a whole host of legal issues can arise, and rightly so.

You know exactly what this is about, so to portray it as though a boy was told to undress in front of some random girl is being willfully dishonest.

We all know what it is about. It doesn't make my title invalid. Given their age and description of events (the girl wearing a bra) it's guaranteed my topic title is extremely accurate.

I'm sure you can always fall back on some sort of "You are whatever you are if you think you are, therefor it's true"--- but no one is going to really buy that except a few select users on CE, and even they know it isn't true.

Or you know, most doctors and certified professionals which is why this happened in the first place.
---

GiftedACIII posted...

TC is a known bigot

Whatever. Sorry I don't go along with all the newest things that are cool and "progressive"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CuphQkD0fUI
---

Capn Circus posted...

GiftedACIII posted...

TC is a known bigot

Whatever. Sorry I don't go along with all the newest things that are cool and "progressive"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CuphQkD0fUI

In this case it's more like you're a flat earther denying objective scientific fact.
---

GiftedACIII posted...

Or you know, most doctors and certified professionals which is why this happened in the first place.

Certified professionals for who? Clearly not the young boys that were perplexed and put off by the whole encounter in their own designated locker room.
---

GiftedACIII posted...

TC is a known bigot

---

Capn Circus posted...

SmidgeIsntBack posted...

Capn Circus posted...

SmidgeIsntBack posted...

I'm sure you posted this exact topic five months ago too.
I bet the kid you feel sorry for moved on with his life quite some time ago.

I'm sure I did.

I'll be honest, I skipped the article and gave you the benefit of a doubt and assumed this was an update on the story.
But nah you just copy/pasted your old topic because you couldn't wait for new material to try (and fail) to get CE riled up over.

How can you say you gave me the benefit of the doubt when you said "I'm sure you posted this exact topic"? And without reading the article? Something doesn't match up here...

I figured if you were going to make a topic about the same thing you did five months ago, you'd at least bring something new to the table, not just the same article as last time.
---

Capn Circus posted...

GiftedACIII posted...

Or you know, most doctors and certified professionals which is why this happened in the first place.

Certified professionals for who? Clearly not the young boys that were perplexed and put off by the whole encounter in their own designated locker room.

lmao what a brain dead argument. There are stupid boys who feel that way about gay people. Some who feel that way about other races. What's your solution for that?
---

Bishop9800 posted...

GiftedACIII posted...

TC is a known bigot

---

GiftedACIII posted...

TC is a known bigot

Liberal shitposters: When logic fails, use slander.

Annihilated posted...

GiftedACIII posted...

TC is a known bigot

Liberal shitposters: When logic fails, use slander.

---

Annihilated posted...

GiftedACIII posted...

TC is a known bigot

Liberal shitposters: When logic fails, use slander.

It figures some other emotional dweeb would be lacking in self-awareness.
---

GiftedACIII posted...

Annihilated posted...

GiftedACIII posted...

TC is a known bigot

Liberal shitposters: When logic fails, use slander.

It figures some other emotional dweeb would be lacking in self-awareness.

Were you referring to yourself with this post?
---

JohnLennon6 posted...

GiftedACIII posted...

Annihilated posted...

GiftedACIII posted...

TC is a known bigot

Liberal shitposters: When logic fails, use slander.

It figures some other emotional dweeb would be lacking in self-awareness.

Were you referring to yourself with this post?

You were never known for your intelligence, Hoth.
---

GiftedACIII posted...

Annihilated posted...

GiftedACIII posted...

TC is a known bigot

Liberal shitposters: When logic fails, use slander.

It figures some other emotional dweeb would be lacking in self-awareness.

Liberal shitposters: When slander fails, use insults.

GiftedACIII posted...

Capn Circus posted...

GiftedACIII posted...

Or you know, most doctors and certified professionals which is why this happened in the first place.

Certified professionals for who? Clearly not the young boys that were perplexed and put off by the whole encounter in their own designated locker room.

lmao what a brain dead argument. There are stupid boys who feel that way about gay people. Some who feel that way about other races. What's your solution for that?

Totally false equivalency. The two scenarios you've just mentioned are observable.

"Is he black? Uhh.. yeah obviously..."

"Is he gay? Yeah.. he does stuff with other dudes sometimes"

"Is that person with breasts and a vagina changing in our locker room a girl?" "NO! YOU'RE A BIGOT!"

Huge, huge difference. Get over it.
---

Capn Circus posted...

We all know what it is about.

Clickbait? Which you hate when liberal rags do? Hypocrite.
---

Capn Circus posted...

Dragonblade01 posted...

Capn Circus posted...

Dragonblade01 posted...

What a dishonest title.

Absolutely not. When one is a minor attending a public school, students' rights are entrusted upon the administration. When the administration instructs, or suggests, for a male student to undress with a girl in a male locker room and make it seem "as natural as possible"---a whole host of legal issues can arise, and rightly so.

You know exactly what this is about, so to portray it as though a boy was told to undress in front of some random girl is being willfully dishonest.

We all know what it is about. It doesn't make my title invalid. Given their age and description of events (the girl wearing a bra) it's guaranteed my topic title is extremely accurate.

I'm sure you can always fall back on some sort of "You are whatever you are if you think you are, therefor it's true"--- but no one is going to really buy that except a few select users on CE, and even they know it isn't true.

I called your title dishonest.

Nothing you just said addresses this.
---

Annihilated posted...

GiftedACIII posted...

Annihilated posted...

Liberal shitposters: When logic fails, use slander.

It figures some other emotional dweeb would be lacking in self-awareness.

Liberal shitposters: When slander fails, use insults.

Stormfront troll: I have nothing valid to say so I can only resort to buzzwords.


Capn Circus posted...

GiftedACIII posted...

Capn Circus posted...

Certified professionals for who? Clearly not the young boys that were perplexed and put off by the whole encounter in their own designated locker room.

lmao what a brain dead argument. There are stupid boys who feel that way about gay people. Some who feel that way about other races. What's your solution for that?

Totally false equivalency. The two scenarios you've just mentioned are observable.

"Is he black? Uhh.. yeah obviously..."

"Is he gay? Yeah.. he does stuff with other dudes sometimes"

"Is that person with a female body who identifies as male and has professionals confirm it transgender? Yeah, which means he empirically has the brain of a dude so he should socially be treated the same"

Huge, huge difference. Get over it.

Fixed. There's literally no difference. Get over it. By the way, how is being uncomfortable with a gay dude different than being uncomfortable with a transdude? I would say it's actually more "justfiable" there since the gay dude could actually be attracted to you while the transdude won't be.
The only problem is that YOU might be attracted to the transdude which is completely your own problem.
---

Dragonblade01 posted...

I called your title dishonest.

Yeah.... and? You didn't say why it's dishonest, or what part of it is dishonest.

I have no idea what you could mean without any further input, given there's some people here that believe night is day, up is down, and left is right.
---

GiftedACIII posted...

Annihilated posted...

GiftedACIII posted...

Annihilated posted...

Liberal shitposters: When logic fails, use slander.

It figures some other emotional dweeb would be lacking in self-awareness.

Liberal shitposters: When slander fails, use insults.

Stormfront troll: I have nothing valid to say so I can only resort to buzzwords.


Capn Circus posted...

GiftedACIII posted...

Capn Circus posted...

Certified professionals for who? Clearly not the young boys that were perplexed and put off by the whole encounter in their own designated locker room.

lmao what a brain dead argument. There are stupid boys who feel that way about gay people. Some who feel that way about other races. What's your solution for that?

Totally false equivalency. The two scenarios you've just mentioned are observable.

"Is he black? Uhh.. yeah obviously..."

"Is he gay? Yeah.. he does stuff with other dudes sometimes"

"Is that person with a female body who identifies as male and has professionals confirm it transgender? Yeah, which means he empirically has the brain of a dude so he should socially be treated the same"

Huge, huge difference. Get over it.

Fixed. There's literally no difference. Get over it. By the way, how is being uncomfortable with a gay dude different than being uncomfortable with a transdude? I would say it's actually more "justfiable" there since the gay dude could actually be attracted to you while the transdude won't be.
The only problem is that YOU might be attracted to the transdude which is completely your own problem.

.... Said no minor in Highschool ever, and I'd appreciate it if you didn't edit my posts.

And there's a big, big difference. It's one thing to allow passable or post-op people to attend restrooms of the opposite sex in the adult world. It's a completely different thing to allow minors who are literal girls with breasts and vaginas and sometimes on their periods, to change in boys' locker rooms.
---