Current Events > See, THIS is how a celebrity cameo in Game of Thrones should be handled SPOILERS

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3
#52	Post #52 was unavailable or deleted.
Broseph_Stalin 08/08/17 3:26:59 PM #53:	HINT: Asking your friends or bringing up the NFL's revenue is not an argument. <cite>Broseph_Stalin posted [p:884412454] in See, THIS ... [t:75650455]...</cite> <quote>HINT: Asking your friends or bringing up the NFL's revenue is not an argument.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Muffinz0rz 08/08/17 3:27:53 PM #54:	Broseph_Stalin posted... HINT: Asking your friends or bringing up the NFL's revenue is not an argument. HINT: My co-workers are not my friends HINT: The entire music industry is not accoustic pop --- Not changing this sig until Pat Benatar is in Super Smash Bros. (Started 8/31/2010) BRAVELY DEFAULT: 1075 - 0844 - 9134 + FS: Pumkaboo, Lampent, Dusclops. <cite>Muffinz0rz posted [p:884412502] in See, THIS ... [t:75650455]...</cite> <quote><cite>Broseph_Stalin posted...</cite> <quote>HINT: Asking your friends or bringing up the NFL's revenue is not an argument.</quote> HINT: My co-workers are not my friends HINT: The entire music industry is not accoustic pop</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
GOOMFalse 08/08/17 3:28:18 PM #55:	Who the fuck is noah cinderglade --- I'm your huckleberry. <cite>GOOMFalse posted [p:884412527] in See, THIS ... [t:75650455]...</cite> <quote>Who the fuck is noah cinderglade</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zeeak4444 08/08/17 3:28:46 PM #56:	Does TC really think Baseball is popular outside its dedicated fans? After seeing his circumstantial evidence I did my own. I asked 33 co-workers aged 20-55. 31 knew who Ed was, of that 31, 25 knew he was mainstream and could list at least one song. The other 6 knew he was pop but didn't know the title of any song. Noah got 6 responses. 2 knew he was Mets pitcher, 2 knew he was a pitcher, 2 knew he played baseball but didn't know the position or the team. So TC, please tell me how a corporation in LA, your "second biggest demograph" had worse results than what you showed? --- Typical gameFAQers are "Complainers that always complain about those who complain about real legitimate complaints."-Joker_X <cite>Zeeak4444 posted [p:884412539] in See, THIS ... [t:75650455]...</cite> <quote>Does TC really think Baseball is popular outside its dedicated fans? After seeing his circumstantial evidence I did my own. I asked 33 co-workers aged 20-55. 31 knew who Ed was, of that 31, 25 knew he was mainstream and could list at least one song. The other 6 knew he was pop but didn't know the title of any song. Noah got 6 responses. 2 knew he was Mets pitcher, 2 knew he was a pitcher, 2 knew he played baseball but didn't know the position or the team. So TC, please tell me how a corporation in LA, your "second biggest demograph" had worse results than what you showed?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Dustin1280 08/08/17 3:30:47 PM #57:	Calling it now, TC response: "Do people really think pop music is popular outside it's dedicated fans?" He will also mention something about circumstantial evidence probably. --- Smash DS Code: 4554-0120-5368 SB4 Name: Roz RIP: Orlando of the Axe Karma: 1642 --he delivered! <cite>Dustin1280 posted [p:884412651] in See, THIS ... [t:75650455]...</cite> <quote>Calling it now, TC response: "Do people really think pop music is popular outside it's dedicated fans?" He will also mention something about circumstantial evidence probably.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zeeak4444 08/08/17 3:38:20 PM #58:	Dustin1280 posted... Calling it now, TC response: "Do people really think pop music is popular outside it's dedicated fans?" He will also mention something about circumstantial evidence probably. That or he never comes back in typical CE fashion. --- Typical gameFAQers are "Complainers that always complain about those who complain about real legitimate complaints."-Joker_X <cite>Zeeak4444 posted [p:884413123] in See, THIS ... [t:75650455]...</cite> <quote><cite>Dustin1280 posted...</cite> <quote>Calling it now, TC response: "Do people really think pop music is popular outside it's dedicated fans?" He will also mention something about circumstantial evidence probably.</quote> That or he never comes back in typical CE fashion.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Muffinz0rz 08/08/17 3:59:34 PM #59:	Zeeak4444 posted... Dustin1280 posted... Calling it now, TC response: "Do people really think pop music is popular outside it's dedicated fans?" He will also mention something about circumstantial evidence probably. That or he never comes back in typical CE fashion. It sure is presumptuous to assume that I would just walk out the door for absolutely no reason --- Not changing this sig until Pat Benatar is in Super Smash Bros. (Started 8/31/2010) BRAVELY DEFAULT: 1075 - 0844 - 9134 + FS: Pumkaboo, Lampent, Dusclops. <cite>Muffinz0rz posted [p:884414382] in See, THIS ... [t:75650455]...</cite> <quote><cite>Zeeak4444 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Dustin1280 posted...</cite> <quote>Calling it now, TC response: "Do people really think pop music is popular outside it's dedicated fans?" He will also mention something about circumstantial evidence probably.</quote> That or he never comes back in typical CE fashion.</quote> It sure is presumptuous to assume that I would just walk out the door for absolutely no reason</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Muffinz0rz 08/08/17 4:02:04 PM #60:	Zeeak4444 posted... Does TC really think Baseball is popular outside its dedicated fans? After seeing his circumstantial evidence I did my own. I asked 33 co-workers aged 20-55. 31 knew who Ed was, of that 31, 25 knew he was mainstream and could list at least one song. The other 6 knew he was pop but didn't know the title of any song. Noah got 6 responses. 2 knew he was Mets pitcher, 2 knew he was a pitcher, 2 knew he played baseball but didn't know the position or the team. So TC, please tell me how a corporation in LA, your "second biggest demograph" had worse results than what you showed? Also, for you to poll 33 people in 15 minutes, means you would've had to get everything off without a hitch, 100% clean. That's literally less than 30 seconds per person. And I'm willing to bet there were a few who hesitated. It's not like you caught these people ready to answer or anything. You'd have to walk down an aisle, ask two questions, get the answers, write them down, and move on to the next person all in 30 seconds. That leaves like three seconds for each answer per person when you factor in the logistics of your "poll" (which you and I both know you didn't do). EDIT: And it's actually less than 15 minutes. I posted my poll at 2:14, you posted at 2:28. --- Not changing this sig until Pat Benatar is in Super Smash Bros. (Started 8/31/2010) BRAVELY DEFAULT: 1075 - 0844 - 9134 + FS: Pumkaboo, Lampent, Dusclops. <cite>Muffinz0rz posted [p:884414556] in See, THIS ... [t:75650455]...</cite> <quote><cite>Zeeak4444 posted...</cite> <quote>Does TC really think Baseball is popular outside its dedicated fans? After seeing his circumstantial evidence I did my own. I asked 33 co-workers aged 20-55. 31 knew who Ed was, of that 31, 25 knew he was mainstream and could list at least one song. The other 6 knew he was pop but didn't know the title of any song. Noah got 6 responses. 2 knew he was Mets pitcher, 2 knew he was a pitcher, 2 knew he played baseball but didn't know the position or the team. So TC, please tell me how a corporation in LA, your "second biggest demograph" had worse results than what you showed?</quote> Also, for you to poll 33 people in 15 minutes, means you would've had to get everything off without a hitch, 100% clean. That's literally less than 30 seconds per person. And I'm willing to bet there were a few who hesitated. It's not like you caught these people ready to answer or anything. You'd have to walk down an aisle, ask two questions, get the answers, write them down, and move on to the next person all in 30 seconds. That leaves like three seconds for each answer per person when you factor in the logistics of your "poll" (which you and I both know you didn't do). EDIT: And it's actually less than 15 minutes. I posted my poll at 2:14, you posted at 2:28.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Kaname_Madoka 08/08/17 4:02:35 PM #61:	@Mernardi posted... Literally who is Ed Sheeran? Main character of game of thrones --- Drawn for me by \| Popcorn_Fairy: https://i.imgtc.com/cvSNxRT.jpg \| Volkswagen_Bros: http://i.imgur.com/86XOVXb.jpg \| ShinobiNinjaX: https://imgur.com/bPb5vEV <cite>Kaname_Madoka posted [p:884414587] in See, THIS ... [t:75650455]...</cite> <quote><cite>@Mernardi posted...</cite> <quote>Literally who is Ed Sheeran?</quote> Main character of game of thrones</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#62	Post #62 was unavailable or deleted.
Broseph_Stalin 08/08/17 4:07:54 PM #63:	hey lets ask the general population instead of polling 10 people https://twitter.com/Noahsyndergaard 760 thousand followers https://twitter.com/edsheeran 20 million followers Close! <cite>Broseph_Stalin posted [p:884414927] in See, THIS ... [t:75650455]...</cite> <quote>hey lets ask the general population instead of polling 10 people https://twitter.com/Noahsyndergaard 760 thousand followers https://twitter.com/edsheeran 20 million followers Close!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Deadpool_18 08/08/17 4:08:21 PM #64:	Muffinz0rz posted... AngelsNAirwav3s posted... Most people don't know who the fuck Noah Syndergaard is. Most people know who Ed Sheeran is. Source? Not living under a rock. I cannot believe you're still this butt hurt over a cameo. --- We're whalers on the moon, we carry a harpoon, but there ain't no whales, so we tell tall tales, and sing our whaling tune. <cite>Deadpool_18 posted [p:884414963] in See, THIS ... [t:75650455]...</cite> <quote><cite>Muffinz0rz posted...</cite> <quote><cite>AngelsNAirwav3s posted...</cite> <quote>Most people don't know who the fuck Noah Syndergaard is. Most people know who Ed Sheeran is. </quote> Source?</quote> Not living under a rock. I cannot believe you're still this butt hurt over a cameo.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Muffinz0rz 08/08/17 4:09:13 PM #65:	Deadpool_18 posted... Muffinz0rz posted... AngelsNAirwav3s posted... Most people don't know who the fuck Noah Syndergaard is. Most people know who Ed Sheeran is. Source? Not living under a rock. I cannot believe you're still this butt hurt over a cameo. BREAKING: CE asks for source, gets called names instead. More at 11. --- Not changing this sig until Pat Benatar is in Super Smash Bros. (Started 8/31/2010) BRAVELY DEFAULT: 1075 - 0844 - 9134 + FS: Pumkaboo, Lampent, Dusclops. <cite>Muffinz0rz posted [p:884415025] in See, THIS ... [t:75650455]...</cite> <quote><cite>Deadpool_18 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Muffinz0rz posted...</cite> <quote><cite>AngelsNAirwav3s posted...</cite> <quote>Most people don't know who the fuck Noah Syndergaard is. Most people know who Ed Sheeran is. </quote> Source?</quote> Not living under a rock. I cannot believe you're still this butt hurt over a cameo.</quote> BREAKING: CE asks for source, gets called names instead. More at 11.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Ulyanyx 08/08/17 4:09:58 PM #66:	Muffinz0rz posted... AngelsNAirwav3s posted... TC has become the equivalent of a little kid plugging his ears and saying "I know you are but what am I?" >Responds appropriately to a baseless claim >Called a troll BREAKING: CE logic, more at 11 you're such an idiot lol many athletes go fairly unknown unless they're popular, as someone who doesn't watch sports i can name a few (lebron james, michael jordon, wayne gretzky) that are fairly well known compare that to an international pop star (and if you think "no one" knows about ed sheeran, a majority of people listen to the radio as they drive, and after or before songs most hosts say "coming up, (song) by (artist)" or "and that was (song) by (artist) secondly, the cameos are entirely different, though i applaud the got writers for making cameos in relation to what these people have done (ed singing as a bard, this guy throwing a spear) ed sheeran is put in a spotlight compared to this cameo, and he's fairly recognizable and definitely more well known than a baseball player. compare the two: a singer who's shows his entire face, or a baseball player wearing a helmet throwing a spear for literally 1 second if not less --- Sober from Alcohol since August 4th 2017 <cite>Ulyanyx posted [p:884415083] in See, THIS ... [t:75650455]...</cite> <quote><cite>Muffinz0rz posted...</cite> <quote><cite>AngelsNAirwav3s posted...</cite> <quote>TC has become the equivalent of a little kid plugging his ears and saying "I know you are but what am I?"</quote> >Responds appropriately to a baseless claim >Called a troll BREAKING: CE logic, more at 11</quote> you're such an idiot lol many athletes go fairly unknown unless they're popular, as someone who doesn't watch sports i can name a few (lebron james, michael jordon, wayne gretzky) that are fairly well known compare that to an international pop star (and if you think "no one" knows about ed sheeran, a majority of people listen to the radio as they drive, and after or before songs most hosts say "coming up, (song) by (artist)" or "and that was (song) by (artist) secondly, the cameos are entirely different, though i applaud the got writers for making cameos in relation to what these people have done (ed singing as a bard, this guy throwing a spear) ed sheeran is put in a spotlight compared to this cameo, and he's fairly recognizable and definitely more well known than a baseball player. compare the two: a singer who's shows his entire face, or a baseball player wearing a helmet throwing a spear for literally 1 second if not less</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Kaname_Madoka 08/08/17 4:10:00 PM #67:	Broseph_Stalin posted... hey lets ask the general population instead of polling 10 people https://twitter.com/Noahsyndergaard 760 thousand followers https://twitter.com/edsheeran 20 million followers Close! --- Drawn for me by \| Popcorn_Fairy: https://i.imgtc.com/cvSNxRT.jpg \| Volkswagen_Bros: http://i.imgur.com/86XOVXb.jpg \| ShinobiNinjaX: https://imgur.com/bPb5vEV <cite>Kaname_Madoka posted [p:884415087] in See, THIS ... [t:75650455]...</cite> <quote><cite>Broseph_Stalin posted...</cite> <quote>hey lets ask the general population instead of polling 10 people https://twitter.com/Noahsyndergaard 760 thousand followers https://twitter.com/edsheeran 20 million followers Close!</quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zeeak4444 08/08/17 4:11:42 PM #68:	Muffinz0rz posted... Zeeak4444 posted... Does TC really think Baseball is popular outside its dedicated fans? After seeing his circumstantial evidence I did my own. I asked 33 co-workers aged 20-55. 31 knew who Ed was, of that 31, 25 knew he was mainstream and could list at least one song. The other 6 knew he was pop but didn't know the title of any song. Noah got 6 responses. 2 knew he was Mets pitcher, 2 knew he was a pitcher, 2 knew he played baseball but didn't know the position or the team. So TC, please tell me how a corporation in LA, your "second biggest demograph" had worse results than what you showed? Also, for you to poll 33 people in 15 minutes, means you would've had to get everything off without a hitch, 100% clean. That's literally less than 30 seconds per person. And I'm willing to bet there were a few who hesitated. It's not like you caught these people ready to answer or anything. You'd have to walk down an aisle, ask two questions, get the answers, write them down, and move on to the next person all in 30 seconds. That leaves like three seconds for each answer per person when you factor in the logistics of your "poll" (which you and I both know you didn't do). EDIT: And it's actually less than 15 minutes. I posted my poll at 2:14, you posted at 2:28. Yeah, nothing you said was accurate about how I conducted it. You also assumed I went up and asked them individually. May I ask why? --- Typical gameFAQers are "Complainers that always complain about those who complain about real legitimate complaints."-Joker_X <cite>Zeeak4444 posted [p:884415197] in See, THIS ... [t:75650455]...</cite> <quote><cite>Muffinz0rz posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Zeeak4444 posted...</cite> <quote>Does TC really think Baseball is popular outside its dedicated fans? After seeing his circumstantial evidence I did my own. I asked 33 co-workers aged 20-55. 31 knew who Ed was, of that 31, 25 knew he was mainstream and could list at least one song. The other 6 knew he was pop but didn't know the title of any song. Noah got 6 responses. 2 knew he was Mets pitcher, 2 knew he was a pitcher, 2 knew he played baseball but didn't know the position or the team. So TC, please tell me how a corporation in LA, your "second biggest demograph" had worse results than what you showed?</quote> Also, for you to poll 33 people in 15 minutes, means you would've had to get everything off without a hitch, 100% clean. That's literally less than 30 seconds per person. And I'm willing to bet there were a few who hesitated. It's not like you caught these people ready to answer or anything. You'd have to walk down an aisle, ask two questions, get the answers, write them down, and move on to the next person all in 30 seconds. That leaves like three seconds for each answer per person when you factor in the logistics of your "poll" (which you and I both know you didn't do). EDIT: And it's actually less than 15 minutes. I posted my poll at 2:14, you posted at 2:28.</quote> Yeah, nothing you said was accurate about how I conducted it. You also assumed I went up and asked them individually. May I ask why?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Dustin1280 08/08/17 4:11:58 PM #69:	Broseph_Stalin posted... hey lets ask the general population instead of polling 10 people https://twitter.com/Noahsyndergaard 760 thousand followers https://twitter.com/edsheeran 20 million followers Close! oooh damn TC... Can't wait for your response to this one. EDIT: Nevermind I think I know what you are gonna say. "Twitter is not a valid source for this argument because <insert bullshit reason here>" --- Smash DS Code: 4554-0120-5368 SB4 Name: Roz RIP: Orlando of the Axe Karma: 1642 --he delivered! <cite>Dustin1280 posted [p:884415207] in See, THIS ... [t:75650455]...</cite> <quote><cite>Broseph_Stalin posted...</cite> <quote>hey lets ask the general population instead of polling 10 people https://twitter.com/Noahsyndergaard 760 thousand followers https://twitter.com/edsheeran 20 million followers Close!</quote> oooh damn TC... Can't wait for your response to this one. EDIT: Nevermind I think I know what you are gonna say. "Twitter is not a valid source for this argument because <insert bullshit reason here>"</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Deadpool_18 08/08/17 4:12:14 PM #70:	Muffinz0rz posted... Deadpool_18 posted... Muffinz0rz posted... AngelsNAirwav3s posted... Most people don't know who the fuck Noah Syndergaard is. Most people know who Ed Sheeran is. Source? Not living under a rock. I cannot believe you're still this butt hurt over a cameo. BREAKING: CE asks for source, gets called names instead. More at 11. Noone called you a name, even though I'm now tempted to. --- We're whalers on the moon, we carry a harpoon, but there ain't no whales, so we tell tall tales, and sing our whaling tune. <cite>Deadpool_18 posted [p:884415222] in See, THIS ... [t:75650455]...</cite> <quote><cite>Muffinz0rz posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Deadpool_18 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Muffinz0rz posted...</cite> <quote><cite>AngelsNAirwav3s posted...</cite> <quote>Most people don't know who the fuck Noah Syndergaard is. Most people know who Ed Sheeran is. </quote> Source?</quote> Not living under a rock. I cannot believe you're still this butt hurt over a cameo.</quote> BREAKING: CE asks for source, gets called names instead. More at 11.</quote> Noone called you a name, even though I'm now tempted to.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zeeak4444 08/08/17 4:13:31 PM #71:	Kaname_Madoka posted... Broseph_Stalin posted... hey lets ask the general population instead of polling 10 people https://twitter.com/Noahsyndergaard 760 thousand followers https://twitter.com/edsheeran 20 million followers Close! lol well played broseph. --- Typical gameFAQers are "Complainers that always complain about those who complain about real legitimate complaints."-Joker_X <cite>Zeeak4444 posted [p:884415305] in See, THIS ... [t:75650455]...</cite> <quote><cite>Kaname_Madoka posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Broseph_Stalin posted...</cite> <quote>hey lets ask the general population instead of polling 10 people https://twitter.com/Noahsyndergaard 760 thousand followers https://twitter.com/edsheeran 20 million followers Close!</quote></quote> lol well played broseph.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Axiom 08/08/17 4:14:40 PM #72:	Are nerds still upset over that guy getting a cameo. Get the fuck over it. This is just pathetic <cite>Axiom posted [p:884415375] in See, THIS ... [t:75650455]...</cite> <quote>Are nerds still upset over that guy getting a cameo. Get the fuck over it. This is just pathetic</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Muffinz0rz 08/08/17 4:15:05 PM #73:	Zeeak4444 posted... Muffinz0rz posted... Zeeak4444 posted... Does TC really think Baseball is popular outside its dedicated fans? After seeing his circumstantial evidence I did my own. I asked 33 co-workers aged 20-55. 31 knew who Ed was, of that 31, 25 knew he was mainstream and could list at least one song. The other 6 knew he was pop but didn't know the title of any song. Noah got 6 responses. 2 knew he was Mets pitcher, 2 knew he was a pitcher, 2 knew he played baseball but didn't know the position or the team. So TC, please tell me how a corporation in LA, your "second biggest demograph" had worse results than what you showed? Also, for you to poll 33 people in 15 minutes, means you would've had to get everything off without a hitch, 100% clean. That's literally less than 30 seconds per person. And I'm willing to bet there were a few who hesitated. It's not like you caught these people ready to answer or anything. You'd have to walk down an aisle, ask two questions, get the answers, write them down, and move on to the next person all in 30 seconds. That leaves like three seconds for each answer per person when you factor in the logistics of your "poll" (which you and I both know you didn't do). EDIT: And it's actually less than 15 minutes. I posted my poll at 2:14, you posted at 2:28. Yeah, nothing you said was accurate about how I conducted it. You also assumed I went up and asked them individually. May I ask why? Because it's more realistic than getting 33 email replies in less than 15 minutes in the middle of the workday for something totally unrelated to work, in addition to the possibility that people had free google access right there. --- Not changing this sig until Pat Benatar is in Super Smash Bros. (Started 8/31/2010) BRAVELY DEFAULT: 1075 - 0844 - 9134 + FS: Pumkaboo, Lampent, Dusclops. <cite>Muffinz0rz posted [p:884415402] in See, THIS ... [t:75650455]...</cite> <quote><cite>Zeeak4444 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Muffinz0rz posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Zeeak4444 posted...</cite> <quote>Does TC really think Baseball is popular outside its dedicated fans? After seeing his circumstantial evidence I did my own. I asked 33 co-workers aged 20-55. 31 knew who Ed was, of that 31, 25 knew he was mainstream and could list at least one song. The other 6 knew he was pop but didn't know the title of any song. Noah got 6 responses. 2 knew he was Mets pitcher, 2 knew he was a pitcher, 2 knew he played baseball but didn't know the position or the team. So TC, please tell me how a corporation in LA, your "second biggest demograph" had worse results than what you showed?</quote> Also, for you to poll 33 people in 15 minutes, means you would've had to get everything off without a hitch, 100% clean. That's literally less than 30 seconds per person. And I'm willing to bet there were a few who hesitated. It's not like you caught these people ready to answer or anything. You'd have to walk down an aisle, ask two questions, get the answers, write them down, and move on to the next person all in 30 seconds. That leaves like three seconds for each answer per person when you factor in the logistics of your "poll" (which you and I both know you didn't do). EDIT: And it's actually less than 15 minutes. I posted my poll at 2:14, you posted at 2:28.</quote> Yeah, nothing you said was accurate about how I conducted it. You also assumed I went up and asked them individually. May I ask why?</quote> Because it's more realistic than getting 33 email replies in less than 15 minutes in the middle of the workday for something totally unrelated to work, in addition to the possibility that people had free google access right there.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Dustin1280 08/08/17 4:16:42 PM #74:	Muffinz0rz posted... Because it's more realistic than getting 33 email replies in less than 15 minutes in the middle of the workday for something totally unrelated to work, in addition to the possibility that people had free google access right there. Workplace IM is a much more efficient way to do that. Responses usually come very quickly too. But I am more interested in whatever reason you can come up to counter this: Broseph_Stalin posted... hey lets ask the general population instead of polling 10 people https://twitter.com/Noahsyndergaard 760 thousand followers https://twitter.com/edsheeran 20 million followers Close! --- Smash DS Code: 4554-0120-5368 SB4 Name: Roz RIP: Orlando of the Axe Karma: 1642 --he delivered! <cite>Dustin1280 posted [p:884415497] in See, THIS ... [t:75650455]...</cite> <quote><cite>Muffinz0rz posted...</cite> <quote>Because it's more realistic than getting 33 email replies in less than 15 minutes in the middle of the workday for something totally unrelated to work, in addition to the possibility that people had free google access right there.</quote> Workplace IM is a much more efficient way to do that. Responses usually come very quickly too. But I am more interested in whatever reason you can come up to counter this: <cite>Broseph_Stalin posted...</cite> <quote>hey lets ask the general population instead of polling 10 people https://twitter.com/Noahsyndergaard 760 thousand followers https://twitter.com/edsheeran 20 million followers Close!</quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#75	Post #75 was unavailable or deleted.
Zeeak4444 08/08/17 4:17:38 PM #76:	Muffinz0rz posted... Zeeak4444 posted... Muffinz0rz posted... Zeeak4444 posted... Does TC really think Baseball is popular outside its dedicated fans? After seeing his circumstantial evidence I did my own. I asked 33 co-workers aged 20-55. 31 knew who Ed was, of that 31, 25 knew he was mainstream and could list at least one song. The other 6 knew he was pop but didn't know the title of any song. Noah got 6 responses. 2 knew he was Mets pitcher, 2 knew he was a pitcher, 2 knew he played baseball but didn't know the position or the team. So TC, please tell me how a corporation in LA, your "second biggest demograph" had worse results than what you showed? Also, for you to poll 33 people in 15 minutes, means you would've had to get everything off without a hitch, 100% clean. That's literally less than 30 seconds per person. And I'm willing to bet there were a few who hesitated. It's not like you caught these people ready to answer or anything. You'd have to walk down an aisle, ask two questions, get the answers, write them down, and move on to the next person all in 30 seconds. That leaves like three seconds for each answer per person when you factor in the logistics of your "poll" (which you and I both know you didn't do). EDIT: And it's actually less than 15 minutes. I posted my poll at 2:14, you posted at 2:28. Yeah, nothing you said was accurate about how I conducted it. You also assumed I went up and asked them individually. May I ask why? Because it's more realistic than getting 33 email replies in less than 15 minutes in the middle of the workday for something totally unrelated to work, in addition to the possibility that people had free google access right there. Why do you assume I E-mailed them lmao? You keep jumping to these random conclusions like they're the only options that exist... Edit: not only did you say E-mail I just noticed you said it had to be G-mail too lmao. Do you not have Microsoft outlook in your state? --- Typical gameFAQers are "Complainers that always complain about those who complain about real legitimate complaints."-Joker_X <cite>Zeeak4444 posted [p:884415550] in See, THIS ... [t:75650455]...</cite> <quote><cite>Muffinz0rz posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Zeeak4444 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Muffinz0rz posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Zeeak4444 posted...</cite> <quote>Does TC really think Baseball is popular outside its dedicated fans? After seeing his circumstantial evidence I did my own. I asked 33 co-workers aged 20-55. 31 knew who Ed was, of that 31, 25 knew he was mainstream and could list at least one song. The other 6 knew he was pop but didn't know the title of any song. Noah got 6 responses. 2 knew he was Mets pitcher, 2 knew he was a pitcher, 2 knew he played baseball but didn't know the position or the team. So TC, please tell me how a corporation in LA, your "second biggest demograph" had worse results than what you showed?</quote> Also, for you to poll 33 people in 15 minutes, means you would've had to get everything off without a hitch, 100% clean. That's literally less than 30 seconds per person. And I'm willing to bet there were a few who hesitated. It's not like you caught these people ready to answer or anything. You'd have to walk down an aisle, ask two questions, get the answers, write them down, and move on to the next person all in 30 seconds. That leaves like three seconds for each answer per person when you factor in the logistics of your "poll" (which you and I both know you didn't do). EDIT: And it's actually less than 15 minutes. I posted my poll at 2:14, you posted at 2:28.</quote> Yeah, nothing you said was accurate about how I conducted it. You also assumed I went up and asked them individually. May I ask why?</quote> Because it's more realistic than getting 33 email replies in less than 15 minutes in the middle of the workday for something totally unrelated to work, in addition to the possibility that people had free google access right there.</quote> Why do you assume I E-mailed them lmao? You keep jumping to these random conclusions like they're the only options that exist... Edit: not only did you say E-mail I just noticed you said it had to be G-mail too lmao. Do you not have Microsoft outlook in your state?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Kaname_Madoka 08/08/17 4:18:25 PM #77:	Zeeak4444 posted... Kaname_Madoka posted... Broseph_Stalin posted... hey lets ask the general population instead of polling 10 people https://twitter.com/Noahsyndergaard 760 thousand followers https://twitter.com/edsheeran 20 million followers Close! lol well played broseph. @Muffinz0rz --- Drawn for me by \| Popcorn_Fairy: https://i.imgtc.com/cvSNxRT.jpg \| Volkswagen_Bros: http://i.imgur.com/86XOVXb.jpg \| ShinobiNinjaX: https://imgur.com/bPb5vEV <cite>Kaname_Madoka posted [p:884415598] in See, THIS ... [t:75650455]...</cite> <quote><cite>Zeeak4444 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Kaname_Madoka posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Broseph_Stalin posted...</cite> <quote>hey lets ask the general population instead of polling 10 people https://twitter.com/Noahsyndergaard 760 thousand followers https://twitter.com/edsheeran 20 million followers Close!</quote></quote> lol well played broseph.</quote> @Muffinz0rz</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Muffinz0rz 08/08/17 4:20:51 PM #78:	Dustin1280 posted... Workplace IM is a much more efficient way to do that. Responses usually come very quickly too. Joke post. Typing 33 individual names, hitting send, cataloging every single response, assuming they all reply...it's just not feasible. Dustin1280 posted... Muffinz0rz posted... Because it's more realistic than getting 33 email replies in less than 15 minutes in the middle of the workday for something totally unrelated to work, in addition to the possibility that people had free google access right there. Workplace IM is a much more efficient way to do that. Responses usually come very quickly too. But I am more interested in whatever reason you can come up to counter this: Broseph_Stalin posted... hey lets ask the general population instead of polling 10 people https://twitter.com/Noahsyndergaard 760 thousand followers https://twitter.com/edsheeran 20 million followers Close! It sure is cute the straws to which one will grasp to try and make news. For starters, Syndergaard has been in the league for two years. Secondly, athletes are almost universally less followed than musicians and entertainers. Michael Jordan has 3.5m and he's the greatest basketball player of all time. The difference lies in the fact that athletes are not entertainers. They are competitors. Musicians are strictly there for your entertainment. As such, in order to get more people to care about them, they take to social media to make their voice heard (and then, in Sheeran's case, "quitting" social media in a publicity stunt to gain more followers). --- Not changing this sig until Pat Benatar is in Super Smash Bros. (Started 8/31/2010) BRAVELY DEFAULT: 1075 - 0844 - 9134 + FS: Pumkaboo, Lampent, Dusclops. <cite>Muffinz0rz posted [p:884415742] in See, THIS ... [t:75650455]...</cite> <quote><cite>Dustin1280 posted...</cite> <quote>Workplace IM is a much more efficient way to do that. Responses usually come very quickly too.</quote> Joke post. Typing 33 individual names, hitting send, cataloging every single response, assuming they all reply...it's just not feasible. <cite>Dustin1280 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Muffinz0rz posted...</cite> <quote>Because it's more realistic than getting 33 email replies in less than 15 minutes in the middle of the workday for something totally unrelated to work, in addition to the possibility that people had free google access right there.</quote> Workplace IM is a much more efficient way to do that. Responses usually come very quickly too. But I am more interested in whatever reason you can come up to counter this: <cite>Broseph_Stalin posted...</cite> <quote>hey lets ask the general population instead of polling 10 people https://twitter.com/Noahsyndergaard 760 thousand followers https://twitter.com/edsheeran 20 million followers Close!</quote></quote> It sure is cute the straws to which one will grasp to try and make news. For starters, Syndergaard has been in the league for two years. Secondly, athletes are almost universally less followed than musicians and entertainers. Michael Jordan has 3.5m and he's the greatest basketball player of all time. The difference lies in the fact that athletes are not entertainers. They are competitors. Musicians are strictly there for your entertainment. As such, in order to get more people to care about them, they take to social media to make their voice heard (and then, in Sheeran's case, "quitting" social media in a publicity stunt to gain more followers).</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LArcEnCieIX 08/08/17 4:21:33 PM #79:	Who the fuck is Ed Sheeran? I know who Syndergaard is, though. --- "I like casey heyward a lot. Would loveyou to getyou him ina like theyou third orand somesuch" - ILoveTheBengalz >D The Arc in the Sky <cite>LArcEnCieIX posted [p:884415787] in See, THIS ... [t:75650455]...</cite> <quote>Who the fuck is Ed Sheeran? I know who Syndergaard is, though.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Muffinz0rz 08/08/17 4:21:42 PM #80:	Zeeak4444 posted... Muffinz0rz posted... Zeeak4444 posted... Muffinz0rz posted... Zeeak4444 posted... Does TC really think Baseball is popular outside its dedicated fans? After seeing his circumstantial evidence I did my own. I asked 33 co-workers aged 20-55. 31 knew who Ed was, of that 31, 25 knew he was mainstream and could list at least one song. The other 6 knew he was pop but didn't know the title of any song. Noah got 6 responses. 2 knew he was Mets pitcher, 2 knew he was a pitcher, 2 knew he played baseball but didn't know the position or the team. So TC, please tell me how a corporation in LA, your "second biggest demograph" had worse results than what you showed? Also, for you to poll 33 people in 15 minutes, means you would've had to get everything off without a hitch, 100% clean. That's literally less than 30 seconds per person. And I'm willing to bet there were a few who hesitated. It's not like you caught these people ready to answer or anything. You'd have to walk down an aisle, ask two questions, get the answers, write them down, and move on to the next person all in 30 seconds. That leaves like three seconds for each answer per person when you factor in the logistics of your "poll" (which you and I both know you didn't do). EDIT: And it's actually less than 15 minutes. I posted my poll at 2:14, you posted at 2:28. Yeah, nothing you said was accurate about how I conducted it. You also assumed I went up and asked them individually. May I ask why? Because it's more realistic than getting 33 email replies in less than 15 minutes in the middle of the workday for something totally unrelated to work, in addition to the possibility that people had free google access right there. Why do you assume I E-mailed them lmao? You keep jumping to these random conclusions like they're the only options that exist... Edit: not only did you say E-mail I just noticed you said it had to be G-mail too lmao. Do you not have Microsoft outlook in your state? Lmao to google who the fucking people are, not gmail. Did you email, IM, or did you walk face to face? What else is there? --- Not changing this sig until Pat Benatar is in Super Smash Bros. (Started 8/31/2010) BRAVELY DEFAULT: 1075 - 0844 - 9134 + FS: Pumkaboo, Lampent, Dusclops. <cite>Muffinz0rz posted [p:884415799] in See, THIS ... [t:75650455]...</cite> <quote><cite>Zeeak4444 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Muffinz0rz posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Zeeak4444 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Muffinz0rz posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Zeeak4444 posted...</cite> <quote>Does TC really think Baseball is popular outside its dedicated fans? After seeing his circumstantial evidence I did my own. I asked 33 co-workers aged 20-55. 31 knew who Ed was, of that 31, 25 knew he was mainstream and could list at least one song. The other 6 knew he was pop but didn't know the title of any song. Noah got 6 responses. 2 knew he was Mets pitcher, 2 knew he was a pitcher, 2 knew he played baseball but didn't know the position or the team. So TC, please tell me how a corporation in LA, your "second biggest demograph" had worse results than what you showed?</quote> Also, for you to poll 33 people in 15 minutes, means you would've had to get everything off without a hitch, 100% clean. That's literally less than 30 seconds per person. And I'm willing to bet there were a few who hesitated. It's not like you caught these people ready to answer or anything. You'd have to walk down an aisle, ask two questions, get the answers, write them down, and move on to the next person all in 30 seconds. That leaves like three seconds for each answer per person when you factor in the logistics of your "poll" (which you and I both know you didn't do). EDIT: And it's actually less than 15 minutes. I posted my poll at 2:14, you posted at 2:28.</quote> Yeah, nothing you said was accurate about how I conducted it. You also assumed I went up and asked them individually. May I ask why?</quote> Because it's more realistic than getting 33 email replies in less than 15 minutes in the middle of the workday for something totally unrelated to work, in addition to the possibility that people had free google access right there.</quote> Why do you assume I E-mailed them lmao? You keep jumping to these random conclusions like they're the only options that exist... Edit: not only did you say E-mail I just noticed you said it had to be G-mail too lmao. Do you not have Microsoft outlook in your state?</quote> Lmao to google who the fucking people are, not gmail. Did you email, IM, or did you walk face to face? What else is there?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zeeak4444 08/08/17 4:23:35 PM #81:	Muffinz0rz posted... Dustin1280 posted... Workplace IM is a much more efficient way to do that. Responses usually come very quickly too. Joke post. Typing 33 individual names, hitting send, cataloging every single response, assuming they all reply...it's just not feasible. Dustin1280 posted... Muffinz0rz posted... Because it's more realistic than getting 33 email replies in less than 15 minutes in the middle of the workday for something totally unrelated to work, in addition to the possibility that people had free google access right there. Workplace IM is a much more efficient way to do that. Responses usually come very quickly too. But I am more interested in whatever reason you can come up to counter this: Broseph_Stalin posted... hey lets ask the general population instead of polling 10 people https://twitter.com/Noahsyndergaard 760 thousand followers https://twitter.com/edsheeran 20 million followers Close! It sure is cute the straws to which one will grasp to try and make news. For starters, Syndergaard has been in the league for two years. Secondly, athletes are almost universally less followed than musicians and entertainers. Michael Jordan has 3.5m and he's the greatest basketball player of all time. The difference lies in the fact that athletes are not entertainers. They are competitors. Musicians are strictly there for your entertainment. As such, in order to get more people to care about them, they take to social media to make their voice heard (and then, in Sheeran's case, "quitting" social media in a publicity stunt to gain more followers). TC's has delusions of grandeur apparently. It's cute when people think things they can't comprehend must be false. --- Typical gameFAQers are "Complainers that always complain about those who complain about real legitimate complaints."-Joker_X <cite>Zeeak4444 posted [p:884415925] in See, THIS ... [t:75650455]...</cite> <quote><cite>Muffinz0rz posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Dustin1280 posted...</cite> <quote>Workplace IM is a much more efficient way to do that. Responses usually come very quickly too.</quote> Joke post. Typing 33 individual names, hitting send, cataloging every single response, assuming they all reply...it's just not feasible. <cite>Dustin1280 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Muffinz0rz posted...</cite> <quote>Because it's more realistic than getting 33 email replies in less than 15 minutes in the middle of the workday for something totally unrelated to work, in addition to the possibility that people had free google access right there.</quote> Workplace IM is a much more efficient way to do that. Responses usually come very quickly too. But I am more interested in whatever reason you can come up to counter this: <cite>Broseph_Stalin posted...</cite> <quote>hey lets ask the general population instead of polling 10 people https://twitter.com/Noahsyndergaard 760 thousand followers https://twitter.com/edsheeran 20 million followers Close!</quote></quote> It sure is cute the straws to which one will grasp to try and make news. For starters, Syndergaard has been in the league for two years. Secondly, athletes are almost universally less followed than musicians and entertainers. Michael Jordan has 3.5m and he's the greatest basketball player of all time. The difference lies in the fact that athletes are not entertainers. They are competitors. Musicians are strictly there for your entertainment. As such, in order to get more people to care about them, they take to social media to make their voice heard (and then, in Sheeran's case, "quitting" social media in a publicity stunt to gain more followers).</quote> TC's has delusions of grandeur apparently. It's cute when people think things they can't comprehend must be false.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Deadpool_18 08/08/17 4:24:58 PM #82:	DuranOfForcena posted... i wish TC could realize how fucking severely he is embarrassing himself right now like, i almost feel bad for him almost Lack of self awareness is a bitch. --- We're whalers on the moon, we carry a harpoon, but there ain't no whales, so we tell tall tales, and sing our whaling tune. <cite>Deadpool_18 posted [p:884416011] in See, THIS ... [t:75650455]...</cite> <quote><cite>DuranOfForcena posted...</cite> <quote>i wish TC could realize how fucking severely he is embarrassing himself right now like, i almost feel bad for him almost</quote> Lack of self awareness is a bitch.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zeeak4444 08/08/17 4:25:58 PM #83:	Muffinz0rz posted... Zeeak4444 posted... Muffinz0rz posted... Zeeak4444 posted... Muffinz0rz posted... Zeeak4444 posted... Does TC really think Baseball is popular outside its dedicated fans? After seeing his circumstantial evidence I did my own. I asked 33 co-workers aged 20-55. 31 knew who Ed was, of that 31, 25 knew he was mainstream and could list at least one song. The other 6 knew he was pop but didn't know the title of any song. Noah got 6 responses. 2 knew he was Mets pitcher, 2 knew he was a pitcher, 2 knew he played baseball but didn't know the position or the team. So TC, please tell me how a corporation in LA, your "second biggest demograph" had worse results than what you showed? Also, for you to poll 33 people in 15 minutes, means you would've had to get everything off without a hitch, 100% clean. That's literally less than 30 seconds per person. And I'm willing to bet there were a few who hesitated. It's not like you caught these people ready to answer or anything. You'd have to walk down an aisle, ask two questions, get the answers, write them down, and move on to the next person all in 30 seconds. That leaves like three seconds for each answer per person when you factor in the logistics of your "poll" (which you and I both know you didn't do). EDIT: And it's actually less than 15 minutes. I posted my poll at 2:14, you posted at 2:28. Yeah, nothing you said was accurate about how I conducted it. You also assumed I went up and asked them individually. May I ask why? Because it's more realistic than getting 33 email replies in less than 15 minutes in the middle of the workday for something totally unrelated to work, in addition to the possibility that people had free google access right there. Why do you assume I E-mailed them lmao? You keep jumping to these random conclusions like they're the only options that exist... Edit: not only did you say E-mail I just noticed you said it had to be G-mail too lmao. Do you not have Microsoft outlook in your state? Lmao to google who the fucking people are, not gmail. Did you email, IM, or did you walk face to face? What else is there? You should specify you thought they cheated in that case not just tacked the statement on. I did it face to face. I just didn't walk up some aisle asking people one by one. Let's hear the mathematical evidence that it's impossible for me to have done that! --- Typical gameFAQers are "Complainers that always complain about those who complain about real legitimate complaints."-Joker_X <cite>Zeeak4444 posted [p:884416070] in See, THIS ... [t:75650455]...</cite> <quote><cite>Muffinz0rz posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Zeeak4444 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Muffinz0rz posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Zeeak4444 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Muffinz0rz posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Zeeak4444 posted...</cite> <quote>Does TC really think Baseball is popular outside its dedicated fans? After seeing his circumstantial evidence I did my own. I asked 33 co-workers aged 20-55. 31 knew who Ed was, of that 31, 25 knew he was mainstream and could list at least one song. The other 6 knew he was pop but didn't know the title of any song. Noah got 6 responses. 2 knew he was Mets pitcher, 2 knew he was a pitcher, 2 knew he played baseball but didn't know the position or the team. So TC, please tell me how a corporation in LA, your "second biggest demograph" had worse results than what you showed?</quote> Also, for you to poll 33 people in 15 minutes, means you would've had to get everything off without a hitch, 100% clean. That's literally less than 30 seconds per person. And I'm willing to bet there were a few who hesitated. It's not like you caught these people ready to answer or anything. You'd have to walk down an aisle, ask two questions, get the answers, write them down, and move on to the next person all in 30 seconds. That leaves like three seconds for each answer per person when you factor in the logistics of your "poll" (which you and I both know you didn't do). EDIT: And it's actually less than 15 minutes. I posted my poll at 2:14, you posted at 2:28.</quote> Yeah, nothing you said was accurate about how I conducted it. You also assumed I went up and asked them individually. May I ask why?</quote> Because it's more realistic than getting 33 email replies in less than 15 minutes in the middle of the workday for something totally unrelated to work, in addition to the possibility that people had free google access right there.</quote> Why do you assume I E-mailed them lmao? You keep jumping to these random conclusions like they're the only options that exist... Edit: not only did you say E-mail I just noticed you said it had to be G-mail too lmao. Do you not have Microsoft outlook in your state?</quote> Lmao to google who the fucking people are, not gmail. Did you email, IM, or did you walk face to face? What else is there?</quote> You should specify you thought they cheated in that case not just tacked the statement on. I did it face to face. I just didn't walk up some aisle asking people one by one. Let's hear the mathematical evidence that it's impossible for me to have done that!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Broseph_Stalin 08/08/17 4:26:23 PM #84:	Muffinz0rz posted... Secondly, athletes are almost universally less followed than musicians and entertainers. Nope. https://twitter.com/Cristiano 56 million https://twitter.com/KingJames 37 million It's more like he doesn't have more followers because he isn't as famous as Sheeran. <cite>Broseph_Stalin posted [p:884416090] in See, THIS ... [t:75650455]...</cite> <quote><cite>Muffinz0rz posted...</cite> <quote>Secondly, athletes are almost universally less followed than musicians and entertainers.</quote> Nope. https://twitter.com/Cristiano 56 million https://twitter.com/KingJames 37 million It's more like he doesn't have more followers because he isn't as famous as Sheeran.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Dustin1280 08/08/17 4:26:24 PM #85:	Muffinz0rz posted... The difference lies in the fact that athletes are not entertainers. They are competitors. Musicians are strictly there for your entertainment. As such, in order to get more people to care about them, they take to social media to make their voice heard (and then, in Sheeran's case, "quitting" social media in a publicity stunt to gain more followers). It's cute that you are so obsessed about proving your non-existent point that you are willing assume that a 19+ million discrepancy can be casually ignored because of some bullshit reason you made up in your head. Beyond that, it would take me 2 minutes to contact 50 people at my workplace through IM. Alternatively it would take me less then 10 seconds to put this question in any general chat that a office/corporation might have. Also this for good measure: Broseph_Stalin posted... Muffinz0rz posted... Secondly, athletes are almost universally less followed than musicians and entertainers. Nope. https://twitter.com/Cristiano 56 million https://twitter.com/KingJames 37 million It's more like he doesn't have more followers because he isn't as famous as Sheeran. --- Smash DS Code: 4554-0120-5368 SB4 Name: Roz RIP: Orlando of the Axe Karma: 1642 --he delivered! <cite>Dustin1280 posted [p:884416092] in See, THIS ... [t:75650455]...</cite> <quote><cite>Muffinz0rz posted...</cite> <quote>The difference lies in the fact that athletes are not entertainers. They are competitors. Musicians are strictly there for your entertainment. As such, in order to get more people to care about them, they take to social media to make their voice heard (and then, in Sheeran's case, "quitting" social media in a publicity stunt to gain more followers).</quote> It's cute that you are so obsessed about proving your non-existent point that you are willing assume that a 19+ million discrepancy can be casually ignored because of some bullshit reason you made up in your head. Beyond that, it would take me 2 minutes to contact 50 people at my workplace through IM. Alternatively it would take me less then 10 seconds to put this question in any general chat that a office/corporation might have. Also this for good measure: <cite>Broseph_Stalin posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Muffinz0rz posted...</cite> <quote>Secondly, athletes are almost universally less followed than musicians and entertainers.</quote> Nope. https://twitter.com/Cristiano 56 million https://twitter.com/KingJames 37 million It's more like he doesn't have more followers because he isn't as famous as Sheeran.</quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zeeak4444 08/08/17 4:28:05 PM #87:	Dustin1280 posted... Muffinz0rz posted... The difference lies in the fact that athletes are not entertainers. They are competitors. Musicians are strictly there for your entertainment. As such, in order to get more people to care about them, they take to social media to make their voice heard (and then, in Sheeran's case, "quitting" social media in a publicity stunt to gain more followers). It's cute that you are so obsessed about proving your non-existent point that you are willing assume that a 19+ million discrepancy can be casually ignored because of some bullshit reason you made up in your head. Beyond that, it would take me 2 minutes to contact 50 people at my workplace through IM. Alternatively it would take me less then 10 seconds to put this question in any general chat that a office/corporation might have. Shh, these things are beyond his capabilities. We don't wanna send his brain into overload. --- Typical gameFAQers are "Complainers that always complain about those who complain about real legitimate complaints."-Joker_X <cite>Zeeak4444 posted [p:884416192] in See, THIS ... [t:75650455]...</cite> <quote><cite>Dustin1280 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Muffinz0rz posted...</cite> <quote>The difference lies in the fact that athletes are not entertainers. They are competitors. Musicians are strictly there for your entertainment. As such, in order to get more people to care about them, they take to social media to make their voice heard (and then, in Sheeran's case, "quitting" social media in a publicity stunt to gain more followers).</quote> It's cute that you are so obsessed about proving your non-existent point that you are willing assume that a 19+ million discrepancy can be casually ignored because of some bullshit reason you made up in your head. Beyond that, it would take me 2 minutes to contact 50 people at my workplace through IM. Alternatively it would take me less then 10 seconds to put this question in any general chat that a office/corporation might have.</quote> Shh, these things are beyond his capabilities. We don't wanna send his brain into overload.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Dustin1280 08/08/17 4:30:44 PM #88:	Zeeak4444 posted... Shh, these things are beyond his capabilities. We don't wanna send his brain into overload. Maybe we should lay off the tc, I would feel terrible if he had an aneurysm trying to comprehend this type of stuff which is clearly more then he is capable of. Don't worry guys, I marked him as "special" so I make sure not to cause him undue stress in the future. --- Smash DS Code: 4554-0120-5368 SB4 Name: Roz RIP: Orlando of the Axe Karma: 1642 --he delivered! <cite>Dustin1280 posted [p:884416352] in See, THIS ... [t:75650455]...</cite> <quote><cite>Zeeak4444 posted...</cite> <quote>Shh, these things are beyond his capabilities. We don't wanna send his brain into overload.</quote> Maybe we should lay off the tc, I would feel terrible if he had an aneurysm trying to comprehend this type of stuff which is clearly more then he is capable of. Don't worry guys, I marked him as "special" so I make sure not to cause him undue stress in the future.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Muffinz0rz 08/08/17 4:32:17 PM #89:	Dustin1280 posted... Beyond that, it would take me 2 minutes to contact 50 people at my workplace through IM. Alternatively it would take me less then 10 seconds to put this question in any general chat that a office/corporation might have. Again, cataloging 50+ responses without duplicates, with accuracy, without distraction, and assuming they all reply in ~15 minutes is an unbelievable long-shot. Unless of course you're working some dead-end cubicle job where people literally have nothing better to do but participate in some totally counter-productive group chat. Broseph_Stalin posted... Muffinz0rz posted... Secondly, athletes are almost universally less followed than musicians and entertainers. Nope. https://twitter.com/Cristiano 56 million https://twitter.com/KingJames 37 million It's more like he doesn't have more followers because he isn't as famous as Sheeran. Right, because it's totally fair to compare two of the most famous AND PROMINENT athletes of the generation to a guy who's been in the league for two years. Totally relevant. Zeeak4444 posted... I did it face to face. I just didn't walk up some aisle asking people one by one. Amazing how you can write two totally contradictory statements and post it without realizing how dumb you sound. --- Not changing this sig until Pat Benatar is in Super Smash Bros. (Started 8/31/2010) BRAVELY DEFAULT: 1075 - 0844 - 9134 + FS: Pumkaboo, Lampent, Dusclops. <cite>Muffinz0rz posted [p:884416436] in See, THIS ... [t:75650455]...</cite> <quote><cite>Dustin1280 posted...</cite> <quote>Beyond that, it would take me 2 minutes to contact 50 people at my workplace through IM. Alternatively it would take me less then 10 seconds to put this question in any general chat that a office/corporation might have.</quote> Again, cataloging 50+ responses without duplicates, with accuracy, without distraction, and assuming they all reply in ~15 minutes is an unbelievable long-shot. Unless of course you're working some dead-end cubicle job where people literally have nothing better to do but participate in some totally counter-productive group chat. <cite>Broseph_Stalin posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Muffinz0rz posted...</cite> <quote>Secondly, athletes are almost universally less followed than musicians and entertainers.</quote> Nope. https://twitter.com/Cristiano 56 million https://twitter.com/KingJames 37 million It's more like he doesn't have more followers because he isn't as famous as Sheeran.</quote> Right, because it's totally fair to compare two of the most famous AND PROMINENT athletes of the generation to a guy who's been in the league for two years. Totally relevant. <cite>Zeeak4444 posted...</cite> <quote>I did it face to face. I just didn't walk up some aisle asking people one by one.</quote> Amazing how you can write two totally contradictory statements and post it without realizing how dumb you sound.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Muffinz0rz 08/08/17 4:32:53 PM #90:	Zeeak4444 posted... Shh, these things are beyond his capabilities. We don't wanna send his brain into overload. Dustin1280 posted... Zeeak4444 posted... Shh, these things are beyond his capabilities. We don't wanna send his brain into overload. Maybe we should lay off the tc, I would feel terrible if he had an aneurysm trying to comprehend this type of stuff which is clearly more then he is capable of. Don't worry guys, I marked him as "special" so I make sure not to cause him undue stress in the future. It sure is cute when people go straight to insults because they want to feel morally superior over an internet chat forum --- Not changing this sig until Pat Benatar is in Super Smash Bros. (Started 8/31/2010) BRAVELY DEFAULT: 1075 - 0844 - 9134 + FS: Pumkaboo, Lampent, Dusclops. <cite>Muffinz0rz posted [p:884416478] in See, THIS ... [t:75650455]...</cite> <quote><cite>Zeeak4444 posted...</cite> <quote>Shh, these things are beyond his capabilities. We don't wanna send his brain into overload.</quote> <cite>Dustin1280 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Zeeak4444 posted...</cite> <quote>Shh, these things are beyond his capabilities. We don't wanna send his brain into overload.</quote> Maybe we should lay off the tc, I would feel terrible if he had an aneurysm trying to comprehend this type of stuff which is clearly more then he is capable of. Don't worry guys, I marked him as "special" so I make sure not to cause him undue stress in the future.</quote> It sure is cute when people go straight to insults because they want to feel morally superior over an internet chat forum</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Deadpool_18 08/08/17 4:33:16 PM #91:	LArcEnCieIX posted... Who the fuck is Ed Sheeran? I know who Syndergaard is, though. This joke has worn out its welcome. --- We're whalers on the moon, we carry a harpoon, but there ain't no whales, so we tell tall tales, and sing our whaling tune. <cite>Deadpool_18 posted [p:884416500] in See, THIS ... [t:75650455]...</cite> <quote><cite>LArcEnCieIX posted...</cite> <quote>Who the fuck is Ed Sheeran? I know who Syndergaard is, though.</quote> This joke has worn out its welcome.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Broseph_Stalin 08/08/17 4:33:33 PM #92:	Muffinz0rz posted... to a guy who's been in the league for two years. Right. He's not famous. We agree. <cite>Broseph_Stalin posted [p:884416520] in See, THIS ... [t:75650455]...</cite> <quote><cite>Muffinz0rz posted...</cite> <quote>to a guy who's been in the league for two years.</quote> Right. He's not famous. We agree.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Dustin1280 08/08/17 4:38:53 PM #94:	Muffinz0rz posted... Again, cataloging 50+ responses without duplicates, with accuracy, without distraction, and assuming they all reply in ~15 minutes is an unbelievable long-shot. Unless of course you're working some dead-end cubicle job where people literally have nothing better to do but participate in some totally counter-productive group chat. I understand that seems an insurmountable task to one such as you, but i assure you it can be done if one had the "facilities" to do so. BTW his was only 33 people, not 50+ that would take roughly 33% less time. --- Smash DS Code: 4554-0120-5368 SB4 Name: Roz RIP: Orlando of the Axe Karma: 1642 --he delivered! <cite>Dustin1280 posted [p:884416817] in See, THIS ... [t:75650455]...</cite> <quote><cite>Muffinz0rz posted...</cite> <quote>Again, cataloging 50+ responses without duplicates, with accuracy, without distraction, and assuming they all reply in ~15 minutes is an unbelievable long-shot. Unless of course you're working some dead-end cubicle job where people literally have nothing better to do but participate in some totally counter-productive group chat. </quote> I understand that seems an insurmountable task to one such as you, but i assure you it can be done if one had the "facilities" to do so. BTW his was only 33 people, not 50+ that would take roughly 33% less time.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ThyCorndog 08/08/17 4:40:43 PM #95:	Kaname_Madoka posted... >Ed Sheeran Who? game of thrones character named edd shireen but people keep spelling it wrong for fun --- Hey what's going on in this thread http://i.imgur.com/6fpKRW8.gif http://i.imgur.com/RNZi0gk.gif <cite>ThyCorndog posted [p:884416912] in See, THIS ... [t:75650455]...</cite> <quote><cite>Kaname_Madoka posted...</cite> <quote>>Ed Sheeran Who?</quote> game of thrones character named edd shireen but people keep spelling it wrong for fun</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zeeak4444 08/08/17 4:40:46 PM #96:	Dustin1280 posted... Muffinz0rz posted... Again, cataloging 50+ responses without duplicates, with accuracy, without distraction, and assuming they all reply in ~15 minutes is an unbelievable long-shot. Unless of course you're working some dead-end cubicle job where people literally have nothing better to do but participate in some totally counter-productive group chat. I understand that seems an insurmountable task to one such as you, but i assure you it can be done. BTW his was only 33 people, not 50+ that would take 33% less time. I could catalog that in my head without dropping a sweat. Even jotting it down on a notebook took like 5 seconds top for each one.. Dude acts like I'm transcribing a meeting or something. --- Typical gameFAQers are "Complainers that always complain about those who complain about real legitimate complaints."-Joker_X <cite>Zeeak4444 posted [p:884416915] in See, THIS ... [t:75650455]...</cite> <quote><cite>Dustin1280 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Muffinz0rz posted...</cite> <quote>Again, cataloging 50+ responses without duplicates, with accuracy, without distraction, and assuming they all reply in ~15 minutes is an unbelievable long-shot. Unless of course you're working some dead-end cubicle job where people literally have nothing better to do but participate in some totally counter-productive group chat. </quote> I understand that seems an insurmountable task to one such as you, but i assure you it can be done. BTW his was only 33 people, not 50+ that would take 33% less time.</quote> I could catalog that in my head without dropping a sweat. Even jotting it down on a notebook took like 5 seconds top for each one.. Dude acts like I'm transcribing a meeting or something.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Kaname_Madoka 08/08/17 4:42:30 PM #97:	ThyCorndog posted... Kaname_Madoka posted... >Ed Sheeran Who? game of thrones character named edd shireen but people keep spelling it wrong for fun Oh, the main character? --- Drawn for me by \| Popcorn_Fairy: https://i.imgtc.com/cvSNxRT.jpg \| Volkswagen_Bros: http://i.imgur.com/86XOVXb.jpg \| ShinobiNinjaX: https://imgur.com/bPb5vEV <cite>Kaname_Madoka posted [p:884417032] in See, THIS ... [t:75650455]...</cite> <quote><cite>ThyCorndog posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Kaname_Madoka posted...</cite> <quote>>Ed Sheeran Who?</quote> game of thrones character named edd shireen but people keep spelling it wrong for fun</quote> Oh, the main character?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Makeveli_lives 08/08/17 4:42:49 PM #98:	Muffinz0rz posted... AngelsNAirwav3s posted... Most people don't know who the fuck Noah Syndergaard is. Most people know who Ed Sheeran is. Source? The billboard charts is an accurate representation of reach and popularity in music. He's pretty goddamn popular and has been for years. --- 3DS FC: 0087-2410-1340 <cite>Makeveli_lives posted [p:884417046] in See, THIS ... [t:75650455]...</cite> <quote><cite>Muffinz0rz posted...</cite> <quote><cite>AngelsNAirwav3s posted...</cite> <quote>Most people don't know who the fuck Noah Syndergaard is. Most people know who Ed Sheeran is. </quote> Source?</quote> The billboard charts is an accurate representation of reach and popularity in music. He's pretty goddamn popular and has been for years.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ThyCorndog 08/08/17 4:43:41 PM #99:	Kaname_Madoka posted... ThyCorndog posted... Kaname_Madoka posted... >Ed Sheeran Who? game of thrones character named edd shireen but people keep spelling it wrong for fun Oh, the main character? yeah, one of the main ones along with khaleesi and karl drogo --- Hey what's going on in this thread http://i.imgur.com/6fpKRW8.gif http://i.imgur.com/RNZi0gk.gif <cite>ThyCorndog posted [p:884417106] in See, THIS ... [t:75650455]...</cite> <quote><cite>Kaname_Madoka posted...</cite> <quote><cite>ThyCorndog posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Kaname_Madoka posted...</cite> <quote>>Ed Sheeran Who?</quote> game of thrones character named edd shireen but people keep spelling it wrong for fun</quote> Oh, the main character?</quote> yeah, one of the main ones along with khaleesi and karl drogo</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Kaname_Madoka 08/08/17 4:44:30 PM #100:	ThyCorndog posted... Kaname_Madoka posted... ThyCorndog posted... Kaname_Madoka posted... >Ed Sheeran Who? game of thrones character named edd shireen but people keep spelling it wrong for fun Oh, the main character? yeah, one of the main ones along with khaleesi and karl drogo Thanks! --- Drawn for me by \| Popcorn_Fairy: https://i.imgtc.com/cvSNxRT.jpg \| Volkswagen_Bros: http://i.imgur.com/86XOVXb.jpg \| ShinobiNinjaX: https://imgur.com/bPb5vEV <cite>Kaname_Madoka posted [p:884417157] in See, THIS ... [t:75650455]...</cite> <quote><cite>ThyCorndog posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Kaname_Madoka posted...</cite> <quote><cite>ThyCorndog posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Kaname_Madoka posted...</cite> <quote>>Ed Sheeran Who?</quote> game of thrones character named edd shireen but people keep spelling it wrong for fun</quote> Oh, the main character?</quote> yeah, one of the main ones along with khaleesi and karl drogo</quote> Thanks!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#101	Post #101 was unavailable or deleted.
ThyCorndog 08/08/17 4:59:45 PM #102:	DuranOfForcena posted... ThyCorndog posted... Kaname_Madoka posted... ThyCorndog posted... Kaname_Madoka posted... >Ed Sheeran Who? game of thrones character named edd shireen but people keep spelling it wrong for fun Oh, the main character? yeah, one of the main ones along with khaleesi and karl drogo Kelly C* thanks! --- Hey what's going on in this thread http://i.imgur.com/6fpKRW8.gif http://i.imgur.com/RNZi0gk.gif <cite>ThyCorndog posted [p:884418017] in See, THIS ... [t:75650455]...</cite> <quote><cite>DuranOfForcena posted...</cite> <quote><cite>ThyCorndog posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Kaname_Madoka posted...</cite> <quote><cite>ThyCorndog posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Kaname_Madoka posted...</cite> <quote>>Ed Sheeran Who?</quote> game of thrones character named edd shireen but people keep spelling it wrong for fun</quote> Oh, the main character?</quote> yeah, one of the main ones along with khaleesi and karl drogo</quote> Kelly C*</quote> thanks!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Dustin1280 08/08/17 5:01:46 PM #103:	Did TC finally run away? Well that is probably best for him, we wouldn't want him to get hurt trying to understand certain concepts. Stay safe TC, maybe wear a helmet? --- Smash DS Code: 4554-0120-5368 SB4 Name: Roz RIP: Orlando of the Axe Karma: 1642 --he delivered! <cite>Dustin1280 posted [p:884418145] in See, THIS ... [t:75650455]...</cite> <quote>Did TC finally run away? Well that is probably best for him, we wouldn't want him to get hurt trying to understand certain concepts. Stay safe TC, maybe wear a helmet?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3

Current Events > See, THIS is how a celebrity cameo in Game of Thrones should be handled SPOILERS (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > See, THIS is how a celebrity cameo in Game of Thrones should be handled SPOILERS