Current Events > UK dad kills son after son finds photos of him eating poo

(+) Yeah! (+)

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/4106244/dad-killed-son-found-photos-eating-poo-womens-clothes-nappy/

A DAD has been accused of murdering his son after the teen allegedly found “compromising” snaps showing him wearing nappies and eating poo.

Dylan Redwine, 13, mysteriously vanished in November 2012 during a visit to see his father in Colorado, USA.

The boy’s remains were discovered scattered in the mountains of South-western Colorado seven months later.

Mark Redwine was arrested last week in Bellingham, Washington, in connection with the death.

And Dylan’s brother Cory has now come forward to say he and his sibling saw lewd photos of their dad carrying out a series of bizarre acts before his death, ABC7 reports.

The brothers had been planning to confront their father over what they had seen, according to the site.

Cory is quoted as saying: “I have seen the photos. It shows him wearing women’s clothes and makeup and a diaper and then eating his faeces from the diaper.

“It was disgusting. We couldn’t believe it.”

The boys’ mother Elaine Hall said on a podcast in 2015 that she believed her son might have said something to her ex which sent him into a rage.

She said: “He may have said something that just didn’t set well with Mark and Mark reacted in a very violent way…obviously. Dylan is no longer here.”

The parents had gone through a contentious divorce and custody battle before their son’s death, which Mark Redwine has always denied any involvement in.

Dylan Redwine, 13, mysteriously vanished in 2012 while visiting his dad

The couple hurled accusations at each other during appearances on the Dr Phil TV show in 2013 as the case drew national attention.

After his disappearance, some of Dylan’s remains were found around 10 miles from his father’s home in Vallecito in 2013.

The boy’s skull was found by hikers in 2015, and forensic experts said it showed injuries consistent with blunt force trauma in two places, the indictment said.

The boy had reluctantly travelled to be with his father for a court-ordered visit the previous Thanksgiving.

Surveillance video from the airport where Dylan’s flight arrived shows little or no interaction between the boy and his father, according to the indictment.

Several witnesses said Dylan did not want to visit his father after the two argued and fought during his previous visit.

Volunteers search the woods for Dylan before his bones were found

Text messages showed that Dylan had asked to stay with a friend on the night of his arrival, but Mark Redwine denied the request, the indictment said.

The next morning the boy’s friend sent a text to Dylan asking “where are you” and got no response.

---

Relevant to last night's Rick and Morty cause of the poop eating

This entire story, on all parts, is fucked up
---

The kid was legally required to spend time with his would-be murderer.
---

Diaper fetishes and eating urine/feces fetishes are old hat.

It's not surprising that the two cross-over.

It's sad that the father was so embarrased that he was willing to kill to hide himself.

Probably was religious
---

Well now literally the whole world knows what the dad was doing.
---

This is fake news right? RIGHT???
---

What made you say he was from the UK?
---

if you're going to be doing sick shit like that, don't have photographic evidence. i'm not really into anything weird, but if i was i'd make sure no one ever found out about it.
---

UnfairRepresent posted...

It's sad that the father was so embarrased that he was willing to kill to hide himself.

Nah, what's sad is dad will probably get 10-15 years in jail instead of the death penalty.
---

Fossil posted...

UnfairRepresent posted...

It's sad that the father was so embarrased that he was willing to kill to hide himself.

Nah, what's sad is dad will probably get 10-15 years in jail instead of the death penalty.

Killing is wrong so let's kill people.

Stellar logic.

I'd rather use knowledge and logic to stop killings from occuring rather than spend money and effort to kill more people.
---

ssj3vegeta posted...

This is fake news right? RIGHT???

Clearly you never saw 2 girls and cup.
---

UnfairRepresent posted...

I'd rather use knowledge and logic to stop killings from occuring rather than spend money and effort to kill more people.

Ah right, let him do his time, give him some BS therapy that won't do anything for him and let him out (assuming he doesn't die of old age). Society would love to have him back again.
---

Fossil posted...

UnfairRepresent posted...

I'd rather use knowledge and logic to stop killings from occuring rather than spend money and effort to kill more people.

Ah right, let him do his time, give him some BS therapy that won't do anything for him and let him out (assuming he doesn't die of old age). Society would love to have him back again.

Sometimes the thing you love or thing you just like or even the thing you dislike the least, is still not a good option.

It's the difference between justice and vengeance. "This will make me feel satisfied" doesn't mean "This is a good course action" as the thief who has no money but sees delicious food on the shelves of Wal-Mart will learn.

You'll understand that when you're older I think.

Killing people might make you happy and you might love it even while you claim killing is wrong without noticing the hypocrisy. But it is a net-negative for society and a waste of money that just leads to more suffering and poor logic, holding us back.

Try to think of a collective of people and all their futures, not the emotions of one person in the present for a fleeting moment and you'll see my point.
---

UnfairRepresent posted...

Fossil posted...

UnfairRepresent posted...

It's sad that the father was so embarrased that he was willing to kill to hide himself.

Nah, what's sad is dad will probably get 10-15 years in jail instead of the death penalty.

Killing is wrong so let's kill people.

Stellar logic.

I'd rather use knowledge and logic to stop killings from occuring rather than spend money and effort to kill more people.

People are going to kill until we're extinct. There's no therapy that's going to cure this pathetic man. He deserves to take his last breath in prison.

I mean this as a way of saying life in prison, but I wouldn't complain about a death penalty sentence for this man. The way his wife spoke implied he has moments where he flies off the handle. As if the photos weren't enough to tell.
---

Sounds more like a Florida story
---

KStateKing17 posted...

People are going to kill until we're extinct.

Then how come crime rates, murder and death fluctuate depending on society, law and attitude?

Hell literally arguing for the death penalty by going "We can never change if we kill" is self-defeating as you must realize if you changed your mind then you just then have already hindered killing.

Sure it's unlikely that society will ever reach a stage where everyone is as smart as me and no one hurts or kills each other. However it is likely that if we built towards a society of reason and logic, not emotion and religion that there would be considerably less killing and harm.

And the proof for that is the last 40,000 years of human history. The very fact that on the whole recorded violence is at an all time historic low in most first world locations in all of recorded history speaks to that.

There's no therapy that's going to cure this pathetic man.

Says man who has never met or spoken to him.

But more importantly, think beyond this one man. Think of the future. This guy was so embarrased about his perversion that he killed his own family to hide it from the light.

Instead of looking to the future and going "People need to be less embarrased about uncontrollable fetishes!" you go "We need to kill people!"

And guess which of those two paths there down the line lead societies towards more harm and violence?

IF this guy reacted with cute embarrasment then the murder would have never occured. Yet you want to promote society that pushes more people to be more likely to respond the way he did... It's absurd.

He deserves to take his last breath in prison.

Possibly.

I don't think that should be up to some guy on the internet who has never met the man and is utterly unfamilar with the case rather than profressionals and a court of law.

But that breath should come from a life sentence, not an execution.
---

UK dad?
---

Animals of the same species kill each other everyday and humans are no different. Whether it's because of their toxic environment, greed, jealousy, etc. People have found some reason to kill another person, and this has been since the beginning of our existence. You can be the most educated man with the highest iq, but we are creatures whose actions can be driven by emotion. There were red flags before the murder with the son not feeling comfortable with being present with his father, and the ex giving that statement implying that his temper is not new to her.

The most effective way that would have prevented this was keeping his children away due to those signs. Now I'm not a doctor, but I'd like to know what type of therapy you suggest that doesn't require doping him up that would have fixed this man since you're sure it would have prevented this. Also I'm very curious on how you would prevent someone from snapping over finding a cheating spouse, or someone killing over jewelry and money.
---

KStateKing17 posted...

Animals of the same species kill each other everyday and humans are no different. Whether it's because of their toxic environment, greed, jealousy, etc. People have found some reason to kill another person, and this has been since the beginning of our existence.

Then how come the level of killing is not consistent?

How come societies with laws and resource management that thrive on logic have very little killing?

It's literally impossible to argue that whatever actions we take will have no effect on the level of killing.

And doubly hilariously hypocritical and impossible to make that argument WHILE ALSO arguing that we need to kill people. And thus increase the level of killing you claim is unchangable.

If we accept that we can make actions that decrease the level of violence and harm then it is not unreasonable to argue that it is potentially possible to remove them entirely, even if unlikely.

KStateKing17 posted...

The most effective way that would have prevented this was keeping his children away due to those signs. Now I'm not a doctor, but I'd like to know what type of therapy you suggest that doesn't require doping him up that would have fixed this man

No idea, don't know him, don't know the case.

since you're sure it would have prevented this. Also I'm very curious on how you would prevent someone from snapping over finding a cheating spouse, or someone killing over jewelry and money.

Simple start is scrapping the death penalty and challenging people like you who support it to question yourself.

When you stop thinking that violence and killing are solutions to problems that's the first step towards not thinking that violence and killing are solutions to problems.

That should be pretty obvious when you think about it.

In the past humans killed each other frequently, for tribal, religious and emotional reasons. AS soceity advanced this quelled over time. People used to beat their children to make them obedient. This failed and just made the children grow up prone to more violence or crude behavior.

"I broke a window or stole, if X found out they would beat me. So instead of telling the truth or not stealing/breaking. I will do it and then then lie. Or I will get someone smaller to do it and then beat them."

Etc

We understand that now. Yet you refuse to consider that as a society teaching everyone that killing is an acceptable solution might shift people down the path to thinking that violene and killing are acceptable.

Second to that in this specific case. Think about the circumstances. This guy is so fucked up about who he is and his perversions that he literally killed his family because he was so embarrased about people finding out.

Don't you think that's absurd?

Don't you think as a society we should barely care about what people's fetishes are beyond a mere quick chuckle?

But no, instead of your reaction going "that's a silly fetish what a strange man." your response is "We have to kill him."

In the big picture, guess what the level of emotion leads to for society?

We're talking about hundreds of millions of people affected on a mental scale in minature hard to measure capacities every day. I'm interested in the best solutions for them as a collective.

You are interested in what satisfies you in the present to punish the "bad man"

Guess which worldview garners better results?

Just think about it. Always always question what you think and why you think it.

Odds are in life you will be wrong 4 times in a row before you are right about something.
---

Dey eat da poo poo
---

Ain't that shit huh
---

UnfairRepresent posted...

Sometimes the thing you love or thing you just like or even the thing you dislike the least, is still not a good option.

This has nothing to do with ridding the problem.

UnfairRepresent posted...

Killing people might make you happy and you might love it even while you claim killing is wrong without noticing the hypocrisy. But it is a net-negative for society and a waste of money that just leads to more suffering and poor logic, holding us back.

Try to think of a collective of people and all their futures, not the emotions of one person in the present for a fleeting moment and you'll see my point.

The net-negative for society is keeping the waste of oxygen that is this "father" alive to waste taxpayers money, time and resources for him to sit in a cell likely the rest of his life.

Please quit pandering to this false sense of emotional attachment I have towards how I feel regarding murderers. I'm a realist. The reality is he lost his rights the second he killed his son. Why should he be allowed to continue existing? What purpose will it serve other than to burden society? You want to fix the problem? Get rid of it. That should be the point of the death penalty. To rid the problem. Also, nobody besides the family suffers from this man continuing to live his life, whether its in a cell or not.

UnfairRepresent posted...

You'll understand that when you're older I think.

You're just embarressing yourself with this condescending statement.

I appreciate the approach you're taking and in most other cases (aka not murder) I likely wouldn't have an issue with allowing a person to seek proper help, treatment, therapy, etc for the issues they are suffering from (we all know wearing diapers and eating shit isn't normal as an adult). But a guy with a mental illness that decided to act violently towards his own flesh and blood because he was "embarressed" by what he learned? Absolutely not.

The article says everything I need to know about the murderer to come to the conclusion he no longer deserves his life.
---

@UnfairRepresent I believe you're assuming I was in favor of him being killed which I explained in my earlier post. If the court decided that he needs to be put there, then I wouldn't complain since they believe him to be that dangerous, which I doubt will happen with this case. However, with his temper, his fetish (he ate poop for goodness sake), and the fact that he made his own family so uncomfortable that they didn't want to be around him, those are signs that he had major issues that were not reported or taken care of. My opinion is that he should not be released from prison due to this, which is what my comment on taking his last breath meant.

People even in the more developed societies commit sexual crimes, murder, theft, and still het into physical altercations for whatever reason. Even if it's not as much as say Mexico, or south Africa. Even if a guy doesn't have to, there can be a situation where he feels that he needs to be macho or confront someone he has issues with because emotions can overpower sense. That has been true since our existence.
---

This has nothing to do with ridding the problem.

The problem has occured. The kid is dead, he was murdered years ago.

The task now is prevent future problems.

The net-negative for society is keeping the waste of oxygen that is this "father" alive to waste taxpayers money, time and resources for him to sit in a cell likely the rest of his life.

Execution would be more expensive.

AS would the tax-payer cost in law enforcement, repairs and more that is spent on a society that promotes violence and killing leading to more violence and killing.

If you want to support the death penalty, "I'm interested in saving costs and resources." is the last argument you want since it flies in the face of the death penalty.

Please quit pandering to this false sense of emotional attachment I have towards how I feel regarding murderers. I'm a realist. The reality is he lost his rights the second he killed his son.

How convenient for you that rights vanish the moment you want something to satisify you.

And how you don't consider that maybe as a society promoting to hundreds of millions of people that rights cease to exist if you want to something that satisfies you, might end up being a bad idea.

Why should he be allowed to continue existing? What purpose will it serve other than to burden society?

Well according to all of recorded human history (With one exception) it would result in less crime, less spending, smarter resoure management and a generally better, more intelligent, less violent and harmful population.

Which are all neat things. in book.

Although putting all the benefit aside, I'd say the question is backwards. "Why should you exist!?" seems bizarre to me. A better question should be "Why shouldn't people exist?"

And this is all still side-stepping the original point you have evaded clumsily of the hypocrisy of "We must kill because killing is evil."
.

You want to fix the problem? Get rid of it.

Exactly. But the problem has occured already. IT's happened. So to fix the problem we prevent the next one.

This is what you are not keen to do.

That should be the point of the death penalty. To rid the problem. .

Killing this guy won't bring the guy he killed back to life. This isn't Babylon 5. You can't be rid of the problem, the kid is dead.

This is what you don't understand because you're not thinking of past and future, you're thinking of yourself and present.

Fossil posted...in most other cases (aka not murder) I likely wouldn't have an issue with allowing a person to seek proper help, treatment, therapy, etc for the issues they are suffering from (we all know wearing diapers and eating shit isn't normal as an adult). But a guy with a mental illness that decided to act violently towards his own flesh and blood because he was "embarressed" by what he learned?

What happens to him now has no influence on the murder that happened in the past. What you don't understand is how society treats people like him affects the future.

You want the path that leads to more suffering and waste because it satifies you in the present.

That is a bad thing.

The article says everything I need to know about the murderer to come to the conclusion he no longer deserves

Great so you read a few words of text and decide it's okay to kill a guy and want society to do so?

No way anyone could ever manipulate that mindset. Not one bit.

And then you get angry at me for thinking you will change your thinking when you experience more of the world.
---

KStateKing17 posted...

People even in the more developed societies commit sexual crimes, murder, theft, and still het into physical altercations for whatever reason. Even if it's not as much as say Mexico, or south Africa. Even if a guy doesn't have to, there can be a situation where he feels that he needs to be macho or confront someone he has issues with because emotions can overpower sense. That has been true since our existence.

But you just said it yourself. It isn't consistent.

"Even if it's not as much" says it all. It can and has been lowered.

I want to lower it further. All of recorded human history points to this and points to how to vaguely achieve it.

We now know how to curbe violence and crime in society. The only thing stopping us is that we choose not to do it. Ignorance is no longer the excuse it was 12,000 years ago.

I reject your notion that we need to kill people because it is impossible curb violence. I don't think that's a logical stance or statement and I think your own arguments demonstrate that.
---

Once again, I am not promoting the idea that this particular man should be killed. In extreme cases like Adolf Hitler or Jeff Dahmer just for some different examples, there would have been nothing to help these men. They were/are so far gone that therapy is not going to help them. They would have no place in society. In these places where the crimes are very high, you have issues with drugs, money, poor education systems, and lack of support for the people that play a huge part in the crimes. Then you just have cases where the people legit have psychological issues that get them in horrible situations like this.

Some people just want to cause harm. There are people like that in the world. They can come from the nastiest ghetto, or the richest neighborhood in the country. If they have a mind to harm someone, they'll do it. They don't need motivation, or media to promote it to them.

The man in this case most likely had anger issues, had some other personal issues mentally, and on top of that had been divorced and embarrassed over some photos. Other people go through some of those and still don't go and kill their own children. Why you would continue to argue about this when his actions led to taking another life is confusing to me. I don't prefer him to be killed, but he has proven to be a man who is a danger to others.
---

Godnorgosh posted...

What a shitty father.

this killed me
---

UnfairRepresent posted...

The task now is prevent future problems.

You're not going to prevent anything keeping a murderer like this guy around. Unless you plan to donate his brain to science. That would be a "logical" start.

UnfairRepresent posted...

Execution would be more expensive.

AS would the tax-payer cost in law enforcement, repairs and more that is spent on a society that promotes violence and killing leading to more violence and killing.

If you want to support the death penalty, "I'm interested in saving costs and resources." is the last argument you want since it flies in the face of the death penalty.

Per the current system, which is a political mess and a complete joke. You want "stellar logic?" Feel free to explain how executing someone on the spot after a guilty trial should cost more than letting them rot in a jail cell. (rhetorical)

I still stand by the fact the world is better off without people like him.

UnfairRepresent posted...

How convenient for you that rights vanish the moment you want something to satisify you.

And how you don't consider that maybe as a society promoting to hundreds of millions of people that rights cease to exist if you want to something that satisfies you, might end up being a bad idea.

You're joking, right? As if rotting in a cell for commiting murder isn't already "promoting" rights cease to exist. Death penalty already exists. It's probably been a "bad idea" for what, hundreds of years now? Yeah, I'm pretty sure there is nothing to "satisfy" here.

UnfairRepresent posted...

Exactly. But the problem has occured already. IT's happened. So to fix the problem we prevent the next one.

This is what you are not keen to do.

Wrong. You can't fix flawed human nature. The problem doubly exists because that murderer is still alive. Who's to say he doesn't get out of jail in 20 years and kill someone else? Preventing the next one obviously failed under that easily preventable future scenario. (good luck preventing something like this too when the signs are hard to detect without invasion of privacy)

UnfairRepresent posted...

Killing this guy won't bring the guy he killed back to life. This isn't Babylon 5. You can't be rid of the problem, the kid is dead.

It's not about bringing the kid back. It's about ridding the world of a killer. I'm making my point perfectly clear and you're pulling these unknown variables out of thin air to counter a point I never made.

UnfairRepresent posted...

What you don't understand is how society treats people like him affects the future.

No, what you fail to understand is how society treats him is how he takes advantage of his next victim. We've seen it time and time again in the past. Plenty of killers let out only to kill again. Is this true for all of them? Of course not, but it's a risk that shouldn't be allowed in the case of this man.

UnfairRepresent posted...

You want the path that leads to more suffering and waste because it satifies you in the present.

That is a bad thing.

Nah, I want the path that rids the world of one less evil. As long as he is alive, he's a threat. This is undeniable.
---

UnfairRepresent posted...

Great so you read a few words of text and decide it's okay to kill a guy and want society to do so?

No way anyone could ever manipulate that mindset. Not one bit.

And then you get angry at me for thinking you will change your thinking when you experience more of the world.

So debating you makes me "angry" now? Lol wut? Is that all you have to retort with is I'm letting emotions get in the way and getting angry? You really have no argument outside of claims of more suffering and this mindset being "bad for society" when these outcomes have already existed for thousands of years prior to my existence. Please put a little more thought into your next post.
---

This is worse than India
---

Fucking ABDL deviants.
---

He should be put in a cushy prison in Norway and rehabilitated. No more than 10 years and when he gets out, he should be treated nicely and given a job and an income. Set the man up for a nice future.
---

Behaviorism posted...

This entire story, on all parts, is fucked up

---

I simply astonished.
---

_Goggalor_ posted...

He should be put in a cushy prison in Norway and rehabilitated. No more than 10 years and when he gets out, he should be treated nicely and given a job and an income. Set the man up for a nice future.

A sewage drain is probably a cushy prison for him hohoho
---

Godnorgosh posted...

What a shitty father.

underrated
---

Holy shit!!
---

I think with the right attitude and a little bit of hard work, we can stop all murders. All other crimes will soon follow, and we'll live in a crime-less utopia.
---

UnfairRepresent posted...

Diaper fetishes and eating urine/feces fetishes are old hat.

It's not surprising that the two cross-over.

It's sad that the father was so embarrased that he was willing to kill to hide himself.

Probably was religious

This
---

WaterLink posted...

Dey eat da poo poo

shit, this brought up bad memories
---

I've lost all affection to anything people in the world do at this point I'm not even surprised anymore.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=chp8repIk1g
---

Could you imagine if he took these pictures on an old roll camera?
Could you imagine being the poor Walmart employee that had to develop pictures of a man eating his own shit out of a diaper?
---

Blusalina posted...

I've lost all affection to anything people in the world do at this point I'm not even surprised anymore.

Why would you have affection to people who eat poo lol
---

UnfairRepresent posted...

Diaper fetishes and eating urine/feces fetishes are old hat.

I don't understand the meaning of this sentence. It makes sense except why is a random word like hat at the end?
---

ImTheMacheteGuy posted...

UnfairRepresent posted...

Diaper fetishes and eating urine/feces fetishes are old hat.

I don't understand the meaning of this sentence. It makes sense except why is a random word like hat at the end?

It's an idiom. Means out of date, boring, predictable, etc.
---

tainted_emerald posted...

ImTheMacheteGuy posted...

UnfairRepresent posted...

Diaper fetishes and eating urine/feces fetishes are old hat.

I don't understand the meaning of this sentence. It makes sense except why is a random word like hat at the end?

It's an idiom. Means out of date, boring, predictable, etc.

lame. I hope it describes itself soon
---

ImTheMacheteGuy posted...

tainted_emerald posted...

ImTheMacheteGuy posted...

UnfairRepresent posted...

Diaper fetishes and eating urine/feces fetishes are old hat.

I don't understand the meaning of this sentence. It makes sense except why is a random word like hat at the end?

It's an idiom. Means out of date, boring, predictable, etc.

lame. I hope it describes itself soon

XD
---