Current Events > How are people not bothered with Disney remaking their childhood with garbage?

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2
Pics_nao_plz 07/24/17 9:50:09 AM #51:	They already did that when they announced Toy Story 4 --- Lol <cite>Pics_nao_plz posted [p:883497580] in How are pe... [t:75593530]...</cite> <quote>They already did that when they announced Toy Story 4</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
GameofWheels 07/24/17 9:58:06 AM #52:	I just don't like them because there's no point to them but to make money off of dumbasses. The new Beauty and the Beast looks good but other than that should not have been made, especially with Emma Watson. Terrible singer compared to the original woman who voiced Belle. --- I'm Gameofwheels. Not Gameofchills. FC: 3196 5348 2859 PSN: Gameofwheels <cite>GameofWheels posted [p:883497881] in How are pe... [t:75593530]...</cite> <quote>I just don't like them because there's no point to them but to make money off of dumbasses. The new Beauty and the Beast looks good but other than that should not have been made, especially with Emma Watson. Terrible singer compared to the original woman who voiced Belle.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
bobbysjoby 07/24/17 10:05:02 AM #53:	The talking objects in the new beauty and the beast looked creepy af and had none of their charm from the original. The talking closet in particular looked like something out of a horror movie <cite>bobbysjoby posted [p:883498144] in How are pe... [t:75593530]...</cite> <quote>The talking objects in the new beauty and the beast looked creepy af and had none of their charm from the original. The talking closet in particular looked like something out of a horror movie</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
saspa 07/25/17 3:30:02 PM #54:	Christ I didn't even want to think about how the cgi would look for the objects, I was already upset at what they did with the Beast, when the original look was my childhood. I was the Beast. --- http://i.imgur.com/0UFI0T9.jpg <cite>saspa posted [p:883577727] in How are pe... [t:75593530]...</cite> <quote>Christ I didn't even want to think about how the cgi would look for the objects, I was already upset at what they did with the Beast, when the original look was my childhood. I was the Beast.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
joe40001 07/25/17 5:08:58 PM #55:	saspa posted... Christ I didn't even want to think about how the cgi would look for the objects, I was already upset at what they did with the Beast, when the original look was my childhood. I was the Beast. Yeah it was pretty bad. I guess I shouldn't have joined the "you are over-reacting" side too much, it's not that it's like good what they are doing it's just expected enough that many people are indifferent. --- "joe is attractive and quite the brilliant poster" - Seiichi Omori http://i.imgur.com/TheGsZ9.gif <cite>joe40001 posted [p:883583901] in How are pe... [t:75593530]...</cite> <quote><cite>saspa posted...</cite> <quote>Christ I didn't even want to think about how the cgi would look for the objects, I was already upset at what they did with the Beast, when the original look was my childhood. I was the Beast.</quote> Yeah it was pretty bad. I guess I shouldn't have joined the "you are over-reacting" side too much, it's not that it's like good what they are doing it's just expected enough that many people are indifferent.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
GameofWheels 07/25/17 9:10:43 PM #56:	saspa posted... Christ I didn't even want to think about how the cgi would look for the objects, I was already upset at what they did with the Beast, when the original look was my childhood. I was the Beast. The issue with the remakes is that they're taking something that was originally 2D and trying to convert it into 3D and it just does not work without looking creepy or dumb ass hell. Take Lion King for instance, how the hell are they going to do this without it looking incredibly fake and ugly? Try to imagine Timon and Pumba in CGI. --- I'm Gameofwheels. Not Gameofchills. FC: 3196 5348 2859 PSN: Gameofwheels <cite>GameofWheels posted [p:883597962] in How are pe... [t:75593530]...</cite> <quote><cite>saspa posted...</cite> <quote>Christ I didn't even want to think about how the cgi would look for the objects, I was already upset at what they did with the Beast, when the original look was my childhood. I was the Beast.</quote> The issue with the remakes is that they're taking something that was originally 2D and trying to convert it into 3D and it just does not work without looking creepy or dumb ass hell. Take Lion King for instance, how the hell are they going to do this without it looking incredibly fake and ugly? Try to imagine Timon and Pumba in CGI.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Skye Reynolds 07/25/17 9:18:03 PM #57:	I hope the live action Lion King gives Nala a father just so that we can do away with the whole "incest" thing. Yes, if they were real lions, they would be cousins and/or siblings. But then real lions don't have musical numbers or monarchical rule. <cite>Skye Reynolds posted [p:883598422] in How are pe... [t:75593530]...</cite> <quote>I hope the live action Lion King gives Nala a father just so that we can do away with the whole "incest" thing. Yes, if they were real lions, they would be cousins and/or siblings. But then real lions don't have musical numbers or monarchical rule.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
saspa 07/28/17 6:58:59 AM #58:	GameofWheels posted... saspa posted... Christ I didn't even want to think about how the cgi would look for the objects, I was already upset at what they did with the Beast, when the original look was my childhood. I was the Beast. The issue with the remakes is that they're taking something that was originally 2D and trying to convert it into 3D and it just does not work without looking creepy or dumb ass hell. Take Lion King for instance, how the hell are they going to do this without it looking incredibly fake and ugly? Try to imagine Timon and Pumba in CGI. Oh good god I definitely don't want to see that. Yet some people seem to be fine with grossly surreal looking cgi animals... --- http://i.imgur.com/0UFI0T9.jpg <cite>saspa posted [p:883746849] in How are pe... [t:75593530]...</cite> <quote><cite>GameofWheels posted...</cite> <quote><cite>saspa posted...</cite> <quote>Christ I didn't even want to think about how the cgi would look for the objects, I was already upset at what they did with the Beast, when the original look was my childhood. I was the Beast.</quote> The issue with the remakes is that they're taking something that was originally 2D and trying to convert it into 3D and it just does not work without looking creepy or dumb ass hell. Take Lion King for instance, how the hell are they going to do this without it looking incredibly fake and ugly? Try to imagine Timon and Pumba in CGI.</quote> Oh good god I definitely don't want to see that. Yet some people seem to be fine with grossly surreal looking cgi animals...</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Lonestar2000 07/28/17 6:59:43 AM #59:	Why would adults give a shit about children's movies? --- Rumble Roses. Someone enters the room. Them: O_O Me: What?! I always play games without my pants on!- Inmate 922335 #ImpeachTrump <cite>Lonestar2000 posted [p:883746864] in How are pe... [t:75593530]...</cite> <quote>Why would adults give a shit about children's movies?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Richbark1 07/28/17 7:08:10 AM #60:	Nazanir posted... Because, no matter how awful these remakes are, the originals are here to stay. --- Feel free add PSN ID barkrich on ps4 <cite>Richbark1 posted [p:883747026] in How are pe... [t:75593530]...</cite> <quote><cite>Nazanir posted...</cite> <quote>Because, no matter how awful these remakes are, the originals are here to stay.</quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
GameofWheels 07/28/17 11:55:18 PM #61:	saspa posted... GameofWheels posted... saspa posted... Christ I didn't even want to think about how the cgi would look for the objects, I was already upset at what they did with the Beast, when the original look was my childhood. I was the Beast. The issue with the remakes is that they're taking something that was originally 2D and trying to convert it into 3D and it just does not work without looking creepy or dumb ass hell. Take Lion King for instance, how the hell are they going to do this without it looking incredibly fake and ugly? Try to imagine Timon and Pumba in CGI. Oh good god I definitely don't want to see that. Yet some people seem to be fine with grossly surreal looking cgi animals... Those people are dumb. Besides everyone will know it's cgi and cgi ages faster than Sonic the hedgehog. --- I'm Gameofwheels. Not Gameofchills. FC: 3196 5348 2859 PSN: Gameofwheels <cite>GameofWheels posted [p:883795291] in How are pe... [t:75593530]...</cite> <quote><cite>saspa posted...</cite> <quote><cite>GameofWheels posted...</cite> <quote><cite>saspa posted...</cite> <quote>Christ I didn't even want to think about how the cgi would look for the objects, I was already upset at what they did with the Beast, when the original look was my childhood. I was the Beast.</quote> The issue with the remakes is that they're taking something that was originally 2D and trying to convert it into 3D and it just does not work without looking creepy or dumb ass hell. Take Lion King for instance, how the hell are they going to do this without it looking incredibly fake and ugly? Try to imagine Timon and Pumba in CGI.</quote> Oh good god I definitely don't want to see that. Yet some people seem to be fine with grossly surreal looking cgi animals...</quote> Those people are dumb. Besides everyone will know it's cgi and cgi ages faster than Sonic the hedgehog.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
saspa 07/30/17 3:51:55 PM #62:	Annihilated posted... The Jungle Book remake only worked because the original had no plot anyway. The rest are the most celebrated films of all time and doing a shot for shot remake of movies we've already seen is not only a waste of time and money, but an insult to the audience's intelligence. Yeah 2016's Jungle Book even had a good thematic element to it, which I found particularly inspired all things considered. It's interesting how fire and the jungle and man's influence on nature was portrayed in this movie, contrasting with how Rudyard Kipling portrayed those things over a century ago (back then, nature was something to be overcome by man, something that man wanted to best. But today nature is precious and precariously balanced, something fragile to be protected, as seen by the destruction of forests and habitat destruction and whatnot) --- http://i.imgur.com/0UFI0T9.jpg <cite>saspa posted [p:883881237] in How are pe... [t:75593530]...</cite> <quote><cite>Annihilated posted...</cite> <quote>The Jungle Book remake only worked because the original had no plot anyway. The rest are the most celebrated films of all time and doing a shot for shot remake of movies we've already seen is not only a waste of time and money, but an insult to the audience's intelligence.</quote> Yeah 2016's Jungle Book even had a good thematic element to it, which I found particularly inspired all things considered. It's interesting how fire and the jungle and man's influence on nature was portrayed in this movie, contrasting with how Rudyard Kipling portrayed those things over a century ago (back then, nature was something to be overcome by man, something that man wanted to best. But today nature is precious and precariously balanced, something fragile to be protected, as seen by the destruction of forests and habitat destruction and whatnot)</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
XT3M3 07/30/17 4:04:20 PM #63:	mehmeh1 posted... Holy_Cloud105 posted... How the fuck are they gonna do a live action Lion King? came to ask this .... --- Brooklyn MADE. Lets go NETS,ISLES,YANKS,GIANTS YT: Ownal0t. i can probably lock you up in a game of 1 on 1 ^_^ <cite>XT3M3 posted [p:883881906] in How are pe... [t:75593530]...</cite> <quote><cite>mehmeh1 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Holy_Cloud105 posted...</cite> <quote>How the fuck are they gonna do a live action Lion King?</quote></quote> came to ask this ....</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Xeno14 07/30/17 4:05:46 PM #64:	I didn't like disney as a kid --- http://i.imgur.com/brMr5Ig.jpg http://i.imgur.com/MoXxySu.gif https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CyGM7qMXgAAwhbT.jpg:large <cite>Xeno14 posted [p:883881985] in How are pe... [t:75593530]...</cite> <quote>I didn't like disney as a kid</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
saspa 07/31/17 4:03:00 PM #65:	XT3M3 posted... mehmeh1 posted... Holy_Cloud105 posted... How the fuck are they gonna do a live action Lion King? came to ask this .... I mean, that's what the topic is about... --- http://i.imgur.com/0UFI0T9.jpg <cite>saspa posted [p:883939454] in How are pe... [t:75593530]...</cite> <quote><cite>XT3M3 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>mehmeh1 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Holy_Cloud105 posted...</cite> <quote>How the fuck are they gonna do a live action Lion King?</quote></quote> came to ask this ....</quote> I mean, that's what the topic is about...</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
visiny 08/02/17 5:45:11 AM #66:	Xeno14 posted... I didn't like disney as a kid I liked Looney Tunes, they were the previous dreamworks of their time. <cite>visiny posted [p:884037134] in How are pe... [t:75593530]...</cite> <quote><cite>Xeno14 posted...</cite> <quote>I didn't like disney as a kid</quote> I liked Looney Tunes, they were the previous dreamworks of their time.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
1NfamousACE_2 08/02/17 6:09:00 AM #67:	saspa posted... XT3M3 posted... mehmeh1 posted... Holy_Cloud105 posted... How the fuck are they gonna do a live action Lion King? came to ask this .... I mean, that's what the topic is about... Same as the Jungle Book? --- #Free OJ Simpson <cite>1NfamousACE_2 posted [p:884037575] in How are pe... [t:75593530]...</cite> <quote><cite>saspa posted...</cite> <quote><cite>XT3M3 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>mehmeh1 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Holy_Cloud105 posted...</cite> <quote>How the fuck are they gonna do a live action Lion King?</quote></quote> came to ask this ....</quote> I mean, that's what the topic is about...</quote> Same as the Jungle Book?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
rexcrk 08/02/17 9:07:18 AM #68:	I've really come to despise the whole "ruined childhood" garbage mentality. Something new coming out doesn't make the original go away. It doesn't erase the memories of your childhood. If you're not interested in the new one, you literally don't have to watch it (unless someone is actually forcing you to for whatever reason). --- These pretzels are making me thirsty! <cite>rexcrk posted [p:884041863] in How are pe... [t:75593530]...</cite> <quote>I've really come to despise the whole "ruined childhood" garbage mentality. Something new coming out doesn't make the original go away. It doesn't erase the memories of your childhood. If you're not interested in the new one, you literally don't have to watch it (unless someone is actually forcing you to for whatever reason).</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#69	Post #69 was unavailable or deleted.
weapon_d00d816 08/02/17 9:17:08 AM #70:	Because they are adults now and shouldn't be bothered by the altering of their childhood. --- SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SlG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SlG <cite>weapon_d00d816 posted [p:884042228] in How are pe... [t:75593530]...</cite> <quote>Because they are adults now and shouldn't be bothered by the altering of their childhood.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
saspa 08/04/17 6:36:37 AM #71:	Phantom_Nook posted... sktgamer_13dude posted... Haven't most of their live-action adaptions been good though? only The Jungle Book was worth anything. Beauty and the Beast was okay, but nothing worthwhile is added or changed. it's almost the same movie. Worse than that, it's Same movie but with creepy cgi... I wasn't a fan of Cinderella's either. You can't have the whole "Disney princess with birds tweeting while dressing her in the morning" in live action instead of animated, it just looks unnatural and creepy. --- http://i.imgur.com/0UFI0T9.jpg <cite>saspa posted [p:884162638] in How are pe... [t:75593530]...</cite> <quote><cite>Phantom_Nook posted...</cite> <quote><cite>sktgamer_13dude posted...</cite> <quote>Haven't most of their live-action adaptions been good though?</quote> only The Jungle Book was worth anything. Beauty and the Beast was okay, but nothing worthwhile is added or changed. it's almost the same movie.</quote> Worse than that, it's Same movie but with creepy cgi... I wasn't a fan of Cinderella's either. You can't have the whole "Disney princess with birds tweeting while dressing her in the morning" in live action instead of animated, it just looks unnatural and creepy.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
HellsingOrg 08/04/17 6:52:23 AM #72:	Live Action do all these pls Disney Black Cauldron (violent and creepy probably PG-13) Treasure Planet Little Mermaid (yay) Atlantis Fox and the Hound (I wanna cry) Bambi (I wanna cry) Pinocchio ( I wanna get scared) Peter Pan Adventures A Goofy Movie Tarzan The Great Mouse Detective Robin Hood (Furry heaven) Mulan (waifu heaven) Brave Little Toaster The Rescuers (kidnap movie probably PG-13) --- *The bird of Hermes is my name eating my wings to make me tame.* <cite>HellsingOrg posted [p:884162913] in How are pe... [t:75593530]...</cite> <quote>Live Action do all these pls Disney Black Cauldron (violent and creepy probably PG-13) Treasure Planet Little Mermaid (yay) Atlantis Fox and the Hound (I wanna cry) Bambi (I wanna cry) Pinocchio ( I wanna get scared) Peter Pan Adventures A Goofy Movie Tarzan The Great Mouse Detective Robin Hood (Furry heaven) Mulan (waifu heaven) Brave Little Toaster The Rescuers (kidnap movie probably PG-13)</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
saspa 08/06/17 1:09:47 AM #73:	^ ^ Brave little toaster isn't disney, although you could be excused for that what with the people behind it going on to become pixar and creating a similar concept in toy story --- http://i.imgur.com/0UFI0T9.jpg <cite>saspa posted [p:884266374] in How are pe... [t:75593530]...</cite> <quote>^ ^ Brave little toaster isn't disney, although you could be excused for that what with the people behind it going on to become pixar and creating a similar concept in toy story</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Skye Reynolds 08/06/17 1:24:49 AM #74:	A live action / CGI Robin Hood where they're all still animals? Interesting idea. Not sure if I wanna see that one or not. <cite>Skye Reynolds posted [p:884267007] in How are pe... [t:75593530]...</cite> <quote>A live action / CGI Robin Hood where they're all still animals? Interesting idea. Not sure if I wanna see that one or not.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
iosifsvoboda 08/06/17 1:29:14 AM #75:	I'm also not a girl Disney shit is girl shit I watched dragon ball z not some princess shit --- ^_^ <cite>iosifsvoboda posted [p:884267176] in How are pe... [t:75593530]...</cite> <quote>I'm also not a girl Disney shit is girl shit I watched dragon ball z not some princess shit</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Skye Reynolds 08/06/17 2:00:32 AM #76:	iosifsvoboda posted... I'm also not a girl Disney shit is girl shit I watched dragon ball z not some princess shit thoughts on DB Evolution? <cite>Skye Reynolds posted [p:884268289] in How are pe... [t:75593530]...</cite> <quote><cite>iosifsvoboda posted...</cite> <quote>I'm also not a girl Disney shit is girl shit I watched dragon ball z not some princess shit</quote> thoughts on DB Evolution?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Sativa_Rerose 08/06/17 2:02:24 AM #77:	Am bothered by it, I deal with it by not watching the remakes. --- My main is currently warned for silly reasons. <cite>Sativa_Rerose posted [p:884268351] in How are pe... [t:75593530]...</cite> <quote>Am bothered by it, I deal with it by not watching the remakes.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Bad_Mojo 08/06/17 2:07:51 AM #78:	Disney used to just re-release their movies in theater, but they don't do that anymore --- https://i.redd.it/ystdmn9hffaz.gif https://i.imgtc.com/ZwLqTeJJAh.gif https://i.imgtc.com/twAnLue.gif <cite>Bad_Mojo posted [p:884268560] in How are pe... [t:75593530]...</cite> <quote>Disney used to just re-release their movies in theater, but they don't do that anymore</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
GameofWheels 08/07/17 1:47:11 AM #79:	saspa posted... ^ ^ Brave little toaster isn't disney, although you could be excused for that what with the people behind it going on to become pixar and creating a similar concept in toy story I honestly don't understand how most people get movies like that and Disney confused. Disney had a higher standard of animation and a different style than the other animated features of the era. --- I'm Gameofwheels. Not Gameofchills. FC: 3196 5348 2859 PSN: Gameofwheels <cite>GameofWheels posted [p:884321588] in How are pe... [t:75593530]...</cite> <quote><cite>saspa posted...</cite> <quote>^ ^ Brave little toaster isn't disney, although you could be excused for that what with the people behind it going on to become pixar and creating a similar concept in toy story</quote> I honestly don't understand how most people get movies like that and Disney confused. Disney had a higher standard of animation and a different style than the other animated features of the era.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Darmik 08/07/17 1:51:25 AM #80:	I wonder if people got butthurt over the 90's live action jungle book lol. Nobody ever talks about that anymore. I liked Hook when I was a kid tbh. I'd be a hypocrite if I demanded stuff I enjoyed as a child can't be used today because most things I liked as a child were adaptations. --- Kind Regards, Darmik <cite>Darmik posted [p:884321756] in How are pe... [t:75593530]...</cite> <quote>I wonder if people got butthurt over the 90's live action jungle book lol. Nobody ever talks about that anymore. I liked Hook when I was a kid tbh. I'd be a hypocrite if I demanded stuff I enjoyed as a child can't be used today because most things I liked as a child were adaptations.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Phantom_Nook 08/07/17 3:02:03 AM #81:	Darmik posted... I wonder if people got butthurt over the 90's live action jungle book lol. Nobody ever talks about that anymore. I liked Hook when I was a kid tbh. I'd be a hypocrite if I demanded stuff I enjoyed as a child can't be used today because most things I liked as a child were adaptations. Those aren't the same thing. Movies like Hook are different adaptions of old properties by different people. The movies being discussed in this topic are specifically remakes of the Disney adaptions of the old properties. --- Posted with GameRaven 3.2.1 <cite>Phantom_Nook posted [p:884323627] in How are pe... [t:75593530]...</cite> <quote><cite>Darmik posted...</cite> <quote>I wonder if people got butthurt over the 90's live action jungle book lol. Nobody ever talks about that anymore. I liked Hook when I was a kid tbh. I'd be a hypocrite if I demanded stuff I enjoyed as a child can't be used today because most things I liked as a child were adaptations.</quote> Those aren't the same thing. Movies like Hook are different adaptions of old properties by different people. The movies being discussed in this topic are specifically remakes of the Disney adaptions of the old properties.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Darmik 08/07/17 3:14:03 AM #82:	Phantom_Nook posted... Movies like Hook are different adaptions of old properties by different people. The movies being discussed in this topic are specifically remakes of the Disney adaptions of the old properties. They're still adaptations none the less. Disney was in a bit of a slump in the mid to late 90's. How many direct to video sequels did they do for their animated movies then? How many crappy sequels did they make for Air Bud? The 90's live action Jungle Book was from Disney too. If anything their stuff today is better. They still banked on the their old and popular stuff but it was solely aimed at kids who didn't know any better. Their animation studios are working on new stuff and they're overall good so it's not like that can really be complained about either. --- Kind Regards, Darmik <cite>Darmik posted [p:884323904] in How are pe... [t:75593530]...</cite> <quote><cite>Phantom_Nook posted...</cite> <quote>Movies like Hook are different adaptions of old properties by different people. The movies being discussed in this topic are specifically remakes of the Disney adaptions of the old properties.</quote> They're still adaptations none the less. Disney was in a bit of a slump in the mid to late 90's. How many direct to video sequels did they do for their animated movies then? How many crappy sequels did they make for Air Bud? The 90's live action Jungle Book was from Disney too. If anything their stuff today is better. They still banked on the their old and popular stuff but it was solely aimed at kids who didn't know any better. Their animation studios are working on new stuff and they're overall good so it's not like that can really be complained about either.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
saspa 08/09/17 12:43:02 AM #84:	^ ^ Yeah exactly, it's one thing to make something like 101 dalmations in live action, or any of their run-off-the-mill movies like aristocats. But not the renaissance movies man. Not the renaissance period movies. --- http://i.imgur.com/0UFI0T9.jpg <cite>saspa posted [p:884443212] in How are pe... [t:75593530]...</cite> <quote>^ ^ Yeah exactly, it's one thing to make something like 101 dalmations in live action, or any of their run-off-the-mill movies like aristocats. But not the renaissance movies man. Not the renaissance period movies.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
saspa 08/11/17 6:59:09 AM #85:	Darmik posted... I wonder if people got butthurt over the 90's live action jungle book lol. Nobody ever talks about that anymore. I liked Hook when I was a kid tbh. I'd be a hypocrite if I demanded stuff I enjoyed as a child can't be used today because most things I liked as a child were adaptations. Why would they? Jungle book is fair game. --- http://i.imgur.com/0UFI0T9.jpg <cite>saspa posted [p:884575847] in How are pe... [t:75593530]...</cite> <quote><cite>Darmik posted...</cite> <quote>I wonder if people got butthurt over the 90's live action jungle book lol. Nobody ever talks about that anymore. I liked Hook when I was a kid tbh. I'd be a hypocrite if I demanded stuff I enjoyed as a child can't be used today because most things I liked as a child were adaptations.</quote> Why would they? Jungle book is fair game.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
saspa 08/13/17 1:20:44 AM #86:	GameofWheels posted... saspa posted... ^ ^ Brave little toaster isn't disney, although you could be excused for that what with the people behind it going on to become pixar and creating a similar concept in toy story I honestly don't understand how most people get movies like that and Disney confused. Disney had a higher standard of animation and a different style than the other animated features of the era. Yeah I was trying to be nice, although to be fair the 70s and 80s weren't the best time for Disney and even their animation quality dipped. Black Cauldron was so so bad... --- http://i.imgur.com/0UFI0T9.jpg <cite>saspa posted [p:884682991] in How are pe... [t:75593530]...</cite> <quote><cite>GameofWheels posted...</cite> <quote><cite>saspa posted...</cite> <quote>^ ^ Brave little toaster isn't disney, although you could be excused for that what with the people behind it going on to become pixar and creating a similar concept in toy story</quote> I honestly don't understand how most people get movies like that and Disney confused. Disney had a higher standard of animation and a different style than the other animated features of the era.</quote> Yeah I was trying to be nice, although to be fair the 70s and 80s weren't the best time for Disney and even their animation quality dipped. Black Cauldron was so so bad...</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Back_Stabbath 08/13/17 1:41:05 AM #87:	saspa posted... Lightsasori posted... The live action for the Jungle Book was great, my only complaint is that they chose actors that couldn't sing to well you know... sing. Yeah 2016's Favreau's Jungle Book was really good, I enjoyed it a lot, really liked it. And not only because the original was rather mediocre for the most part, the movie was fun and beautiful and I thought the actors were fine... it wasn't a musical so the singing isn't really singing in that sense, just two pals goofing off. ehh, that doesn't really work for king louie though, it sounds like he was trying to imitate the classic song exactly, but it just sounds... strange... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ma-dJbxKcHE the ost version sounds much better though, both Walken so idk what they were going for https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DUzruyL5hB4 --- please help <cite>Back_Stabbath posted [p:884683781] in How are pe... [t:75593530]...</cite> <quote><cite>saspa posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Lightsasori posted...</cite> <quote>The live action for the Jungle Book was great, my only complaint is that they chose actors that couldn't sing to well you know... sing.</quote> Yeah 2016's Favreau's Jungle Book was really good, I enjoyed it a lot, really liked it. And not only because the original was rather mediocre for the most part, the movie was fun and beautiful and I thought the actors were fine... it wasn't a musical so the singing isn't really singing in that sense, just two pals goofing off.</quote> ehh, that doesn't really work for king louie though, it sounds like he was trying to imitate the classic song exactly, but it just sounds... strange... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ma-dJbxKcHE the ost version sounds much better though, both Walken so idk what they were going for https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DUzruyL5hB4</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DezCaughtIt 08/13/17 1:42:36 AM #88:	saspa posted... My rage knows no bounds Are you untethered? --- *The user formally known as freakofnature30* ROCK FLAAAAG AND EAAAAAAAAAGLLLLLLLE <cite>DezCaughtIt posted [p:884683833] in How are pe... [t:75593530]...</cite> <quote><cite>saspa posted...</cite> <quote>My rage knows no bounds</quote> Are you untethered?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Skye Reynolds 08/13/17 1:42:40 AM #89:	saspa posted... ^ ^ Yeah exactly, it's one thing to make something like 101 dalmations in live action, or any of their run-off-the-mill movies like aristocats. But not the renaissance movies man. Not the renaissance period movies. So, it's okay to remake the movies your parents might've watched as children so long as they don't remake the ones you watched as a child? <cite>Skye Reynolds posted [p:884683837] in How are pe... [t:75593530]...</cite> <quote><cite>saspa posted...</cite> <quote>^ ^ Yeah exactly, it's one thing to make something like 101 dalmations in live action, or any of their run-off-the-mill movies like aristocats. But not the renaissance movies man. Not the renaissance period movies.</quote> So, it's okay to remake the movies your parents might've watched as children so long as they don't remake the ones you watched as a child?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Skye Reynolds 08/13/17 1:47:14 AM #90:	Speaking of which, they are in the process of once again remaking 101 Dalmatians with Emma Stone as Cruella. Here's to hoping they don't try to "redeem" her like they did with Maleficent. And I would be pissed about that movie except that it came and went. Maleficent (the villain) still appears in a lot of merchandise whereas the good girl movie counterpart was just a cash grab that came and went. And getting back to The Jungle Book, I've heard that it was good. But I haven't heard anything about it since. The classics are still there and will still still be there. These are just passing films which will make Disney a bunch of money and then become a matter of trivia. The Disney Wiki page will note that 101 Dalmatians has two live action versions, a cartoon series, etc. And the Lion King page will read much the same way. <cite>Skye Reynolds posted [p:884683995] in How are pe... [t:75593530]...</cite> <quote>Speaking of which, they are in the process of once again remaking 101 Dalmatians with Emma Stone as Cruella. Here's to hoping they don't try to "redeem" her like they did with Maleficent. And I would be pissed about that movie except that it came and went. Maleficent (the villain) still appears in a lot of merchandise whereas the good girl movie counterpart was just a cash grab that came and went. And getting back to The Jungle Book, I've heard that it was good. But I haven't heard anything about it since. The classics are still there and will still still be there. These are just passing films which will make Disney a bunch of money and then become a matter of trivia. The Disney Wiki page will note that 101 Dalmatians has two live action versions, a cartoon series, etc. And the Lion King page will read much the same way.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Annihilated 08/13/17 8:24:03 PM #91:	Skye Reynolds posted... saspa posted... ^ ^ Yeah exactly, it's one thing to make something like 101 dalmations in live action, or any of their run-off-the-mill movies like aristocats. But not the renaissance movies man. Not the renaissance period movies. So, it's okay to remake the movies your parents might've watched as children so long as they don't remake the ones you watched as a child? Yes, because they weren't that good. That's what remakes are for, to remake films that can be improved. <cite>Annihilated posted [p:884723032] in How are pe... [t:75593530]...</cite> <quote><cite>Skye Reynolds posted...</cite> <quote><cite>saspa posted...</cite> <quote>^ ^ Yeah exactly, it's one thing to make something like 101 dalmations in live action, or any of their run-off-the-mill movies like aristocats. But not the renaissance movies man. Not the renaissance period movies.</quote> So, it's okay to remake the movies your parents might've watched as children so long as they don't remake the ones you watched as a child?</quote> Yes, because they weren't that good. That's what remakes are for, to remake films that can be improved.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Skye Reynolds 08/13/17 10:28:06 PM #92:	Annihilated posted... Yes, because they weren't that good. Yeah. That's what every young person thinks. It's okay to cover old music or remake old movies because they're not as entertaining. Leave my generation alone though. We perfected everything. <cite>Skye Reynolds posted [p:884729056] in How are pe... [t:75593530]...</cite> <quote><cite>Annihilated posted...</cite> <quote>Yes, because they weren't that good. </quote> Yeah. That's what every young person thinks. It's okay to cover old music or remake old movies because they're not as entertaining. Leave my generation alone though. We perfected everything.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Darmik 08/13/17 10:37:15 PM #93:	101 Dalmatians is great wtf? --- Kind Regards, Darmik <cite>Darmik posted [p:884729524] in How are pe... [t:75593530]...</cite> <quote>101 Dalmatians is great wtf?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Skye Reynolds 08/13/17 11:54:34 PM #94:	You'll get no argument from me. I briefly considered watching it tonight. <cite>Skye Reynolds posted [p:884733473] in How are pe... [t:75593530]...</cite> <quote>You'll get no argument from me. I briefly considered watching it tonight.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Nomadic View 08/13/17 11:56:12 PM #95:	If that's all it takes to "ruin your childhood" then you were way too pampered as a child. --- {}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{} {}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;> <cite>Nomadic View posted [p:884733537] in How are pe... [t:75593530]...</cite> <quote>If that's all it takes to "ruin your childhood" then you were way too pampered as a child.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ChromaticAngel 08/14/17 12:02:33 AM #96:	sktgamer_13dude posted... Haven't most of their live-action adaptions been good though? I heard Maleficent was meh John Carter was completely wasted potential. It wasn't even bad, they just clearly didn't believe in it and sent it out to die. Lone Ranger was also bad Pirates after the first one was bad Star Wars 7 is really bad Their older live action shit was really good, though. Hook, Who Framed Roger Rabbit?, original Tron, etc were all top tier movies, IMO. Used to be the live action was better than the cartoons. Then the Disney Revival happened and it's the reverse, their animated shit is way better than live action shit. (See, for example, Big Hero 6, aka the best Marvel Movie they made) --- https://puu.sh/tcLsT/24f4611235.png <cite>ChromaticAngel posted [p:884733851] in How are pe... [t:75593530]...</cite> <quote><cite>sktgamer_13dude posted...</cite> <quote>Haven't most of their live-action adaptions been good though?</quote> I heard Maleficent was meh John Carter was completely wasted potential. It wasn't even bad, they just clearly didn't believe in it and sent it out to die. Lone Ranger was also bad Pirates after the first one was bad Star Wars 7 is really bad Their older live action shit was really good, though. Hook, Who Framed Roger Rabbit?, original Tron, etc were all top tier movies, IMO. Used to be the live action was better than the cartoons. Then the Disney Revival happened and it's the reverse, their animated shit is way better than live action shit. (See, for example, Big Hero 6, aka the best Marvel Movie they made)</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Skye Reynolds 08/14/17 12:19:36 AM #97:	The Lone Ranger is one of those films where the only good thing about the movie is the villain. Michael Fichtner does a great job as Butch Cavendish. The rest of the film is agonizingly dull and goes out of its way to disrespect the Lone Ranger as a character. That one does get under my skin. <cite>Skye Reynolds posted [p:884734574] in How are pe... [t:75593530]...</cite> <quote>The Lone Ranger is one of those films where the only good thing about the movie is the villain. Michael Fichtner does a great job as Butch Cavendish. The rest of the film is agonizingly dull and goes out of its way to disrespect the Lone Ranger as a character. That one does get under my skin.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
saspa 08/16/17 1:00:06 AM #98:	^ ^ You realize the irony of your statement, yes? --- http://i.imgur.com/0UFI0T9.jpg <cite>saspa posted [p:884861943] in How are pe... [t:75593530]...</cite> <quote>^ ^ You realize the irony of your statement, yes?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Skye Reynolds 08/16/17 7:19:45 PM #99:	Yeah, but that movie literally dragged the Lone Ranger through shit. <cite>Skye Reynolds posted [p:884906709] in How are pe... [t:75593530]...</cite> <quote>Yeah, but that movie literally dragged the Lone Ranger through shit.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2

Current Events > How are people not bothered with Disney remaking their childhood with garbage? (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > How are people not bothered with Disney remaking their childhood with garbage?