Current Events > Women in Arkansas now need permission from men to have an abortion

Topic List	Page List: 1 ... 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
hockeybub89 07/22/17 8:19:03 PM #253:	I'm still not sure why we are talking about men paying child support in a topic over a law that would allow them to force a woman to not get an abortion. --- http://card.psnprofiles.com/1/NIR_Hockey.png http://www.last.fm/user/hockeybub89/ <cite>hockeybub89 posted [p:883413995] in Women in A... [t:75592972]...</cite> <quote>I'm still not sure why we are talking about men paying child support in a topic over a law that would allow them to force a woman to not get an abortion.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DarthAragorn 07/22/17 8:19:47 PM #254:	LinksLiege posted... dave_is_slick posted... I just can't get behind this part. Creating a baby is a two-way street, terminating a baby should be 75/25. The best compromise I've seen is the proposition that a man have the right to sign away their role as parent. Along with relieving them of their responsibilities, they also give away any rights regarding the kid. So if they decide a year from now that they do want to be a part of their child's life, the mother has the right to refuse them any contact whatsoever. That would be perfectly fair --- i7 7700k \| GTX 1080 \| 16GB DDR4 \| Asus Z270E \| Dell S2716DG http://steamcommunity.com/id/StoneWallace17 <cite>DarthAragorn posted [p:883414026] in Women in A... [t:75592972]...</cite> <quote><cite>LinksLiege posted...</cite> <quote><cite>dave_is_slick posted...</cite> <quote> I just can't get behind this part. Creating a baby is a two-way street, terminating a baby should be 75/25.</quote> The best compromise I've seen is the proposition that a man have the right to sign away their role as parent. Along with relieving them of their responsibilities, they also give away any rights regarding the kid. So if they decide a year from now that they do want to be a part of their child's life, the mother has the right to refuse them any contact whatsoever.</quote> That would be perfectly fair</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
super_clout 07/22/17 8:20:40 PM #255:	time to pass this law in all 50 --- FC 1891 1184 7059. IGN. Clout <cite>super_clout posted [p:883414061] in Women in A... [t:75592972]...</cite> <quote>time to pass this law in all 50</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
legendary_zell 07/22/17 9:57:30 PM #256:	Sage JJ posted... Ammonitida posted... Mark_DeRosa posted... It takes two people to have a baby, both should have a say and right to do what they choose LOL Men are not the ones who have to carry a baby to full term and risk their jobs, mental/physical health, etc. This is a disturbing law. proof of any woman risking her job for being pregnant in the US or stfu It's very common for people to have to quit their job after pregnancy, getting replaced while pregnant, being fired due to pregnancy....that's why laws had to be passed against it on the federal level and there are court cases over it daily...wtf is this? --- http://i.imgur.com/0Bi86cp.gif <cite>legendary_zell posted [p:883418835] in Women in A... [t:75592972]...</cite> <quote><cite>Sage JJ posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Ammonitida posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Mark_DeRosa posted...</cite> <quote>It takes two people to have a baby, both should have a say and right to do what they choose</quote> LOL Men are not the ones who have to carry a baby to full term and risk their jobs, mental/physical health, etc. This is a disturbing law.</quote> proof of any woman risking her job for being pregnant in the US or stfu</quote> It's very common for people to have to quit their job after pregnancy, getting replaced while pregnant, being fired due to pregnancy....that's why laws had to be passed against it on the federal level and there are court cases over it daily...wtf is this?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Rika_Furude 07/23/17 1:01:58 AM #257:	Cleo_II posted... No, because he is not carrying the baby he's still the father and if the mother murders his child without his consent it can carry emotional distress --- http://www.imgur.com/oQHLBrx.jpg http://www.imgur.com/ah5IE8D.jpg http://www.imgur.com/USV84z9.jpg http://www.imgur.com/PSjlohO.jpg <cite>Rika_Furude posted [p:883427601] in Women in A... [t:75592972]...</cite> <quote><cite>Cleo_II posted...</cite> <quote>No, because he is not carrying the baby </quote> he's still the father and if the mother murders his child without his consent it can carry emotional distress</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
hockeybub89 07/23/17 1:31:59 AM #258:	Rika_Furude posted... Cleo_II posted... No, because he is not carrying the baby he's still the father and if the mother murders his child without his consent it can carry emotional distress Too bad. Not his body. --- http://card.psnprofiles.com/1/NIR_Hockey.png http://www.last.fm/user/hockeybub89/ <cite>hockeybub89 posted [p:883428711] in Women in A... [t:75592972]...</cite> <quote><cite>Rika_Furude posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Cleo_II posted...</cite> <quote>No, because he is not carrying the baby </quote> he's still the father and if the mother murders his child without his consent it can carry emotional distress</quote> Too bad. Not his body.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Bio1590 07/23/17 1:43:17 AM #259:	hockeybub89 posted... Rika_Furude posted... Cleo_II posted... No, because he is not carrying the baby he's still the father and if the mother murders his child without his consent it can carry emotional distress Too bad. Not his body. Not even worth arguing with people who equate "aborting a fetus" to "murdering a child". --- http://i.imgur.com/bbRWLI8.gif https://i.imgur.com/A0BErSV.jpg <cite>Bio1590 posted [p:883429127] in Women in A... [t:75592972]...</cite> <quote><cite>hockeybub89 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Rika_Furude posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Cleo_II posted...</cite> <quote>No, because he is not carrying the baby </quote> he's still the father and if the mother murders his child without his consent it can carry emotional distress</quote> Too bad. Not his body.</quote> Not even worth arguing with people who equate "aborting a fetus" to "murdering a child".</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Lorenzo_2003 07/23/17 2:04:17 AM #260:	Bio1590 posted... hockeybub89 posted... Rika_Furude posted... Cleo_II posted... No, because he is not carrying the baby he's still the father and if the mother murders his child without his consent it can carry emotional distress Too bad. Not his body. Not even worth arguing with people who equate "aborting a fetus" to "murdering a child". Semantics muddies the waters sometimes. If you murder an expecting mother, you can pretty much expect to be facing criminal charges for both mother and her unborn. Fetus is also a word with context. An unborn baby at nine weeks is a fetus, but then so is an unborn baby that is nine months old and just seconds from exiting the womb. --- ... <cite>Lorenzo_2003 posted [p:883429819] in Women in A... [t:75592972]...</cite> <quote><cite>Bio1590 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>hockeybub89 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Rika_Furude posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Cleo_II posted...</cite> <quote>No, because he is not carrying the baby </quote> he's still the father and if the mother murders his child without his consent it can carry emotional distress</quote> Too bad. Not his body.</quote> Not even worth arguing with people who equate "aborting a fetus" to "murdering a child".</quote> Semantics muddies the waters sometimes. If you murder an expecting mother, you can pretty much expect to be facing criminal charges for both mother and her unborn. Fetus is also a word with context. An unborn baby at nine weeks is a fetus, but then so is an unborn baby that is nine months old and just seconds from exiting the womb.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ClockworkHare 07/23/17 2:23:57 AM #261:	ShadowRisae posted... What prevents somebody from taking a male friend along and claiming he's the father, knowing full well he isn't, just to get a male name to sign off? The state could demand a DNA test I guess but it makes me wonder how early DNA tests are even viable. Google claims they can be done as early as 8 weeks, but 1) they would have to do it and 2) what if the woman wants an abortion before 8 weeks? Unless they do those things, there's no actual enforcement and any claim they can make for this to try to seem legitimate is BS. Really no point in demanding a paternity test besides the mother keeping the kid and seeking child support. To which I would agree with the notion that paternity testing in the child's early development after birth should become a mandatory standard. It's just something that should have been put on the list decades ago... If the mother wants an abortion in the US, she's basically going to have that option available to her one way or another. In most states, she has that as a legal right. And it's not like women are unable to commute to another state that allows it. Some already travel to different countries to get it done (hello, Mexico). --- Bite me like one of your French rolls. http://www.imageupload.co.uk/images/2017/06/05/flcnpawn.png http://www.imageupload.co.uk/images/2017/06/05/84543589.gif <cite>ClockworkHare posted [p:883430504] in Women in A... [t:75592972]...</cite> <quote><cite>ShadowRisae posted...</cite> <quote>What prevents somebody from taking a male friend along and claiming he's the father, knowing full well he isn't, just to get a male name to sign off? The state could demand a DNA test I guess but it makes me wonder how early DNA tests are even viable. Google claims they can be done as early as 8 weeks, but 1) they would have to do it and 2) what if the woman wants an abortion before 8 weeks? Unless they do those things, there's no actual enforcement and any claim they can make for this to try to seem legitimate is BS.</quote> Really no point in demanding a paternity test besides the mother keeping the kid and seeking child support. To which I would agree with the notion that paternity testing in the child's early development after birth should become a mandatory standard. It's just something that should have been put on the list decades ago... If the mother wants an abortion in the US, she's basically going to have that option available to her one way or another. In most states, she has that as a legal right. And it's not like women are unable to commute to another state that allows it. Some already travel to different countries to get it done (hello, Mexico).</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
hockeybub89 07/23/17 2:29:54 AM #262:	Lorenzo_2003 posted... Bio1590 posted... hockeybub89 posted... Rika_Furude posted... Cleo_II posted... No, because he is not carrying the baby he's still the father and if the mother murders his child without his consent it can carry emotional distress Too bad. Not his body. Not even worth arguing with people who equate "aborting a fetus" to "murdering a child". Semantics muddies the waters sometimes. If you murder an expecting mother, you can pretty much expect to be facing criminal charges for both mother and her unborn. Fetus is also a word with context. An unborn baby at nine weeks is a fetus, but then so is an unborn baby that is nine months old and just seconds from exiting the womb. Killing a pregnant woman is not double murder everywhere and the assumption is the woman was planning on having the child. Also, no one is aborting a 9 month old fetus since you basically have to give birth to get rid of it and it can become a viable baby. --- http://card.psnprofiles.com/1/NIR_Hockey.png http://www.last.fm/user/hockeybub89/ <cite>hockeybub89 posted [p:883430704] in Women in A... [t:75592972]...</cite> <quote><cite>Lorenzo_2003 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Bio1590 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>hockeybub89 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Rika_Furude posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Cleo_II posted...</cite> <quote>No, because he is not carrying the baby </quote> he's still the father and if the mother murders his child without his consent it can carry emotional distress</quote> Too bad. Not his body.</quote> Not even worth arguing with people who equate "aborting a fetus" to "murdering a child".</quote> Semantics muddies the waters sometimes. If you murder an expecting mother, you can pretty much expect to be facing criminal charges for both mother and her unborn. Fetus is also a word with context. An unborn baby at nine weeks is a fetus, but then so is an unborn baby that is nine months old and just seconds from exiting the womb.</quote> Killing a pregnant woman is not double murder everywhere and the assumption is the woman was planning on having the child. Also, no one is aborting a 9 month old fetus since you basically have to give birth to get rid of it and it can become a viable baby.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#263	Post #263 was unavailable or deleted.
Rika_Furude 07/23/17 5:45:40 AM #264:	hockeybub89 posted... Rika_Furude posted... Cleo_II posted... No, because he is not carrying the baby he's still the father and if the mother murders his child without his consent it can carry emotional distress Too bad. Not his body. not her sperm --- http://www.imgur.com/oQHLBrx.jpg http://www.imgur.com/ah5IE8D.jpg http://www.imgur.com/USV84z9.jpg http://www.imgur.com/PSjlohO.jpg <cite>Rika_Furude posted [p:883434746] in Women in A... [t:75592972]...</cite> <quote><cite>hockeybub89 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Rika_Furude posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Cleo_II posted...</cite> <quote>No, because he is not carrying the baby </quote> he's still the father and if the mother murders his child without his consent it can carry emotional distress</quote> Too bad. Not his body.</quote> not her sperm</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Rika_Furude 07/23/17 5:46:16 AM #265:	hockeybub89 posted... Lorenzo_2003 posted... Bio1590 posted... hockeybub89 posted... Rika_Furude posted... Cleo_II posted... No, because he is not carrying the baby he's still the father and if the mother murders his child without his consent it can carry emotional distress Too bad. Not his body. Not even worth arguing with people who equate "aborting a fetus" to "murdering a child". Semantics muddies the waters sometimes. If you murder an expecting mother, you can pretty much expect to be facing criminal charges for both mother and her unborn. Fetus is also a word with context. An unborn baby at nine weeks is a fetus, but then so is an unborn baby that is nine months old and just seconds from exiting the womb. Killing a pregnant woman is not double murder everywhere and the assumption is the woman was planning on having the child. Also, no one is aborting a 9 month old fetus since you basically have to give birth to get rid of it and it can become a viable baby. a baby doesnt just become "not alive" just because a mother doesnt plan on having it --- http://www.imgur.com/oQHLBrx.jpg http://www.imgur.com/ah5IE8D.jpg http://www.imgur.com/USV84z9.jpg http://www.imgur.com/PSjlohO.jpg <cite>Rika_Furude posted [p:883434754] in Women in A... [t:75592972]...</cite> <quote><cite>hockeybub89 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Lorenzo_2003 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Bio1590 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>hockeybub89 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Rika_Furude posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Cleo_II posted...</cite> <quote>No, because he is not carrying the baby </quote> he's still the father and if the mother murders his child without his consent it can carry emotional distress</quote> Too bad. Not his body.</quote> Not even worth arguing with people who equate "aborting a fetus" to "murdering a child".</quote> Semantics muddies the waters sometimes. If you murder an expecting mother, you can pretty much expect to be facing criminal charges for both mother and her unborn. Fetus is also a word with context. An unborn baby at nine weeks is a fetus, but then so is an unborn baby that is nine months old and just seconds from exiting the womb.</quote> Killing a pregnant woman is not double murder everywhere and the assumption is the woman was planning on having the child. Also, no one is aborting a 9 month old fetus since you basically have to give birth to get rid of it and it can become a viable baby.</quote> a baby doesnt just become "not alive" just because a mother doesnt plan on having it</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
hockeybub89 07/23/17 6:04:49 AM #266:	Rika_Furude posted... hockeybub89 posted... Rika_Furude posted... Cleo_II posted... No, because he is not carrying the baby he's still the father and if the mother murders his child without his consent it can carry emotional distress Too bad. Not his body. not her sperm The sperm went into her body and fertilized an egg in her body, forming an embryo inside her body. Her body will develop a human being for 9 months. No one can tell her what goes on in her body besides her. Because it's her body. --- http://card.psnprofiles.com/1/NIR_Hockey.png http://www.last.fm/user/hockeybub89/ <cite>hockeybub89 posted [p:883435073] in Women in A... [t:75592972]...</cite> <quote><cite>Rika_Furude posted...</cite> <quote><cite>hockeybub89 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Rika_Furude posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Cleo_II posted...</cite> <quote>No, because he is not carrying the baby </quote> he's still the father and if the mother murders his child without his consent it can carry emotional distress</quote> Too bad. Not his body.</quote> not her sperm</quote> The sperm went into her body and fertilized an egg in her body, forming an embryo inside her body. Her body will develop a human being for 9 months. No one can tell her what goes on in her body besides her. Because it's her body.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
hockeybub89 07/23/17 6:06:32 AM #267:	Rika_Furude posted... hockeybub89 posted... Lorenzo_2003 posted... Bio1590 posted... hockeybub89 posted... Rika_Furude posted... Cleo_II posted... No, because he is not carrying the baby he's still the father and if the mother murders his child without his consent it can carry emotional distress Too bad. Not his body. Not even worth arguing with people who equate "aborting a fetus" to "murdering a child". Semantics muddies the waters sometimes. If you murder an expecting mother, you can pretty much expect to be facing criminal charges for both mother and her unborn. Fetus is also a word with context. An unborn baby at nine weeks is a fetus, but then so is an unborn baby that is nine months old and just seconds from exiting the womb. Killing a pregnant woman is not double murder everywhere and the assumption is the woman was planning on having the child. Also, no one is aborting a 9 month old fetus since you basically have to give birth to get rid of it and it can become a viable baby. a baby doesnt just become "not alive" just because a mother doesnt plan on having it It becomes not alive because she kills it. Also, it depends what you define as alive given the state most fetuses are in when they are terminated. side question: Do anti-choicers consider babies to be 9 months old when they are born? --- http://card.psnprofiles.com/1/NIR_Hockey.png http://www.last.fm/user/hockeybub89/ <cite>hockeybub89 posted [p:883435098] in Women in A... [t:75592972]...</cite> <quote><cite>Rika_Furude posted...</cite> <quote><cite>hockeybub89 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Lorenzo_2003 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Bio1590 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>hockeybub89 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Rika_Furude posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Cleo_II posted...</cite> <quote>No, because he is not carrying the baby </quote> he's still the father and if the mother murders his child without his consent it can carry emotional distress</quote> Too bad. Not his body.</quote> Not even worth arguing with people who equate "aborting a fetus" to "murdering a child".</quote> Semantics muddies the waters sometimes. If you murder an expecting mother, you can pretty much expect to be facing criminal charges for both mother and her unborn. Fetus is also a word with context. An unborn baby at nine weeks is a fetus, but then so is an unborn baby that is nine months old and just seconds from exiting the womb.</quote> Killing a pregnant woman is not double murder everywhere and the assumption is the woman was planning on having the child. Also, no one is aborting a 9 month old fetus since you basically have to give birth to get rid of it and it can become a viable baby.</quote> a baby doesnt just become "not alive" just because a mother doesnt plan on having it</quote> It becomes not alive because she kills it. Also, it depends what you define as alive given the state most fetuses are in when they are terminated. side question: Do anti-choicers consider babies to be 9 months old when they are born?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
UnfairRepresent 07/23/17 6:08:08 AM #268:	"Its an alive baby not a fetus.therefore it's up to the man to decide to kill it" Wut --- ^ Hey now that's completely unfair. https://imgtc.com/i/14JHfrt.jpg <cite>UnfairRepresent posted [p:883435121] in Women in A... [t:75592972]...</cite> <quote>"Its an alive baby not a fetus.therefore it's up to the man to decide to kill it" Wut</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Rika_Furude 07/23/17 6:58:58 AM #269:	hockeybub89 posted... No one can tell her what goes on in her body besides her and biology. It's still life inside her, which she is murdering. --- http://www.imgur.com/oQHLBrx.jpg http://www.imgur.com/ah5IE8D.jpg http://www.imgur.com/USV84z9.jpg http://www.imgur.com/PSjlohO.jpg <cite>Rika_Furude posted [p:883435993] in Women in A... [t:75592972]...</cite> <quote><cite>hockeybub89 posted...</cite> <quote>No one can tell her what goes on in her body besides her and biology.</quote> It's still life inside her, which she is murdering.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Rika_Furude 07/23/17 6:59:18 AM #270:	hockeybub89 posted... It becomes not alive because she kills it Making her a murderer. --- http://www.imgur.com/oQHLBrx.jpg http://www.imgur.com/ah5IE8D.jpg http://www.imgur.com/USV84z9.jpg http://www.imgur.com/PSjlohO.jpg <cite>Rika_Furude posted [p:883436002] in Women in A... [t:75592972]...</cite> <quote><cite>hockeybub89 posted...</cite> <quote>It becomes not alive because she kills it</quote> Making her a murderer.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
IfGodCouldDie 07/23/17 10:35:23 AM #271:	Rika_Furude posted... hockeybub89 posted... No one can tell her what goes on in her body besides her and biology. It's still life inside her, which she is murdering. hockeybub89 posted... Do anti-choicers consider babies to be 9 months old when they are born? --- Mind post. XBL:Cyanide Sucker PSN:Paters1 IGN:SuperPattyCakes <cite>IfGodCouldDie posted [p:883441398] in Women in A... [t:75592972]...</cite> <quote><cite>Rika_Furude posted...</cite> <quote><cite>hockeybub89 posted...</cite> <quote>No one can tell her what goes on in her body besides her and biology.</quote> It's still life inside her, which she is murdering.</quote> <cite>hockeybub89 posted...</cite> <quote>Do anti-choicers consider babies to be 9 months old when they are born?</quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Steve Nick 07/23/17 10:37:45 AM #272:	Ammonitida posted... Just because a man provided a tiny sperm cell after an orgasm, some think he should have the right to force a woman's body to go through nine months of gestating the baby despite the emotional and physical consequences that could result from a forced pregnancy. What about the man who has go through 18 years of labour to support a child? --- This is my signature. <cite>Steve Nick posted [p:883441466] in Women in A... [t:75592972]...</cite> <quote><cite>Ammonitida posted...</cite> <quote>Just because a man provided a tiny sperm cell after an orgasm, some think he should have the right to force a woman's body to go through nine months of gestating the baby despite the emotional and physical consequences that could result from a forced pregnancy.</quote> What about the man who has go through 18 years of labour to support a child?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#273	Post #273 was unavailable or deleted.
Turbam 07/23/17 10:43:13 AM #274:	I can kind of understand the thought process of "what I'd the man was excited to be a dad!?" But this is still dumb. I think that couples should definitely talk about it before making any decisions, but getting a permission slip for it is dumb as shit. --- ~snip (V)_(; ;)_(V) snip~ I'm just one man! Whoa! Well, I'm a one man band! http://i.imgur.com/p9Xvjvs.gif <cite>Turbam posted [p:883441675] in Women in A... [t:75592972]...</cite> <quote>I can kind of understand the thought process of "what I'd the man was excited to be a dad!?" But this is still dumb. I think that couples should definitely talk about it before making any decisions, but getting a permission slip for it is dumb as shit.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
booboy 07/23/17 11:13:12 AM #275:	I ran into the situation where my ex went on birth control, insisted on me finishing inside her over the next several months, and then deliberately went off birth control without telling me. I was only able to get her to confess when I noticed she didn't have her period. This was a professional, college educated woman that pulled that shit on me. It's more likely to happen among the less educated and more impoverished than that. All it taught me was that I would never buy the line again that she (my future hypothetical girlfriend) is on birth control and didn't want kids. --- There is no problem that can't be solved by applying more yuri to it. In Torque We Trust <cite>booboy posted [p:883442728] in Women in A... [t:75592972]...</cite> <quote>I ran into the situation where my ex went on birth control, insisted on me finishing inside her over the next several months, and then deliberately went off birth control without telling me. I was only able to get her to confess when I noticed she didn't have her period. This was a professional, college educated woman that pulled that shit on me. It's more likely to happen among the less educated and more impoverished than that. All it taught me was that I would never buy the line again that she (my future hypothetical girlfriend) is on birth control and didn't want kids.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
IfGodCouldDie 07/23/17 11:29:50 AM #276:	Steve Nick posted... Ammonitida posted... Just because a man provided a tiny sperm cell after an orgasm, some think he should have the right to force a woman's body to go through nine months of gestating the baby despite the emotional and physical consequences that could result from a forced pregnancy. What about the man who has go through 18 years of labour to support a child? So you think 18 years of child support is equal to or greater than 9 months of pregnancy, 18 years of financial support, AND 18 years of time investment? --- I suffer from a very sexy learning disability. PSN-Paters1 XBL-Cyanide Sucker LoL-SuperPattyCakes <cite>IfGodCouldDie posted [p:883443347] in Women in A... [t:75592972]...</cite> <quote><cite>Steve Nick posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Ammonitida posted...</cite> <quote>Just because a man provided a tiny sperm cell after an orgasm, some think he should have the right to force a woman's body to go through nine months of gestating the baby despite the emotional and physical consequences that could result from a forced pregnancy.</quote> What about the man who has go through 18 years of labour to support a child?</quote> So you think 18 years of child support is equal to or greater than 9 months of pregnancy, 18 years of financial support, AND 18 years of time investment?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Rika_Furude 07/24/17 7:17:11 AM #277:	IfGodCouldDie posted... Steve Nick posted... Ammonitida posted... Just because a man provided a tiny sperm cell after an orgasm, some think he should have the right to force a woman's body to go through nine months of gestating the baby despite the emotional and physical consequences that could result from a forced pregnancy. What about the man who has go through 18 years of labour to support a child? So you think 18 years of child support is equal to or greater than 9 months of pregnancy, 18 years of financial support, AND 18 years of time investment? Why are you assuming the woman has sole custody? The man could have sole custody of his child. --- http://www.imgur.com/oQHLBrx.jpg http://www.imgur.com/ah5IE8D.jpg http://www.imgur.com/USV84z9.jpg http://www.imgur.com/PSjlohO.jpg <cite>Rika_Furude posted [p:883493493] in Women in A... [t:75592972]...</cite> <quote><cite>IfGodCouldDie posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Steve Nick posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Ammonitida posted...</cite> <quote>Just because a man provided a tiny sperm cell after an orgasm, some think he should have the right to force a woman's body to go through nine months of gestating the baby despite the emotional and physical consequences that could result from a forced pregnancy.</quote> What about the man who has go through 18 years of labour to support a child?</quote> So you think 18 years of child support is equal to or greater than 9 months of pregnancy, 18 years of financial support, AND 18 years of time investment?</quote> Why are you assuming the woman has sole custody? The man could have sole custody of his child.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
l Dudeboy l 07/24/17 7:25:42 AM #278:	Ammonitida posted... Even in the case of rape, women wishing to terminate a pregnancy would have to seek the opinion of their attacker or abusive partner – who would be able to refuse and potentially block the procedure. yo what the fuck --- You are now breathing manually. Lets put a little lead in the air, and see what falls over. <cite>l Dudeboy l posted [p:883493640] in Women in A... [t:75592972]...</cite> <quote><cite>Ammonitida posted...</cite> <quote><quote>Even in the case of rape, women wishing to terminate a pregnancy would have to seek the opinion of their attacker or abusive partner – who would be able to refuse and potentially block the procedure.</quote></quote> yo what the fuck</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
IfGodCouldDie 07/24/17 8:06:32 AM #279:	Rika_Furude posted... IfGodCouldDie posted... Steve Nick posted... Ammonitida posted... Just because a man provided a tiny sperm cell after an orgasm, some think he should have the right to force a woman's body to go through nine months of gestating the baby despite the emotional and physical consequences that could result from a forced pregnancy. What about the man who has go through 18 years of labour to support a child? So you think 18 years of child support is equal to or greater than 9 months of pregnancy, 18 years of financial support, AND 18 years of time investment? Why are you assuming the woman has sole custody? The man could have sole custody of his child. Are you kidding me? His scenario of only paying child support implies that the father is not investing time with the child. So maybe instead of trying to be a pretentious douchebag you develop a little bit of reading comprehension. Also if the man has sole custody, I highly doubt he was trying to get her to have an abortion. --- Mind post. XBL:Cyanide Sucker PSN:Paters1 IGN:SuperPattyCakes <cite>IfGodCouldDie posted [p:883494493] in Women in A... [t:75592972]...</cite> <quote><cite>Rika_Furude posted...</cite> <quote><cite>IfGodCouldDie posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Steve Nick posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Ammonitida posted...</cite> <quote>Just because a man provided a tiny sperm cell after an orgasm, some think he should have the right to force a woman's body to go through nine months of gestating the baby despite the emotional and physical consequences that could result from a forced pregnancy.</quote> What about the man who has go through 18 years of labour to support a child?</quote> So you think 18 years of child support is equal to or greater than 9 months of pregnancy, 18 years of financial support, AND 18 years of time investment?</quote> Why are you assuming the woman has sole custody? The man could have sole custody of his child.</quote> Are you kidding me? His scenario of only paying child support implies that the father is not investing time with the child. So maybe instead of trying to be a pretentious douchebag you develop a little bit of reading comprehension. Also if the man has sole custody, I highly doubt he was trying to get her to have an abortion.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
OpheliaAdenade 07/24/17 8:11:20 AM #280:	Ammonitida posted... Even in the case of rape, women wishing to terminate a pregnancy would have to seek the opinion of their attacker or abusive partner who would be able to refuse and potentially block the procedure. dear god. --- http://imgur.com/Q6Qj55q <cite>OpheliaAdenade posted [p:883494585] in Women in A... [t:75592972]...</cite> <quote><cite>Ammonitida posted...</cite> <quote><quote>Even in the case of rape, women wishing to terminate a pregnancy would have to seek the opinion of their attacker or abusive partner who would be able to refuse and potentially block the procedure.</quote></quote> dear god.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Rika_Furude 07/24/17 8:34:10 AM #281:	IfGodCouldDie posted... Rika_Furude posted... IfGodCouldDie posted... Steve Nick posted... Ammonitida posted... Just because a man provided a tiny sperm cell after an orgasm, some think he should have the right to force a woman's body to go through nine months of gestating the baby despite the emotional and physical consequences that could result from a forced pregnancy. What about the man who has go through 18 years of labour to support a child? So you think 18 years of child support is equal to or greater than 9 months of pregnancy, 18 years of financial support, AND 18 years of time investment? Why are you assuming the woman has sole custody? The man could have sole custody of his child. Are you kidding me? His scenario of only paying child support implies that the father is not investing time with the child. So maybe instead of trying to be a pretentious douchebag you develop a little bit of reading comprehension. Also if the man has sole custody, I highly doubt he was trying to get her to have an abortion. So you are ignoring all scenarios which paint baby murdering in a bad light? well done. --- http://www.imgur.com/oQHLBrx.jpg http://www.imgur.com/ah5IE8D.jpg http://www.imgur.com/USV84z9.jpg http://www.imgur.com/PSjlohO.jpg <cite>Rika_Furude posted [p:883495156] in Women in A... [t:75592972]...</cite> <quote><cite>IfGodCouldDie posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Rika_Furude posted...</cite> <quote><cite>IfGodCouldDie posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Steve Nick posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Ammonitida posted...</cite> <quote>Just because a man provided a tiny sperm cell after an orgasm, some think he should have the right to force a woman's body to go through nine months of gestating the baby despite the emotional and physical consequences that could result from a forced pregnancy.</quote> What about the man who has go through 18 years of labour to support a child?</quote> So you think 18 years of child support is equal to or greater than 9 months of pregnancy, 18 years of financial support, AND 18 years of time investment?</quote> Why are you assuming the woman has sole custody? The man could have sole custody of his child.</quote> Are you kidding me? His scenario of only paying child support implies that the father is not investing time with the child. So maybe instead of trying to be a pretentious douchebag you develop a little bit of reading comprehension. Also if the man has sole custody, I highly doubt he was trying to get her to have an abortion.</quote> So you are ignoring all scenarios which paint baby murdering in a bad light? well done.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Medz2017 07/24/17 8:43:27 AM #282:	https://i.redd.it/xde431772juy.jpg --- Hi <cite>Medz2017 posted [p:883495412] in Women in A... [t:75592972]...</cite> <quote>https://i.redd.it/xde431772juy.jpg</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
IfGodCouldDie 07/24/17 8:47:27 AM #283:	Rika_Furude posted... IfGodCouldDie posted... Rika_Furude posted... IfGodCouldDie posted... Steve Nick posted... Ammonitida posted... Just because a man provided a tiny sperm cell after an orgasm, some think he should have the right to force a woman's body to go through nine months of gestating the baby despite the emotional and physical consequences that could result from a forced pregnancy. What about the man who has go through 18 years of labour to support a child? So you think 18 years of child support is equal to or greater than 9 months of pregnancy, 18 years of financial support, AND 18 years of time investment? Why are you assuming the woman has sole custody? The man could have sole custody of his child. Are you kidding me? His scenario of only paying child support implies that the father is not investing time with the child. So maybe instead of trying to be a pretentious douchebag you develop a little bit of reading comprehension. Also if the man has sole custody, I highly doubt he was trying to get her to have an abortion. So you are ignoring all scenarios which paint baby murdering in a bad light? well done. Nope, just responding to the one scenario that was presented. Also abortions aren't "baby murder," but you already know that and are just being facetious. --- Mind post. XBL:Cyanide Sucker PSN:Paters1 IGN:SuperPattyCakes <cite>IfGodCouldDie posted [p:883495526] in Women in A... [t:75592972]...</cite> <quote><cite>Rika_Furude posted...</cite> <quote><cite>IfGodCouldDie posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Rika_Furude posted...</cite> <quote><cite>IfGodCouldDie posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Steve Nick posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Ammonitida posted...</cite> <quote>Just because a man provided a tiny sperm cell after an orgasm, some think he should have the right to force a woman's body to go through nine months of gestating the baby despite the emotional and physical consequences that could result from a forced pregnancy.</quote> What about the man who has go through 18 years of labour to support a child?</quote> So you think 18 years of child support is equal to or greater than 9 months of pregnancy, 18 years of financial support, AND 18 years of time investment?</quote> Why are you assuming the woman has sole custody? The man could have sole custody of his child.</quote> Are you kidding me? His scenario of only paying child support implies that the father is not investing time with the child. So maybe instead of trying to be a pretentious douchebag you develop a little bit of reading comprehension. Also if the man has sole custody, I highly doubt he was trying to get her to have an abortion.</quote> So you are ignoring all scenarios which paint baby murdering in a bad light? well done.</quote> Nope, just responding to the one scenario that was presented. Also abortions aren't "baby murder," but you already know that and are just being facetious.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Rika_Furude 07/24/17 8:48:35 AM #284:	IfGodCouldDie posted... Also abortions aren't "baby murder," only if you are a literal monster looking to feel good for ending a human life --- http://www.imgur.com/oQHLBrx.jpg http://www.imgur.com/ah5IE8D.jpg http://www.imgur.com/USV84z9.jpg http://www.imgur.com/PSjlohO.jpg <cite>Rika_Furude posted [p:883495557] in Women in A... [t:75592972]...</cite> <quote><cite>IfGodCouldDie posted...</cite> <quote>Also abortions aren't "baby murder,"</quote> only if you are a literal monster looking to feel good for ending a human life</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
IfGodCouldDie 07/24/17 8:51:51 AM #285:	Rika_Furude posted... IfGodCouldDie posted... Also abortions aren't "baby murder," only if you are a literal monster looking to feel good for ending a human life See there you go being facetious again. --- Mind post. XBL:Cyanide Sucker PSN:Paters1 IGN:SuperPattyCakes <cite>IfGodCouldDie posted [p:883495649] in Women in A... [t:75592972]...</cite> <quote><cite>Rika_Furude posted...</cite> <quote><cite>IfGodCouldDie posted...</cite> <quote>Also abortions aren't "baby murder,"</quote> only if you are a literal monster looking to feel good for ending a human life</quote> See there you go being facetious again.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
k darkfire 07/24/17 8:56:39 AM #286:	Women have no right to determine who lives and who dies. Abortion is murder. <cite>k darkfire posted [p:883495787] in Women in A... [t:75592972]...</cite> <quote>Women have no right to determine who lives and who dies. Abortion is murder.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
OpheliaAdenade 07/24/17 9:00:48 AM #287:	k darkfire posted... Women have no right to determine who lives and who dies. Abortion is murder. They do. It is their body. :u Trust me, if you had something growing in your body that you didn't want, you would take any means necessary to get rid of it. Make abortions illegal and women will just find another way to do it. Coat hangers, Halloween hayrides, alcohol/drugs. :v Abortion just makes it less risky for everyone involved. Less dumpster babies. --- http://imgur.com/Q6Qj55q <cite>OpheliaAdenade posted [p:883495917] in Women in A... [t:75592972]...</cite> <quote><cite>k darkfire posted...</cite> <quote>Women have no right to determine who lives and who dies. Abortion is murder.</quote> They do. It is their body. :u Trust me, if you had something growing in your body that you didn't want, you would take any means necessary to get rid of it. Make abortions illegal and women will just find another way to do it. Coat hangers, Halloween hayrides, alcohol/drugs. :v Abortion just makes it less risky for everyone involved. Less dumpster babies.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Rika_Furude 07/24/17 9:02:43 AM #288:	IfGodCouldDie posted... Rika_Furude posted... IfGodCouldDie posted... Also abortions aren't "baby murder," only if you are a literal monster looking to feel good for ending a human life See there you go being facetious again. how would you prefer I call it then? --- http://www.imgur.com/oQHLBrx.jpg http://www.imgur.com/ah5IE8D.jpg http://www.imgur.com/USV84z9.jpg http://www.imgur.com/PSjlohO.jpg <cite>Rika_Furude posted [p:883495987] in Women in A... [t:75592972]...</cite> <quote><cite>IfGodCouldDie posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Rika_Furude posted...</cite> <quote><cite>IfGodCouldDie posted...</cite> <quote>Also abortions aren't "baby murder,"</quote> only if you are a literal monster looking to feel good for ending a human life</quote> See there you go being facetious again.</quote> how would you prefer I call it then?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
IfGodCouldDie 07/24/17 9:11:42 AM #289:	Rika_Furude posted... IfGodCouldDie posted... Rika_Furude posted... IfGodCouldDie posted... Also abortions aren't "baby murder," only if you are a literal monster looking to feel good for ending a human life See there you go being facetious again. how would you prefer I call it then? To be completely honest, I don't care what you call it. --- Mind post. XBL:Cyanide Sucker PSN:Paters1 IGN:SuperPattyCakes <cite>IfGodCouldDie posted [p:883496276] in Women in A... [t:75592972]...</cite> <quote><cite>Rika_Furude posted...</cite> <quote><cite>IfGodCouldDie posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Rika_Furude posted...</cite> <quote><cite>IfGodCouldDie posted...</cite> <quote>Also abortions aren't "baby murder,"</quote> only if you are a literal monster looking to feel good for ending a human life</quote> See there you go being facetious again.</quote> how would you prefer I call it then?</quote> To be completely honest, I don't care what you call it.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Rika_Furude 07/24/17 9:13:39 AM #290:	IfGodCouldDie posted... Rika_Furude posted... IfGodCouldDie posted... Rika_Furude posted... IfGodCouldDie posted... Also abortions aren't "baby murder," only if you are a literal monster looking to feel good for ending a human life See there you go being facetious again. how would you prefer I call it then? To be completely honest, I don't care what you call it. So you're just being a contrarian white knight? good to know --- http://www.imgur.com/oQHLBrx.jpg http://www.imgur.com/ah5IE8D.jpg http://www.imgur.com/USV84z9.jpg http://www.imgur.com/PSjlohO.jpg <cite>Rika_Furude posted [p:883496340] in Women in A... [t:75592972]...</cite> <quote><cite>IfGodCouldDie posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Rika_Furude posted...</cite> <quote><cite>IfGodCouldDie posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Rika_Furude posted...</cite> <quote><cite>IfGodCouldDie posted...</cite> <quote>Also abortions aren't "baby murder,"</quote> only if you are a literal monster looking to feel good for ending a human life</quote> See there you go being facetious again.</quote> how would you prefer I call it then?</quote> To be completely honest, I don't care what you call it.</quote> So you're just being a contrarian white knight? good to know</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
IfGodCouldDie 07/24/17 9:17:13 AM #291:	Rika_Furude posted... IfGodCouldDie posted... Rika_Furude posted... IfGodCouldDie posted... Rika_Furude posted... IfGodCouldDie posted... Also abortions aren't "baby murder," only if you are a literal monster looking to feel good for ending a human life See there you go being facetious again. how would you prefer I call it then? To be completely honest, I don't care what you call it. So you're just being a contrarian white knight? good to know Umm, how am I being the contrarian white knight here? You are the attempting to misconstrue what I have said in an attempt to defend fetuses. Like you call abortions baby murder, you are the very definition of a white knight contrarian right now. Lol. Then you start throwing a tantrum because I won't buy in to your lame attempts at trolling. Good luck with life there bud. --- Mind post. XBL:Cyanide Sucker PSN:Paters1 IGN:SuperPattyCakes <cite>IfGodCouldDie posted [p:883496471] in Women in A... [t:75592972]...</cite> <quote><cite>Rika_Furude posted...</cite> <quote><cite>IfGodCouldDie posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Rika_Furude posted...</cite> <quote><cite>IfGodCouldDie posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Rika_Furude posted...</cite> <quote><cite>IfGodCouldDie posted...</cite> <quote>Also abortions aren't "baby murder,"</quote> only if you are a literal monster looking to feel good for ending a human life</quote> See there you go being facetious again.</quote> how would you prefer I call it then?</quote> To be completely honest, I don't care what you call it.</quote> So you're just being a contrarian white knight? good to know</quote> Umm, how am I being the contrarian white knight here? You are the attempting to misconstrue what I have said in an attempt to defend fetuses. Like you call abortions baby murder, you are the very definition of a white knight contrarian right now. Lol. Then you start throwing a tantrum because I won't buy in to your lame attempts at trolling. Good luck with life there bud.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#292	Post #292 was unavailable or deleted.
Dragonblade01 07/24/17 11:28:11 AM #293:	Asherlee10 posted... I didn't read into the article, having trouble loading it. But was this actually passed? Yes. The bill, which was signed into law in March and is set to come into force at the end of July, includes aborted foetuses in a rule stating family members must agree on what to do with the remains of their dead relatives. --- PSN: kazukifafner <cite>Dragonblade01 posted [p:883501856] in Women in A... [t:75592972]...</cite> <quote><cite>Asherlee10 posted...</cite> <quote>I didn't read into the article, having trouble loading it. But was this actually passed?</quote> Yes. <quote>The bill, which was signed into law in March and is set to come into force at the end of July, includes aborted foetuses in a rule stating family members must agree on what to do with the remains of their dead relatives.</quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#294	Post #294 was unavailable or deleted.
Sage JJ 07/24/17 12:35:59 PM #295:	legendary_zell posted... Sage JJ posted... Ammonitida posted... Mark_DeRosa posted... It takes two people to have a baby, both should have a say and right to do what they choose LOL Men are not the ones who have to carry a baby to full term and risk their jobs, mental/physical health, etc. This is a disturbing law. proof of any woman risking her job for being pregnant in the US or stfu It's very common for people to have to quit their job after pregnancy, getting replaced while pregnant, being fired due to pregnancy....that's why laws had to be passed against it on the federal level and there are court cases over it daily...wtf is this? If there is court cases daily you can easily show proof --- Posted using GameFlux Get it now for Android from Google Play! <cite>Sage JJ posted [p:883505227] in Women in A... [t:75592972]...</cite> <quote><cite>legendary_zell posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Sage JJ posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Ammonitida posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Mark_DeRosa posted...</cite> <quote>It takes two people to have a baby, both should have a say and right to do what they choose</quote> LOL Men are not the ones who have to carry a baby to full term and risk their jobs, mental/physical health, etc. This is a disturbing law.</quote> proof of any woman risking her job for being pregnant in the US or stfu</quote> It's very common for people to have to quit their job after pregnancy, getting replaced while pregnant, being fired due to pregnancy....that's why laws had to be passed against it on the federal level and there are court cases over it daily...wtf is this?</quote> If there is court cases daily you can easily show proof</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Transcendentia 07/24/17 6:35:48 PM #296:	https://nypost.com/2017/07/23/man-ordered-to-pay-65k-in-child-support-for-kid-who-isnt-his/ <cite>Transcendentia posted [p:883525222] in Women in A... [t:75592972]...</cite> <quote>https://nypost.com/2017/07/23/man-ordered-to-pay-65k-in-child-support-for-kid-who-isnt-his/</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
marc55 07/24/17 6:53:00 PM #297:	Rika_Furude posted... IfGodCouldDie posted... Steve Nick posted... Ammonitida posted... Just because a man provided a tiny sperm cell after an orgasm, some think he should have the right to force a woman's body to go through nine months of gestating the baby despite the emotional and physical consequences that could result from a forced pregnancy. What about the man who has go through 18 years of labour to support a child? So you think 18 years of child support is equal to or greater than 9 months of pregnancy, 18 years of financial support, AND 18 years of time investment? Why are you assuming the woman has sole custody? The man could have sole custody of his child. isnt that extremely rare ? --- There is no sound, no voice, no cry in all the world that can be heard... until someone listens. <cite>marc55 posted [p:883526224] in Women in A... [t:75592972]...</cite> <quote><cite>Rika_Furude posted...</cite> <quote><cite>IfGodCouldDie posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Steve Nick posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Ammonitida posted...</cite> <quote>Just because a man provided a tiny sperm cell after an orgasm, some think he should have the right to force a woman's body to go through nine months of gestating the baby despite the emotional and physical consequences that could result from a forced pregnancy.</quote> What about the man who has go through 18 years of labour to support a child?</quote> So you think 18 years of child support is equal to or greater than 9 months of pregnancy, 18 years of financial support, AND 18 years of time investment?</quote> Why are you assuming the woman has sole custody? The man could have sole custody of his child.</quote> isnt that extremely rare ?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Dragonblade01 07/24/17 6:53:42 PM #298:	Transcendentia posted... https://nypost.com/2017/07/23/man-ordered-to-pay-65k-in-child-support-for-kid-who-isnt-his/ “There can be consequences, even if you don’t do anything,” lol, fuck you Stith --- PSN: kazukifafner <cite>Dragonblade01 posted [p:883526262] in Women in A... [t:75592972]...</cite> <quote><cite>Transcendentia posted...</cite> <quote>https://nypost.com/2017/07/23/man-ordered-to-pay-65k-in-child-support-for-kid-who-isnt-his/</quote> “There can be consequences, even if you don’t do anything,” lol, fuck you Stith</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
HippopotamusRex 07/24/17 7:11:41 PM #299:	hockeybub89 posted... dave_is_slick posted... hockeybub89 posted... The man deserves no say I just can't get behind this part. Creating a baby is a two-way street, terminating a baby should be 75/25. And what do you do if the woman says abort and the man says no? How do we honor his partial say in a woman's body? Give him a quarter fetus? The simplest answer here is the woman can override a man's no. But in so doing she needs to have knowledge that the man will not be raising it or contributing to it. That's as fair as it gets. A man cannot override a woman's yes, but that yes comes with full knowledge the man will be no part of it. In the same sense a man cannot override a woman's no and force her to carry it to term. So she has complete power in her no vote, but in her yes vote, she has slightly less power because she has to understand the yes will not include the man once the child is born. --- The Retro Hippo of the Retro Achievements http://retroachievements.org/User/HippopotamusRex <cite>HippopotamusRex posted [p:883527241] in Women in A... [t:75592972]...</cite> <quote><cite>hockeybub89 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>dave_is_slick posted...</cite> <quote><cite>hockeybub89 posted...</cite> <quote>The man deserves no say</quote> I just can't get behind this part. Creating a baby is a two-way street, terminating a baby should be 75/25.</quote> And what do you do if the woman says abort and the man says no? How do we honor his partial say in a woman's body? Give him a quarter fetus?</quote> The simplest answer here is the woman can override a man's no. But in so doing she needs to have knowledge that the man will not be raising it or contributing to it. That's as fair as it gets. A man cannot override a woman's yes, but that yes comes with full knowledge the man will be no part of it. In the same sense a man cannot override a woman's no and force her to carry it to term. So she has complete power in her no vote, but in her yes vote, she has slightly less power because she has to understand the yes will not include the man once the child is born.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Samurontai 07/24/17 7:24:08 PM #300:	This is why Christianity is an awful religion --- http://i.imgur.com/Scl5rwX.gif http://i.imgur.com/Fjgt7Qq.gif http://i.imgur.com/NidhAni.gif http://i.imgur.com/IGIbQPk.gif <cite>Samurontai posted [p:883527934] in Women in A... [t:75592972]...</cite> <quote>This is why Christianity is an awful religion</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
legendary_zell 07/24/17 8:27:30 PM #301:	Sage JJ posted... legendary_zell posted... Sage JJ posted... Ammonitida posted... Mark_DeRosa posted... It takes two people to have a baby, both should have a say and right to do what they choose LOL Men are not the ones who have to carry a baby to full term and risk their jobs, mental/physical health, etc. This is a disturbing law. proof of any woman risking her job for being pregnant in the US or stfu It's very common for people to have to quit their job after pregnancy, getting replaced while pregnant, being fired due to pregnancy....that's why laws had to be passed against it on the federal level and there are court cases over it daily...wtf is this? If there is court cases daily you can easily show proof http://www.nbcwashington.com/news/local/UPS-Settles-With-Maryland-Woman-in-Pregnancy-Discrimination-Case-330305251.html http://www.spigglelaw.com/employment-blog/6-newsworthy-pregnanacy-discrimination-lawsuits/ All from within 15 seconds of googling "pregnancy discrimination cases" --- http://i.imgur.com/0Bi86cp.gif <cite>legendary_zell posted [p:883531552] in Women in A... [t:75592972]...</cite> <quote><cite>Sage JJ posted...</cite> <quote><cite>legendary_zell posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Sage JJ posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Ammonitida posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Mark_DeRosa posted...</cite> <quote>It takes two people to have a baby, both should have a say and right to do what they choose</quote> LOL Men are not the ones who have to carry a baby to full term and risk their jobs, mental/physical health, etc. This is a disturbing law.</quote> proof of any woman risking her job for being pregnant in the US or stfu</quote> It's very common for people to have to quit their job after pregnancy, getting replaced while pregnant, being fired due to pregnancy....that's why laws had to be passed against it on the federal level and there are court cases over it daily...wtf is this?</quote> If there is court cases daily you can easily show proof</quote> http://www.nbcwashington.com/news/local/UPS-Settles-With-Maryland-Woman-in-Pregnancy-Discrimination-Case-330305251.html http://www.spigglelaw.com/employment-blog/6-newsworthy-pregnanacy-discrimination-lawsuits/ All from within 15 seconds of googling "pregnancy discrimination cases"</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1 ... 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

Current Events > Women in Arkansas now need permission from men to have an abortion (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > Women in Arkansas now need permission from men to have an abortion