Current Events > Blackmail

Topic List	Page List: 1
KiwiTerraRizing 07/05/17 8:53:45 AM #1:	18 U.S.C. § 873 "Whoever, under a threat of informing, or as a consideration for not informing, against any violation of any law of the United States, demands or receives any money or other valuable thing, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both." --- Jake Peralta: World's Grossest Pervert <cite>KiwiTerraRizing posted [p:882362533] in Blackmail... [t:75533294]...</cite> <quote>18 U.S.C. § 873 "Whoever, under a threat of informing, or as a consideration for not informing, against any violation of any law of the United States, demands or receives any money or other valuable thing, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both."</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#2	Post #2 was unavailable or deleted.
KiwiTerraRizing 07/05/17 9:00:45 AM #3:	GregShmedley posted... https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/blackmail a : extortion or coercion by threats especially of public exposure or criminal prosecution When there is a legal definition it takes precedence. Dictionary means nothing in this instance. --- Jake Peralta: World's Grossest Pervert <cite>KiwiTerraRizing posted [p:882362726] in Blackmail... [t:75533294]...</cite> <quote><cite>GregShmedley posted...</cite> <quote>https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/blackmail a : extortion or coercion by threats especially of public exposure or criminal prosecution</quote> When there is a legal definition it takes precedence. Dictionary means nothing in this instance.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#4	Post #4 was unavailable or deleted.
KiwiTerraRizing 07/05/17 9:07:38 AM #5:	GregShmedley posted... KiwiTerraRizing posted... GregShmedley posted... https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/blackmail a : extortion or coercion by threats especially of public exposure or criminal prosecution When there is a legal definition it takes precedence. Dictionary means nothing in this instance. ...not even. But please, continue on with your trolling. So you admit what CNN did wasn't a crime. --- Jake Peralta: World's Grossest Pervert <cite>KiwiTerraRizing posted [p:882362963] in Blackmail... [t:75533294]...</cite> <quote><cite>GregShmedley posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KiwiTerraRizing posted...</cite> <quote><cite>GregShmedley posted...</cite> <quote>https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/blackmail a : extortion or coercion by threats especially of public exposure or criminal prosecution</quote> When there is a legal definition it takes precedence. Dictionary means nothing in this instance.</quote> ...not even. But please, continue on with your trolling.</quote> So you admit what CNN did wasn't a crime.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
pikachupwnage 07/05/17 9:14:38 AM #6:	KiwiTerraRizing posted... GregShmedley posted... KiwiTerraRizing posted... GregShmedley posted... https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/blackmail a : extortion or coercion by threats especially of public exposure or criminal prosecution When there is a legal definition it takes precedence. Dictionary means nothing in this instance. ...not even. But please, continue on with your trolling. So you admit what CNN did wasn't a crime. Doesn't have to be a crime to be shitty disgusting imoorql thing to do. It's a horrible precedent for the news media. "Do things we don't like and we will make sure you are exposed to as many people as possible" --- I'm Mary Poppins y'all. http://i2.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/000/665/328/d75.gif <cite>pikachupwnage posted [p:882363200] in Blackmail... [t:75533294]...</cite> <quote><cite>KiwiTerraRizing posted...</cite> <quote><cite>GregShmedley posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KiwiTerraRizing posted...</cite> <quote><cite>GregShmedley posted...</cite> <quote>https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/blackmail a : extortion or coercion by threats especially of public exposure or criminal prosecution</quote> When there is a legal definition it takes precedence. Dictionary means nothing in this instance.</quote> ...not even. But please, continue on with your trolling.</quote> So you admit what CNN did wasn't a crime.</quote> Doesn't have to be a crime to be shitty disgusting imoorql thing to do. It's a horrible precedent for the news media. "Do things we don't like and we will make sure you are exposed to as many people as possible"</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
KiwiTerraRizing 07/05/17 9:19:39 AM #7:	So CNN is wrong for revealing what a person actually did? So a news organization is wrong for stating a fact? --- Jake Peralta: World's Grossest Pervert <cite>KiwiTerraRizing posted [p:882363374] in Blackmail... [t:75533294]...</cite> <quote>So CNN is wrong for revealing what a person actually did? So a news organization is wrong for stating a fact?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
pikachupwnage 07/05/17 9:38:49 AM #8:	KiwiTerraRizing posted... So CNN is wrong for revealing what a person actually did? So a news organization is wrong for stating a fact? Facts can be immoral. Let's say they had the identity of a undercover cop infiltrating a dangerous gang that has committed many murders. They expose him and he gets murdered. Obviously wrong and potentially criminal. The point is they are going after a guy for posting a silly gif about them. It's petty and disproportionate. Also the whole holding a metaphorical gun thing tohis head. I would be angry but less so if they outright exposed him but now he has to tread carefully in what he says because CNN has leverage over him. The political divide is absurdly polarized. This man is going to suffer harassment if they out him. It's also a dangerous precedent and raises the question...is CNN silencing others by similar means? Media is all about information and freedom of speech. It's disgusting for it to silence speech like this. --- I'm Mary Poppins y'all. http://i2.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/000/665/328/d75.gif <cite>pikachupwnage posted [p:882364007] in Blackmail... [t:75533294]...</cite> <quote><cite>KiwiTerraRizing posted...</cite> <quote>So CNN is wrong for revealing what a person actually did? So a news organization is wrong for stating a fact?</quote> Facts can be immoral. Let's say they had the identity of a undercover cop infiltrating a dangerous gang that has committed many murders. They expose him and he gets murdered. Obviously wrong and potentially criminal. The point is they are going after a guy for posting a silly gif about them. It's petty and disproportionate. Also the whole holding a metaphorical gun thing tohis head. I would be angry but less so if they outright exposed him but now he has to tread carefully in what he says because CNN has leverage over him. The political divide is absurdly polarized. This man is going to suffer harassment if they out him. It's also a dangerous precedent and raises the question...is CNN silencing others by similar means? Media is all about information and freedom of speech. It's disgusting for it to silence speech like this.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
KiwiTerraRizing 07/05/17 9:41:31 AM #9:	pikachupwnage posted... KiwiTerraRizing posted... So CNN is wrong for revealing what a person actually did? So a news organization is wrong for stating a fact? Facts can be immoral. Let's say they had the identity of a undercover cop infiltrating a dangerous gang that has committed many murders. They expose him and he gets murdered. Obviously wrong and potentially criminal. The point is they are going after a guy for posting a silly gif about them. It's petty and disproportionate. Also the whole holding a metaphorical gun thing tohis head. I would be angry but less so if they outright exposed him but now he has to tread carefully in what he says because CNN has leverage over him. The political divide is absurdly polarized. This man is going to suffer harassment if they out him. It's also a dangerous precedent and raises the question...is CNN silencing others by similar means? Media is all about information and freedom of speech. It's disgusting for it to silence speech like this. Actions have consequences. Is my work censoring me if they will fire me for hate speech? --- Jake Peralta: World's Grossest Pervert <cite>KiwiTerraRizing posted [p:882364116] in Blackmail... [t:75533294]...</cite> <quote><cite>pikachupwnage posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KiwiTerraRizing posted...</cite> <quote>So CNN is wrong for revealing what a person actually did? So a news organization is wrong for stating a fact?</quote> Facts can be immoral. Let's say they had the identity of a undercover cop infiltrating a dangerous gang that has committed many murders. They expose him and he gets murdered. Obviously wrong and potentially criminal. The point is they are going after a guy for posting a silly gif about them. It's petty and disproportionate. Also the whole holding a metaphorical gun thing tohis head. I would be angry but less so if they outright exposed him but now he has to tread carefully in what he says because CNN has leverage over him. The political divide is absurdly polarized. This man is going to suffer harassment if they out him. It's also a dangerous precedent and raises the question...is CNN silencing others by similar means? Media is all about information and freedom of speech. It's disgusting for it to silence speech like this.</quote> Actions have consequences. Is my work censoring me if they will fire me for hate speech?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LightHawKnight 07/05/17 9:45:34 AM #10:	Can't believe people are defending CNN from this garbage. This allows them to do even worse stuff in the future. --- The Official Odin of the Shin Megami Tensei IV board. "You know how confusing the whole good-evil concept is for me." <cite>LightHawKnight posted [p:882364265] in Blackmail... [t:75533294]...</cite> <quote>Can't believe people are defending CNN from this garbage. This allows them to do even worse stuff in the future.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
pikachupwnage 07/05/17 9:51:53 AM #11:	KiwiTerraRizing posted... pikachupwnage posted... KiwiTerraRizing posted... So CNN is wrong for revealing what a person actually did? So a news organization is wrong for stating a fact? Facts can be immoral. Let's say they had the identity of a undercover cop infiltrating a dangerous gang that has committed many murders. They expose him and he gets murdered. Obviously wrong and potentially criminal. The point is they are going after a guy for posting a silly gif about them. It's petty and disproportionate. Also the whole holding a metaphorical gun thing tohis head. I would be angry but less so if they outright exposed him but now he has to tread carefully in what he says because CNN has leverage over him. The political divide is absurdly polarized. This man is going to suffer harassment if they out him. It's also a dangerous precedent and raises the question...is CNN silencing others by similar means? Media is all about information and freedom of speech. It's disgusting for it to silence speech like this. Actions have consequences. Is my work censoring me if they will fire me for hate speech? That is quite different from this and you know it. That situation is a company you actually have a relationship with. This situation is a massive media outlet hunting down a person for a silly internet gif and threatening to expose him because they have skin less thick than graphene and the morality of a toddler. --- I'm Mary Poppins y'all. http://i2.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/000/665/328/d75.gif <cite>pikachupwnage posted [p:882364511] in Blackmail... [t:75533294]...</cite> <quote><cite>KiwiTerraRizing posted...</cite> <quote><cite>pikachupwnage posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KiwiTerraRizing posted...</cite> <quote>So CNN is wrong for revealing what a person actually did? So a news organization is wrong for stating a fact?</quote> Facts can be immoral. Let's say they had the identity of a undercover cop infiltrating a dangerous gang that has committed many murders. They expose him and he gets murdered. Obviously wrong and potentially criminal. The point is they are going after a guy for posting a silly gif about them. It's petty and disproportionate. Also the whole holding a metaphorical gun thing tohis head. I would be angry but less so if they outright exposed him but now he has to tread carefully in what he says because CNN has leverage over him. The political divide is absurdly polarized. This man is going to suffer harassment if they out him. It's also a dangerous precedent and raises the question...is CNN silencing others by similar means? Media is all about information and freedom of speech. It's disgusting for it to silence speech like this.</quote> Actions have consequences. Is my work censoring me if they will fire me for hate speech?</quote> That is quite different from this and you know it. That situation is a company you actually have a relationship with. This situation is a massive media outlet hunting down a person for a silly internet gif and threatening to expose him because they have skin less thick than graphene and the morality of a toddler.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Vindris_SNH 07/05/17 9:53:21 AM #12:	--- glitteringfairy: Just build the damn wall ThyCorndog: and how exactly will that stop the mexican space program from orbital dropping illegal immigrants? <cite>Vindris_SNH posted [p:882364562] in Blackmail... [t:75533294]...</cite> <quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
KiwiTerraRizing 07/05/17 9:53:30 AM #13:	pikachupwnage posted... KiwiTerraRizing posted... pikachupwnage posted... KiwiTerraRizing posted... So CNN is wrong for revealing what a person actually did? So a news organization is wrong for stating a fact? Facts can be immoral. Let's say they had the identity of a undercover cop infiltrating a dangerous gang that has committed many murders. They expose him and he gets murdered. Obviously wrong and potentially criminal. The point is they are going after a guy for posting a silly gif about them. It's petty and disproportionate. Also the whole holding a metaphorical gun thing tohis head. I would be angry but less so if they outright exposed him but now he has to tread carefully in what he says because CNN has leverage over him. The political divide is absurdly polarized. This man is going to suffer harassment if they out him. It's also a dangerous precedent and raises the question...is CNN silencing others by similar means? Media is all about information and freedom of speech. It's disgusting for it to silence speech like this. Actions have consequences. Is my work censoring me if they will fire me for hate speech? That is quite different from this and you know it. That situation is a company you actually have a relationship with. This situation is a massive media outlet hunting down a person for a silly internet gif and threatening to expose him because they have skin less thick than graphene and the morality of a toddler. Valid point. I appreciate those who know you can entertain a thought and not accept it. --- Jake Peralta: World's Grossest Pervert <cite>KiwiTerraRizing posted [p:882364569] in Blackmail... [t:75533294]...</cite> <quote><cite>pikachupwnage posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KiwiTerraRizing posted...</cite> <quote><cite>pikachupwnage posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KiwiTerraRizing posted...</cite> <quote>So CNN is wrong for revealing what a person actually did? So a news organization is wrong for stating a fact?</quote> Facts can be immoral. Let's say they had the identity of a undercover cop infiltrating a dangerous gang that has committed many murders. They expose him and he gets murdered. Obviously wrong and potentially criminal. The point is they are going after a guy for posting a silly gif about them. It's petty and disproportionate. Also the whole holding a metaphorical gun thing tohis head. I would be angry but less so if they outright exposed him but now he has to tread carefully in what he says because CNN has leverage over him. The political divide is absurdly polarized. This man is going to suffer harassment if they out him. It's also a dangerous precedent and raises the question...is CNN silencing others by similar means? Media is all about information and freedom of speech. It's disgusting for it to silence speech like this.</quote> Actions have consequences. Is my work censoring me if they will fire me for hate speech?</quote> That is quite different from this and you know it. That situation is a company you actually have a relationship with. This situation is a massive media outlet hunting down a person for a silly internet gif and threatening to expose him because they have skin less thick than graphene and the morality of a toddler.</quote> Valid point. I appreciate those who know you can entertain a thought and not accept it.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Howl 07/05/17 9:59:28 AM #14:	KiwiTerraRizing posted... Is my work censoring me if they will fire me for hate speech? Of course they are censoring you, but it's censorship that you willingly acknowledge and engage in actively by working for them. --- woof <cite>Howl posted [p:882364796] in Blackmail... [t:75533294]...</cite> <quote><cite>KiwiTerraRizing posted...</cite> <quote>Is my work censoring me if they will fire me for hate speech?</quote> Of course they are censoring you, but it's censorship that you willingly acknowledge and engage in actively by working for them.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Siaperaz 07/05/17 10:00:21 AM #15:	Are liberals seriously defending this? --- GO KNICKS!!! <cite>Siaperaz posted [p:882364832] in Blackmail... [t:75533294]...</cite> <quote>Are liberals seriously defending this?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
COVxy 07/05/17 10:02:51 AM #16:	Siaperaz posted... Are liberals seriously defending this? I mean, for the most part it's not about defending but combating the waves of hyperbole and melodrama coming from the alt-right. If you've noticed, they've turned the poster into a kid to make him more sympathetic. --- =E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])] <cite>COVxy posted [p:882364949] in Blackmail... [t:75533294]...</cite> <quote><cite>Siaperaz posted...</cite> <quote>Are liberals seriously defending this?</quote> I mean, for the most part it's not about defending but combating the waves of hyperbole and melodrama coming from the alt-right. If you've noticed, they've turned the poster into a kid to make him more sympathetic.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1

Current Events > Blackmail (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > Blackmail