Board 8 > Remember when people thought Seth Rich's fate was "just a conspiracy"?

(+) Yeah! (+)

guys please stop bullying Vlado, we don't want another JDPizza situation
---

Jakyl25 posted...

Vlado believes Africa is demeaning.

He certainly does. What a sad excuse for a person :/
---

MoogleKupo141 posted...

guys please stop bullying Vlado, we don't want another JDPizza situation

Yes we do. That is exactly what we want to happen with vlado
---

Assange outright admitted in an interview Rich was a source, so any liberal denying this is just being a moron.
---

UItimaterializer posted...

Assange outright admitted in an interview Rich was a source, so any liberal denying this is just being a moron.

Rich's family says otherwise. I'm more inclined to believe them (who have no reason to deny the conspiracy) over someone with political motivations to push a conspiracy.
---

UItimaterializer posted...

Assange outright admitted in an interview Rich was a source, so any liberal denying this is just being a moron.

But any conservative denying it is not a moron
---

UItimaterializer posted...

Assange outright admitted in an interview Rich was a source, so any liberal denying this is just being a moron.

no, he did not.

Espeon posted...

UItimaterializer posted...

Assange outright admitted in an interview Rich was a source, so any liberal denying this is just being a moron.

Rich's family says otherwise. I'm more inclined to believe them (who have no reason to deny the conspiracy) over someone with political motivations to push a conspiracy.

They've also pleaded that people stop politicizing his murder and the people who continue to do so are blatantly disrespecting his family's wishes.
---

Unknown_voter posted...

UItimaterializer posted...

Assange outright admitted in an interview Rich was a source, so any liberal denying this is just being a moron.

no, he did not.

uh oh now I don't know what to believe
---

UltimaterializerX posted...

great things that I agreed with

redundant
---

UltimaterializerX posted...

Reminder that liberals believed every word of that Washington ComPost story yesterday, but with this one they're on the high horse about unnamed sources and such.

Their entire party platform is "no team red grr", which is dumb because democrats used to stand up for a lot of great things that I agreed with.

The Seth Rich "story" is literally a PI who contributes to Fox News, relaying information from an unnamed source that is officially denied by the police department from where the leak is allegedly from. Also, Trump LITERALLY verified the story you're complaining about.

So why is YOUR story beyond reproach?
---

Ulti, Seth Rich worked for Hillary for like 4 days in JULY, when all the shit leaked well before that.

It literally doesn't make sense for him to have been a source for WikiLeaks
---

that's him fanning some conspiracy flames. It doesn't actually mean Seth Rich was his source.
---

Ulti links usually don't support what he thinks they do.

He has...comprehension difficulties at times.
---

MoogleKupo141 posted...

that's him fanning some conspiracy flames. It doesn't actually mean Seth Rich was his source.

Julian Assange has also said in many interviews he would never reveal his sources, and often gets very upset when anyone asks even questions like if someone can be ruled out.

One, he doesn't name Seth Rich as his source. It's extremely suspicious that he's dropping hints THAT heavily but won't outright admit Seth is the source. At that point, Seth was already dead, so why not outright say "This was our source and he was killed."?

Two, WikiLeaks acted with a BLATANT political bias during the election. When Assange is on record as having information from Trump and the GOP that he did NOT release in the same manner as the Podesta e-mails, then that immediately taints his statements as being politically motivated. Specifically, politically motivated to continue making the Dems look bad.
---

Unknown_voter posted...

Julian Assange has also said in many interviews he would never reveal his sources, and often gets very upset when anyone asks even questions like if someone can be ruled out.

Ah, but see, strongly alluding to the idea that Rich was a source but without literally saying the words "Seth Rich was a source," literally no one could break through that veil of anonymity. Very protective of sources, that Assange.

Clearly that's what it is and clearly not specifically avoiding voicing any unfounded, untrue claims out loud that could get him into trouble. Who would ever think of such a thing?
---

Espeon posted...

Two, WikiLeaks acted with a BLATANT political bias during the election. When Assange is on record as having information from Trump and the GOP that he did NOT release in the same manner as the Podesta e-mails, then that immediately taints his statements as being politically motivated. Specifically, politically motivated to continue making the Dems look bad.

again, as I said in the pol topic before, he claims he had info that he did not release because someone else already released it and nobody cared because the info was not really important.

Unknown_voter posted...

Espeon posted...

Two, WikiLeaks acted with a BLATANT political bias during the election. When Assange is on record as having information from Trump and the GOP that he did NOT release in the same manner as the Podesta e-mails, then that immediately taints his statements as being politically motivated. Specifically, politically motivated to continue making the Dems look bad.

again, as I said in the pol topic before, he claims he had info that he did not release because someone else already released it and nobody cared because the info was not really important.

That's still arbitrarily making a choice not to publish information when he and his sight are supposed to be advocating for transparency. Even if the emails were completely innocuous, let the public decide that for themselves. The Podesta emails, in reality, were hardly damning. But anti-Hillary factions cherry picked through them and crafted a narrative that the DNC was corrupt and thus Democrats were being mistreated. That same opportunity was never afforded towards the Republicans. In fact, by NOT having any leaks published, it painted them as honest and transparent. That's bias on the part of WikiLeaks.
---

What he said is that someone else leaked the only stuff he had on the GOP and so he didn't publish them under wikileaks as it would look like he was taking credit for something others already leaked. So people did have the opportunity to look at the info, the media just didn't pick it up. If you accept he is being honest, then it doesn't seem biased at all. Given he has previously leaked information that hurt the GOP, and is not even American, I tend to believe he is at least not biased in a partisan manner. If you don't wanna believe him, thats fine, like I said its possible hes lying. (to be clear - I mean about his intentions/bias, he is for sure not lying that someone else leaked info on the gop)

Unknown_voter posted...

What he said is that someone else leaked the only stuff he had on the GOP and so he didn't publish them under wikileaks as it would look like he was taking credit for something others already leaked. So people did have the opportunity to look at the info, the media just didn't pick it up. If you accept he is being honest, then it doesn't seem biased at all. Given he has previously leaked information that hurt the GOP, and is not even American, I tend to believe he is at least not biased in a partisan manner. If you don't wanna believe him, thats fine, like I said its possible hes lying. (to be clear - I mean about his intentions/bias, he is for sure not lying that someone else leaked info on the gop)

Where did you see this?

Because the Assange quote I saw is he said he didn't release it because it was boring and less interesting than stuff Trump does every day.

I didn't see a word of what you're talking about.
---

https://theintercept.com/2017/04/19/intercepted-podcast-julian-assange-speaks-out-as-trumps-cia-director-threatens-to-end-wikileaks/

That's from last month, sounds like he's doing revisionist history.

http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/293453-assange-wikileaks-trump-info-no-worse-than-him

Here he is before the election, making zero mention of the info already being out there.
---

Maybe, thats a really vague quote, and I wish he would explain what he meant. I think even if he was purposefully tampering with the election, if he had anything worthwhile about Trump he would release it after the election was over. He has been calling for info about the Trump administration, potential comey tapes, WH recordings, etc to be sent to wikileaks. The Trump WH has made him an enemy, wants to arrest him, hell some people in his administration think he should be put to death. so he has no reason to not release anything he has on him.

https://twitter.com/TrueFactsStated/status/864579105018216453

lmao

"no - it wasn't the dnc/hillary...it was RUSSIA!"

I see that whoever killed Seth Rich is basically just...whoever you want it to be.

Can it be Vlado?
---

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cNgxyL5zEAk
---

To be fair, it might have actually been him
---

Addendum:

https://twitter.com/margiecakes/status/864646761645658112
---

Investigator Rod Wheeler's interview with Sean Hannity:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CuRJDKEVxHY
---

does this mean vlado will disappear for another three weeks?
---

UltimaterializerX posted...

Reminder that liberals believed every word of that Washington ComPost story yesterday, but with this one they're on the high horse about unnamed sources and such.

But Tuesday afternoon, Wheeler told CNN he had no evidence to suggest Rich had contacted Wikileaks before his death.

Wheeler instead said he only learned about the possible existence of such evidence through the reporter he spoke to for the FoxNews.com story. He explained that the comments he made to WTTG-TV were intended to simply preview Fox News' Tuesday story. The WTTG-TV news director did not respond to multiple requests for comment.

"I only got that [information] from the reporter at Fox News," Wheeler told CNN.

Aww, honey, I'm sorry. I know how hard you wanted this story to be true. You should really be wary of "news" that's only reported on by Fox News, Druge Report, and Breitbart.

UltimaterializerX posted...

Their entire party platform is "no team red grr", which is dumb because democrats used to stand up for a lot of great things that I agreed with.

Hillary Clinton had the most comprehensive policy platform of any presidential candidate this past election and possibly ever.

You can read more at

https://www.hillaryclinton.com/issues/

https://www.amazon.com/Stronger-Together-Blueprint-Americas-Future/dp/1501161733/

But you probably won't. We know how much trouble you Trump supporters have with reading.
---

Watch this.
psaltery posted...

Investigator Rod Wheeler's interview with Sean Hannity:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CuRJDKEVxHY

Remember. No amount of liberal circle jerking can erase the facts. Yes, you are louder than us. You're still wrong. In the end, you're nothing but semi-useful tools of the people who want to destroy humanity. For that, history will never forgive you.

Thank goodness we're not like you. :)
---

Vlado posted...

Yes, you are louder than us. You're still wrong. In the end, you're nothing but semi-useful tools of the people who want to destroy humanity. For that, history will never forgive you.

lmfao who talks like this why do you think life is a 90s jRPG

Not an argument.
---

But Tuesday afternoon, Wheeler told CNN he had no evidence to suggest Rich had contacted Wikileaks before his death.
Wheeler instead said he only learned about the possible existence of such evidence through the reporter he spoke to for the FoxNews.com story. He explained that the comments he made to WTTG-TV were intended to simply preview Fox News' Tuesday story. The WTTG-TV news director did not respond to multiple requests for comment.
"I only got that [information] from the reporter at Fox News," Wheeler told CNN.
Asked about a quote attributed to him in the Fox News story in which he said his "investigation up to this point shows there was some degree of email exchange between Seth Rich and Wikileaks," Wheeler said he was referring to information that had already been reported in the media.

---

Vlado's smug self-righteousness combined with his constantly being wrong would make him an ideal candidate for the Trump White House

I hear they might need a new press secretary soon!
---

Jakyl25 posted...

"investigation up to this point shows there was some degree of email exchange between Seth Rich and Wikileaks,"

Exactly. The rest ("oh, it wasn't actually investigation, never mind that he explicitly states so, it was just those evil conspiracy theories!") is globalist wishful thinking.
---

Who is Seth Rich?
---

oh shit, anonymous 4chan poster guarantees Hillary is going to hell or jail (presumably both in the latter case)

nothing fills me with confidence like a random nameless person saying a thing on the internet
---

It's a good post. But the sad thing is Clinton is not going to be facing the courts over this one. The sadder thing is Clinton is just a puppet. The saddest thing is that ones who could be good men helping humanity progress towards the stars are being used by Clinton's puppetmasters to keep humanity down like pigs in the mud.
---

the saddester thing is you thinking that's a good post
---

The essence of the post - that media shills are panicking to keep this story overshadowed by more anti-Russian bullshit, and that in itself is proof enough of fishiness - is what makes it great.
---

actually it's right wing shills peddling a conspiracy theory to distract from negative Trump stories

Seth Rich died a year ago, but Fox News suddenly has some random investigator on to talk about him with no actual evidence at the same time everyone's talking about Trump leaking intel to Russians and the Comey memo

fishy
---