Current Events > Why the hell hasn't Gambit been in any of the live X-Men movies? (spoilers)

Topic List
Page List: 1
Sting
04/20/17 9:32:04 PM
#1:


Yes, I know, he was in the first Wolverine. But that doesn't count because for 1) It was Wolverine, not X-Men, and for 2) He only had a small role in that movie. So why is it that we haven't gotten one of the most popular X-Men in a live movie? They need to put him in a movie already.
---
IT'S SHOWTIME FOLKS!
... Copied to Clipboard!
AvlButtslam
04/20/17 9:34:03 PM
#2:


Oh yeah that reminds me I thought Channing Tatum was supposed to play him in a solo movie
---
Hey kiddies
... Copied to Clipboard!
SSJGrimReaper
04/20/17 9:34:07 PM
#3:


... Copied to Clipboard!
Hash-Brown
04/20/17 9:35:46 PM
#4:


Sting posted...
It was Wolverine, not X-Men

Literally X-Men Origins: Wolverine.
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
Sting
04/20/17 9:37:01 PM
#5:


Hash-Brown posted...
Sting posted...
It was Wolverine, not X-Men

Literally X-Men Origins: Wolverine.


Yeah but come on, that wasn't a movie with all of the main X-Men characters in it. It was about Weapon X.
---
IT'S SHOWTIME FOLKS!
... Copied to Clipboard!
Hash-Brown
04/20/17 9:41:54 PM
#6:


Sting posted...
Hash-Brown posted...
Sting posted...
It was Wolverine, not X-Men

Literally X-Men Origins: Wolverine.


Yeah but come on, that wasn't a movie with all of the main X-Men characters in it. It was about Weapon X.

It still had several X-Men and was titled as an X-Men movie.
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
Sting
04/20/17 9:45:46 PM
#7:


Hash-Brown posted...
Sting posted...
Hash-Brown posted...
Sting posted...
It was Wolverine, not X-Men

Literally X-Men Origins: Wolverine.


Yeah but come on, that wasn't a movie with all of the main X-Men characters in it. It was about Weapon X.

It still had several X-Men and was titled as an X-Men movie.


But the point of the title was that it was about one of the X-Men's origins. Also, Deadpool sucked in that movie.
---
IT'S SHOWTIME FOLKS!
... Copied to Clipboard!
YookaLaylee
04/20/17 9:46:32 PM
#8:


Sting posted...
Hash-Brown posted...
Sting posted...
It was Wolverine, not X-Men

Literally X-Men Origins: Wolverine.


Yeah but come on, that wasn't a movie with all of the main X-Men characters in it. It was about Weapon X.

Weapon X is part of X-men. It doesn't need to have every X-men character in it to be an X-men movie
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
#9
Post #9 was unavailable or deleted.
YookaLaylee
04/20/17 9:50:22 PM
#10:


shockthemonkey posted...
YookaLaylee posted...
Sting posted...
Hash-Brown posted...
Sting posted...
It was Wolverine, not X-Men

Literally X-Men Origins: Wolverine.


Yeah but come on, that wasn't a movie with all of the main X-Men characters in it. It was about Weapon X.

Weapon X is part of X-men. It doesn't need to have every X-men character in it to be an X-men movie

Are these semantics really worth arguing about when you understand what he was asking?

He's the one arguing semantics. Everyone else is stating facts.
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
#11
Post #11 was unavailable or deleted.
Zack_Attackv1
04/20/17 9:53:07 PM
#12:


... Copied to Clipboard!
dave_is_slick
04/20/17 9:55:13 PM
#13:


YookaLaylee posted...
shockthemonkey posted...
YookaLaylee posted...
Sting posted...
Hash-Brown posted...
Sting posted...
It was Wolverine, not X-Men

Literally X-Men Origins: Wolverine.


Yeah but come on, that wasn't a movie with all of the main X-Men characters in it. It was about Weapon X.

Weapon X is part of X-men. It doesn't need to have every X-men character in it to be an X-men movie

Are these semantics really worth arguing about when you understand what he was asking?

He's the one arguing semantics. Everyone else is stating facts.

Yet everyone on the goddamned planet sees it as a Wolverine movie.
---
The most relaxing version of Aquatic Ambiance I've ever heard:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bl61y1XM7sM
... Copied to Clipboard!
mach25687
04/20/17 9:56:07 PM
#14:


Isn;t gambit and rogue are going to be in the next xmen movie.
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
YookaLaylee
04/20/17 10:09:52 PM
#15:


dave_is_slick posted...
YookaLaylee posted...
shockthemonkey posted...
YookaLaylee posted...
Sting posted...
Hash-Brown posted...
Sting posted...
It was Wolverine, not X-Men

Literally X-Men Origins: Wolverine.


Yeah but come on, that wasn't a movie with all of the main X-Men characters in it. It was about Weapon X.

Weapon X is part of X-men. It doesn't need to have every X-men character in it to be an X-men movie

Are these semantics really worth arguing about when you understand what he was asking?

He's the one arguing semantics. Everyone else is stating facts.

Yet everyone on the goddamned planet sees it as a Wolverine movie.

Wolverine is a member of the X-men. Ergo, it's a X-men movie.
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
Sting
04/21/17 11:04:01 PM
#16:


Lol I guess Logan is an X men movie too then and so is Deadpool, because X men were in it
---
IT'S SHOWTIME FOLKS!
... Copied to Clipboard!
scoobydoobydont
04/21/17 11:05:22 PM
#17:


... Copied to Clipboard!
ManSpread
04/21/17 11:06:10 PM
#18:


... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1