Current Events > -If- we invaded the Middle East, would Democrats have 2020 in the bag?

Topic List	Page List: 1
ShutTheHellUp 04/07/17 11:09:44 AM #1:	Nt --- The bigger the booty the bigger the slug. Currently playing: You for a fool, son. <cite>ShutTheHellUp posted [p:876726962] in -If- we in... [t:75209323]...</cite> <quote>Nt</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
the_cajun88 04/07/17 11:10:05 AM #2:	Not necessarily. --- http://i.imgur.com/ks5GR7C.jpg http://i.imgur.com/vG1Yhak.jpg <cite>the_cajun88 posted [p:876726987] in -If- we in... [t:75209323]...</cite> <quote>Not necessarily.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Antifar 04/07/17 11:11:25 AM #3:	Not if they go along in support of it. --- an aspirin the size of the sun. <cite>Antifar posted [p:876727072] in -If- we in... [t:75209323]...</cite> <quote>Not if they go along in support of it.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
KainWind 04/07/17 11:11:35 AM #4:	Is Hillary the Democrat in question? --- http://i.imgtc.com/pRZqu18C.gif http://i.imgtc.com/jccgiB1G.gif http://i.imgtc.com/WEkU41Yb.gif http://i.imgtc.com/dBcIyU2x.gif <cite>KainWind posted [p:876727082] in -If- we in... [t:75209323]...</cite> <quote>Is Hillary the Democrat in question?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Anarchy_Juiblex 04/07/17 11:11:39 AM #5:	No. "Stay the course." "Don't switch mid stream" etc --- "Tolerance of intolerance is cowardice." ~ Ayaan Hirsi Ali <cite>Anarchy_Juiblex posted [p:876727087] in -If- we in... [t:75209323]...</cite> <quote>No. "Stay the course." "Don't switch mid stream" etc</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Guardian-Sloth 04/07/17 11:12:09 AM #6:	the_cajun88 posted... Not necessarily. <cite>Guardian-Sloth posted [p:876727125] in -If- we in... [t:75209323]...</cite> <quote><cite>the_cajun88 posted...</cite> <quote>Not necessarily.</quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
JJWatt 04/07/17 11:12:16 AM #7:	ITT the middle east is a country to invade --- #1 Player in the NFL <cite>JJWatt posted [p:876727135] in -If- we in... [t:75209323]...</cite> <quote>ITT the middle east is a country to invade</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ShutTheHellUp 04/07/17 11:13:08 AM #8:	JJWatt posted... ITT the middle east is a country to invade We wouldn't necessarily invade just Syria, if history is any indication. --- The bigger the booty the bigger the slug. Currently playing: You for a fool, son. <cite>ShutTheHellUp posted [p:876727186] in -If- we in... [t:75209323]...</cite> <quote><cite>JJWatt posted...</cite> <quote>ITT the middle east is a country to invade</quote> We wouldn't necessarily invade just Syria, if history is any indication.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
JJWatt 04/07/17 11:13:42 AM #9:	ShutTheHellUp posted... JJWatt posted... ITT the middle east is a country to invade We wouldn't necessarily invade just Syria, if history is any indication. Watch out Isreal --- #1 Player in the NFL <cite>JJWatt posted [p:876727213] in -If- we in... [t:75209323]...</cite> <quote><cite>ShutTheHellUp posted...</cite> <quote><cite>JJWatt posted...</cite> <quote>ITT the middle east is a country to invade</quote> We wouldn't necessarily invade just Syria, if history is any indication.</quote> Watch out Isreal</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
the_cajun88 04/07/17 11:14:43 AM #10:	Isreal is not real. --- http://i.imgur.com/ks5GR7C.jpg http://i.imgur.com/vG1Yhak.jpg <cite>the_cajun88 posted [p:876727252] in -If- we in... [t:75209323]...</cite> <quote>Isreal is not real.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Antifar 04/07/17 11:15:58 AM #11:	How can Israel be real if our minds aren't real? --- an aspirin the size of the sun. <cite>Antifar posted [p:876727330] in -If- we in... [t:75209323]...</cite> <quote>How can Israel be real if our minds aren't real?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
the_cajun88 04/07/17 11:16:55 AM #12:	Antifar posted... How can Israel be real if our minds aren't real? Not Israel. We're talking about Isreal. --- http://i.imgur.com/ks5GR7C.jpg http://i.imgur.com/vG1Yhak.jpg <cite>the_cajun88 posted [p:876727382] in -If- we in... [t:75209323]...</cite> <quote><cite>Antifar posted...</cite> <quote>How can Israel be real if our minds aren't real?</quote> Not Israel. We're talking about Isreal.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ThyCorndog 04/07/17 11:17:32 AM #13:	Is-it-real? --- Hey what's going on in this thread http://i.imgur.com/6fpKRW8.gif http://i.imgur.com/RNZi0gk.gif <cite>ThyCorndog posted [p:876727408] in -If- we in... [t:75209323]...</cite> <quote>Is-it-real?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DevsBro 04/07/17 11:21:44 AM #15:	Who was the last president to not get re-elected again? --- http://backloggery.com/devsbro/sig.gif http://i.imgur.com/kU5vu5N.png Never pepper popcorn <cite>DevsBro posted [p:876727654] in -If- we in... [t:75209323]...</cite> <quote>Who was the last president to not get re-elected again?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Antifar 04/07/17 11:22:15 AM #16:	DevsBro posted... Who was the last president to not get re-elected again? HW. --- an aspirin the size of the sun. <cite>Antifar posted [p:876727686] in -If- we in... [t:75209323]...</cite> <quote><cite>DevsBro posted...</cite> <quote>Who was the last president to not get re-elected again?</quote> HW.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Flaming_Fire619 04/07/17 11:23:27 AM #17:	On the contrary. A war starting up would probably hurt the Democrats more than the Republicans, especially if it surrounds Syria. One of the major things that people thought Hillary was going to do was start a war. Now, while Donald is in the White House, and would be the one starting it, most of their base sees it as justified. That means that Democrats supporting it will be a wash for the election. But if they don't support it, and try to oppose another war? Then they look like the heartless politicians who do not want justice for all those killed by the chemical attack and otherwise in Syria. Republicans could eat that up. "Democrats tried to block actions that would save countless civilian lives" is a headline that would ruin any candidate. The only way that this war could hurt Republicans is if war weariness is still high. Considering that most Donald supporters are hating this attack because it could draw us into another war, that may hurt him in the long run...but I doubt it, unless the war truly is long. --- Not changing until Shelton Benjamin wins the WHC Started: Jan. 10. 2009 http://myanimelist.net/profile/fantheflames <cite>Flaming_Fire619 posted [p:876727759] in -If- we in... [t:75209323]...</cite> <quote>On the contrary. A war starting up would probably hurt the Democrats more than the Republicans, especially if it surrounds Syria. One of the major things that people thought Hillary was going to do was start a war. Now, while Donald is in the White House, and would be the one starting it, most of their base sees it as justified. That means that Democrats supporting it will be a wash for the election. But if they don't support it, and try to oppose another war? Then they look like the heartless politicians who do not want justice for all those killed by the chemical attack and otherwise in Syria. Republicans could eat that up. "Democrats tried to block actions that would save countless civilian lives" is a headline that would ruin any candidate. The only way that this war could hurt Republicans is if war weariness is still high. Considering that most Donald supporters are hating this attack because it could draw us into another war, that may hurt him in the long run...but I doubt it, unless the war truly is long.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ShutTheHellUp 04/07/17 11:32:43 AM #18:	Flaming_Fire619 posted... On the contrary. A war starting up would probably hurt the Democrats more than the Republicans, especially if it surrounds Syria. One of the major things that people thought Hillary was going to do was start a war. Now, while Donald is in the White House, and would be the one starting it, most of their base sees it as justified. That means that Democrats supporting it will be a wash for the election. But if they don't support it, and try to oppose another war? Then they look like the heartless politicians who do not want justice for all those killed by the chemical attack and otherwise in Syria. Republicans could eat that up. "Democrats tried to block actions that would save countless civilian lives" is a headline that would ruin any candidate. The only way that this war could hurt Republicans is if war weariness is still high. Considering that most Donald supporters are hating this attack because it could draw us into another war, that may hurt him in the long run...but I doubt it, unless the war truly is long. This is what I find (about ISIS, but gives idea of how Americans feel about war in the current climate) http://thehill.com/policy/defense/260313-poll-americans-want-more-action-against-isis-but-oppose-ground-troops Basically, Americans want to fight ISIS, but not in a protracted war with ground troops. I don't know but would presume that applies for military intervention in this context. --- The bigger the booty the bigger the slug. Currently playing: You for a fool, son. <cite>ShutTheHellUp posted [p:876728288] in -If- we in... [t:75209323]...</cite> <quote><cite>Flaming_Fire619 posted...</cite> <quote>On the contrary. A war starting up would probably hurt the Democrats more than the Republicans, especially if it surrounds Syria. One of the major things that people thought Hillary was going to do was start a war. Now, while Donald is in the White House, and would be the one starting it, most of their base sees it as justified. That means that Democrats supporting it will be a wash for the election. But if they don't support it, and try to oppose another war? Then they look like the heartless politicians who do not want justice for all those killed by the chemical attack and otherwise in Syria. Republicans could eat that up. "Democrats tried to block actions that would save countless civilian lives" is a headline that would ruin any candidate. The only way that this war could hurt Republicans is if war weariness is still high. Considering that most Donald supporters are hating this attack because it could draw us into another war, that may hurt him in the long run...but I doubt it, unless the war truly is long.</quote> This is what I find (about ISIS, but gives idea of how Americans feel about war in the current climate) http://thehill.com/policy/defense/260313-poll-americans-want-more-action-against-isis-but-oppose-ground-troops Basically, Americans want to fight ISIS, but not in a protracted war with ground troops. I don't know but would presume that applies for military intervention in this context.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1

Current Events > -If- we invaded the Middle East, would Democrats have 2020 in the bag? (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > -If- we invaded the Middle East, would Democrats have 2020 in the bag?