Current Events > I'm so confused, I thought Liberals hated Assad and Putin

(+) Yeah! (+)

now they support Russia and Assad after Trump strikes Syria.

I think it's bad move. I don't get the Assad and Russia propaganda garbage.

ISIS actively threatens to kill us. Assad and Russia have never even done anything for us to be scared of them. I don't get the move, we are not the world police

Nobody likes Assad and Putin, we just don't think strikes that will likely kill many civilians are a way to deal with Assad.
---

Most people are probably against military action in the middle east. At least I hope so.

Unfortunately our overlords in washington love playing real life Risk.
---

You don't have to support Assad to think that U.S. military intervention will harm more than help.
---

Paper_Okami posted...

Nobody likes Assad and Putin, we just don't think strikes that will likely kill many civilians are a way to deal with Assad.

Obama has murdered countless civilians with drones, that's a given with a strike of any kind.

You either have to deploy troops or kill civilians. But ISIS should be the one getting drone striked and barraged with missiles, not Assad.

I don't care what "rules he broke" that Obama put in place or whatever. We aren't the world police and we shouldn't be enforcing shit in other garbage countries

TomNook20 posted...

Most people are probably against military action in the middle east. At least I hope so.

Unfortunately our overlords in washington love playing real life Risk.

I'm pro military action against terror threats and other countries that openly threaten us.

Has Assad or Russia ever threatened us ever

Milkman5 posted...

TomNook20 posted...

Most people are probably against military action in the middle east. At least I hope so.

Unfortunately our overlords in washington love playing real life Risk.

Has Assad or Russia ever threatened us ever

Can't be serious
---

Certain insane Liberals will always support what Trump opposes no matter what. Even if it's in conflict of interest.
---

Sanktu_Vyvorant posted...

Can't be serious

wow, you sure proved me wrong

It seems like everyone flip flopped on this since a big thing I remember against Hillary was her wanting to put in a no fly zone which would only piss off Russia.
---

They literally say the opposite of what Trump says at any given moment, there is no common sense to factor in, just blind hate.

GOATTHlEF posted...

Well it was a stupid thing to say mudbray

I'm waiting for some proof

I can't help, but feel Trump is a fool and got tricked by this dumb anti-Russia propaganda shit that has been all over the news for the past 8 months

Guardian-Sloth posted...

They literally say the opposite of what Trump says at any given moment, there is no common sense to factor in, just blind hate.

---

Guardian-Sloth posted...

They literally say the opposite of what Trump says at any given moment, there is no common sense to factor in, just blind hate.

This. Liberals have nothing to stand on since this strike was a slap in the face to Russia, blowing their whole narrative to hell. The next few months will be interesting to say the least.
---

CrimsonRage posted...

TC really needs to stop these "I saw two liberals say thing so I'm gonna act like all liberals say thing" topics.

Nobody but idiots support Assad and Putin, people just don't want another damn Middle Eastern war.

stop acting like the DNC hasn't been openly against Russia and Assad for a year now

CrimsonRage posted...

Nobody but idiots support Assad and Putin, people just don't want another damn Middle Eastern war.

/topic

Didn't Hillary just state we should strike Syria's air fields?
---

Kirby posted...

Didn't Hillary just state we should strike Syria's air fields?

that's exactly what Trump just did

Milkman5 posted...

now they support Russia and Assad after Trump strikes Syria.

I think it's bad move. I don't get the Assad and Russia propaganda garbage.

ISIS actively threatens to kill us. Assad and Russia have never even done anything for us to be scared of them. I don't get the move, we are not the world police

Here's the thing about Assad. He broke an agreement he had with the U.S. in which he "supposedly" gave up his chemical weapons last time he used them. He crossed the red line and the U.S. responded by targeting the airfield where the chemical strikes came from.
---

100% liberal here.

I am vegan, drink almond flavored soy milk, and only wear clothes I find in the dumpster behind the local Salvation Army (cuz supporting the establishment is for suckers).

Y'all are meat eating murderers.
---

Milkman5 posted...

now they support Russia and Assad after Trump strikes Syria.

I think it's bad move. I don't get the Assad and Russia propaganda garbage.

ISIS actively threatens to kill us. Assad and Russia have never even done anything for us to be scared of them. I don't get the move, we are not the world police

Trumpanzees have trouble reading well

More at 11
---

Milkman5 posted...

Kirby posted...

Didn't Hillary just state we should strike Syria's air fields?

that's exactly what Trump just did

After he said she was a warmonger for saying it
---

CrimsonRage posted...

scorpion41 posted...

Guardian-Sloth posted...

They literally say the opposite of what Trump says at any given moment, there is no common sense to factor in, just blind hate.

This. Liberals have nothing to stand on since this strike was a slap in the face to Russia, blowing their whole narrative to hell. The next few months will be interesting to say the least.

What about the narrative that Trump voters used? "Vote Trump, Hillary is gonna drag us into another pointless ME war and antagonise Russia!"

Yeah, liberals are the only flip-floppers, huh?

Admit it, if this was Obama/Hillary you would be defending the fuck out of this. You can't now because Trump made the move, which is justified.
---

HannibalBarca3 posted...

Here's the thing about Assad. He broke an agreement he had with the U.S. in which he "supposedly" gave up his chemical weapons last time he used them. He crossed the red line and the U.S. responded by targeting the airfield where the chemical strikes came from.

Who cares? Why should America play world police? let someone else play world police and get the backlash from it

Milkman5 posted...

HannibalBarca3 posted...

Here's the thing about Assad. He broke an agreement he had with the U.S. in which he "supposedly" gave up his chemical weapons last time he used them. He crossed the red line and the U.S. responded by targeting the airfield where the chemical strikes came from.

Who cares? Why should America play world police? let someone else play world police and get the backlash from it

You just don't walk away from that. He broke his promise he should pay the consequences. The thing is that Trump wasn't planning on removing him but Assad pretty much sealed his own fate.
---

Milkman5 posted...

Sanktu_Vyvorant posted...

Can't be serious

wow, you sure proved me wrong

Since you posted the equivalent of "The sun is going to die tomorrow" I don't think I need to.

You forget about the whole Ukraine mess or something?
---

Paper_Okami posted...

Nobody likes Assad and Putin, we just don't think strikes that will likely kill many civilians are a way to deal with Assad.

Then what is?
---