So instead seeing the same characters win every year, we can have an interesting contest that's not easily predictable: the GOTY selection ensures that no game is ever entered twice into a bracket tournament.
It'd be fairly trivial to come up with a shortlist of ~10 potential GOTY candidates (Arkham City, Portal 2, Skyrim, Skyward Sword, ME2, LBP2, GOW3, MW3, etc.); however, it's not clear which of these would win in a 1:1 polling format. And if we were to expand the list to include Tier 2 and Tier 3 games (for example Sonic Generations vs. RAGE), it'd be hard to submit a perfect bracket.
-- GameFAQs.com: Where YOU make the content, but CBS makes the money. http://lueshi.info/Mario_Zelda_Tier_List.gif
This idea has been pitched multiple times before, and really should be done, yes.
--
Cats land on their feet. Toast lands peanut butter side down. A cat with toast strapped to its back will hover above the ground in a state of quantum indecision
LordoftheMorons posted... There are easily 64 characters people care about; there are not 64 games that a decent percentage of people care about each year.
right, it would be a 32 or 16 game contest, probably with a vote-in.
Granted, note that last year there were like...over 100 games in the end-of-year polls. This was like 10 on each system, though, including 10 iPhone games, though, so definitely some chaff that you'd want to drop in a 1v1 format.
--
Cats land on their feet. Toast lands peanut butter side down. A cat with toast strapped to its back will hover above the ground in a state of quantum indecision
I would agree because allen forgets some obvious games makes him look silly
Also no crappy catagories either. That way we can have the strongest games competing in the final polls. Red dead and batman got robbed last 2 years from appearing in the final polls.
1v1 format makes sense but not a contest for prizes or karma just a goty contest