Current Events > You're kicking your kids out of the house once they turn 18

(+) Yeah! (+)

Lmao no.

By the time they're 18, it'll probably take a platoon size element of individuals to afford housing for a single family

Anyone who does this shouldn't have been parents in the first place.

There'd multiple good reasons to kick a child out.

The world isn't black and white.

https://i.imgur.com/hTTQmlx.jpg

I'm not a piece of shit and I've read more than enough studies that show that doing things like that drastically lower their chances of escaping poverty as they'd be thrust immediately into that.

If your reason is "they turned 18" you're not fit to have ever been a parent.

Don't justify patterns of abuse because some circumstances might justify kicking someone out.

You're intentionally being dense now.

Like I said the world isn't black and white,... and there's a shit ton of good reasons a child was kicked out at 18. Reasons that you know full damn well isn't only about them being 18.

To reply with, "Oh OnLy BeCaUsE tHeY wErE 18" is being intentionally dense. Same to your dancing over not all children kicked out at 18 isn't some tragic story of parental abuse or toxicity.

I specifically said it depends on the child on whether I'd kick the child out. Someone embracing criminal, terrorist, violent behaviors cannot stay in my home.

That wouldn't be because they turned 18 now is it?

No it would not. If this child of mine who is a legal adult is acting a certain way inside my home that is dangerous to my me and my family, THAT would be why the child who is an adult was kicked out.

You're being dense.

It'll piss you off to find out that some cities are bringing back laws that prevents more than x number of non related individuals from living under the same roof. The laws have an origin in targeting women who lived together under the accusation that you'd only get 4+ non related women in an apartment together if they were engaging in prostitution or lesbianism. So you know, some really old effing laws.

Then you are not in opposition to what I said. Stop acting like it.

I said that the issue was kicking them out because theyre 18. Not if you have a good reason to kick them and they're 18 that's bad.

Learn to fucking read.

You'll find that it was you who responded to me first.

You responded to my post that specifically responded to the topic asking whether or not I would kick my kids out at 18 and you claiming any parent who'd kick a child out is bad.

I responded and explained in detail that it depends on the child. You specifically responded to my post, ignored everything I posted and decided to go down some strawman of, "Oh OnLy BeCaUsE tHeY wErE 18."

The broad conclusion that you made on anyone who kicked their child out at 18, did so literally and simply because they turned 18 is a bad assumption.

You're intentionally being dense now.

Like I said the world isn't black and white,... and there's a s*** ton of good reasons a child was kicked out at 18. Reasons that you know full damn well isn't only about them being 18.

To reply with, "Oh OnLy BeCaUsE tHeY wErE 18" is being intentionally dense. Same to your dancing over not all children kicked out at 18 isn't some tragic story of parental abuse or toxicity.

I specifically said it depends on the child on whether I'd kick the child out. Someone embracing criminal, terrorist, violent behaviors cannot stay in my home. Even then the things I mentioned above need further specifics on a case by case basis since all situations aren't created equally.

Bottom line is my child is not unconditionally living in my home once they turn 18.

If your child turned out to be such a dangerous individual, that would have been partially your fault regardless of them turning 18.

Kicking them out after that fact does not absolve you of being a shitty parent.

That is objectively not true.

You could have used a different word, but chose to use objectively incorrectly.

Good fucking job.

That is objectively not true.

Your child is not a video game, program or robot you can master override. The point is, a parent can teach, guide and discipline but so much. In the end, a human will choose what type of human being they want to be regardless of what their parent or guardian taught them. On top of this, there are multiple influences that goes into what makes up the personality of a child later grown ass adult.

This misconception that a bad grown ass adult or even child is the result of bad parenting is a huge misconception.

Thanks, as what that user claimed is not an objective fact lol.

How a child turns put is not always due to the parent or guardians actions.

You can have bad parents produce great children and good parents produce awful children. Children are human beings you can attempt to influence and guide, but ultimately they are at the drivers seat on the type of human they wish to be in the end.

And who do you think is responsible for a child being exposed to and potentially radicalized by outside sources?

Theres a reason that parents who dont monitor their kids internet usage are considered bad parents.