ps3 era fuck up their lighting so bad?

Topic List	Page List: 1
apolloooo 04/20/21 12:59:06 AM #1:	mas effect: (original) remaster: --- http://i.imgtc.com/iJyp6bF.png http://i.imgtc.com/ZBw36Qh.png Thanks for the peeps that made the pics <3 if i make typos it means i am on phone <cite>apolloooo posted [p:953023589] in why modern... [t:79414930]...</cite> <quote>mas effect: (original) remaster: </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
apolloooo 04/20/21 12:59:31 AM #2:	remaster: --- http://i.imgtc.com/iJyp6bF.png http://i.imgtc.com/ZBw36Qh.png Thanks for the peeps that made the pics <3 if i make typos it means i am on phone <cite>apolloooo posted [p:953023596] in why modern... [t:79414930]...</cite> <quote>remaster: </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
apolloooo 04/20/21 1:00:16 AM #3:	batman: --- http://i.imgtc.com/iJyp6bF.png http://i.imgtc.com/ZBw36Qh.png Thanks for the peeps that made the pics <3 if i make typos it means i am on phone <cite>apolloooo posted [p:953023609] in why modern... [t:79414930]...</cite> <quote>batman: </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Darmik 04/20/21 1:02:36 AM #4:	The Mass Effect Remaster looks more realistic to me. No idea what happened in the Arkham remaster. --- Kind Regards, Darmik <cite>Darmik posted [p:953023661] in why modern... [t:79414930]...</cite> <quote>The Mass Effect Remaster looks more realistic to me. No idea what happened in the Arkham remaster. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DarthAragorn 04/20/21 1:04:19 AM #5:	The lighting in old games was actually not good at all You're just used to it --- 100% garbage waste of human skin <cite>DarthAragorn posted [p:953023693] in why modern... [t:79414930]...</cite> <quote>The lighting in old games was actually not good at all You're just used to it </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ThirstForBLOOD 04/20/21 1:04:52 AM #6:	The Arkham Remaster was just pure laziness <cite>ThirstForBLOOD posted [p:953023704] in why modern... [t:79414930]...</cite> <quote>The Arkham Remaster was just pure laziness </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
apolloooo 04/20/21 1:06:10 AM #7:	Darmik posted... The Mass Effect Remaster looks more realistic to me. No idea what happened in the Arkham remaster. even if it looks more "realistic" it's less pleasing than the original. like you just turn up the bloom and call it a day --- http://i.imgtc.com/iJyp6bF.png http://i.imgtc.com/ZBw36Qh.png Thanks for the peeps that made the pics <3 if i make typos it means i am on phone <cite>apolloooo posted [p:953023739] in why modern... [t:79414930]...</cite> <quote>Darmik posted... </cite> <quote>The Mass Effect Remaster looks more realistic to me. No idea what happened in the Arkham remaster.</quote>even if it looks more "realistic" it's less pleasing than the original. like you just turn up the bloom and call it a day </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Irony 04/20/21 1:06:55 AM #8:	ME Remaster looks better --- I am Mogar, God of Irony and The Devourer of Topics. <cite>Irony posted [p:953023751] in why modern... [t:79414930]...</cite> <quote>ME Remaster looks better </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#9	Post #9 was unavailable or deleted.
apolloooo 04/20/21 1:08:01 AM #10:	this one is better though (but i find the lens flare super annoying) --- http://i.imgtc.com/iJyp6bF.png http://i.imgtc.com/ZBw36Qh.png Thanks for the peeps that made the pics <3 if i make typos it means i am on phone <cite>apolloooo posted [p:953023773] in why modern... [t:79414930]...</cite> <quote>this one is better though (but i find the lens flare super annoying) </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Doom_Art 04/20/21 1:08:17 AM #11:	The ME: Remaster stuff is closer to the original concept artwork. And IIRC ME1's engine was notorious for handling low lighting and shadows poorly. The Arkham City thing is because the original cutscene was pre-rendered whereas in the remaster it's all in-engine. --- Not removing this until Mega Man 64 is released on the Wii Virtual Console. Started on: 12/1/2009 https://imgur.com/mPvcy <cite>Doom_Art posted [p:953023780] in why modern... [t:79414930]...</cite> <quote>The ME: Remaster stuff is closer to the original concept artwork. And IIRC ME1's engine was notorious for handling low lighting and shadows poorly. The Arkham City thing is because the original cutscene was pre-rendered whereas in the remaster it's all in-engine. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
apolloooo 04/20/21 1:09:17 AM #12:	the remaster picture looks like it has depth --- http://i.imgtc.com/iJyp6bF.png http://i.imgtc.com/ZBw36Qh.png Thanks for the peeps that made the pics <3 if i make typos it means i am on phone <cite>apolloooo posted [p:953023798] in why modern... [t:79414930]...</cite> <quote> the remaster picture looks like it has depth </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Guide 04/20/21 1:09:46 AM #13:	I'm not seeing the issue with either remaster. --- evening main 2.4356848e+91 https://youtu.be/Acn5IptKWQU <cite>Guide posted [p:953023809] in why modern... [t:79414930]...</cite> <quote>I'm not seeing the issue with either remaster. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Darmik 04/20/21 1:12:38 AM #14:	apolloooo posted... even if it looks more "realistic" it's less pleasing than the original. like you just turn up the bloom and call it a day Eh I dunno. The light shafts in ME1 look like curtains and don't really make sense. --- Kind Regards, Darmik <cite>Darmik posted [p:953023872] in why modern... [t:79414930]...</cite> <quote>apolloooo posted... </cite> <quote>even if it looks more "realistic" it's less pleasing than the original. like you just turn up the bloom and call it a day</quote> Eh I dunno. The light shafts in ME1 look like curtains and don't really make sense. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Master_Bass 04/20/21 1:13:42 AM #15:	Irony posted... ME Remaster looks better --- Many Bothans died to bring you this post. <cite>Master_Bass posted [p:953023894] in why modern... [t:79414930]...</cite> <quote>Irony posted... </cite> <quote>ME Remaster looks better</quote> </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Darmik 04/20/21 1:18:09 AM #16:	I think this is a better example of what you're talking about The atmosphere is completely different. Technically it's more coherent with 3 but it's way less mysterious and foreboding. --- Kind Regards, Darmik <cite>Darmik posted [p:953023984] in why modern... [t:79414930]...</cite> <quote>I think this is a better example of what you're talking about The atmosphere is completely different. Technically it's more coherent with 3 but it's way less mysterious and foreboding. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#17	Post #17 was unavailable or deleted.
#18	Post #18 was unavailable or deleted.
apolloooo 04/20/21 2:23:44 AM #19:	Darmik posted... I think this is a better example of what you're talking about The atmosphere is completely different. Technically it's more coherent with 3 but it's way less mysterious and foreboding. Wtf lol --- http://i.imgtc.com/iJyp6bF.png http://i.imgtc.com/ZBw36Qh.png Thanks for the peeps that made the pics <3 if i make typos it means i am on phone <cite>apolloooo posted [p:953025163] in why modern... [t:79414930]...</cite> <quote>Darmik posted... </cite> <quote>I think this is a better example of what you're talking about The atmosphere is completely different. Technically it's more coherent with 3 but it's way less mysterious and foreboding.</quote>Wtf lol </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Lonestar2000 04/20/21 2:27:30 AM #20:	God, ME1 was so fucking good. I hated how they dumbed down the sequels. --- Rumble Roses. Someone enters the room. Them: O_O Me: What?! I always play games without my pants on!- Inmate 922335 #ImpeachToadDickTrump <cite>Lonestar2000 posted [p:953025215] in why modern... [t:79414930]...</cite> <quote>God, ME1 was so fucking good. I hated how they dumbed down the sequels. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ThirstForBLOOD 04/20/21 2:11:17 PM #21:	Lonestar2000 posted... God, ME1 was so fucking good. I hated how they dumbed down the sequels. ME2 was amazing <cite>ThirstForBLOOD posted [p:953039295] in why modern... [t:79414930]...</cite> <quote>Lonestar2000 posted... </cite> <quote>God, ME1 was so fucking good. I hated how they dumbed down the sequels.</quote> ME2 was amazing </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
littlebro07 04/20/21 2:13:46 PM #22:	Worst offender IMO is Halo CE. Specifically the first Flood level. in the original youre in a dark spooky swamp in the remaster youre in a bright colorful forest just totally wrecked the atmosphere --- https://i.imgtc.com/MGGa6Os.gif <cite>littlebro07 posted [p:953039390] in why modern... [t:79414930]...</cite> <quote>Worst offender IMO is Halo CE. Specifically the first Flood level. in the original youre in a dark spooky swamp in the remaster youre in a bright colorful forest just totally wrecked the atmosphere </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#23	Post #23 was unavailable or deleted.
Xavier_On_High 04/20/21 2:56:04 PM #24:	It's like there's a need to put god rays and diffusion effects in everything, just because the technology exists now. --- http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_ltnafhjcUz1qmxswbo1_500.gif <cite>Xavier_On_High posted [p:953040701] in why modern... [t:79414930]...</cite> <quote>It's like there's a need to put god rays and diffusion effects in everything, just because the technology exists now. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Jagr_68 04/20/21 2:59:00 PM #25:	The early 2010s were a time for stupid trends like chromatic aberration, intense blue and brown filters, and high contrast brightness. --- New York Rangers [2004-2008] https://media.giphy.com/media/WvQHBYW0q4TuxdAg61/giphy.gif https://psnprofiles.com/Jaromiroquai68 <cite>Jagr_68 posted [p:953040786] in why modern... [t:79414930]...</cite> <quote>The early 2010s were a time for stupid trends like chromatic aberration, intense blue and brown filters, and high contrast brightness. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
RustyFerret 04/20/21 3:01:03 PM #26:	I do think game remasters are suffering from some of the issues that movies suffer from when they are remastered for newer releases, where these production companies change the color temperature which changes the tones of scenes or add ridiculous amounts of DNR. It's just way worse with games because they can go in and change the actual elements of the game, but they don't try and match the artistic direction of the original. <cite>RustyFerret posted [p:953040854] in why modern... [t:79414930]...</cite> <quote>I do think game remasters are suffering from some of the issues that movies suffer from when they are remastered for newer releases, where these production companies change the color temperature which changes the tones of scenes or add ridiculous amounts of DNR. It's just way worse with games because they can go in and change the actual elements of the game, but they don't try and match the artistic direction of the original. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1

Current Events > why modern remasters of 360/ps3 era fuck up their lighting so bad? (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > why modern remasters of 360/ps3 era fuck up their lighting so bad?