Poll of the Day > From a numismatic standpoint, but hope Biden doesnt pick Warren as sec. tres.

Topic List	Page List: 1
argonautweakend 11/13/20 9:46:16 PM #1:	While it would be neat to have the first ever series of US currency with two female signatures(treasurer has been a female signature since 1934 D series notes, and secretary of treasury has always been male), I don't want it to be Elizabeth Warren, a name i've seen floated around. Why? Look at this shit: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/9e/Elizabeth_Warren_Signature.svg That is a god awful signature. Maybe even worse than Steven Mnuchin's https://www.coinworld.com/images/default-source/news/mnuchin-from-cbsnews-lead.jpg?Status=Master&sfvrsn=74ed1e7f_0 Hell, this is George P. Schultz level bad https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/ae/George_Pratt_Shultz_Signature.svg/1024px-George_Pratt_Shultz_Signature.svg.png In my world, where all I care about is dollar bills....I don't know... Another name I have seen around is Sarah Bloom Raskin. I like that name. I don't know what her signature looks like, but the name is badass, at least. <cite>argonautweakend posted [p:947141227] in From a num... [t:79108964]...</cite> <quote>While it would be neat to have the first ever series of US currency with two female signatures(treasurer has been a female signature since 1934 D series notes, and secretary of treasury has always been male), I don't want it to be Elizabeth Warren, a name i've seen floated around. Why? Look at this shit: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/9e/Elizabeth_Warren_Signature.svg That is a god awful signature. Maybe even worse than Steven Mnuchin's https://www.coinworld.com/images/default-source/news/mnuchin-from-cbsnews-lead.jpg?Status=Master&sfvrsn=74ed1e7f_0 Hell, this is George P. Schultz level bad https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/ae/George_Pratt_Shultz_Signature.svg/1024px-George_Pratt_Shultz_Signature.svg.png In my world, where all I care about is dollar bills....I don't know... Another name I have seen around is Sarah Bloom Raskin. I like that name. I don't know what her signature looks like, but the name is badass, at least. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LuciferSage 11/13/20 9:49:56 PM #2:	Do you really think for one second that Biden would nominate a non-establishment non-corporate democrat to any position above White House groundskeeper? --- http://i170.photobucket.com/albums/u260/luciferxsage/LxSsigFinal.png pigs we get what pigs deserve... -\|\\| \| \|/\| <cite>LuciferSage posted [p:947141353] in From a num... [t:79108964]...</cite> <quote>Do you really think for one second that Biden would nominate a non-establishment non-corporate democrat to any position above White House groundskeeper? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zeus 11/13/20 9:59:35 PM #3:	argonautweakend posted... While it would be neat to have the first ever series of US currency with two female signatures(treasurer has been a female signature since 1934 D series notes, and secretary of treasury has always been male), I don't want it to be Elizabeth Warren, a name i've seen floated around. Why? Look at this shit: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/9e/Elizabeth_Warren_Signature.svg That and she'd be a lousy treasury secretary, but I guess the signature thing is more important =p Also that's still more legible than my signature. I might as well just sign with a "Z" LuciferSage posted... Do you really think for one second that Biden would nominate a non-establishment non-corporate democrat to any position above White House groundskeeper? She's a bit of a tweener and they were both in the Obama administration. If Biden were 10 or 20 years younger and still charting his own course, he'd probably pick somebody a little interesting. Right now when he doesn't even want to be president, he's probably just going to go with whoever the DNC (or Harris) wants. --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| There are precious few at ease / With moral ambiguities / So we act as though they don't exist. <cite>Zeus posted [p:947141658] in From a num... [t:79108964]...</cite> <quote>argonautweakend posted... </cite> <quote>While it would be neat to have the first ever series of US currency with two female signatures(treasurer has been a female signature since 1934 D series notes, and secretary of treasury has always been male), I don't want it to be Elizabeth Warren, a name i've seen floated around. Why? Look at this shit: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/9e/Elizabeth_Warren_Signature.svg</quote> That and she'd be a lousy treasury secretary, but I guess the signature thing is more important =p Also that's still more legible than my signature. I might as well just sign with a "Z" LuciferSage posted... </cite> <quote>Do you really think for one second that Biden would nominate a non-establishment non-corporate democrat to any position above White House groundskeeper?</quote> She's a bit of a tweener and they were both in the Obama administration. If Biden were 10 or 20 years younger and still charting his own course, he'd probably pick somebody a little interesting. Right now when he doesn't even want to be president, he's probably just going to go with whoever the DNC (or Harris) wants. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mead 11/13/20 10:18:25 PM #4:	Putting a signature that bad on our money would greatly dishonor the memory of the creator of US currency, mister William Bucks --- The Betrayer <cite>Mead posted [p:947142267] in From a num... [t:79108964]...</cite> <quote>Putting a signature that bad on our money would greatly dishonor the memory of the creator of US currency, mister William Bucks </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1

Poll of the Day > From a numismatic standpoint, but hope Biden doesnt pick Warren as sec. tres. (+) Yeah! (+)

Poll of the Day > From a numismatic standpoint, but hope Biden doesnt pick Warren as sec. tres.