Topic List |
Page List:
1, 2 |
---|---|
Enclave 04/14/24 2:55:51 PM #51: |
Definitely does seem like it's just a terrible mannequin.
--- The commercial says that Church isn't for perfect people, I guess that's why I'm an atheist. ... Copied to Clipboard!
|
gamepimp12 04/14/24 3:29:38 PM #52: |
Zanzenburger posted...
A big reason why this is an issue is because they did not have alternative options at the Tokyo games. The alternative options available now are a result of this type of pushback. The fact that, even with more options, this is the outfit they chose to highlight, shows where the focus is being directed. they definitely had these options the 2020 Olympics why are we lying --- we rich now but used to be slaves,we pushing whips now we used to be whipped,rockin chains when we used to be in 'em ... Copied to Clipboard!
|
Mistere_Man 04/14/24 3:37:25 PM #53: |
It reminds me of a one piece swimsuit
https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/c/c810d53d.jpg --- Water+Fall=Radiation. ... Copied to Clipboard!
|
deoxxys 04/14/24 6:54:45 PM #54: |
Kradek posted...
I understand that just fine. What part do you not understand about it not needing to exist at all? Also the picture you used as your example for "it's just the mannequin that makes it look bad" is not the one from the OP.Just because there's some outraged people online doesn't mean it shouldn't exist. It exists because it's a preference of some athletes. A lot of athletes like tight fitting outfits with the legs and arms cut off because it offers the least resistance when there's nothing flapping around and it doesn't get in way of their arms and legs movement. --- twylite sprinkle http://tinyurl.com/jeqyas3 https://tinyurl.com/mgvx7h2 ... Copied to Clipboard!
|
CSCA33 04/14/24 6:57:22 PM #55: |
deoxxys posted...
Just because there's some outraged people online doesn't mean it shouldn't exist.Are you still referring to the person they literally pay to promote their products? --- [click here] pronouns incoming SHE HAS PRONOUNS!>(She/Her)<CHECK OUT my PRONOUNS ... Copied to Clipboard!
|
deoxxys 04/14/24 7:00:51 PM #56: |
CSCA33 posted...
Are you still referring to the person they literally pay to promote their products?I'm talking about Kradek saying how the unitard as a whole appointment exist --- twylite sprinkle http://tinyurl.com/jeqyas3 https://tinyurl.com/mgvx7h2 ... Copied to Clipboard!
|
SauI_Goodman 04/14/24 7:06:02 PM #57: |
Is it any more revealing than what the gymnasts are forced to wear? Or the women wrestlers with the singlets.
--- Italian, French, German. ... Copied to Clipboard!
|
Sufferedphoenix 04/14/24 10:53:20 PM #58: |
SauI_Goodman posted...
Is it any more revealing than what the gymnasts are forced to wear? Or the women wrestlers with the singlets. Are singles really revealing? I wore one when I wrestled and I chose to I didn't have to. --- I put my heart and soul into my work and I fear I have lost my mind in the process ... Copied to Clipboard!
|
#59 | Post #59 was unavailable or deleted. |
ssjevot 04/14/24 11:07:17 PM #60: |
[LFAQs-redacted-quote]
It's optional to wear it and the picture someone posted of someone allegedly wearing it doesn't look bad. So I would say it's an overreaction. --- Favorite Games: BlazBlue: Central Fiction, Street Fighter III: Third Strike, Bayonetta, Bloodborne thats a username you habe - chuckyhacksss ... Copied to Clipboard!
|
lderivedx 04/14/24 11:09:27 PM #61: |
ssjevot posted...
So I would say it's an overreaction. idk it's definitely presented by Nike as the uniform for women, rather than a misrepresentation of one of the uniforms they can choose from. There's definitely an issue with that. --- i cant get off unless we're violating at least four OSHA regulations ... Copied to Clipboard!
|
DnDer 04/14/24 11:10:03 PM #62: |
[LFAQs-redacted-quote]
I don't think so. "You get all these options, but one of them is still for people to look at you like a sex object. But options! That's equality enough, right?" No one should be in ashes and sackcloth over it, but it's still kind of bullshit that it's basically "athletic options you can compete in minus one for the fanservice." --- What has books ever teached us? -- Captain Afrohead Subject-verb agreement. -- t3h 0n3 ... Copied to Clipboard!
|
YugiNoob 04/14/24 11:12:33 PM #63: |
[LFAQs-redacted-quote]
Fake outrage. At first I thought they had a point until I read that it was just one of many options and that no one had to wear it if they didnt want to. --- ( ^_^)/\(^_^ ) Maya High-Five! ... Copied to Clipboard!
|
UAZaqwert 04/14/24 11:14:02 PM #64: |
gamepimp12 posted... i dont get why this is a big deal. It's not a big deal, it's just standard media-outrage bait. Athletes get to pick from numerous options and that's just one of them many things men or women can choose to wear. ... Copied to Clipboard!
|
Link_of_time 04/14/24 11:45:22 PM #65: |
Sufferedphoenix posted... Are singles really revealing? I wore one when I wrestled and I chose to I didn't have to.yeah the singlets are basically the same between the men and women. Thought I have seen the mens be more revealing in the chest area. He is right about the women's gymnastics uniform. Theirs actually does look like the mannequin in TC post. ... Copied to Clipboard!
|
Link_of_time 04/14/24 11:52:47 PM #66: |
YugiNoob posted... Fake outrage. At first I thought they had a point until I read that it was just one of many options and that no one had to wear it if they didnt want to.Under this train of thought there would still be room for outrage here. Many female olympians like wearing brief's style. Changing the design of the most popular style so that they show more skin is still sexist as hell. The "options" argument fails if there isn't more than one brief style to wear(that might be the case idk all the options available). What actually clears this up is Katie Moons twitter post. If believed, it was all just a bad media release by Nike. ... Copied to Clipboard!
|
YugiNoob 04/15/24 12:29:56 AM #67: |
Link_of_time posted...
Under this train of thought there would still be room for outrage here. Many female olympians like wearing brief's style. Changing the design of the most popular style so that they show more skin is still sexist as hell. The "options" argument fails if there isn't more than one brief style to wear(that might be the case idk all the options available).I mean people get outraged no matter what. People even ignore the fact that Nike will have tailors available, just as that lady asked. All they need to do is to ignore that one outfit they don't want to wear, and instead pick another one. It's not hard. --- ( ^_^)/\(^_^ ) Maya High-Five! ... Copied to Clipboard!
|
Link_of_time 04/15/24 1:13:41 AM #68: |
YugiNoob posted... I mean people get outraged no matter what. People even ignore the fact that Nike will have tailors available, just as that lady asked. All they need to do is to ignore that one outfit they don't want to wear, and instead pick another one. It's not hard.Agree, but ppl can only work with the information given. The publics reaction to this was justified based on the images released at the time. There's also the Olympics poor track record with similar situations fueling this current misunderstanding. ... Copied to Clipboard!
|
YugiNoob 04/15/24 2:02:07 AM #69: |
I think people need to avoid jumping the gun though. So often we see news stories create outrage when the fact of the matter is that they're missing key information that invalidates it.
--- ( ^_^)/\(^_^ ) Maya High-Five! ... Copied to Clipboard!
|
gamepimp12 04/15/24 3:05:29 AM #70: |
lderivedx posted...
idk it's definitely presented by Nike as the uniform for women, rather than a misrepresentation of one of the uniforms they can choose from. There's definitely an issue with that. Nos Nikes press release is pretty clear its one of multiple options. https://about.nike.com/en/newsroom/collections/2024-national-and-federation-kits --- we rich now but used to be slaves,we pushing whips now we used to be whipped,rockin chains when we used to be in 'em ... Copied to Clipboard!
|
GeneSnitsky 04/15/24 6:54:55 AM #71: |
gamepimp12 posted...
Nos Nikes press release is pretty clear its one of multiple options. Shhh... you're wrecking their narrative. --- It wasn't my fault!! ... Copied to Clipboard!
|
Zanzenburger 04/15/24 7:04:04 AM #72: |
gamepimp12 posted...
they definitely had these options the 2020 Olympics why are we lyingI'm basing it off this comment in the article referenced in the OP: Nike said in an email to Reuters that it was offering athletes unitard options with both a brief and a short for this Olympics, whereas it only offered the brief for the Tokyo Olympics. --- Congratulations! Your post was deemed response-worthy. ... Copied to Clipboard!
|
gamepimp12 04/15/24 11:30:44 AM #73: |
Zanzenburger posted...
I'm basing it off this comment in the article referenced in the OP: so thats just in reference to unitards options and not in reference to the entire kit --- we rich now but used to be slaves,we pushing whips now we used to be whipped,rockin chains when we used to be in 'em ... Copied to Clipboard!
|
emblem-man 04/15/24 11:42:21 AM #74: |
I've always found it weird how revealing clothing for women athletes are. Mainly because until recently, they actually had no choice to wear less revealing clothes
--- http://avatar.xboxlive.com/avatar/emblem%20boy/avatar-body.png haters gonna hate ... Copied to Clipboard!
|
Topic List |
Page List:
1, 2 |