(x^4+1) in your head?

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2
BloodMoon7 01/12/23 2:58:01 AM #52:	I can't even multiply or divide in my head. --- My maid will hear about this. <cite>BloodMoon7 posted [p:970790758] in Are you ab... [t:80306468]...</cite> <quote>I can't even multiply or divide in my head.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
NeonTentacles 01/12/23 3:11:44 AM #54:	I took Calc 5 and I cant do that in my head lol --- https://imgur.com/aMaI3hj https://imgur.com/7PsdJNc https://imgur.com/eK8vZVn https://imgur.com/u2HR4nG https://imgur.com/nQGM5cZ <cite>NeonTentacles posted [p:970790849] in Are you ab... [t:80306468]...</cite> <quote>I took Calc 5 and I cant do that in my head lol</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Ratchetrockon 01/12/23 3:27:31 AM #55:	Nah idk anything about math --- I'm a Taurus I like collecting headphones and iems. My fave game of all time is DMC 3 SE on PC w/ style switch mod. IMO it the best button masher on earth <cite>Ratchetrockon posted [p:970790964] in Are you ab... [t:80306468]...</cite> <quote>Nah idk anything about math</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mistere_Man 01/12/23 3:30:53 AM #56:	After watching a couple minutes of an explanation of it I believe I can integrate that in my head if I am understanding the process . I have absolutely no idea what it means, but I think it should look something like this (sorry if my () are incorrect hopefully you get the idea that / means over that number) ((x^4)/4+(x^2)/2+c)/((x^5)/5+1+c) In my head so probably incorrect hopefully I am at least close, if not I apologize. --- Water+Fall=Radiation. <cite>Mistere_Man posted [p:970790981] in Are you ab... [t:80306468]...</cite> <quote>After watching a couple minutes of an explanation of it I believe I can integrate that in my head if I am understanding the process . I have absolutely no idea what it means, but I think it should look something like this (sorry if my () are incorrect hopefully you get the idea that / means over that number)((x^4)/4+(x^2)/2+c)/((x^5)/5+1+c) In my head so probably incorrect hopefully I am at least close, if not I apologize.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
nexigrams 01/12/23 3:33:50 AM #57:	Yep, took me like 7 seconds. --- http://imgur.com/SYiqIRC <cite>nexigrams posted [p:970791000] in Are you ab... [t:80306468]...</cite> <quote>Yep, took me like 7 seconds. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mistere_Man 01/12/23 3:36:01 AM #58:	nexigrams posted... Yep, took me like 7 seconds. Am I close on my answer? Post #56 --- Water+Fall=Radiation. <cite>Mistere_Man posted [p:970791020] in Are you ab... [t:80306468]...</cite> <quote>nexigrams posted... </cite><quote>Yep, took me like 7 seconds.</quote>Am I close on my answer? Post #56</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Philip027 01/12/23 3:48:56 AM #59:	Not only can I not do it, I don't know what "integrate" means in this context, and I also don't care. <cite>Philip027 posted [p:970791106] in Are you ab... [t:80306468]...</cite> <quote>Not only can I not do it, I don't know what "integrate" means in this context, and I also don't care.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
scar_the_1 01/12/23 7:38:44 AM #60:	Mistere_Man posted... After watching a couple minutes of an explanation of it I believe I can integrate that in my head if I am understanding the process . I have absolutely no idea what it means, but I think it should look something like this (sorry if my () are incorrect hopefully you get the idea that / means over that number) ((x^4)/4+(x^2)/2+c)/((x^5)/5+1+c) In my head so probably incorrect hopefully I am at least close, if not I apologize. Sadly this is not close :( what you're doing is correct for polynomials, but this is a rational expression and we can't just integrate numerator and denominator by themselves. --- Stop being so aggressively argumentative for no reason. - UnfairRepresent <cite>scar_the_1 posted [p:970792632] in Are you ab... [t:80306468]...</cite> <quote>Mistere_Man posted... </cite><quote>After watching a couple minutes of an explanation of it I believe I can integrate that in my head if I am understanding the process . I have absolutely no idea what it means, but I think it should look something like this (sorry if my () are incorrect hopefully you get the idea that / means over that number)((x^4)/4+(x^2)/2+c)/((x^5)/5+1+c) In my head so probably incorrect hopefully I am at least close, if not I apologize.</quote>Sadly this is not close :( what you're doing is correct for polynomials, but this is a rational expression and we can't just integrate numerator and denominator by themselves.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mistere_Man 01/12/23 8:13:34 AM #61:	Thank you I just wanted to try, I just am not understanding it , oh well. With my brain I am not surprised. I was probably looking at the wrong thing as I am not even sure what is being asked. Oh well thank you again, and sorry. --- Water+Fall=Radiation. <cite>Mistere_Man posted [p:970792952] in Are you ab... [t:80306468]...</cite> <quote>Thank you I just wanted to try, I just am not understanding it , oh well. With my brain I am not surprised. I was probably looking at the wrong thing as I am not even sure what is being asked. Oh well thank you again, and sorry.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
MedeaLysistrata 01/12/23 5:30:39 PM #62:	lol, ok, now that you've solved the easy questions answer the following: what is the epistemological doctrine that accounts for the commensurability of numbers with geometrical elements? e.g why is it that you can have a line of 5 units be longer than a line of 4 units? what is the relevance of unit to line here? basically, how do you explain that number theory will work in tandem with geometry? --- Please join the 100 Presidents community board and contribute to the project! Check back for updates! https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/1568-100-presidents <cite>MedeaLysistrata posted [p:970802878] in Are you ab... [t:80306468]...</cite> <quote>lol, ok, now that you've solved the easy questions answer the following: what is the epistemological doctrine that accounts for the commensurability of numbers with geometrical elements? e.g why is it that you can have a line of 5 units be longer than a line of 4 units? what is the relevance of unit to line here? basically, how do you explain that number theory will work in tandem with geometry?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
FLOUR 01/12/23 6:18:51 PM #63:	Since we're getting into geometry now, can you prove that the converse to the alternate interior angle theorem is equivalent to Euclid's parallel postulate in your head? Of course, taking a class in modern geometry would help. --- OK, so what am I doing? Oh, I'm chasing this guy? No, he's chasing me... <cite>FLOUR posted [p:970803845] in Are you ab... [t:80306468]...</cite> <quote>Since we're getting into geometry now, can you prove that the converse to the alternate interior angle theorem is equivalent to Euclid's parallel postulate in your head? Of course, taking a class in modern geometry would help.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mistere_Man 01/12/23 6:33:46 PM #64:	FLOUR posted... Since we're getting into geometry now, can you prove that the converse to the alternate interior angle theorem is equivalent to Euclid's parallel postulate in your head? Of course, taking a class in modern geometry would help. As I have already proven, no, no I cannot do anything math related. --- Water+Fall=Radiation. <cite>Mistere_Man posted [p:970804155] in Are you ab... [t:80306468]...</cite> <quote>FLOUR posted... </cite><quote>Since we're getting into geometry now, can you prove that the converse to the alternate interior angle theorem is equivalent to Euclid's parallel postulate in your head? Of course, taking a class in modern geometry would help.</quote>As I have already proven, no, no I cannot do anything math related.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
MedeaLysistrata 01/12/23 6:34:56 PM #65:	FLOUR posted... Since we're getting into geometry now, can you prove that the converse to the alternate interior angle theorem is equivalent to Euclid's parallel postulate in your head? Of course, taking a class in modern geometry would help. I'm sure you can prove there is no difference between two things, if you wanted to do the above --- Please join the 100 Presidents community board and contribute to the project! Check back for updates! https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/1568-100-presidents <cite>MedeaLysistrata posted [p:970804194] in Are you ab... [t:80306468]...</cite> <quote>FLOUR posted... </cite><quote>Since we're getting into geometry now, can you prove that the converse to the alternate interior angle theorem is equivalent to Euclid's parallel postulate in your head? Of course, taking a class in modern geometry would help.</quote>I'm sure you can prove there is no difference between two things, if you wanted to do the above</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2

Current Events > Are you able to integrate (x^3+x)/(x^4+1) in your head? (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > Are you able to integrate (x^3+x)/(x^4+1) in your head?