Current Events > Ignoring nuclear bombs, who wins a war between USA and Russia in these times?

Topic List	Page List: 1
gna647 02/15/22 12:38:00 PM #1:	Topic --- http://i.imgur.com/iMaDK.jpg http://i.imgur.com/e9OCH.jpg http://i.imgur.com/RnA9A.gif http://i.imgur.com/LvJeR.png <cite>gna647 posted [p:962671590] in Ignoring n... [t:79900302]...</cite> <quote>Topic </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Southernfatman 02/15/22 12:38:48 PM #2:	The military industrial complex and PMCs. --- http://i.imgur.com/hslUvRN.jpg When I sin I sin real good. <cite>Southernfatman posted [p:962671602] in Ignoring n... [t:79900302]...</cite> <quote>The military industrial complex and PMCs. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Kingbuffet 02/15/22 12:39:20 PM #3:	US cant go it alone, they need help from Ukraine, Poland, UK and France we need to send our best snipers over there to kill Russian invaders --- https://i.imgflip.com/5nt9up.jpg <cite>Kingbuffet posted [p:962671615] in Ignoring n... [t:79900302]...</cite> <quote>US cant go it alone, they need help from Ukraine, Poland, UK and France we need to send our best snipers over there to kill Russian invaders </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Letron_James 02/15/22 12:39:56 PM #4:	Nobody on earth can beat America in a 1v1 conflict. It would take some combination of China/Iran/Russia to even have a shot and that's ignoring outside help for the U.S. --- Ask me if I would eat da booty. <cite>Letron_James posted [p:962671632] in Ignoring n... [t:79900302]...</cite> <quote>Nobody on earth can beat America in a 1v1 conflict. It would take some combination of China/Iran/Russia to even have a shot and that's ignoring outside help for the U.S. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
HagenEx 02/15/22 12:40:24 PM #5:	Letron_James posted... Nobody on earth can beat America in a 1v1 conflict. It would take some combination of China/Iran/Russia to even have a shot and that's ignoring outside help for the U.S. --- PWB's #1 Bad Bunny Mark <cite>HagenEx posted [p:962671645] in Ignoring n... [t:79900302]...</cite> <quote>Letron_James posted... </cite> <quote>Nobody on earth can beat America in a 1v1 conflict. It would take some combination of China/Iran/Russia to even have a shot and that's ignoring outside help for the U.S.</quote> </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Norman_Smiley 02/15/22 12:41:46 PM #6:	it comes down to Russia's SAMs vs our air force. Most likely US wins --- http://i.imgur.com/BVBQC.jpg The big wiggle equals ratings. <cite>Norman_Smiley posted [p:962671679] in Ignoring n... [t:79900302]...</cite> <quote>it comes down to Russia's SAMs vs our air force. Most likely US wins </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#7	Post #7 was unavailable or deleted.
UnfairRepresent 02/15/22 12:43:48 PM #8:	Everyone loses except Southernfatman posted... The military industrial complex and PMCs. --- ^ Hey now that's completely unfair! http://i.imgur.com/yPw05Ob.png <cite>UnfairRepresent posted [p:962671726] in Ignoring n... [t:79900302]...</cite> <quote>Everyone loses except Southernfatman posted... </cite> <quote>The military industrial complex and PMCs.</quote> </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
UnholyMudcrab 02/15/22 12:43:54 PM #9:	Come on. --- http://i.imgur.com/VeNBg.gif http://i.imgur.com/gd5jC8q.gif http://i.imgur.com/PKIy7.gif http://i.imgur.com/3p29JqP.gif <cite>UnholyMudcrab posted [p:962671728] in Ignoring n... [t:79900302]...</cite> <quote>Come on. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TheMikh 02/15/22 12:47:29 PM #10:	pyrrhic us victory --- http://i.imgur.com/A0TAfek.png <cite>TheMikh posted [p:962671834] in Ignoring n... [t:79900302]...</cite> <quote>pyrrhic us victory </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Gobstoppers12 02/15/22 12:48:34 PM #11:	Russia isn't half the threat some people think they are. --- I write Naruto Fanfiction. But I am definitely not a furry. <cite>Gobstoppers12 posted [p:962671869] in Ignoring n... [t:79900302]...</cite> <quote>Russia isn't half the threat some people think they are. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CrimsonAngel 02/15/22 12:49:34 PM #12:	The US has an insane defense budget and over twice the population of Russia --- http://large.horse <cite>CrimsonAngel posted [p:962671897] in Ignoring n... [t:79900302]...</cite> <quote>The US has an insane defense budget and over twice the population of Russia </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
pogo_rabid 02/15/22 12:50:53 PM #13:	Russian troops are underpaid, underequipped, and under trained vs the standard us combat troup. This is not counting the sheer amount of equipment and resources available to the US military. Also, the vast majority of the US military has actual combat experience, whereas most other armies are green. In a conventional war with no nukes are used, there is not a single army in the world that can take the US army on. --- Ryzen 3800x, 6900XT, 32 gig, 970pro, Asus Strix x570-E FC: SW-8431-3263-1243 <cite>pogo_rabid posted [p:962671932] in Ignoring n... [t:79900302]...</cite> <quote>Russian troops are underpaid, underequipped, and under trained vs the standard us combat troup. This is not counting the sheer amount of equipment and resources available to the US military. Also, the vast majority of the US military has actual combat experience, whereas most other armies are green. In a conventional war with no nukes are used, there is not a single army in the world that can take the US army on. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
wackyteen 02/15/22 12:53:11 PM #14:	Are we talking strictly from a fighting from/out of Ukraine scenario? In that scenario, US could long term defend Ukraine basically indefinitely so long as the public support it. A straight fight with all cards on the table just between US and Russia, no allies? Russia doesn't have the naval power to invade the US so the war would strictly be in Russian/Ukrainian territory. So long as US has Alaska and can exert control over the Pacific, US can blockade the eastern half/majority of Russia and then focus efforts on the Western half. But really it depends on what the goal is. --- The name is wackyteen for a reason. Never doubt. <cite>wackyteen posted [p:962672015] in Ignoring n... [t:79900302]...</cite> <quote>Are we talking strictly from a fighting from/out of Ukraine scenario? In that scenario, US could long term defend Ukraine basically indefinitely so long as the public support it. A straight fight with all cards on the table just between US and Russia, no allies? Russia doesn't have the naval power to invade the US so the war would strictly be in Russian/Ukrainian territory. So long as US has Alaska and can exert control over the Pacific, US can blockade the eastern half/majority of Russia and then focus efforts on the Western half. But really it depends on what the goal is. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
pogo_rabid 02/15/22 12:56:07 PM #15:	wackyteen posted... Are we talking strictly from a fighting from/out of Ukraine scenario? In that scenario, US could long term defend Ukraine basically indefinitely so long as the public support it. A straight fight with all cards on the table just between US and Russia, no allies? Russia doesn't have the naval power to invade the US so the war would strictly be in Russian/Ukrainian territory. So long as US has Alaska and can exert control over the Pacific, US can blockade the eastern half/majority of Russia and then focus efforts on the Western half. But really it depends on what the goal is. I'd say the capacty to fend off war fatigue is a lot higher on the US side. We have a much stronger economy, with the ability to ruin russia's economy with sanctions. The russian public will be screaming for them to end a war a lot sooner when they can't get basic necessitates for months on end, where the US public will be living more of a normal day to day. --- Ryzen 3800x, 6900XT, 32 gig, 970pro, Asus Strix x570-E FC: SW-8431-3263-1243 <cite>pogo_rabid posted [p:962672101] in Ignoring n... [t:79900302]...</cite> <quote>wackyteen posted... </cite> <quote>Are we talking strictly from a fighting from/out of Ukraine scenario? In that scenario, US could long term defend Ukraine basically indefinitely so long as the public support it. A straight fight with all cards on the table just between US and Russia, no allies? Russia doesn't have the naval power to invade the US so the war would strictly be in Russian/Ukrainian territory. So long as US has Alaska and can exert control over the Pacific, US can blockade the eastern half/majority of Russia and then focus efforts on the Western half. But really it depends on what the goal is.</quote>I'd say the capacty to fend off war fatigue is a lot higher on the US side. We have a much stronger economy, with the ability to ruin russia's economy with sanctions. The russian public will be screaming for them to end a war a lot sooner when they can't get basic necessitates for months on end, where the US public will be living more of a normal day to day. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
wackyteen 02/15/22 1:43:07 PM #16:	pogo_rabid posted... Also, the vast majority of the US military has actual combat experience, whereas most other armies are green. I wouldn't say this necessarily. We have deployment experience but a rather small amount of US troops have been in combat and most from the WoT have gotten out. --- The name is wackyteen for a reason. Never doubt. <cite>wackyteen posted [p:962673317] in Ignoring n... [t:79900302]...</cite> <quote>pogo_rabid posted... </cite> <quote>Also, the vast majority of the US military has actual combat experience, whereas most other armies are green.</quote>I wouldn't say this necessarily. We have deployment experience but a rather small amount of US troops have been in combat and most from the WoT have gotten out. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#17	Post #17 was unavailable or deleted.
Mearcstapa 02/15/22 1:46:46 PM #18:	Russia is the very definition of a paper tiger without their nukes. The nukes are the only reason the rest of the world is forced to take that frozen backwater seriously. --- after years of waiting nothing came <cite>Mearcstapa posted [p:962673419] in Ignoring n... [t:79900302]...</cite> <quote>Russia is the very definition of a paper tiger without their nukes. The nukes are the only reason the rest of the world is forced to take that frozen backwater seriously. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DirkDiggles 02/15/22 1:49:04 PM #19:	Mearcstapa posted... Russia is the very definition of a paper tiger without their nukes. This Even with their nukes, they aren't going to do anything. --- Intel 486, Integrated videocard, 16MB RAM, 64MB HD, 3 1/4 inch floppy <cite>DirkDiggles posted [p:962673482] in Ignoring n... [t:79900302]...</cite> <quote>Mearcstapa posted... </cite> <quote>Russia is the very definition of a paper tiger without their nukes.</quote> This Even with their nukes, they aren't going to do anything. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Smackems 02/15/22 2:03:23 PM #20:	Letron_James posted... Nobody on earth can beat America in a 1v1 conflict. It would take some combination of China/Iran/Russia to even have a shot and that's ignoring outside help for the U.S. Except Afghanistan and Vietnam What you're trying to say is no one can take on the US in a traditional war, which they still actually could --- Common sense said you can common my sense, ifyaknowwhatimeanwinkwink -smackems- some dudette named JimCarrysToe <cite>Smackems posted [p:962673841] in Ignoring n... [t:79900302]...</cite> <quote>Letron_James posted... </cite> <quote>Nobody on earth can beat America in a 1v1 conflict. It would take some combination of China/Iran/Russia to even have a shot and that's ignoring outside help for the U.S.</quote>Except Afghanistan and Vietnam What you're trying to say is no one can take on the US in a traditional war, which they still actually could </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Stormvale12 02/15/22 2:23:46 PM #21:	Define "win". <cite>Stormvale12 posted [p:962674377] in Ignoring n... [t:79900302]...</cite> <quote>Define "win". </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Gobstoppers12 02/15/22 2:30:07 PM #22:	Smackems posted... Except Afghanistan and Vietnam What you're trying to say is no one can take on the US in a traditional war, which they still actually could Imagine trying to invade the USA, though. Just imagine it. Imagine the amount of guns you'll have to contend with. --- I write Naruto Fanfiction. But I am definitely not a furry. <cite>Gobstoppers12 posted [p:962674536] in Ignoring n... [t:79900302]...</cite> <quote>Smackems posted... </cite> <quote>Except Afghanistan and Vietnam What you're trying to say is no one can take on the US in a traditional war, which they still actually could</quote>Imagine trying to invade the USA, though. Just imagine it. Imagine the amount of guns you'll have to contend with. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
divot1338 02/15/22 2:32:13 PM #23:	gna647 posted... Ignoring nuclear bombs, who wins a war between USA and Russia in these times? Cockroaches. Or whatever radiation resistant creature takes our spot at the top of the food chain. --- Moustache twirling villian https://i.imgur.com/U3lt3H4.jpg- Kerbey <cite>divot1338 posted [p:962674588] in Ignoring n... [t:79900302]...</cite> <quote>gna647 posted... </cite> <quote>Ignoring nuclear bombs, who wins a war between USA and Russia in these times?</quote>Cockroaches. Or whatever radiation resistant creature takes our spot at the top of the food chain. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
zammox 02/15/22 2:34:42 PM #24:	Russia easily. it's not even a competition same if it was US vs China. easy smoke for the Chinese army US could win vs somewhere like France, UK, maybe Germany etc. --- aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa <cite>zammox posted [p:962674658] in Ignoring n... [t:79900302]...</cite> <quote>Russia easily. it's not even a competition same if it was US vs China. easy smoke for the Chinese army US could win vs somewhere like France, UK, maybe Germany etc. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
NoxObscuras 02/15/22 2:35:50 PM #25:	With no nukes involved, we'd just send airstrikes at their military bases. --- PSN - NoxObscuras Z490 \| i9-10900K \| EVGA 3080 FTW3 Ultra \| 32GB DDR4 3600 \| 4TB SSD <cite>NoxObscuras posted [p:962674681] in Ignoring n... [t:79900302]...</cite> <quote>With no nukes involved, we'd just send airstrikes at their military bases. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ShutTheF---Up 02/15/22 2:38:02 PM #26:	If there are more than two major powers and two of them go to war, the third (/fourth / whatever) is the winner. So by that logic, the winner here would be China. --- Trumble alt. <cite>ShutTheF---Up posted [p:962674725] in Ignoring n... [t:79900302]...</cite> <quote>If there are more than two major powers and two of them go to war, the third (/fourth / whatever) is the winner. So by that logic, the winner here would be China. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
OmegaShinkai 02/15/22 2:38:57 PM #27:	zammox posted... Russia easily. it's not even a competition bruh, did you see how Russia performed in South Ossetia when they invaded Georgia? For beating up an ex-Soviet shithole with inferior equipment in every way they had huge, glaring issues with performance that Russia spent the next half decade desperately overhauling their forces. I think people are really underestimating the advantage the US has in force projection over virtually every other country in the world. <cite>OmegaShinkai posted [p:962674748] in Ignoring n... [t:79900302]...</cite> <quote>zammox posted... </cite> <quote>Russia easily. it's not even a competition</quote>bruh, did you see how Russia performed in South Ossetia when they invaded Georgia? For beating up an ex-Soviet shithole with inferior equipment in every way they had huge, glaring issues with performance that Russia spent the next half decade desperately overhauling their forces. I think people are really underestimating the advantage the US has in force projection over virtually every other country in the world. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
zammox 02/15/22 2:41:19 PM #28:	OmegaShinkai posted... bruh, did you see how Russia performed in South Ossetia when they invaded Georgia? false flag --- aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa <cite>zammox posted [p:962674807] in Ignoring n... [t:79900302]...</cite> <quote>OmegaShinkai posted... </cite> <quote>bruh, did you see how Russia performed in South Ossetia when they invaded Georgia?</quote>false flag </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
HagenEx 02/15/22 2:42:22 PM #29:	zammox posted... Russia easily. it's not even a competition same if it was US vs China. easy smoke for the Chinese army US could win vs somewhere like France, UK, maybe Germany etc. Lmao, Shablagoo, is that you? --- PWB's #1 Bad Bunny Mark <cite>HagenEx posted [p:962674835] in Ignoring n... [t:79900302]...</cite> <quote>zammox posted... </cite> <quote>Russia easily. it's not even a competition same if it was US vs China. easy smoke for the Chinese army US could win vs somewhere like France, UK, maybe Germany etc.</quote> Lmao, Shablagoo, is that you? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkmaian23 02/15/22 2:56:10 PM #31:	The defense contractors. <cite>darkmaian23 posted [p:962675202] in Ignoring n... [t:79900302]...</cite> <quote>The defense contractors. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Stallion_Prime 02/15/22 2:58:51 PM #32:	Balnazarr posted... In Afghanistan we were trying to nation build and fighting off the entire region. Vietnam we pulled out because the war wasn't worth fighting anymore. We had won every conflict and the tet offensive was actually a huge defeat for the vietcong. Americas were sick and tired of fighting a pointless war in Vietnam. Russia wouldnt last a week before Putin is ousted and the new regime signs a peace treaty. I'd even say he wouldn't last a day. fucking american --- -Hunter1534 http://abload.de/img/powercdkcb.gif <cite>Stallion_Prime posted [p:962675271] in Ignoring n... [t:79900302]...</cite> <quote>Balnazarr posted... </cite> <quote>In Afghanistan we were trying to nation build and fighting off the entire region. Vietnam we pulled out because the war wasn't worth fighting anymore. We had won every conflict and the tet offensive was actually a huge defeat for the vietcong. Americas were sick and tired of fighting a pointless war in Vietnam. Russia wouldnt last a week before Putin is ousted and the new regime signs a peace treaty. I'd even say he wouldn't last a day.</quote>fucking american </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
uwnim 02/15/22 2:59:40 PM #33:	Smackems posted... Except Afghanistan and Vietnam What you're trying to say is no one can take on the US in a traditional war, which they still actually could They couldnt. The Taliban were removed from power really quickly when the US attacked because they had no capacity to fight a traditional war against the US. They took back the country from the US backed government as we continued to reduce the amount of support we were willing to provide. Relatively weak groups can defeat the US by being decentralized and having a concrete goal while the US has no reason to remain. After a point, killing the enemy is a loss for the US because we have no real objectives to achieve and are basically just wasting bullets, fuel and other such things and getting killed is a loss because one of our people died. For actual countries, in a non-nuclear war China is probably the only one that could get a win. Theyve focused heavily on defensive stuff that would cripple our typical means of force projection, their interests are close to China and they are a healthy world power. --- I want a pet Lavos Spawn. [Order of the Cetaceans: Phocoena dioptrica] <cite>uwnim posted [p:962675301] in Ignoring n... [t:79900302]...</cite> <quote>Smackems posted... </cite> <quote>Except Afghanistan and Vietnam What you're trying to say is no one can take on the US in a traditional war, which they still actually could</quote>They couldnt. The Taliban were removed from power really quickly when the US attacked because they had no capacity to fight a traditional war against the US. They took back the country from the US backed government as we continued to reduce the amount of support we were willing to provide. Relatively weak groups can defeat the US by being decentralized and having a concrete goal while the US has no reason to remain. After a point, killing the enemy is a loss for the US because we have no real objectives to achieve and are basically just wasting bullets, fuel and other such things and getting killed is a loss because one of our people died. For actual countries, in a non-nuclear war China is probably the only one that could get a win. Theyve focused heavily on defensive stuff that would cripple our typical means of force projection, their interests are close to China and they are a healthy world power. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
shiby with it 02/15/22 3:00:13 PM #34:	US and it's not close. --- ...I knew this 45 year old guy, goes by the name of Uncle Slappy, used to hang out on the corner of 56th and Rucker... -SArmstr0ng <cite>shiby with it posted [p:962675317] in Ignoring n... [t:79900302]...</cite> <quote>US and it's not close. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Balnazarr 02/15/22 3:00:40 PM #35:	Stallion_Prime posted... fucking american ok? <cite>Balnazarr posted [p:962675328] in Ignoring n... [t:79900302]...</cite> <quote>Stallion_Prime posted... </cite> <quote>fucking american</quote> ok? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Stallion_Prime 02/16/22 1:57:47 AM #36:	Balnazarr posted... ok? Yes. You should be ashamed --- -Hunter1534 http://abload.de/img/powercdkcb.gif <cite>Stallion_Prime posted [p:962690305] in Ignoring n... [t:79900302]...</cite> <quote>Balnazarr posted... </cite> <quote>ok?</quote> Yes. You should be ashamed </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Nukazie 02/16/22 2:16:21 AM #37:	murica --- Life is just a journey from the maternity ward to the crematorium. https://imgur.com/a/LEjr0RZ waifu courtesy of bnui_ransder <cite>Nukazie posted [p:962690533] in Ignoring n... [t:79900302]...</cite> <quote>murica </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Arcanine2009 02/16/22 2:28:26 AM #38:	in Soviet Russia, Amurica owns you! --- Less is more. Everything you want, isn't everything you need. <cite>Arcanine2009 posted [p:962690681] in Ignoring n... [t:79900302]...</cite> <quote>in Soviet Russia, Amurica owns you! </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1

Current Events > Ignoring nuclear bombs, who wins a war between USA and Russia in these times? (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > Ignoring nuclear bombs, who wins a war between USA and Russia in these times?