Current Events > Someone got EVICTED for using that cam website we aren't allowed to name here

(+) Yeah! (+)

What is it with landlords believing they should have control of their tenants entire lives?

---

Huh, not only that it's their own private lives, but it also pays the bills and rent.

---

I've lived in people's houses with them before as a tenant and they've been insane in some way like... six out of seven times. it's way too much power and there's usually gaps in tenancy laws.

---

nice

now she can get a real essential job like unwrappin burgers and warming them up at McDeez

---

More prudes being disgusting...

---

Fuck shitty landlords.

---

cuh posted...

Literally abolish landlords in 2021

And then what, make everyone buy a house or go live in the street?

I hope she sues.
If she's in CA especially there are tons of laws in place right now to prevent tenants from being kicked out.
Also most states have a law against discrimination over where money comes from for bills.

---

Yo what up w the WiFi

---

For context, is this like a renting a room type of situation?

---

Yeah, sounds like she's renting a room in someone's house rather than renting an actual apartment unit. Tenants basically have no rights in those cases and its bullshit.
---

yunalenne10 posted...

Huh, not only that it's their own private lives, but it also pays the bills and rent.

Exactly. Old lady is stupid

---

It sounds like she's living with her bf's family (her bf said the wifi not working was an accident). Sounds like a tricky situation, just from that.

---

TommyG663513 posted...

Maybe if she had a real job this wouldn't happen?

Idk maybe we shouldn't rush to defend women who try and make a career out of that site?

Maybe everything about that site is creepy and it should just get shut down?

Maybe we as a society shouldn't promote the idea of simping and allowing women to profit from this behavior?

But yeah the landlord is evil for not wanting porn filmed on her property.

Maybe you should shut the fuck up.

---

TommyG663513 posted...

You don't believe any of this dogshit, dude.

---

rats5 posted...

And then what, make everyone buy a house or go live in the street?

here's a good starting point
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_housing

---

averagejoel posted...

here's a good starting point
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_housing

I'm a landlord to Section 8 properties. It's not easy to be qualified, plus the waiting lists.

---

I'm a landlord, my tenants can do whatever they want so long as it's legal and they don't fuck up my house for all I care.

---

Solid Snake07 posted...

I'm a landlord, my tenants can do whatever they want so long as it's legal and they don't fuck up my house for all I care.

*high five*

---

yunalenne10 posted...

I'm a landlord to Section 8 properties. It's not easy to be qualified, plus the waiting lists.

the position of a landlord is a fundamentally exploitative one, regardless of how easy it is to be qualified and how long the waiting list is

---

averagejoel posted...

the position of a landlord is a fundamentally exploitative one, regardless of how easy it is to be qualified and how long the waiting list is

Oh, I was referencing the tenants, not myself.

---

Begone, thot, indeed.

fire_bolt posted...

Yeah, sounds like she's renting a room in someone's house rather than renting an actual apartment unit. Tenants basically have no rights in those cases and its bullshit.

in my state, accepting money or services in exchange for rent makes you go through the same process as landlords

---

Thought this was about that archiving website

Antifar posted...

You don't believe any of this dogshit, dude.

How would you know what I do and don't believe?

If I was renting out property to someone and they used that property to film porn and I didn't like that for whatever reason then should I be ok with them doing that on my property?

I'm not under the impression that your average tenant approves of having porn filmed on their property.

---

Conflict posted...

Everything about this post is funny

"MaYbE iF sHe HaD a ReAl JoB" I've seen mouthbreathers say the same thing about Twitch streamers. Who are you to determine what a "real job" is? If you're concerned about taxes, guess what, OF creators have to pay taxes too.

And not everything on OF is porn either

Literally anything involving streaming is a job.

I only draw the line at OF, because that is a creepy and pathetic website. A website made for women to take advantage of simps is not a real job.

Get a job at a strip club or even a real porn production.

Trolling simps into thinking they might have a shot with you if only you subscribe to their page is beyond pathetic.

How do people equate that site with anything else that is mildly legitimate?

---

shockthemonkey posted...

lmfao this is pathetic

Honestly, do you ever engage in any sort of good faith?

---

TommyG663513 posted...

Literally anything involving streaming is a job.

I only draw the line at OF, because that is a creepy and pathetic website. A website made for women to take advantage of simps is not a real job.

Get a job at a strip club or even a real porn production.

Trolling simps into thinking they might have a shot with you if only you subscribe to their page is beyond pathetic.

How do people equate that site with anything else that is mildly legitimate?

You know strippers don't actually like you, right?

---

shockthemonkey posted...

lmao @ this meltdown

Ah so you are you

---

Funcoot posted...

You know strippers don't actually like you, right?

Lol the joke is that strippers actually look a lot more respectable than people on that site.

Stripping isn't the most noble of professions, but it definitely isn't work.

Also, if a girl was operating a strip club out of a residence that she pays rent to live in then I'd also advocate that she should get evicted


---

TommyG663513 posted...

Lol the joke is that strippers actually look a lot more respectable than people on that site.

Stripping isn't the most noble of professions, but it definitely isn't work.

Also, if a girl was operating a strip club out of a residence that she pays rent to live in then I'd also advocate that she should get evicted

Shut the fuck up


---

TommyG663513 posted...

How would you know what I do and don't believe?

I was giving you the benefit of the doubt, because it is deeply moronic to believe the views in your original post. I assumed you weren't, but if you feel the need to correct me, so be it.

TommyG663513 posted...

If I was renting out property to someone and they used that property to film porn and I didn't like that for whatever reason then should I be ok with them doing that on my property?

Why should someone's actions, provided they aren't causing any real harm to the property or other tenants, be cause for putting them out on the street in February? The punishment of eviction is wildly disproportionate to even the most exaggerated of possible harms here.

TommyG663513 posted...

I only draw the line at OF, because that is a creepy and pathetic website. A website made for women to take advantage of simps is not a real job.

Get a job at a strip club or even a real porn production.

What do you think happens at strip clubs, or for that matter, any other company selling a product? Your problem isn't with "taking advantage" of anybody, it isn't even that it takes place online, it's just with the specific outlet. My question is why? What makes this categorically different from any other occupation that entails selling people stuff for money?

If you want me to think that you really believe this dumbass bullshit, I will. But I'd rather not.

---

Conflict posted...

You're puritan to completely nonsensical levels. It's like you have this weird hard-on over people's lives getting ruined over stuff you think is "icky" or something.

I only draw the line at that site. If the landlord is cool with porn being filmed on their property then that is their right.

---

Conflict posted...

I don't even think he knows the answers to any of those questions

Pretty sure it all boils down to "I think porn and stripping is icky"

He also had this weirdly specific example in mind of "women taking advantage of simps" even though that's not even what happens most of the time on OF

That is a pretty blatant straw man argument

Women taking advantage of simps is all that site is. It makes regular porn look super healthy by comparison.

What evidence do you see of me having puritan values? I only take issue with that site.

---

TommyG663513 posted...

That is a pretty blatant straw man argument

Women taking advantage of simps is all that site is. It makes regular porn look super healthy by comparison.

What evidence do you see of me having puritan values? I only take issue with that site.

It's the simps' personal responsibility.

---

Wait, we can't say OF on this site?

---

Antifar posted...

I was giving you the benefit of the doubt, because it is deeply moronic to believe the views in your original post. I assumed you weren't, but if you feel the need to correct me, so be it.

Why should someone's actions, provided they aren't causing any real harm to the property or other tenants, be cause for putting them out on the street in February? The punishment of eviction is wildly disproportionate to even the most exaggerated of possible harms here.

What do you think happens at strip clubs, or for that matter, any other company selling a product? Your problem isn't with "taking advantage" of anybody, it isn't even that it takes place online, it's just with the specific outlet. My question is why? What makes this categorically different from any other occupation that entails selling people stuff for money?

If you want me to think that you really believe this dumbass bullshit, I will. But I'd rather not.

I believe what I believe. I've never once argued in bad faith on here. I've been on GameFAQs nearly 20 years.

Landlords should be allowed to say no porn cant be filmed on our property. They also don't allow drug use too or tend not to depending on the state etc.

Like properties either allow or don't allow smoking too. It seems like allowing or not allowing porn to be filmed there is similarly reasonable.

Giving her two days is definitely harsh though. I feel like she should get 30 days or something like that.

There is a big difference between that site and the rest of the sex industry. I'm not gonna pretend that the rest of the sex industry is clean by any sense, but that site seems like a special breed of wtf.

This is simple though, should property owners be allowed to prohibit porn being filmed on their property by tenants?

---

Trumble posted...

It's the simps' personal responsibility.

So those soliciting themselves on that site have zero responsibility or are they perhaps at least complicit?

---