Current Events > Mueller ain't fuckin around with this probe, man.

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2
booboy 12/04/18 5:05:13 PM #52:	IIRC, Manafort's conviction and penalties alone actually made a net profit. --- There is no problem that can't be solved by applying more yuri to it. In Torque We Trust <cite>booboy posted [p:913542726] in Mueller ai... [t:77267349]...</cite> <quote>IIRC, Manafort's conviction and penalties alone actually made a net profit.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Schwarber 12/04/18 9:16:52 PM #53:	https://mobile.twitter.com/ap/status/1070132405678288897 BREAKING: The special counsels office is calling Michael Flynns cooperation substantial and is recommending no prison time for the former Trump administration national security adviser Interesting --- https://imgur.com/iQXgYOx https://imgur.com/l3frhSF https://imgur.com/HM1Hjby https://imgur.com/bvsFH0H - drawn by Yaridovich <cite>Schwarber posted [p:913556722] in Mueller ai... [t:77267349]...</cite> <quote>https://mobile.twitter.com/ap/status/1070132405678288897 <quote>BREAKING: The special counsels office is calling Michael Flynns cooperation substantial and is recommending no prison time for the former Trump administration national security adviser</quote> Interesting</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
spudger 12/04/18 9:29:37 PM #54:	Schwarber posted... https://mobile.twitter.com/ap/status/1070132405678288897 BREAKING: The special counsels office is calling Michael Flynns cooperation substantial and is recommending no prison time for the former Trump administration national security adviser Interesting dun dunnn --- -Only dead fish swim with the current http://error1355.com/ce/spudger.html <cite>spudger posted [p:913557537] in Mueller ai... [t:77267349]...</cite> <quote><cite>Schwarber posted...</cite> <quote>https://mobile.twitter.com/ap/status/1070132405678288897 <quote>BREAKING: The special counsels office is calling Michael Flynns cooperation substantial and is recommending no prison time for the former Trump administration national security adviser</quote> Interesting</quote> dun dunnn</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
MagnusX 12/04/18 9:31:35 PM #55:	Schwarber posted... https://mobile.twitter.com/ap/status/1070132405678288897 BREAKING: The special counsels office is calling Michael Flynns cooperation substantial and is recommending no prison time for the former Trump administration national security adviser Interesting Thanks. I retweeted this and @d the moron president. <cite>MagnusX posted [p:913557670] in Mueller ai... [t:77267349]...</cite> <quote><cite>Schwarber posted...</cite> <quote>https://mobile.twitter.com/ap/status/1070132405678288897 <quote>BREAKING: The special counsels office is calling Michael Flynns cooperation substantial and is recommending no prison time for the former Trump administration national security adviser</quote> Interesting</quote> Thanks. I retweeted this and @d the moron president.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
UnholyMudcrab 12/04/18 9:32:54 PM #56:	Schwarber posted... https://mobile.twitter.com/ap/status/1070132405678288897 BREAKING: The special counsels office is calling Michael Flynns cooperation substantial and is recommending no prison time for the former Trump administration national security adviser Interesting And now we wait for Trump to start attacking Flynn on Twitter --- https://imgur.com/VeNBg https://imgur.com/gd5jC8q https://imgur.com/PKIy7 https://imgur.com/3p29JqP <cite>UnholyMudcrab posted [p:913557738] in Mueller ai... [t:77267349]...</cite> <quote><cite>Schwarber posted...</cite> <quote>https://mobile.twitter.com/ap/status/1070132405678288897 <quote> BREAKING: The special counsels office is calling Michael Flynns cooperation substantial and is recommending no prison time for the former Trump administration national security adviser</quote> Interesting</quote> And now we wait for Trump to start attacking Flynn on Twitter</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Houston 12/04/18 9:34:30 PM #57:	DEKMStephens posted... spudger posted... fingering the culprits in Moscow to catch the Trump, Mueller must become the Trump Hahahahaha --- Time keeps on slippin', slippin', slippin' <cite>Houston posted [p:913557821] in Mueller ai... [t:77267349]...</cite> <quote><cite>DEKMStephens posted...</cite> <quote><cite>spudger posted...</cite> <quote>fingering the culprits in Moscow</quote> to catch the Trump, Mueller must become the Trump</quote> Hahahahaha</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
jumi 12/04/18 9:39:12 PM #58:	Questionmarktarius posted... The long con here is for Trump to resign on exactly January 21, to set up ten years of a fundamentalist Pence regime. Like Pence could beat anyone in the general. Hell, another Republican would probably destroy him in the primary. --- XBL Gamertag: Rob Thorsman Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/robertvsilvers <cite>jumi posted [p:913558086] in Mueller ai... [t:77267349]...</cite> <quote><cite>Questionmarktarius posted...</cite> <quote>The long con here is for Trump to resign on exactly January 21, to set up ten years of a fundamentalist Pence regime.</quote> Like Pence could beat anyone in the general. Hell, another Republican would probably destroy him in the primary.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Houston 12/04/18 9:43:40 PM #59:	MagnusX posted... Schwarber posted... https://mobile.twitter.com/ap/status/1070132405678288897 BREAKING: The special counsels office is calling Michael Flynns cooperation substantial and is recommending no prison time for the former Trump administration national security adviser Interesting Thanks. I retweeted this and @d the moron president. What were Flynn's contacts with a Russian official about? Collusion? No. Have any of Mueller's arrests dealt with collusion? No. Has Donald Jr. even been subpoenaed? Nah Flynn's cooperation could have been "substantial" in many regards, but none indicate his cooperation was substantial for Trump-Russia collusion, which is what the Dem rallying cry is all about--- "Impeach 45! Trump colluded with Russia!"--- nah. Doubt it. --- Time keeps on slippin', slippin', slippin' <cite>Houston posted [p:913558344] in Mueller ai... [t:77267349]...</cite> <quote><cite>MagnusX posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Schwarber posted...</cite> <quote>https://mobile.twitter.com/ap/status/1070132405678288897 <quote>BREAKING: The special counsels office is calling Michael Flynns cooperation substantial and is recommending no prison time for the former Trump administration national security adviser</quote> Interesting</quote> Thanks. I retweeted this and @d the moron president.</quote> What were Flynn's contacts with a Russian official about? Collusion? No. Have any of Mueller's arrests dealt with collusion? No. Has Donald Jr. even been subpoenaed? Nah Flynn's cooperation could have been "substantial" in many regards, but none indicate his cooperation was substantial for Trump-Russia collusion, which is what the Dem rallying cry is all about--- "Impeach 45! Trump colluded with Russia!"--- nah. Doubt it.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
loafy013 12/04/18 10:05:30 PM #60:	Houston posted... What were Flynn's contacts with a Russian official about? Collusion? No. Have any of Mueller's arrests dealt with collusion? No. Has Donald Jr. even been subpoenaed? Nah Flynn's cooperation could have been "substantial" in many regards, but none indicate his cooperation was substantial for Trump-Russia collusion, which is what the Dem rallying cry is all about--- "Impeach 45! Trump colluded with Russia!"--- nah. Doubt it. Good thing people with a brain are aware that there is no "collusion charge" in the law. Now conspiracy with a hostile nation is another story. --- The ball is round, the game lasts 90 minutes. That's fact. Everything else, is theory. <cite>loafy013 posted [p:913559520] in Mueller ai... [t:77267349]...</cite> <quote><cite>Houston posted...</cite> <quote>What were Flynn's contacts with a Russian official about? Collusion? No. Have any of Mueller's arrests dealt with collusion? No. Has Donald Jr. even been subpoenaed? Nah Flynn's cooperation could have been "substantial" in many regards, but none indicate his cooperation was substantial for Trump-Russia collusion, which is what the Dem rallying cry is all about--- "Impeach 45! Trump colluded with Russia!"--- nah. Doubt it.</quote> Good thing people with a brain are aware that there is no "collusion charge" in the law. Now conspiracy with a hostile nation is another story.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Houston 12/04/18 10:12:08 PM #61:	loafy013 posted... Houston posted... What were Flynn's contacts with a Russian official about? Collusion? No. Have any of Mueller's arrests dealt with collusion? No. Has Donald Jr. even been subpoenaed? Nah Flynn's cooperation could have been "substantial" in many regards, but none indicate his cooperation was substantial for Trump-Russia collusion, which is what the Dem rallying cry is all about--- "Impeach 45! Trump colluded with Russia!"--- nah. Doubt it. Good thing people with a brain are aware that there is no "collusion charge" in the law. Now conspiracy with a hostile nation is another story. Replace collusion with "conspiracy to commit election meddling with a hostile nation" and my reasoning stands the same. None of Mueller's indictments or charges have anything to do with the sort (besides the useless indictments of the several who will never even be extradited). It seems his investigation is wrapping up, too. Thank god. So people on the "Impeach Trump" side for meddling, conspiracy, collusion, whatever, better be praying Mueller pulls something out of left field. --- Time keeps on slippin', slippin', slippin' <cite>Houston posted [p:913559922] in Mueller ai... [t:77267349]...</cite> <quote><cite>loafy013 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Houston posted...</cite> <quote>What were Flynn's contacts with a Russian official about? Collusion? No. Have any of Mueller's arrests dealt with collusion? No. Has Donald Jr. even been subpoenaed? Nah Flynn's cooperation could have been "substantial" in many regards, but none indicate his cooperation was substantial for Trump-Russia collusion, which is what the Dem rallying cry is all about--- "Impeach 45! Trump colluded with Russia!"--- nah. Doubt it.</quote> Good thing people with a brain are aware that there is no "collusion charge" in the law. Now conspiracy with a hostile nation is another story.</quote> Replace collusion with "conspiracy to commit election meddling with a hostile nation" and my reasoning stands the same. None of Mueller's indictments or charges have anything to do with the sort (besides the useless indictments of the several who will never even be extradited). It seems his investigation is wrapping up, too. Thank god. So people on the "Impeach Trump" side for meddling, conspiracy, collusion, whatever, better be praying Mueller pulls something out of left field.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tyranthraxus 12/04/18 10:22:06 PM #62:	Houston posted... What were Flynn's contacts with a Russian official about? Collusion? No. They were about conspiracy to commit treason. I'll let you decide which one is worse Houston posted... Have any of Mueller's arrests dealt with collusion? No. He's not investigating collusion. He's investigation foreign election interference which could include collusion but doesn't have to Houston posted... Has Donald Jr. even been subpoenaed? Nah This is going to change very quickly come January when the Dems take the house. --- It says right here in Matthew 16:4 "Jesus doth not need a giant Mecha." https://imgur.com/dQgC4kv <cite>Tyranthraxus posted [p:913560449] in Mueller ai... [t:77267349]...</cite> <quote><cite>Houston posted...</cite> <quote>What were Flynn's contacts with a Russian official about? Collusion? No.</quote> They were about conspiracy to commit treason. I'll let you decide which one is worse <cite>Houston posted...</cite> <quote>Have any of Mueller's arrests dealt with collusion? No. </quote> He's not investigating collusion. He's investigation foreign election interference which could include collusion but doesn't have to <cite>Houston posted...</cite> <quote>Has Donald Jr. even been subpoenaed? Nah </quote> This is going to change very quickly come January when the Dems take the house.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
frozenshock 12/04/18 10:44:06 PM #63:	Tyranthraxus posted... This is going to change very quickly come January when the Dems take the house. Unless the republican house just votes to strip themselves of their power --- I don't hate people, people hate me. <cite>frozenshock posted [p:913561545] in Mueller ai... [t:77267349]...</cite> <quote><cite>Tyranthraxus posted...</cite> <quote>This is going to change very quickly come January when the Dems take the house.</quote> Unless the republican house just votes to strip themselves of their power</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tyranthraxus 12/05/18 12:11:22 AM #64:	frozenshock posted... Tyranthraxus posted... This is going to change very quickly come January when the Dems take the house. Unless the republican house just votes to strip themselves of their power Even if they tried something like that, the US constitution prevents laws like that from coming into effect immediately. You can't just change the law on a pivot like that. --- It says right here in Matthew 16:4 "Jesus doth not need a giant Mecha." https://imgur.com/dQgC4kv <cite>Tyranthraxus posted [p:913565149] in Mueller ai... [t:77267349]...</cite> <quote><cite>frozenshock posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tyranthraxus posted...</cite> <quote>This is going to change very quickly come January when the Dems take the house.</quote> Unless the republican house just votes to strip themselves of their power</quote> Even if they tried something like that, the US constitution prevents laws like that from coming into effect immediately. You can't just change the law on a pivot like that.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ImTheMacheteGuy 12/05/18 2:09:50 PM #65:	Houston posted... loafy013 posted... Houston posted... What were Flynn's contacts with a Russian official about? Collusion? No. Have any of Mueller's arrests dealt with collusion? No. Has Donald Jr. even been subpoenaed? Nah Flynn's cooperation could have been "substantial" in many regards, but none indicate his cooperation was substantial for Trump-Russia collusion, which is what the Dem rallying cry is all about--- "Impeach 45! Trump colluded with Russia!"--- nah. Doubt it. Good thing people with a brain are aware that there is no "collusion charge" in the law. Now conspiracy with a hostile nation is another story. Replace collusion with "conspiracy to commit election meddling with a hostile nation" and my reasoning stands the same. None of Mueller's indictments or charges have anything to do with the sort (besides the useless indictments of the several who will never even be extradited). It seems his investigation is wrapping up, too. Thank god. So people on the "Impeach Trump" side for meddling, conspiracy, collusion, whatever, better be praying Mueller pulls something out of left field. If you want to get the people at the top, you start at the bottom and charge the bottom people with whatever is applicable to them specifically and you get them to cooperate. If you want to take down a cartel boss, you start with street dealers. You don't just charge those dealers with all of the crimes you're going after the boss for. That wouldn't make sense. --- Place-holder sig because new phone and old sigs not saved :/ <cite>ImTheMacheteGuy posted [p:913591460] in Mueller ai... [t:77267349]...</cite> <quote><cite>Houston posted...</cite> <quote><cite>loafy013 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Houston posted...</cite> <quote>What were Flynn's contacts with a Russian official about? Collusion? No. Have any of Mueller's arrests dealt with collusion? No. Has Donald Jr. even been subpoenaed? Nah Flynn's cooperation could have been "substantial" in many regards, but none indicate his cooperation was substantial for Trump-Russia collusion, which is what the Dem rallying cry is all about--- "Impeach 45! Trump colluded with Russia!"--- nah. Doubt it.</quote> Good thing people with a brain are aware that there is no "collusion charge" in the law. Now conspiracy with a hostile nation is another story.</quote> Replace collusion with "conspiracy to commit election meddling with a hostile nation" and my reasoning stands the same. None of Mueller's indictments or charges have anything to do with the sort (besides the useless indictments of the several who will never even be extradited). It seems his investigation is wrapping up, too. Thank god. So people on the "Impeach Trump" side for meddling, conspiracy, collusion, whatever, better be praying Mueller pulls something out of left field.</quote> If you want to get the people at the top, you start at the bottom and charge the bottom people with whatever is applicable to them specifically and you get them to cooperate. If you want to take down a cartel boss, you start with street dealers. You don't just charge those dealers with all of the crimes you're going after the boss for. That wouldn't make sense.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
EliteC 12/05/18 2:39:41 PM #66:	ImTheMacheteGuy posted... Houston posted... loafy013 posted... Houston posted... What were Flynn's contacts with a Russian official about? Collusion? No. Have any of Mueller's arrests dealt with collusion? No. Has Donald Jr. even been subpoenaed? Nah Flynn's cooperation could have been "substantial" in many regards, but none indicate his cooperation was substantial for Trump-Russia collusion, which is what the Dem rallying cry is all about--- "Impeach 45! Trump colluded with Russia!"--- nah. Doubt it. Good thing people with a brain are aware that there is no "collusion charge" in the law. Now conspiracy with a hostile nation is another story. Replace collusion with "conspiracy to commit election meddling with a hostile nation" and my reasoning stands the same. None of Mueller's indictments or charges have anything to do with the sort (besides the useless indictments of the several who will never even be extradited). It seems his investigation is wrapping up, too. Thank god. So people on the "Impeach Trump" side for meddling, conspiracy, collusion, whatever, better be praying Mueller pulls something out of left field. If you want to get the people at the top, you start at the bottom and charge the bottom people with whatever is applicable to them specifically and you get them to cooperate. If you want to take down a cartel boss, you start with street dealers. You don't just charge those dealers with all of the crimes you're going after the boss for. That wouldn't make sense. I read somewhere he is taking a layered approach in case he is not allowed to publish the report or the report gets canceled: he already charged all of his underlings so the thing speaks for itself <cite>EliteC posted [p:913593093] in Mueller ai... [t:77267349]...</cite> <quote><cite>ImTheMacheteGuy posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Houston posted...</cite> <quote><cite>loafy013 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Houston posted...</cite> <quote>What were Flynn's contacts with a Russian official about? Collusion? No. Have any of Mueller's arrests dealt with collusion? No. Has Donald Jr. even been subpoenaed? Nah Flynn's cooperation could have been "substantial" in many regards, but none indicate his cooperation was substantial for Trump-Russia collusion, which is what the Dem rallying cry is all about--- "Impeach 45! Trump colluded with Russia!"--- nah. Doubt it.</quote> Good thing people with a brain are aware that there is no "collusion charge" in the law. Now conspiracy with a hostile nation is another story.</quote> Replace collusion with "conspiracy to commit election meddling with a hostile nation" and my reasoning stands the same. None of Mueller's indictments or charges have anything to do with the sort (besides the useless indictments of the several who will never even be extradited). It seems his investigation is wrapping up, too. Thank god. So people on the "Impeach Trump" side for meddling, conspiracy, collusion, whatever, better be praying Mueller pulls something out of left field.</quote> If you want to get the people at the top, you start at the bottom and charge the bottom people with whatever is applicable to them specifically and you get them to cooperate. If you want to take down a cartel boss, you start with street dealers. You don't just charge those dealers with all of the crimes you're going after the boss for. That wouldn't make sense.</quote> I read somewhere he is taking a layered approach in case he is not allowed to publish the report or the report gets canceled: he already charged all of his underlings so the thing speaks for itself</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ImTheMacheteGuy 12/05/18 3:29:53 PM #67:	EliteC posted... ImTheMacheteGuy posted... Houston posted... loafy013 posted... Houston posted... What were Flynn's contacts with a Russian official about? Collusion? No. Have any of Mueller's arrests dealt with collusion? No. Has Donald Jr. even been subpoenaed? Nah Flynn's cooperation could have been "substantial" in many regards, but none indicate his cooperation was substantial for Trump-Russia collusion, which is what the Dem rallying cry is all about--- "Impeach 45! Trump colluded with Russia!"--- nah. Doubt it. Good thing people with a brain are aware that there is no "collusion charge" in the law. Now conspiracy with a hostile nation is another story. Replace collusion with "conspiracy to commit election meddling with a hostile nation" and my reasoning stands the same. None of Mueller's indictments or charges have anything to do with the sort (besides the useless indictments of the several who will never even be extradited). It seems his investigation is wrapping up, too. Thank god. So people on the "Impeach Trump" side for meddling, conspiracy, collusion, whatever, better be praying Mueller pulls something out of left field. If you want to get the people at the top, you start at the bottom and charge the bottom people with whatever is applicable to them specifically and you get them to cooperate. If you want to take down a cartel boss, you start with street dealers. You don't just charge those dealers with all of the crimes you're going after the boss for. That wouldn't make sense. I read somewhere he is taking a layered approach in case he is not allowed to publish the report or the report gets canceled: he already charged all of his underlings so the thing speaks for itself Yeah. I think Houston just wants to keep believing this is "nothing hamburger" even though it's turning out to be an "everything entire McDonald's menu" --- Place-holder sig because new phone and old sigs not saved :/ <cite>ImTheMacheteGuy posted [p:913595862] in Mueller ai... [t:77267349]...</cite> <quote><cite>EliteC posted...</cite> <quote><cite>ImTheMacheteGuy posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Houston posted...</cite> <quote><cite>loafy013 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Houston posted...</cite> <quote>What were Flynn's contacts with a Russian official about? Collusion? No. Have any of Mueller's arrests dealt with collusion? No. Has Donald Jr. even been subpoenaed? Nah Flynn's cooperation could have been "substantial" in many regards, but none indicate his cooperation was substantial for Trump-Russia collusion, which is what the Dem rallying cry is all about--- "Impeach 45! Trump colluded with Russia!"--- nah. Doubt it.</quote> Good thing people with a brain are aware that there is no "collusion charge" in the law. Now conspiracy with a hostile nation is another story.</quote> Replace collusion with "conspiracy to commit election meddling with a hostile nation" and my reasoning stands the same. None of Mueller's indictments or charges have anything to do with the sort (besides the useless indictments of the several who will never even be extradited). It seems his investigation is wrapping up, too. Thank god. So people on the "Impeach Trump" side for meddling, conspiracy, collusion, whatever, better be praying Mueller pulls something out of left field.</quote> If you want to get the people at the top, you start at the bottom and charge the bottom people with whatever is applicable to them specifically and you get them to cooperate. If you want to take down a cartel boss, you start with street dealers. You don't just charge those dealers with all of the crimes you're going after the boss for. That wouldn't make sense.</quote> I read somewhere he is taking a layered approach in case he is not allowed to publish the report or the report gets canceled: he already charged all of his underlings so the thing speaks for itself</quote> Yeah. I think Houston just wants to keep believing this is "nothing hamburger" even though it's turning out to be an "everything entire McDonald's menu"</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#68	Post #68 was unavailable or deleted.
Bio1590 12/05/18 7:06:10 PM #69:	Did anyone ever figure out who Houston actually is --- https://imgur.com/bbRWLI8 https://imgur.com/A0BErSV https://imgur.com/7fCcfko <cite>Bio1590 posted [p:913607612] in Mueller ai... [t:77267349]...</cite> <quote>Did anyone ever figure out who Houston actually is</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
spudger 12/05/18 7:13:37 PM #70:	Bio1590 posted... Did anyone ever figure out who Houston actually is eh. just tag him as another trumpeter. --- -Only dead fish swim with the current http://error1355.com/ce/spudger.html <cite>spudger posted [p:913608016] in Mueller ai... [t:77267349]...</cite> <quote><cite>Bio1590 posted...</cite> <quote>Did anyone ever figure out who Houston actually is</quote> eh. just tag him as another trumpeter.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Akagami_Shanks 12/05/18 7:16:15 PM #71:	I swear I wasn't in on the collusion! It was just everyone associated with me! I promise! --- It's the internet, quit your crying <cite>Akagami_Shanks posted [p:913608161] in Mueller ai... [t:77267349]...</cite> <quote>I swear I wasn't in on the collusion! It was just everyone associated with me! I promise!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2

Current Events > Mueller ain't fuckin around with this probe, man. (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > Mueller ain't fuckin around with this probe, man.