Current Events > Trump on the Dems and the Courts.

Topic List	Page List: 1
cjsdowg 07/11/18 5:38:55 PM #1:	If the Democrats want to win Supreme Court and other Court picks, dont Obstruct and Resist, but rather do it the good ol fashioned way, WIN ELECTIONS! https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1017153813625626624 Motherfucker, Obama won his election and the evil ass Republicans blocked his pick, does he fucking forget that. I mean this shit just happened. --- Bender: Well, everybody, I just saved a turtle. What have you done with your lives? <cite>cjsdowg posted [p:904903483] in Trump on t... [t:76798109]...</cite> <quote><quote>If the Democrats want to win Supreme Court and other Court picks, dont Obstruct and Resist, but rather do it the good ol fashioned way, WIN ELECTIONS!</quote> https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1017153813625626624 Motherfucker, Obama won his election and the evil ass Republicans blocked his pick, does he fucking forget that. I mean this shit just happened.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BWLurker 07/11/18 5:39:50 PM #2:	Gaslighting and alternative facts have been the MO of this administration from the very beginning. <cite>BWLurker posted [p:904903542] in Trump on t... [t:76798109]...</cite> <quote>Gaslighting and alternative facts have been the MO of this administration from the very beginning.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
sktgamer_13dude 07/11/18 5:40:23 PM #3:	tbf, I thought waiting instead of pushing Obamas pick through was a good decision. I also think the Senate should wait to confirm Trumps newest pick until the mid terms happen and the new Senate meets. --- https://imgur.com/jWVrg9U https://imgur.com/g2efUtT https://imgur.com/5dOwhaP https://imgur.com/LVdqu8J Go Cougs and M's #DI4B <cite>sktgamer_13dude posted [p:904903567] in Trump on t... [t:76798109]...</cite> <quote>tbf, I thought waiting instead of pushing Obamas pick through was a good decision. I also think the Senate should wait to confirm Trumps newest pick until the mid terms happen and the new Senate meets.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
UnholyMudcrab 07/11/18 5:44:02 PM #4:	sktgamer_13dude posted... tbf, I thought waiting instead of pushing Obamas pick through was a good decision. By "pushing Obama's pick through" you mean "performing your constitutional duty by giving due consideration to the president's nomination," right? --- https://imgur.com/VeNBg https://imgur.com/gd5jC8q https://imgur.com/PKIy7 https://imgur.com/3p29JqP <cite>UnholyMudcrab posted [p:904903786] in Trump on t... [t:76798109]...</cite> <quote><cite>sktgamer_13dude posted...</cite> <quote>tbf, I thought waiting instead of pushing Obamas pick through was a good decision. </quote> By "pushing Obama's pick through" you mean "performing your constitutional duty by giving due consideration to the president's nomination," right?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tyranthraxus 07/11/18 5:45:40 PM #5:	UnholyMudcrab posted... sktgamer_13dude posted... tbf, I thought waiting instead of pushing Obamas pick through was a good decision. By "pushing Obama's pick through" you mean "performing your constitutional duty by giving due consideration to the president's nomination," right? I wish I had a job where I could just not do anything and get to keep it --- It says right here in Matthew 16:4 "Jesus doth not need a giant Mecha." https://imgur.com/dQgC4kv <cite>Tyranthraxus posted [p:904903891] in Trump on t... [t:76798109]...</cite> <quote><cite>UnholyMudcrab posted...</cite> <quote><cite>sktgamer_13dude posted...</cite> <quote>tbf, I thought waiting instead of pushing Obamas pick through was a good decision. </quote> By "pushing Obama's pick through" you mean "performing your constitutional duty by giving due consideration to the president's nomination," right?</quote> I wish I had a job where I could just not do anything and get to keep it</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Nomadic View 07/11/18 5:46:24 PM #6:	Hes not wrong. If you want Supreme Court picks you have to win the presidency. Go out and vote. --- {}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{} {}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;> <cite>Nomadic View posted [p:904903930] in Trump on t... [t:76798109]...</cite> <quote>Hes not wrong. If you want Supreme Court picks you have to win the presidency. Go out and vote.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
southcoast09 07/11/18 5:46:25 PM #7:	You sound like this really got to you --- Stand for the anthem or sit for the game! <cite>southcoast09 posted [p:904903932] in Trump on t... [t:76798109]...</cite> <quote>You sound like this really got to you</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BWLurker 07/11/18 5:46:45 PM #8:	I wish both sides would push to make SCOTUS more moderate. Extremists just don't make sense. <cite>BWLurker posted [p:904903954] in Trump on t... [t:76798109]...</cite> <quote>I wish both sides would push to make SCOTUS more moderate. Extremists just don't make sense.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
southcoast09 07/11/18 5:48:12 PM #9:	BWLurker posted... I wish both sides would push to make SCOTUS more moderate. Extremists just don't make sense. Obama picked two extremists, so if we picked two quiet moderates, it really wouldnt balance things in our favor (which the other side did). So why should we be the ones to acquiesce and let the Democratics keep control when theyre attacking our partys values? --- Stand for the anthem or sit for the game! <cite>southcoast09 posted [p:904904049] in Trump on t... [t:76798109]...</cite> <quote><cite>BWLurker posted...</cite> <quote>I wish both sides would push to make SCOTUS more moderate. Extremists just don't make sense.</quote> Obama picked two extremists, so if we picked two quiet moderates, it really wouldnt balance things in our favor (which the other side did). So why should we be the ones to acquiesce and let the Democratics keep control when theyre attacking our partys values?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
kawalimus 07/11/18 5:48:40 PM #10:	Republicans treat politics like an actual struggle to accomplish some sort of goal, however horrid that goal might be. I don't even know how to describe whatever the fuck it is the democrats do. <cite>kawalimus posted [p:904904073] in Trump on t... [t:76798109]...</cite> <quote>Republicans treat politics like an actual struggle to accomplish some sort of goal, however horrid that goal might be. I don't even know how to describe whatever the fuck it is the democrats do.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
cjsdowg 07/11/18 5:52:38 PM #11:	southcoast09 posted... Obama picked two extremists, so if we picked two quiet moderates, it really wouldnt balance things in our favor (which the other side did). So why should we be the ones to acquiesce and let the Democratics keep control when theyre attacking our partys values? That is got damn bullshit and you fucking know it. --- Bender: Well, everybody, I just saved a turtle. What have you done with your lives? <cite>cjsdowg posted [p:904904271] in Trump on t... [t:76798109]...</cite> <quote><cite>southcoast09 posted...</cite> <quote> Obama picked two extremists, so if we picked two quiet moderates, it really wouldnt balance things in our favor (which the other side did). So why should we be the ones to acquiesce and let the Democratics keep control when theyre attacking our partys values?</quote> That is got damn bullshit and you fucking know it.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BWLurker 07/11/18 5:53:48 PM #12:	southcoast09 posted... BWLurker posted... I wish both sides would push to make SCOTUS more moderate. Extremists just don't make sense. Obama picked two extremists, so if we picked two quiet moderates, it really wouldnt balance things in our favor (which the other side did). So why should we be the ones to acquiesce and let the Democratics keep control when theyre attacking our partys values? I mean the only extremist on there is Thomas. RBG and Sotomayor were too liberal, yes, but Merrick Garland? He would have been moderate. <cite>BWLurker posted [p:904904343] in Trump on t... [t:76798109]...</cite> <quote><cite>southcoast09 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BWLurker posted...</cite> <quote>I wish both sides would push to make SCOTUS more moderate. Extremists just don't make sense.</quote> Obama picked two extremists, so if we picked two quiet moderates, it really wouldnt balance things in our favor (which the other side did). So why should we be the ones to acquiesce and let the Democratics keep control when theyre attacking our partys values?</quote> I mean the only extremist on there is Thomas. RBG and Sotomayor were too liberal, yes, but Merrick Garland? He would have been moderate.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
UnholyMudcrab 07/11/18 5:56:22 PM #13:	Please don't feed southcoast --- https://imgur.com/VeNBg https://imgur.com/gd5jC8q https://imgur.com/PKIy7 https://imgur.com/3p29JqP <cite>UnholyMudcrab posted [p:904904464] in Trump on t... [t:76798109]...</cite> <quote>Please don't feed southcoast</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Damn_Underscore 07/11/18 5:56:53 PM #14:	should have nominated bernie --- Shenmue II = best game of all time Shenmue = 2nd best game of all time <cite>Damn_Underscore posted [p:904904499] in Trump on t... [t:76798109]...</cite> <quote>should have nominated bernie</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
kawalimus 07/11/18 5:57:44 PM #15:	southcoast09 posted... BWLurker posted... I wish both sides would push to make SCOTUS more moderate. Extremists just don't make sense. Obama picked two extremists, so if we picked two quiet moderates, it really wouldnt balance things in our favor (which the other side did). So why should we be the ones to acquiesce and let the Democratics keep control when theyre attacking our partys values? you wouldnt know an "extremist" if one came up and bit you on the ass Its part of your whole strategy though. Beg for a middle ground, invade that "middle ground", then act like it was never there to begin with. Its been very effective at driving discourse far to the right. <cite>kawalimus posted [p:904904548] in Trump on t... [t:76798109]...</cite> <quote><cite>southcoast09 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BWLurker posted...</cite> <quote>I wish both sides would push to make SCOTUS more moderate. Extremists just don't make sense.</quote> Obama picked two extremists, so if we picked two quiet moderates, it really wouldnt balance things in our favor (which the other side did). So why should we be the ones to acquiesce and let the Democratics keep control when theyre attacking our partys values?</quote> you wouldnt know an "extremist" if one came up and bit you on the ass Its part of your whole strategy though. Beg for a middle ground, invade that "middle ground", then act like it was never there to begin with. Its been very effective at driving discourse far to the right.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
southcoast09 07/11/18 5:58:23 PM #16:	Damn_Underscore posted... should have nominated bernie You did; the dnc snubbed him for Hillary, though. --- Stand for the anthem or sit for the game! <cite>southcoast09 posted [p:904904576] in Trump on t... [t:76798109]...</cite> <quote><cite>Damn_Underscore posted...</cite> <quote>should have nominated bernie</quote> You did; the dnc snubbed him for Hillary, though.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BWLurker 07/11/18 5:58:53 PM #17:	Also there's this. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/22/us/politics/supreme-court-warrants-cell-phone-privacy.html You can thank the liberals for that one. If Trump had a 6-3 court, that would have gone a different way. It really should be moderates who go by logical reasoning and the constitution rather than conservatives and liberals who decide based on feels and party lines. <cite>BWLurker posted [p:904904608] in Trump on t... [t:76798109]...</cite> <quote>Also there's this. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/22/us/politics/supreme-court-warrants-cell-phone-privacy.html You can thank the liberals for that one. If Trump had a 6-3 court, that would have gone a different way. It really should be moderates who go by logical reasoning and the constitution rather than conservatives and liberals who decide based on feels and party lines.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
metralo 07/11/18 5:59:03 PM #18:	kawalimus posted... southcoast09 posted... BWLurker posted... I wish both sides would push to make SCOTUS more moderate. Extremists just don't make sense. Obama picked two extremists, so if we picked two quiet moderates, it really wouldnt balance things in our favor (which the other side did). So why should we be the ones to acquiesce and let the Democratics keep control when theyre attacking our partys values? you wouldnt know an "extremist" if one came up and bit you on the ass his views on extremists are likely just supporting rights for women and minorities. --- https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1298321979/image.jpg bustin makes me feel good <cite>metralo posted [p:904904621] in Trump on t... [t:76798109]...</cite> <quote><cite>kawalimus posted...</cite> <quote><cite>southcoast09 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BWLurker posted...</cite> <quote>I wish both sides would push to make SCOTUS more moderate. Extremists just don't make sense.</quote> Obama picked two extremists, so if we picked two quiet moderates, it really wouldnt balance things in our favor (which the other side did). So why should we be the ones to acquiesce and let the Democratics keep control when theyre attacking our partys values?</quote> you wouldnt know an "extremist" if one came up and bit you on the ass</quote> his views on extremists are likely just supporting rights for women and minorities.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Damn_Underscore 07/11/18 6:08:48 PM #19:	BWLurker posted... Also there's this. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/22/us/politics/supreme-court-warrants-cell-phone-privacy.html You can thank the liberals for that one. If Trump had a 6-3 court, that would have gone a different way. What? John Roberts was the deciding vote. Kennedy dissented. --- Shenmue II = best game of all time Shenmue = 2nd best game of all time <cite>Damn_Underscore posted [p:904905192] in Trump on t... [t:76798109]...</cite> <quote><cite>BWLurker posted...</cite> <quote>Also there's this. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/22/us/politics/supreme-court-warrants-cell-phone-privacy.html You can thank the liberals for that one. If Trump had a 6-3 court, that would have gone a different way. </quote> What? John Roberts was the deciding vote. Kennedy dissented.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BWLurker 07/11/18 6:10:40 PM #20:	Damn_Underscore posted... BWLurker posted... Also there's this. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/22/us/politics/supreme-court-warrants-cell-phone-privacy.html You can thank the liberals for that one. If Trump had a 6-3 court, that would have gone a different way. What? John Roberts was the deciding vote. Kennedy dissented. I said if Trump had a 6-3 court. A SCOTUS overbalanced one way or the other is bad. <cite>BWLurker posted [p:904905276] in Trump on t... [t:76798109]...</cite> <quote><cite>Damn_Underscore posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BWLurker posted...</cite> <quote>Also there's this. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/22/us/politics/supreme-court-warrants-cell-phone-privacy.html You can thank the liberals for that one. If Trump had a 6-3 court, that would have gone a different way. </quote> What? John Roberts was the deciding vote. Kennedy dissented.</quote> I said if Trump had a 6-3 court. A SCOTUS overbalanced one way or the other is bad.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LightningAce11 07/11/18 6:13:29 PM #21:	Considering the republican party's abhorrent values, it's certainly alright to attack them. --- "I'm an atheist too but still believe in hell. That's where you're headed pal." - Mr_Karate_II <cite>LightningAce11 posted [p:904905443] in Trump on t... [t:76798109]...</cite> <quote>Considering the republican party's abhorrent values, it's certainly alright to attack them.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Damn_Underscore 07/11/18 6:18:29 PM #22:	BWLurker posted... Damn_Underscore posted... BWLurker posted... Also there's this. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/22/us/politics/supreme-court-warrants-cell-phone-privacy.html You can thank the liberals for that one. If Trump had a 6-3 court, that would have gone a different way. What? John Roberts was the deciding vote. Kennedy dissented. I said if Trump had a 6-3 court. A SCOTUS overbalanced one way or the other is bad. The same justices would have still supported that ruling. --- Shenmue II = best game of all time Shenmue = 2nd best game of all time <cite>Damn_Underscore posted [p:904905700] in Trump on t... [t:76798109]...</cite> <quote><cite>BWLurker posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Damn_Underscore posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BWLurker posted...</cite> <quote>Also there's this. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/22/us/politics/supreme-court-warrants-cell-phone-privacy.html You can thank the liberals for that one. If Trump had a 6-3 court, that would have gone a different way. </quote> What? John Roberts was the deciding vote. Kennedy dissented.</quote> I said if Trump had a 6-3 court. A SCOTUS overbalanced one way or the other is bad.</quote> The same justices would have still supported that ruling.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BWLurker 07/11/18 6:24:36 PM #23:	Damn_Underscore posted... BWLurker posted... Damn_Underscore posted... BWLurker posted... Also there's this. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/22/us/politics/supreme-court-warrants-cell-phone-privacy.html You can thank the liberals for that one. If Trump had a 6-3 court, that would have gone a different way. What? John Roberts was the deciding vote. Kennedy dissented. I said if Trump had a 6-3 court. A SCOTUS overbalanced one way or the other is bad. The same justices would have still supported that ruling. In a 6-3 scenario, RBG was replaced (she's almost certainly the next to go, whenever that is) So even if Roberts sides with the 3 libs, Kavanagh is definitely siding with the conservatives and whatever extremist he picks to replace RBG (Barrett?) will certainly side with the conservatives. <cite>BWLurker posted [p:904906015] in Trump on t... [t:76798109]...</cite> <quote><cite>Damn_Underscore posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BWLurker posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Damn_Underscore posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BWLurker posted...</cite> <quote>Also there's this. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/22/us/politics/supreme-court-warrants-cell-phone-privacy.html You can thank the liberals for that one. If Trump had a 6-3 court, that would have gone a different way. </quote> What? John Roberts was the deciding vote. Kennedy dissented.</quote> I said if Trump had a 6-3 court. A SCOTUS overbalanced one way or the other is bad.</quote> The same justices would have still supported that ruling.</quote> In a 6-3 scenario, RBG was replaced (she's almost certainly the next to go, whenever that is) So even if Roberts sides with the 3 libs, Kavanagh is definitely siding with the conservatives and whatever extremist he picks to replace RBG (Barrett?) will certainly side with the conservatives.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Damn_Underscore 07/11/18 6:32:36 PM #24:	Oh nevermind, I understand what you mean now. --- Shenmue II = best game of all time Shenmue = 2nd best game of all time <cite>Damn_Underscore posted [p:904906424] in Trump on t... [t:76798109]...</cite> <quote>Oh nevermind, I understand what you mean now.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Bishop9800 07/11/18 6:32:42 PM #25:	southcoast09 posted... Obama picked two extremists, Who were they? --- Seriously. I don't care what side of the fence someone is on, if they are a piece of crap, they are a piece of crap. <cite>Bishop9800 posted [p:904906429] in Trump on t... [t:76798109]...</cite> <quote><cite>southcoast09 posted...</cite> <quote>Obama picked two extremists, </quote> Who were they?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1

Current Events > Trump on the Dems and the Courts. (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > Trump on the Dems and the Courts.