Current Events > 39.8% of American adults are obese

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2
Kazi1212 06/22/18 4:24:56 PM #51:	KamenRiderBlade posted... Kazi1212 posted... For one, I despise whole wheat and white rice. I dont see a reason to take one for the team for something that can be solved by fostering a culture with better eating habits without the need to outright mandate a government sanctioned ban on certain foods like some authoritative state. Think of it this say, if you think the government has to step in and coddle people for something so basic as having better eating habits, then thats not exactly a population that can make rational decisions on a whole host of other important life choices either. Well then, most of society should be stripped of their voting rights since most of society can't make rational decisions then. Thats what Im saying is the implication of your position in regards to government regulating our eating habits. Its obviously a ridiculous suggestion to strip people of voting rights because the majority may not be reasonably informed enough to vote. Government is there to aid its people in extentunating circumstances, not to make better life choices for them, even if a lot of people arent capable of making good choices consistently, we just have to live with that as part of being human. --- I don't know my gimmick "Does that sound reasonable to you?" <cite>Kazi1212 posted [p:903773922] in 39.8% of A... [t:76739847]...</cite> <quote><cite>KamenRiderBlade posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Kazi1212 posted...</cite> <quote>For one, I despise whole wheat and white rice. I dont see a reason to take one for the team for something that can be solved by fostering a culture with better eating habits without the need to outright mandate a government sanctioned ban on certain foods like some authoritative state. Think of it this say, if you think the government has to step in and coddle people for something so basic as having better eating habits, then thats not exactly a population that can make rational decisions on a whole host of other important life choices either.</quote>Well then, most of society should be stripped of their voting rights since most of society can't make rational decisions then.</quote> Thats what Im saying is the implication of your position in regards to government regulating our eating habits. Its obviously a ridiculous suggestion to strip people of voting rights because the majority may not be reasonably informed enough to vote. Government is there to aid its people in extentunating circumstances, not to make better life choices for them, even if a lot of people arent capable of making good choices consistently, we just have to live with that as part of being human.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
southcoast09 06/22/18 4:27:26 PM #52:	I thought it was closer to 70% The information below is from 2016, but its the most up to date study I could find: https://abcnews.go.com/Health/average-weight-american-men-15-pounds-20-years/story?id=41100782 Researchers from the CDC found that the average weight of U.S. men over the age of 20 has increased to 195.7 pounds, according to data from 2011 to 2014. The former average, 180.7 pounds, was based on data from 1988-1994. The heights of both men and women remained about the same. Women and children are not immune to the slow weight gain of recent decades, either. The average woman in 1960 weighed 140.2 pounds. Today, the average weight for a woman is 168.5 pounds. Adolescent boys and girls seem to be the most at risk, with a 12 pound average weight gain -- proportionately more based on height -- compared to 20 years ago. --- Stand for the anthem or sit for the game! <cite>southcoast09 posted [p:903774040] in 39.8% of A... [t:76739847]...</cite> <quote>I thought it was closer to 70% The information below is from 2016, but its the most up to date study I could find: https://abcnews.go.com/Health/average-weight-american-men-15-pounds-20-years/story?id=41100782 Researchers from the CDC found that the average weight of U.S. men over the age of 20 has increased to 195.7 pounds, according to data from 2011 to 2014. The former average, 180.7 pounds, was based on data from 1988-1994. The heights of both men and women remained about the same. Women and children are not immune to the slow weight gain of recent decades, either. The average woman in 1960 weighed 140.2 pounds. Today, the average weight for a woman is 168.5 pounds. Adolescent boys and girls seem to be the most at risk, with a 12 pound average weight gain -- proportionately more based on height -- compared to 20 years ago.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
KamenRiderBlade 06/22/18 4:27:47 PM #53:	Sativa_Rose posted... I want to be just as fit as the Ancient Spartans. So you want to be like Leonidas from 300 with Rock Hard 8 pack abs, all glistened up in oil. --- Are you a MexiCAN or a MexiCAN'T - Johnny Depp '*Once Upon A Time in Mexico*' <cite>KamenRiderBlade posted [p:903774052] in 39.8% of A... [t:76739847]...</cite> <quote><cite>Sativa_Rose posted...</cite> <quote>I want to be just as fit as the Ancient Spartans.</quote>So you want to be like Leonidas from 300 with Rock Hard 8 pack abs, all glistened up in oil.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
KamenRiderBlade 06/22/18 4:29:51 PM #54:	Kazi1212 posted... Thats what Im saying is the implication of your position in regards to government regulating our eating habits. Its obviously a ridiculous suggestion to strip people of voting rights because the majority may not be reasonably informed enough to vote. Government is there to aid its people in extentunating circumstances, not to make better life choices for them, even if a lot of people arent capable of making good choices consistently, we just have to live with that as part of being human. Then we do what we can, like how the government tries to increase Fuel Efficiency Ratings of most Automobiles every so often to have a lesser impact on the environment. We can replace parts of food to have a "Healthier" substitute to help with the Physical Health of the nation. That's what I'm trying to do. --- Are you a MexiCAN or a MexiCAN'T - Johnny Depp '*Once Upon A Time in Mexico*' <cite>KamenRiderBlade posted [p:903774178] in 39.8% of A... [t:76739847]...</cite> <quote><cite>Kazi1212 posted...</cite> <quote>Thats what Im saying is the implication of your position in regards to government regulating our eating habits. Its obviously a ridiculous suggestion to strip people of voting rights because the majority may not be reasonably informed enough to vote. Government is there to aid its people in extentunating circumstances, not to make better life choices for them, even if a lot of people arent capable of making good choices consistently, we just have to live with that as part of being human.</quote>Then we do what we can, like how the government tries to increase Fuel Efficiency Ratings of most Automobiles every so often to have a lesser impact on the environment. We can replace parts of food to have a "Healthier" substitute to help with the Physical Health of the nation. That's what I'm trying to do.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Sativa_Rose 06/22/18 4:31:28 PM #55:	KamenRiderBlade posted... Sativa_Rose posted... I want to be just as fit as the Ancient Spartans. So you want to be like Leonidas from 300 with Rock Hard 8 pack abs, all glistened up in oil. yeah except not CGI --- I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister. <cite>Sativa_Rose posted [p:903774259] in 39.8% of A... [t:76739847]...</cite> <quote><cite>KamenRiderBlade posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Sativa_Rose posted...</cite> <quote>I want to be just as fit as the Ancient Spartans.</quote>So you want to be like Leonidas from 300 with Rock Hard 8 pack abs, all glistened up in oil.</quote> yeah except not CGI</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ApathyBear 06/22/18 4:32:44 PM #56:	No fat chicks --- MacadamianNut3 reverse alt <cite>ApathyBear posted [p:903774325] in 39.8% of A... [t:76739847]...</cite> <quote>No fat chicks</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
KamenRiderBlade 06/22/18 4:32:47 PM #57:	Sativa_Rose posted... yeah except not CGI And of course you'll be walking around in a Banana Hammock, Loin Cloth, Cape, and Spartan Helmet. --- Are you a MexiCAN or a MexiCAN'T - Johnny Depp '*Once Upon A Time in Mexico*' <cite>KamenRiderBlade posted [p:903774327] in 39.8% of A... [t:76739847]...</cite> <quote><cite>Sativa_Rose posted...</cite> <quote>yeah except not CGI</quote>And of course you'll be walking around in a Banana Hammock, Loin Cloth, Cape, and Spartan Helmet.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Sativa_Rose 06/22/18 4:33:19 PM #58:	KamenRiderBlade posted... Sativa_Rose posted... yeah except not CGI And of course you'll be walking around in a Banana Hammock, Loin Cloth, Cape, and Spartan Helmet. That's the current fashion trend. --- I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister. <cite>Sativa_Rose posted [p:903774362] in 39.8% of A... [t:76739847]...</cite> <quote><cite>KamenRiderBlade posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Sativa_Rose posted...</cite> <quote>yeah except not CGI</quote>And of course you'll be walking around in a Banana Hammock, Loin Cloth, Cape, and Spartan Helmet.</quote> That's the current fashion trend.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
KamenRiderBlade 06/22/18 4:33:53 PM #59:	Sativa_Rose posted... That's the current fashion trend. Take a selfie of yourself doing that right now. --- Are you a MexiCAN or a MexiCAN'T - Johnny Depp '*Once Upon A Time in Mexico*' <cite>KamenRiderBlade posted [p:903774393] in 39.8% of A... [t:76739847]...</cite> <quote><cite>Sativa_Rose posted...</cite> <quote>That's the current fashion trend.</quote>Take a selfie of yourself doing that right now.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
southcoast09 06/22/18 4:35:55 PM #60:	I realize this is dated, but the info shows us an unsurprising trend: https://abcnews.go.com/Health/average-weight-american-men-15-pounds-20-years/story?id=41100782 Researchers from the CDC found that the average weight of U.S. men over the age of 20 has increased to 195.7 pounds, according to data from 2011 to 2014. The former average, 180.7 pounds, was based on data from 1988-1994. The heights of both men and women remained about the same. Women and children are not immune to the slow weight gain of recent decades, either. The average woman in 1960 weighed 140.2 pounds. Today, the average weight for a woman is 168.5 pounds. Adolescent boys and girls seem to be the most at risk, with a 12 pound average weight gain -- proportionately more based on height -- compared to 20 years ago. The world is counting calories and ignoring sugar. Its no wonder everybody lacks the energy to exercise. Calories and carbs are good if you want energy to burn. Its like putting gas in a car. Sugar is never good. Health foods are packed with it and people fool themselves into thinking theyre making good choices. --- Stand for the anthem or sit for the game! <cite>southcoast09 posted [p:903774502] in 39.8% of A... [t:76739847]...</cite> <quote>I realize this is dated, but the info shows us an unsurprising trend: https://abcnews.go.com/Health/average-weight-american-men-15-pounds-20-years/story?id=41100782 Researchers from the CDC found that the average weight of U.S. men over the age of 20 has increased to 195.7 pounds, according to data from 2011 to 2014. The former average, 180.7 pounds, was based on data from 1988-1994. The heights of both men and women remained about the same. Women and children are not immune to the slow weight gain of recent decades, either. The average woman in 1960 weighed 140.2 pounds. Today, the average weight for a woman is 168.5 pounds. Adolescent boys and girls seem to be the most at risk, with a 12 pound average weight gain -- proportionately more based on height -- compared to 20 years ago. The world is counting calories and ignoring sugar. Its no wonder everybody lacks the energy to exercise. Calories and carbs are good if you want energy to burn. Its like putting gas in a car. Sugar is never good. Health foods are packed with it and people fool themselves into thinking theyre making good choices.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Kazi1212 06/22/18 4:43:10 PM #61:	KamenRiderBlade posted... Kazi1212 posted... Thats what Im saying is the implication of your position in regards to government regulating our eating habits. Its obviously a ridiculous suggestion to strip people of voting rights because the majority may not be reasonably informed enough to vote. Government is there to aid its people in extentunating circumstances, not to make better life choices for them, even if a lot of people arent capable of making good choices consistently, we just have to live with that as part of being human. Then we do what we can, like how the government tries to increase Fuel Efficiency Ratings of most Automobiles every so often to have a lesser impact on the environment. We can replace parts of food to have a "Healthier" substitute to help with the Physical Health of the nation. That's what I'm trying to do. To be fair, a person who is irresponsible in being environmentally friendly affects other people because we all live in the same environment. A persons individual dietary habits, however, generally do not affect others as significantly and therefore has less of a reason to be within the governments jurisdiction to regulate. The idea that the government is supposed to act like some nanny and protect us from making bad choices is ludicrous to me, thats just not what the government is there for (unless you believe in an authoritative government), if anything its there for us to have the right to make the bad choices we do make. --- I don't know my gimmick "Does that sound reasonable to you?" <cite>Kazi1212 posted [p:903774869] in 39.8% of A... [t:76739847]...</cite> <quote><cite>KamenRiderBlade posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Kazi1212 posted...</cite> <quote>Thats what Im saying is the implication of your position in regards to government regulating our eating habits. Its obviously a ridiculous suggestion to strip people of voting rights because the majority may not be reasonably informed enough to vote. Government is there to aid its people in extentunating circumstances, not to make better life choices for them, even if a lot of people arent capable of making good choices consistently, we just have to live with that as part of being human.</quote>Then we do what we can, like how the government tries to increase Fuel Efficiency Ratings of most Automobiles every so often to have a lesser impact on the environment. We can replace parts of food to have a "Healthier" substitute to help with the Physical Health of the nation. That's what I'm trying to do.</quote> To be fair, a person who is irresponsible in being environmentally friendly affects other people because we all live in the same environment. A persons individual dietary habits, however, generally do not affect others as significantly and therefore has less of a reason to be within the governments jurisdiction to regulate. The idea that the government is supposed to act like some nanny and protect us from making bad choices is ludicrous to me, thats just not what the government is there for (unless you believe in an authoritative government), if anything its there for us to have the right to make the bad choices we do make.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Sativa_Rose 06/22/18 4:45:34 PM #62:	I am below the average weight for both men AND women... interesting. --- I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister. <cite>Sativa_Rose posted [p:903775000] in 39.8% of A... [t:76739847]...</cite> <quote>I am below the average weight for both men AND women... interesting.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
KamenRiderBlade 06/22/18 4:46:06 PM #63:	Kazi1212 posted... To be fair, a person who is irresponsible in being environmentally friendly affects other people because we all live in the same environment. A persons individual dietary habits, however, generally do not affect others as significantly and therefore has less of a reason to be within the governments jurisdiction to regulate. The idea that the government is supposed to act like some nanny and protect us from making bad choices is ludicrous to me, thats just not what the government is there for (unless you believe in an authoritative government), if anything its there for us to have the right to make the bad choices we do. A large group of Fat folks affects you monetarily in that it raises your overall Health Insurance Premiums, ergo costing you money in the long run. Fat Folks cost more to transport around, ergo burning of more fossil fuels, which in turn hurts you indirectly. Anyways, people can still "Over Eat" and still get fat if they want to. --- Are you a MexiCAN or a MexiCAN'T - Johnny Depp '*Once Upon A Time in Mexico*' <cite>KamenRiderBlade posted [p:903775034] in 39.8% of A... [t:76739847]...</cite> <quote><cite>Kazi1212 posted...</cite> <quote>To be fair, a person who is irresponsible in being environmentally friendly affects other people because we all live in the same environment. A persons individual dietary habits, however, generally do not affect others as significantly and therefore has less of a reason to be within the governments jurisdiction to regulate. The idea that the government is supposed to act like some nanny and protect us from making bad choices is ludicrous to me, thats just not what the government is there for (unless you believe in an authoritative government), if anything its there for us to have the right to make the bad choices we do.</quote>A large group of Fat folks affects you monetarily in that it raises your overall Health Insurance Premiums, ergo costing you money in the long run. Fat Folks cost more to transport around, ergo burning of more fossil fuels, which in turn hurts you indirectly. Anyways, people can still "Over Eat" and still get fat if they want to.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Kazi1212 06/22/18 4:54:34 PM #64:	KamenRiderBlade posted... Kazi1212 posted... To be fair, a person who is irresponsible in being environmentally friendly affects other people because we all live in the same environment. A persons individual dietary habits, however, generally do not affect others as significantly and therefore has less of a reason to be within the governments jurisdiction to regulate. The idea that the government is supposed to act like some nanny and protect us from making bad choices is ludicrous to me, thats just not what the government is there for (unless you believe in an authoritative government), if anything its there for us to have the right to make the bad choices we do. A large group of Fat folks affects you monetarily in that it raises your overall Health Insurance Premiums, ergo costing you money in the long run. Fat Folks cost more to transport around, ergo burning of more fossil fuels, which in turn hurts you indirectly. Anyways, people can still "Over Eat" and still get fat if they want to. Thats why I said not as significantly, I realize theres obviously some personal downsides to an obese population, but lets not pretend its anywhere near as significant as having a population thats mostly environmentally unfriendly. Also, as posted earlier this topic, the data shows obese people smokers cost less in the long run in terms of medical costs. Also, if youre going to regulate what people can eat, why just stop there, why not just regulate food portions as well? In NYC for instance, restaurants arent allowed to serve fountain drinks over a certain size. --- I don't know my gimmick "Does that sound reasonable to you?" <cite>Kazi1212 posted [p:903775513] in 39.8% of A... [t:76739847]...</cite> <quote><cite>KamenRiderBlade posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Kazi1212 posted...</cite> <quote>To be fair, a person who is irresponsible in being environmentally friendly affects other people because we all live in the same environment. A persons individual dietary habits, however, generally do not affect others as significantly and therefore has less of a reason to be within the governments jurisdiction to regulate. The idea that the government is supposed to act like some nanny and protect us from making bad choices is ludicrous to me, thats just not what the government is there for (unless you believe in an authoritative government), if anything its there for us to have the right to make the bad choices we do.</quote>A large group of Fat folks affects you monetarily in that it raises your overall Health Insurance Premiums, ergo costing you money in the long run. Fat Folks cost more to transport around, ergo burning of more fossil fuels, which in turn hurts you indirectly. Anyways, people can still "Over Eat" and still get fat if they want to.</quote> Thats why I said not as significantly, I realize theres obviously some personal downsides to an obese population, but lets not pretend its anywhere near as significant as having a population thats mostly environmentally unfriendly. Also, as posted earlier this topic, the data shows obese people smokers cost less in the long run in terms of medical costs. Also, if youre going to regulate what people can eat, why just stop there, why not just regulate food portions as well? In NYC for instance, restaurants arent allowed to serve fountain drinks over a certain size.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
KamenRiderBlade 06/22/18 6:38:20 PM #65:	Kazi1212 posted... In NYC for instance, restaurants arent allowed to serve fountain drinks over a certain size. Don't give the legislators any more crazy ideas. --- Are you a MexiCAN or a MexiCAN'T - Johnny Depp '*Once Upon A Time in Mexico*' <cite>KamenRiderBlade posted [p:903781315] in 39.8% of A... [t:76739847]...</cite> <quote><cite>Kazi1212 posted...</cite> <quote> In NYC for instance, restaurants arent allowed to serve fountain drinks over a certain size.</quote>Don't give the legislators any more crazy ideas.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Sativa_Rose 06/22/18 6:41:18 PM #66:	Kazi1212 posted... In NYC for instance, restaurants arent allowed to serve fountain drinks over a certain size. I thought a court struck down the Bloomberg Soda Ban? --- I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister. <cite>Sativa_Rose posted [p:903781478] in 39.8% of A... [t:76739847]...</cite> <quote><cite>Kazi1212 posted...</cite> <quote>In NYC for instance, restaurants arent allowed to serve fountain drinks over a certain size.</quote> I thought a court struck down the Bloomberg Soda Ban?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
KamenRiderBlade 06/22/18 6:47:30 PM #67:	Sativa_Rose posted... I thought a court struck down the Bloomberg Soda Ban? Yup! But it took a court ruling to do that. https://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/27/nyregion/city-loses-final-appeal-on-limiting-sales-of-large-sodas.html --- Are you a MexiCAN or a MexiCAN'T - Johnny Depp '*Once Upon A Time in Mexico*' <cite>KamenRiderBlade posted [p:903781815] in 39.8% of A... [t:76739847]...</cite> <quote><cite>Sativa_Rose posted...</cite> <quote>I thought a court struck down the Bloomberg Soda Ban?</quote>Yup! But it took a court ruling to do that. https://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/27/nyregion/city-loses-final-appeal-on-limiting-sales-of-large-sodas.html</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
KamenRiderBlade 06/22/18 6:49:17 PM #68:	Michael Bloomberg is still trying to fight against Big Soda!! http://fortune.com/2016/11/03/michael-bloomberg-soda-taxes/ --- Are you a MexiCAN or a MexiCAN'T - Johnny Depp '*Once Upon A Time in Mexico*' <cite>KamenRiderBlade posted [p:903781915] in 39.8% of A... [t:76739847]...</cite> <quote>Michael Bloomberg is still trying to fight against Big Soda!! http://fortune.com/2016/11/03/michael-bloomberg-soda-taxes/</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Kazi1212 06/22/18 6:52:22 PM #69:	Go to hell Mike! I kid, I kid --- I don't know my gimmick "Does that sound reasonable to you?" <cite>Kazi1212 posted [p:903782079] in 39.8% of A... [t:76739847]...</cite> <quote>Go to hell Mike! I kid, I kid</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
KamenRiderBlade 06/22/18 6:53:31 PM #70:	Kazi1212 posted... Go to hell Mike! I kid, I kid I'm serious, he should "GO TO HELL!!!!" If it was replacing HFCS with all natural Cane Sugar, I can get behind that. A Organic Soda move, sure!! But a tax on it, NOOOO!!!! --- Are you a MexiCAN or a MexiCAN'T - Johnny Depp '*Once Upon A Time in Mexico*' <cite>KamenRiderBlade posted [p:903782146] in 39.8% of A... [t:76739847]...</cite> <quote><cite>Kazi1212 posted...</cite> <quote>Go to hell Mike! I kid, I kid</quote>I'm serious, he should "GO TO HELL!!!!" If it was replacing HFCS with all natural Cane Sugar, I can get behind that. A Organic Soda move, sure!! But a tax on it, NOOOO!!!!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TheRealDill2000 06/22/18 7:10:34 PM #71:	This is a pointless stat if based on BMI. --- CE's source of sagely advice #BLM <cite>TheRealDill2000 posted [p:903783056] in 39.8% of A... [t:76739847]...</cite> <quote>This is a pointless stat if based on BMI.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
KobeSystem 06/22/18 7:37:12 PM #72:	KamenRiderBlade posted... Kazi1212 posted... In NYC for instance, restaurants arent allowed to serve fountain drinks over a certain size. Don't give the legislators any more crazy ideas. This reminds me of that one Parks and Rec episode where Leslie tries to regulate the ridiculous soda portions pawnch burger offers >.> --- http://www.last.fm/user/KobeSystem92 \| https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/725087214401671170/02UGgybe_400x400.jpg WIN SEXANGELS GREATKERZ <cite>KobeSystem posted [p:903784445] in 39.8% of A... [t:76739847]...</cite> <quote><cite>KamenRiderBlade posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Kazi1212 posted...</cite> <quote> In NYC for instance, restaurants arent allowed to serve fountain drinks over a certain size.</quote>Don't give the legislators any more crazy ideas.</quote> This reminds me of that one Parks and Rec episode where Leslie tries to regulate the ridiculous soda portions pawnch burger offers >.></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Vol2tex 06/22/18 9:40:56 PM #73:	I remember having such small drink cups in pizza stores a few years ago in NYC. --- https://imgtc.com/i/7cQjt43.jpg https://i.imgtc.com/YFpt0kk.jpg <cite>Vol2tex posted [p:903790699] in 39.8% of A... [t:76739847]...</cite> <quote>I remember having such small drink cups in pizza stores a few years ago in NYC.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Vol2tex 06/23/18 11:41:56 AM #74:	bump --- https://imgtc.com/i/7cQjt43.jpg https://i.imgtc.com/YFpt0kk.jpg <cite>Vol2tex posted [p:903816489] in 39.8% of A... [t:76739847]...</cite> <quote>bump</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Vol2tex 06/23/18 4:42:53 PM #75:	bump --- https://imgtc.com/i/7cQjt43.jpg https://i.imgtc.com/YFpt0kk.jpg <cite>Vol2tex posted [p:903831142] in 39.8% of A... [t:76739847]...</cite> <quote>bump</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Maeiv 06/23/18 4:49:14 PM #76:	Perhaps Im blind but I couldnt find it in the website, Whats considered obese or overweight? --- Achieve the dream 76ers, Eagles <cite>Maeiv posted [p:903831429] in 39.8% of A... [t:76739847]...</cite> <quote>Perhaps Im blind but I couldnt find it in the website, Whats considered obese or overweight?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
HBOSS 06/23/18 5:06:55 PM #77:	Maeiv posted... Perhaps Im blind but I couldnt find it in the website, Whats considered obese or overweight? http://www.cdc.gov/obesity/adult/defining.html If your BMI is 25.0 to <30, it falls within the overweight range. If your BMI is 30.0 or higher, it falls within the obese range. --- You don't stop playing because you grow old, You grow old because you stop playing <cite>HBOSS posted [p:903832264] in 39.8% of A... [t:76739847]...</cite> <quote><cite>Maeiv posted...</cite> <quote>Perhaps Im blind but I couldnt find it in the website, Whats considered obese or overweight?</quote> http://www.cdc.gov/obesity/adult/defining.html If your BMI is 25.0 to <30, it falls within the overweight range. If your BMI is 30.0 or higher, it falls within the obese range.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Dathrowed1 06/24/18 2:00:54 PM #78:	I am considered overweight, but when I tell women I need to lose pounds they get upset. --- sig <cite>Dathrowed1 posted [p:903878737] in 39.8% of A... [t:76739847]...</cite> <quote>I am considered overweight, but when I tell women I need to lose pounds they get upset.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2

Current Events > 39.8% of American adults are obese (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > 39.8% of American adults are obese