Current Events > Bill Clinton panicked as 1998 sealed Grand Jury documents to be released

(+) Yeah! (+)

https://www.cnn.com/2018/02/16/politics/bill-clinton-federal-court-lewinsky-investigation/index.html



Former President Bill Clinton told a federal court on Friday that he'd like to weigh in on whether sealed documents from his 1998 grand jury investigation should be released to the public.

The request, from Clinton's longtime criminal defense lawyer David Kendall, comes in response to CNN asking the court to unseal records of subpoena fights from that investigation into his relationship with Monica Lewinsky.

CNN previously reported that a federal court in Washington would unseal documents that have stayed secret for two decades from independent counsel Ken Starr's investigation of Clinton, following a request from CNN.

Clinton's lawyer said Friday that his client would like to be part of the unsealing case so he can "present his position" about the records of his own grand jury subpoena and other court complaints at the time, including a grand jury leak investigation.

Can't wait to see what the Clintons and the Democrats hid from the American people. Guarantee Billy woulda been removed from office if his crimes weren't covered up.
---

yeah that doesnt soudn great

meh who cares. bill clinton is old news

CNN wants us to stop looking at Trump for a while.
---

They will literally never get over their obsession with Clinton, will they?
---

Aristoph posted...

They will literally never get over their obsession with Clinton, will they?

Maybe if they stopped shoving his wife in our faces
---

Both the Clintons should just retire into obscurity so we can focus on our current horrible political situation.
---

Funny how this stuff comes out literally a day after any sort of heat turns towards Trump. It's almost as if someone is planning it that way ...

Dash_Harber posted...

Funny how this stuff comes out literally a day after any sort of heat turns towards Trump. It's almost as if someone is planning it that way ...

In all fairness, Bill had this coming for decades.

And it is especially pertinent during this #MeToo movement. There's really no debate as to whether he abused his position of power to garner sexual favors. If that's enough to condemn other politicians, he's past due for his own comeuppance.
---

Dash_Harber posted...

Funny how this stuff comes out literally a day after any sort of heat turns towards Trump. It's almost as if someone is planning it that way ...

Remember how they reported that WTC 7 collapsed 23 minutes before it did?
With the WTC 7 in the background?
---

Foppe posted...

CNN wants us to stop looking at Trump for a while.

Fake news.
---

Coffeebeanz posted...

Dash_Harber posted...

Funny how this stuff comes out literally a day after any sort of heat turns towards Trump. It's almost as if someone is planning it that way ...

In all fairness, Bill had this coming for decades.

And it is especially pertinent during this #MeToo movement. There's really no debate as to whether he abused his position of power to garner sexual favors. If that's enough to condemn other politicians, he's past due for his own comeuppance.

Oh totally. He should get what he deserves especially if he is guilty. I'm just saying it's very convenient that these sorts of stories just happen to leak exactly when another article comes out that make Trump look bad, especially when mayn of these stories are not time exclusive.

Foppe posted...

Dash_Harber posted...

Funny how this stuff comes out literally a day after any sort of heat turns towards Trump. It's almost as if someone is planning it that way ...

Remember how they reported that WTC 7 collapsed 23 minutes before it did?
With the WTC 7 in the background?

I'm not talking conspiracy theory bullshit. I'm saying it's pretty suspicious that the stories are timed that way. I'm not saying it's a conpsiracy, I'm saying it's a conscious decision made by people on his staff or his supporters.

Dash_Harber posted...

Oh totally. He should get what he deserves especially if he is guilty. I'm just saying it's very convenient that these sorts of stories just happen to leak exactly when another article comes out that make Trump look bad, especially when mayn of these stories are not time exclusive.

Is the Clinton News Network conveniently covering for Trump now since they were the ones that requested the documents?

The liberal spin zone is a weird place.
---

iClockwork posted...

Dash_Harber posted...

Oh totally. He should get what he deserves especially if he is guilty. I'm just saying it's very convenient that these sorts of stories just happen to leak exactly when another article comes out that make Trump look bad, especially when mayn of these stories are not time exclusive.

Is the Clinton News Network conveniently covering for Trump now since they were the ones that requested the documents?

The liberal spin zone is a weird place.

No, more like if I was working for Trump I would make sure that the news sources were aware of that particular 'story' even though absolutely nothing new happened.

iClockwork posted...

Dash_Harber posted...

Oh totally. He should get what he deserves especially if he is guilty. I'm just saying it's very convenient that these sorts of stories just happen to leak exactly when another article comes out that make Trump look bad, especially when mayn of these stories are not time exclusive.

Is the Clinton News Network conveniently covering for Trump now since they were the ones that requested the documents?

The liberal spin zone is a weird place.

It's odd that you're spinning it by calling it the Clinton News Network and then accusing others of spinning things. Regardless, if there's really something there that Bill wants to keep hidden that isn't about his sexual endeavors in the Oval Office, I'm very interested to hear it.
---

Dash_Harber posted...

No, more like if I was working for Trump I would make sure that the news sources were aware of that particular 'story' even though absolutely nothing new happened.

It says in the link that CNN is requesting for the documents themselves to be released. It wasn't some back hall story that's being leaked...
---

Tag for laughs later
---

iClockwork posted...

Dash_Harber posted...

No, more like if I was working for Trump I would make sure that the news sources were aware of that particular 'story' even though absolutely nothing new happened.

It says in the link that CNN is requesting for the documents themselves to be released. It wasn't some back hall story that's being leaked...

Fair enough.

Dash_Harber posted...

Funny how this stuff comes out literally a day after any sort of heat turns towards Trump. It's almost as if someone is planning it that way ...

Shuto-uke posted...

Dash_Harber posted...

Funny how this stuff comes out literally a day after any sort of heat turns towards Trump. It's almost as if someone is planning it that way ...

iClockwork posted...

Is the Clinton News Network conveniently covering for Trump now since they were the ones that requested the documents?

---

#timesup Bill
---

Foppe posted...

Dash_Harber posted...

Funny how this stuff comes out literally a day after any sort of heat turns towards Trump. It's almost as if someone is planning it that way ...

Remember how they reported that WTC 7 collapsed 23 minutes before it did?
With the WTC 7 in the background?

Bill Clinton did 9/11.
---

Dash_Harber posted...

Coffeebeanz posted...

Dash_Harber posted...

Funny how this stuff comes out literally a day after any sort of heat turns towards Trump. It's almost as if someone is planning it that way ...

In all fairness, Bill had this coming for decades.

And it is especially pertinent during this #MeToo movement. There's really no debate as to whether he abused his position of power to garner sexual favors. If that's enough to condemn other politicians, he's past due for his own comeuppance.

Oh totally. He should get what he deserves especially if he is guilty. I'm just saying it's very convenient that these sorts of stories just happen to leak exactly when another article comes out that make Trump look bad, especially when mayn of these stories are not time exclusive.

Foppe posted...

Dash_Harber posted...

Funny how this stuff comes out literally a day after any sort of heat turns towards Trump. It's almost as if someone is planning it that way ...

Remember how they reported that WTC 7 collapsed 23 minutes before it did?
With the WTC 7 in the background?

I'm not talking conspiracy theory bullshit. I'm saying it's pretty suspicious that the stories are timed that way. I'm not saying it's a conpsiracy, I'm saying it's a conscious decision made by people on his staff or his supporters.

You want hard facts?
6 big media companies controls 90% of the media in USA.
These 6 all get their news from Reuters and the Associated Press. Reuters owns the AP and Rothschilds own Reuters.
Big news media channels have internal memos about what they are not allowed to report and what to concentrate on at specific days.
They decide what kind of news they want to feed you and when. Always had.
9/11 is a great example, with their covering about Iraq more than 2/3 of the US population believed that Iraq had something to do with 9/11. Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11.
It is known that CNN is being "sponsored" to make some countries look better in the news, like Bahrain. CNN spent over $100.000 to make a documentary about the Arabic Spring in Bahrain which they only showed once in USA and never in CNN International. It won prizes and CNN rewarded their reporter by telling her to shut up about the documentary.
Remember how they spent weeks without mentioning Ron Paul in the election covering?
I know that I sound crazy here, but the US news media is controlled.
---

Dash_Harber posted...

Funny how this stuff comes out literally a day after any sort of heat turns towards Trump. It's almost as if someone is planning it that way ...

You are right it is pretty suspicious that they didn't go for it earlier like when the #metoo movement was in full swing and people were talking about it daily. Of course anyone that actually mentioned Bill Clinton at the time were casually dismissed as "it was a different time it ain't relevent"....
---

served on a Fed Grand Jury, probably not going to be anything too exciting in these documents.
---

Foppe posted...

Reuters owns the AP and Rothschilds own Reuters.

Reuters is 62% owned by the Woodbridge group which was formed by the Thompson family as their investment company. And I don't see anything about Reuters owning AP.
---

really? i wonder what he could be worried about coming out. Wasn't most of that shit released in the starr report?

If someone wants to blow you because youre the president, shes the victim?

Do we ever plan on reaming these women trying to trade pussy for power or money? Or do they just get the best of both, profiting from making themselves a "victim"?

Funny how noone ever comes out guilty about doing this when it works, only when they dont get what they whored for.

Foppe posted...

Dash_Harber posted...

Coffeebeanz posted...

Dash_Harber posted...

Funny how this stuff comes out literally a day after any sort of heat turns towards Trump. It's almost as if someone is planning it that way ...

In all fairness, Bill had this coming for decades.

And it is especially pertinent during this #MeToo movement. There's really no debate as to whether he abused his position of power to garner sexual favors. If that's enough to condemn other politicians, he's past due for his own comeuppance.

Oh totally. He should get what he deserves especially if he is guilty. I'm just saying it's very convenient that these sorts of stories just happen to leak exactly when another article comes out that make Trump look bad, especially when mayn of these stories are not time exclusive.

Foppe posted...

Dash_Harber posted...

Funny how this stuff comes out literally a day after any sort of heat turns towards Trump. It's almost as if someone is planning it that way ...

Remember how they reported that WTC 7 collapsed 23 minutes before it did?
With the WTC 7 in the background?

I'm not talking conspiracy theory bullshit. I'm saying it's pretty suspicious that the stories are timed that way. I'm not saying it's a conpsiracy, I'm saying it's a conscious decision made by people on his staff or his supporters.

You want hard facts?
6 big media companies controls 90% of the media in USA.
These 6 all get their news from Reuters and the Associated Press. Reuters owns the AP and Rothschilds own Reuters.
Big news media channels have internal memos about what they are not allowed to report and what to concentrate on at specific days.
They decide what kind of news they want to feed you and when. Always had.
9/11 is a great example, with their covering about Iraq more than 2/3 of the US population believed that Iraq had something to do with 9/11. Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11.
It is known that CNN is being "sponsored" to make some countries look better in the news, like Bahrain. CNN spent over $100.000 to make a documentary about the Arabic Spring in Bahrain which they only showed once in USA and never in CNN International. It won prizes and CNN rewarded their reporter by telling her to shut up about the documentary.
Remember how they spent weeks without mentioning Ron Paul in the election covering?
I know that I sound crazy here, but the US news media is controlled.

Damn that is one cheap documentary
---

i think everything already came out though

Foppe posted...

Dash_Harber posted...

Coffeebeanz posted...

Dash_Harber posted...

Funny how this stuff comes out literally a day after any sort of heat turns towards Trump. It's almost as if someone is planning it that way ...

In all fairness, Bill had this coming for decades.

And it is especially pertinent during this #MeToo movement. There's really no debate as to whether he abused his position of power to garner sexual favors. If that's enough to condemn other politicians, he's past due for his own comeuppance.

Oh totally. He should get what he deserves especially if he is guilty. I'm just saying it's very convenient that these sorts of stories just happen to leak exactly when another article comes out that make Trump look bad, especially when mayn of these stories are not time exclusive.

Foppe posted...

Dash_Harber posted...

Funny how this stuff comes out literally a day after any sort of heat turns towards Trump. It's almost as if someone is planning it that way ...

Remember how they reported that WTC 7 collapsed 23 minutes before it did?
With the WTC 7 in the background?

I'm not talking conspiracy theory bullshit. I'm saying it's pretty suspicious that the stories are timed that way. I'm not saying it's a conpsiracy, I'm saying it's a conscious decision made by people on his staff or his supporters.

You want hard facts?
6 big media companies controls 90% of the media in USA.
These 6 all get their news from Reuters and the Associated Press. Reuters owns the AP and Rothschilds own Reuters.
Big news media channels have internal memos about what they are not allowed to report and what to concentrate on at specific days.
They decide what kind of news they want to feed you and when. Always had.
9/11 is a great example, with their covering about Iraq more than 2/3 of the US population believed that Iraq had something to do with 9/11. Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11.
It is known that CNN is being "sponsored" to make some countries look better in the news, like Bahrain. CNN spent over $100.000 to make a documentary about the Arabic Spring in Bahrain which they only showed once in USA and never in CNN International. It won prizes and CNN rewarded their reporter by telling her to shut up about the documentary.
Remember how they spent weeks without mentioning Ron Paul in the election covering?
I know that I sound crazy here, but the US news media is controlled.

When did anyone say that Iraq was responsible for 9/11? Bush literally used UN weapons inspectors getting a hard time in Iraq as his justification for invading. Literally was never about 9/11. Fox News might have done their usual idiocy about potential but thats it.

KazGT6 posted...

i think everything already came out though

This. I mean, I don't really know what people are expecting to see come out from this. Its all going to be about stuff that is already public knowledge. You might get more details about specific things that she said he was doing or said but there aren't going to be confessions about committing murder or something like that.

It will be fun to watch the right accuse the former president of being a misogynist womanizer that had no family values. It won't stop them, but it will be good for a laugh.
---

Cal12 posted...

When did anyone say that Iraq was responsible for 9/11? Bush literally used UN weapons inspectors getting a hard time in Iraq as his justification for invading. Literally was never about 9/11. Fox News might have done their usual idiocy about potential but thats it.

Well that's just not true, as many people both in the Bush WH and their surrogates all over the media on all the networks made that connection. At the time it wasn't just FNC pushing that belief, it was all over the place regardless of partisan spin
---

Foppe posted...

CNN wants us to stop looking at Trump for a while.

Why? He's all they talk about.

Patchwork posted...

Both the Clintons should just retire into obscurity so we can focus on our current horrible political situation.

Absolutely not. The Clintons are a gift to the Republican Party.
---

how bad could it be that Trump hasn't already made look tame in comparison?

Cal12 posted...

When did anyone say that Iraq was responsible for 9/11? Bush literally used UN weapons inspectors getting a hard time in Iraq as his justification for invading. Literally was never about 9/11. Fox News might have done their usual idiocy about potential but thats it.

The media was filled with people trying to connect Al-Qaida with Iraq.
People still believed it after Bush said that they had found no connections, simply because the media had such a hardon for it.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2003/sep/07/usa.theobserver
---

whitelytning posted...

This. I mean, I don't really know what people are expecting to see come out from this. Its all going to be about stuff that is already public knowledge. You might get more details about specific things that she said he was doing or said but there aren't going to be confessions about committing murder or something like that.

Charges don't have to be brought for these records to sway public opinion. There could be some extremely nasty stuff in there.
---

Sway public opinion about..Bill Clinton? I think it's a little late for that, who even cares
---

Why post this, TC?
To counter all the anti-trump topics?
---

iClockwork posted...

The liberal spin zone is a weird place.

Wait. Why do liberals give a fuck what happens to Bill/Hillary Clinton in 2018?
---

thronedfire2 posted...

Sway public opinion about..Bill Clinton? I think it's a little late for that, who even cares

Bill Clinton is touted by Dems as "untouchable."

LordRazziel posted...

Why post this, TC?

It's a current event.
---

iClockwork posted...

thronedfire2 posted...

Sway public opinion about..Bill Clinton? I think it's a little late for that, who even cares

Bill Clinton is touted by Dems as "untouchable."

LordRazziel posted...

Why post this, TC?

It's a current event.

Just wanted to share?
There was no other motive?
---

LordRazziel posted...

Just wanted to share?

Yup.

LordRazziel posted...

There was no other motive?

If I had a motive I wouldn't be linking to CNN would I?
---

iClockwork posted...

thronedfire2 posted...

Sway public opinion about..Bill Clinton? I think it's a little late for that, who even cares

Bill Clinton is touted by Dems as "untouchable."

LordRazziel posted...

Why post this, TC?

It's a current event.

He's touted as untouchable because why even bother
---

what could be in there? wasnt it about him banging her in the oval?
---

iClockwork posted...

LordRazziel posted...

Just wanted to share?

Yup.

LordRazziel posted...

There was no other motive?

If I had a motive I wouldn't be linking to CNN would I?

That's bullshit.
I know it, you know it, everyone knows it.

Why does CNN change anything? It's not the source, it's how you used it. Doesn't seem like a concept that would elude you. Weak tactic.
---

LordRazziel posted...

iClockwork posted...

LordRazziel posted...

Just wanted to share?

Yup.

LordRazziel posted...

There was no other motive?

If I had a motive I wouldn't be linking to CNN would I?

That's bullshit.
I know it, you know it, everyone knows it.

Why does CNN change anything? It's not the source, it's how you used it. Doesn't seem like a concept that would elude you. Weak tactic.

Triggered as fuck
---

gmanthebest posted...

LordRazziel posted...

iClockwork posted...

LordRazziel posted...

Just wanted to share?

Yup.

LordRazziel posted...

There was no other motive?

If I had a motive I wouldn't be linking to CNN would I?

That's bullshit.
I know it, you know it, everyone knows it.

Why does CNN change anything? It's not the source, it's how you used it. Doesn't seem like a concept that would elude you. Weak tactic.

Triggered as fuck

*cries and throws things*
---

LordRazziel posted...

Weak tactic.

There is no "tactic."
---