Poll of the Day > Anybody else watching Joe Kennedy's conference?

Topic List	Page List: 1
WastelandCowboy 01/30/18 10:48:29 PM #1:	https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PsStXrcI8AQ Dude makes sense. <cite>WastelandCowboy posted [p:895147957] in Anybody el... [t:76263580]...</cite> <quote> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PsStXrcI8AQ Dude makes sense.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TheWorstPoster 01/30/18 11:06:18 PM #2:	You mean baseless rhetoric without stating any facts? <cite>TheWorstPoster posted [p:895149474] in Anybody el... [t:76263580]...</cite> <quote>You mean baseless rhetoric without stating any facts?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
WastelandCowboy 01/30/18 11:10:03 PM #3:	Dude still made much more sense than Trump in his left ass cheek and you in your whole life combined. <cite>WastelandCowboy posted [p:895149735] in Anybody el... [t:76263580]...</cite> <quote>Dude still made much more sense than Trump in his left ass cheek and you in your whole life combined.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TheWorstPoster 01/30/18 11:10:43 PM #4:	WastelandCowboy posted... Dude still made much more sense than Trump in his left ass cheek and you in your whole life combined. Like what, exactly? <cite>TheWorstPoster posted [p:895149790] in Anybody el... [t:76263580]...</cite> <quote><cite>WastelandCowboy posted...</cite> <quote>Dude still made much more sense than Trump in his left ass cheek and you in your whole life combined.</quote> Like what, exactly?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Metal_Mario99 01/30/18 11:49:08 PM #5:	Pfft. Yeah. Right. Enjoy your drooling, ginger-haired Kennedy and his love for illegal aliens. --- The GameFAQs mods are terrible at their job. <cite>Metal_Mario99 posted [p:895152316] in Anybody el... [t:76263580]...</cite> <quote>Pfft. Yeah. Right. Enjoy your drooling, ginger-haired Kennedy and his love for illegal aliens.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
JixHedgehog 01/31/18 12:25:27 AM #6:	Nah, after Trump was done I jumped in the shower --- Not changing my sig until Nintendo announces the Switch XL 1/12/2017 <cite>JixHedgehog posted [p:895154294] in Anybody el... [t:76263580]...</cite> <quote>Nah, after Trump was done I jumped in the shower</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
WastelandCowboy 01/31/18 2:39:40 AM #7:	https://www.npr.org/2018/01/30/580378787/fact-check-democratic-response-to-state-of-the-union Much better review than I'd care to spend time doing, considering that @Metal_Mario99 and @TheWorstPoster would ride the Trump train into the sunset. <cite>WastelandCowboy posted [p:895159765] in Anybody el... [t:76263580]...</cite> <quote>https://www.npr.org/2018/01/30/580378787/fact-check-democratic-response-to-state-of-the-union Much better review than I'd care to spend time doing, considering that @Metal_Mario99 and @TheWorstPoster would ride the Trump train into the sunset.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zeus 01/31/18 2:53:01 AM #8:	Lackluster rebuttal. Mostly an array of trite talking points, some of which regurgitated from speeches across the past 20 or 30 years while most of the rest was recycled attacks against Trump along with some gutter-tier pandering. Honestly, even Marco "Dry Mouth" Rubio a few years back gave a stronger rebuttal. Wasn't worth the 13.5 minutes run-time. Also, for a Kennedy, he's damn creepy-looking. The only plus is that this might be the last time we hear from Chucky Kennedy after this shitty rebuttal. --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| There are precious few at ease / With moral ambiguities / So we act as though they don't exist. <cite>Zeus posted [p:895160208] in Anybody el... [t:76263580]...</cite> <quote>Lackluster rebuttal. Mostly an array of trite talking points, some of which regurgitated from speeches across the past 20 or 30 years while most of the rest was recycled attacks against Trump along with some gutter-tier pandering. Honestly, even Marco "Dry Mouth" Rubio a few years back gave a stronger rebuttal. Wasn't worth the 13.5 minutes run-time. Also, for a Kennedy, he's damn creepy-looking. The only plus is that this might be the last time we hear from Chucky Kennedy after this shitty rebuttal.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
WastelandCowboy 01/31/18 2:56:13 AM #9:	Zeus posted... Lackluster rebuttal. Mostly an array of trite talking points, some of which regurgitated from speeches across the past 20 or 30 years while most of the rest was recycled attacks against Trump along with some gutter-tier pandering. Honestly, even Marco "Dry Mouth" Rubio a few years back gave a stronger rebuttal. Wasn't worth the 13.5 minutes run-time. Also, for a Kennedy, he's damn creepy-looking. The only plus is that this might be the last time we hear from Chucky Kennedy after this shitty rebuttal. I'd love to see your reasoning and sources behind these moronic comments of yours, Zeusy. If not, you're more than welcome to sit on a tack. <cite>WastelandCowboy posted [p:895160319] in Anybody el... [t:76263580]...</cite> <quote><cite>Zeus posted...</cite> <quote>Lackluster rebuttal. Mostly an array of trite talking points, some of which regurgitated from speeches across the past 20 or 30 years while most of the rest was recycled attacks against Trump along with some gutter-tier pandering. Honestly, even Marco "Dry Mouth" Rubio a few years back gave a stronger rebuttal. Wasn't worth the 13.5 minutes run-time. Also, for a Kennedy, he's damn creepy-looking. The only plus is that this might be the last time we hear from Chucky Kennedy after this shitty rebuttal.</quote> I'd love to see your reasoning and sources behind these moronic comments of yours, Zeusy. If not, you're more than welcome to sit on a tack.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zeus 01/31/18 3:04:17 AM #10:	WastelandCowboy posted... Zeus posted... Lackluster rebuttal. Mostly an array of trite talking points, some of which regurgitated from speeches across the past 20 or 30 years while most of the rest was recycled attacks against Trump along with some gutter-tier pandering. Honestly, even Marco "Dry Mouth" Rubio a few years back gave a stronger rebuttal. Wasn't worth the 13.5 minutes run-time. Also, for a Kennedy, he's damn creepy-looking. The only plus is that this might be the last time we hear from Chucky Kennedy after this shitty rebuttal. I'd love to see your reasoning and sources behind these moronic comments of yours, Zeusy. If not, you're more than welcome to sit on a tack. Reasoning and sources for what, the fact that he failed to present anything we haven't heard from other boilerplate stump speeches, he didn't heavily recycle attacks on Trump, and he didn't engage in cheaper pandering than a Mick Foley cheap pop? Honestly, if you need sources for any of that, it demonstrates that you've paid zero attention to political speeches in recent years which undermines any credibility you might have on political matters. And if you're using hostility to mask your ignorance on the subject, you're not really helping anybody let alone the cause you claim to represent. --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| There are precious few at ease / With moral ambiguities / So we act as though they don't exist. <cite>Zeus posted [p:895160575] in Anybody el... [t:76263580]...</cite> <quote><cite>WastelandCowboy posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Zeus posted...</cite> <quote>Lackluster rebuttal. Mostly an array of trite talking points, some of which regurgitated from speeches across the past 20 or 30 years while most of the rest was recycled attacks against Trump along with some gutter-tier pandering. Honestly, even Marco "Dry Mouth" Rubio a few years back gave a stronger rebuttal. Wasn't worth the 13.5 minutes run-time. Also, for a Kennedy, he's damn creepy-looking. The only plus is that this might be the last time we hear from Chucky Kennedy after this shitty rebuttal.</quote> I'd love to see your reasoning and sources behind these moronic comments of yours, Zeusy. If not, you're more than welcome to sit on a tack.</quote> Reasoning and sources for what, the fact that he failed to present anything we haven't heard from other boilerplate stump speeches, he didn't heavily recycle attacks on Trump, and he didn't engage in cheaper pandering than a Mick Foley cheap pop? Honestly, if you need sources for any of that, it demonstrates that you've paid zero attention to political speeches in recent years which undermines any credibility you might have on political matters. And if you're using hostility to mask your ignorance on the subject, you're not really helping anybody let alone the cause you claim to represent.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
WastelandCowboy 01/31/18 3:12:08 AM #11:	Zeus posted... WastelandCowboy posted... Zeus posted... Lackluster rebuttal. Mostly an array of trite talking points, some of which regurgitated from speeches across the past 20 or 30 years while most of the rest was recycled attacks against Trump along with some gutter-tier pandering. Honestly, even Marco "Dry Mouth" Rubio a few years back gave a stronger rebuttal. Wasn't worth the 13.5 minutes run-time. Also, for a Kennedy, he's damn creepy-looking. The only plus is that this might be the last time we hear from Chucky Kennedy after this shitty rebuttal. I'd love to see your reasoning and sources behind these moronic comments of yours, Zeusy. If not, you're more than welcome to sit on a tack. Reasoning and sources for what, the fact that he failed to present anything we haven't heard from other boilerplate stump speeches, he didn't heavily recycle attacks on Trump, and he didn't engage in cheaper pandering than a Mick Foley cheap pop? Honestly, if you need sources for any of that, it demonstrates that you've paid zero attention to political speeches in recent years which undermines any credibility you might have on political matters. And if you're using hostility to mask your ignorance on the subject, you're not really helping anybody let alone the cause you claim to represent. So thats a no, then? Figured as much from a shitposter like you. <cite>WastelandCowboy posted [p:895160821] in Anybody el... [t:76263580]...</cite> <quote><cite>Zeus posted...</cite> <quote><cite>WastelandCowboy posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Zeus posted...</cite> <quote>Lackluster rebuttal. Mostly an array of trite talking points, some of which regurgitated from speeches across the past 20 or 30 years while most of the rest was recycled attacks against Trump along with some gutter-tier pandering. Honestly, even Marco "Dry Mouth" Rubio a few years back gave a stronger rebuttal. Wasn't worth the 13.5 minutes run-time. Also, for a Kennedy, he's damn creepy-looking. The only plus is that this might be the last time we hear from Chucky Kennedy after this shitty rebuttal.</quote> I'd love to see your reasoning and sources behind these moronic comments of yours, Zeusy. If not, you're more than welcome to sit on a tack.</quote> Reasoning and sources for what, the fact that he failed to present anything we haven't heard from other boilerplate stump speeches, he didn't heavily recycle attacks on Trump, and he didn't engage in cheaper pandering than a Mick Foley cheap pop? Honestly, if you need sources for any of that, it demonstrates that you've paid zero attention to political speeches in recent years which undermines any credibility you might have on political matters. And if you're using hostility to mask your ignorance on the subject, you're not really helping anybody let alone the cause you claim to represent.</quote> So thats a no, then? Figured as much from a shitposter like you.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zeus 01/31/18 3:23:21 AM #12:	WastelandCowboy posted... Zeus posted... WastelandCowboy posted... Zeus posted... Lackluster rebuttal. Mostly an array of trite talking points, some of which regurgitated from speeches across the past 20 or 30 years while most of the rest was recycled attacks against Trump along with some gutter-tier pandering. Honestly, even Marco "Dry Mouth" Rubio a few years back gave a stronger rebuttal. Wasn't worth the 13.5 minutes run-time. Also, for a Kennedy, he's damn creepy-looking. The only plus is that this might be the last time we hear from Chucky Kennedy after this shitty rebuttal. I'd love to see your reasoning and sources behind these moronic comments of yours, Zeusy. If not, you're more than welcome to sit on a tack. Reasoning and sources for what, the fact that he failed to present anything we haven't heard from other boilerplate stump speeches, he didn't heavily recycle attacks on Trump, and he didn't engage in cheaper pandering than a Mick Foley cheap pop? Honestly, if you need sources for any of that, it demonstrates that you've paid zero attention to political speeches in recent years which undermines any credibility you might have on political matters. And if you're using hostility to mask your ignorance on the subject, you're not really helping anybody let alone the cause you claim to represent. So thats a no, then? That's a "you should already know" and, if you legitimately don't, it's embarrassing. That or you know better and solely want to waste my time by dissecting an absurdly rote speech. You could have played bingo with it because it crosses off nearly every item on the checklist. WastelandCowboy posted... Figured as much from a Says the guy pretending that this is the greatest thing ever because he's never watched a political speech. --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| There are precious few at ease / With moral ambiguities / So we act as though they don't exist. <cite>Zeus posted [p:895161102] in Anybody el... [t:76263580]...</cite> <quote><cite>WastelandCowboy posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Zeus posted...</cite> <quote><cite>WastelandCowboy posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Zeus posted...</cite> <quote>Lackluster rebuttal. Mostly an array of trite talking points, some of which regurgitated from speeches across the past 20 or 30 years while most of the rest was recycled attacks against Trump along with some gutter-tier pandering. Honestly, even Marco "Dry Mouth" Rubio a few years back gave a stronger rebuttal. Wasn't worth the 13.5 minutes run-time. Also, for a Kennedy, he's damn creepy-looking. The only plus is that this might be the last time we hear from Chucky Kennedy after this shitty rebuttal.</quote> I'd love to see your reasoning and sources behind these moronic comments of yours, Zeusy. If not, you're more than welcome to sit on a tack.</quote> Reasoning and sources for what, the fact that he failed to present anything we haven't heard from other boilerplate stump speeches, he didn't heavily recycle attacks on Trump, and he didn't engage in cheaper pandering than a Mick Foley cheap pop? Honestly, if you need sources for any of that, it demonstrates that you've paid zero attention to political speeches in recent years which undermines any credibility you might have on political matters. And if you're using hostility to mask your ignorance on the subject, you're not really helping anybody let alone the cause you claim to represent.</quote> So thats a no, then?</quote> That's a "you should already know" and, if you legitimately don't, it's embarrassing. That or you know better and solely want to waste my time by dissecting an absurdly rote speech. You could have played bingo with it because it crosses off nearly every item on the checklist. <cite>WastelandCowboy posted...</cite> <quote>Figured as much from a</quote> Says the guy pretending that this is the greatest thing ever because he's never watched a political speech.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
WastelandCowboy 01/31/18 1:45:32 PM #13:	Zeus posted... WastelandCowboy posted... Zeus posted... WastelandCowboy posted... Zeus posted... Lackluster rebuttal. Mostly an array of trite talking points, some of which regurgitated from speeches across the past 20 or 30 years while most of the rest was recycled attacks against Trump along with some gutter-tier pandering. Honestly, even Marco "Dry Mouth" Rubio a few years back gave a stronger rebuttal. Wasn't worth the 13.5 minutes run-time. Also, for a Kennedy, he's damn creepy-looking. The only plus is that this might be the last time we hear from Chucky Kennedy after this shitty rebuttal. I'd love to see your reasoning and sources behind these moronic comments of yours, Zeusy. If not, you're more than welcome to sit on a tack. Reasoning and sources for what, the fact that he failed to present anything we haven't heard from other boilerplate stump speeches, he didn't heavily recycle attacks on Trump, and he didn't engage in cheaper pandering than a Mick Foley cheap pop? Honestly, if you need sources for any of that, it demonstrates that you've paid zero attention to political speeches in recent years which undermines any credibility you might have on political matters. And if you're using hostility to mask your ignorance on the subject, you're not really helping anybody let alone the cause you claim to represent. So thats a no, then? That's a "you should already know" and, if you legitimately don't, it's embarrassing. That or you know better and solely want to waste my time by dissecting an absurdly rote speech. You could have played bingo with it because it crosses off nearly every item on the checklist. WastelandCowboy posted... Figured as much from a Says the guy pretending that this is the greatest thing ever because he's never watched a political speech. Because your time is sooooo valuable and should be treated so. Lol, ego much? <cite>WastelandCowboy posted [p:895183956] in Anybody el... [t:76263580]...</cite> <quote><cite>Zeus posted...</cite> <quote><cite>WastelandCowboy posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Zeus posted...</cite> <quote><cite>WastelandCowboy posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Zeus posted...</cite> <quote>Lackluster rebuttal. Mostly an array of trite talking points, some of which regurgitated from speeches across the past 20 or 30 years while most of the rest was recycled attacks against Trump along with some gutter-tier pandering. Honestly, even Marco "Dry Mouth" Rubio a few years back gave a stronger rebuttal. Wasn't worth the 13.5 minutes run-time. Also, for a Kennedy, he's damn creepy-looking. The only plus is that this might be the last time we hear from Chucky Kennedy after this shitty rebuttal.</quote> I'd love to see your reasoning and sources behind these moronic comments of yours, Zeusy. If not, you're more than welcome to sit on a tack.</quote> Reasoning and sources for what, the fact that he failed to present anything we haven't heard from other boilerplate stump speeches, he didn't heavily recycle attacks on Trump, and he didn't engage in cheaper pandering than a Mick Foley cheap pop? Honestly, if you need sources for any of that, it demonstrates that you've paid zero attention to political speeches in recent years which undermines any credibility you might have on political matters. And if you're using hostility to mask your ignorance on the subject, you're not really helping anybody let alone the cause you claim to represent.</quote> So thats a no, then?</quote> That's a "you should already know" and, if you legitimately don't, it's embarrassing. That or you know better and solely want to waste my time by dissecting an absurdly rote speech. You could have played bingo with it because it crosses off nearly every item on the checklist. <cite>WastelandCowboy posted...</cite> <quote>Figured as much from a</quote> Says the guy pretending that this is the greatest thing ever because he's never watched a political speech.</quote> Because your time is sooooo valuable and should be treated so. Lol, ego much?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1

Poll of the Day > Anybody else watching Joe Kennedy's conference? (+) Yeah! (+)

Poll of the Day > Anybody else watching Joe Kennedy's conference?