Current Events > Dawkins has been banned.

Topic List	Page List: 1 ... 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
#256	Post #256 was unavailable or deleted.
UnfairRepresent 01/10/18 9:29:31 AM #257:	Conflict posted... It's just foolish to blame CE because most of the people were trying to get him to face reality and the severity of his situation and he responded with mockery This, there was no shortage of people offering help and really really really good advice. Every time they were threatened and insulted. --- ^ Hey now that's completely unfair. https://imgtc.com/i/14JHfrt.jpg <cite>UnfairRepresent posted [p:893764106] in Dawkins ha... [t:76183741]...</cite> <quote><cite>Conflict posted...</cite> <quote>It's just foolish to blame CE because most of the people were trying to get him to face reality and the severity of his situation and he responded with mockery</quote> This, there was no shortage of people offering help and really really really good advice. Every time they were threatened and insulted.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#258	Post #258 was unavailable or deleted.
UnfairRepresent 01/10/18 9:45:03 AM #259:	JustMyOpinion posted... Dawkins certainly deserved to be banned, but let's not pretend certain people didn't do their part. There were more than a couple topics created by others about him that were little more than an attempt at circlejerk harassment against him that the mods did nothing about. There was no shortage of people offering help and really really really good advice. Every time they were threatened and insulted. --- ^ Hey now that's completely unfair. https://imgtc.com/i/14JHfrt.jpg <cite>UnfairRepresent posted [p:893764685] in Dawkins ha... [t:76183741]...</cite> <quote><cite>JustMyOpinion posted...</cite> <quote>Dawkins certainly deserved to be banned, but let's not pretend certain people didn't do their part. There were more than a couple topics created by others about him that were little more than an attempt at circlejerk harassment against him that the mods did nothing about.</quote> There was no shortage of people offering help and really really really good advice. Every time they were threatened and insulted.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
WrkHrdPlayHrdr 01/10/18 9:47:15 AM #260:	JustMyOpinion posted... Dawkins certainly deserved to be banned, but let's not pretend certain people didn't do their part. There were more than a couple topics created by others about him that were little more than an attempt at circlejerk harassment against him that the mods did nothing about. How do you police that though? They let him get away with more stuff than they would with most other people. The rules are pretty simple. He couldn't follow them and didn't get punished (that much) for not following them so it turned into a circle jerk. --- "I also advised their executives through e-mail that further behavior could result in a cyber attack[...]" <cite>WrkHrdPlayHrdr posted [p:893764768] in Dawkins ha... [t:76183741]...</cite> <quote><cite>JustMyOpinion posted...</cite> <quote>Dawkins certainly deserved to be banned, but let's not pretend certain people didn't do their part. There were more than a couple topics created by others about him that were little more than an attempt at circlejerk harassment against him that the mods did nothing about.</quote> How do you police that though? They let him get away with more stuff than they would with most other people. The rules are pretty simple. He couldn't follow them and didn't get punished (that much) for not following them so it turned into a circle jerk.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#261	Post #261 was unavailable or deleted.
SpiralDrift 01/10/18 9:53:06 AM #262:	The vast majority tried to help him but he was always just abusive and made threats in return. He brought the ban on himself by trying to turn our negative reactions into a legal issue for the site, though he actually brought that negativity himself and constantly fed it. I sincerely hope this is a permanent ban and he'll take it as proof that he needs to change the way he deals with others. --- Do unto others what your parents did to you. <cite>SpiralDrift posted [p:893765000] in Dawkins ha... [t:76183741]...</cite> <quote>The vast majority tried to help him but he was always just abusive and made threats in return. He brought the ban on himself by trying to turn our negative reactions into a legal issue for the site, though he actually brought that negativity himself and constantly fed it. I sincerely hope this is a permanent ban and he'll take it as proof that he needs to change the way he deals with others.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
WrkHrdPlayHrdr 01/10/18 9:58:19 AM #263:	JustMyOpinion posted... WrkHrdPlayHrdr posted... JustMyOpinion posted... Dawkins certainly deserved to be banned, but let's not pretend certain people didn't do their part. There were more than a couple topics created by others about him that were little more than an attempt at circlejerk harassment against him that the mods did nothing about. How do you police that though? They let him get away with more stuff than they would with most other people. The rules are pretty simple. He couldn't follow them and didn't get punished (that much) for not following them so it turned into a circle jerk. Just delete/lock the topic. It's that simple. Then let him get himself banned without others helping him get said ban along the way. I mean no one told him to threaten a DDOS attack on an individual and a giant company. So that worked out perfectly. What it comes down to is he was mentally unstable with no ability to respect or listen to authority. He can't function on his own as an adult (based on his behavior and psychologist notes he provided) He never should have been allowed to post here to begin with. --- "I also advised their executives through e-mail that further behavior could result in a cyber attack[...]" <cite>WrkHrdPlayHrdr posted [p:893765208] in Dawkins ha... [t:76183741]...</cite> <quote><cite>JustMyOpinion posted...</cite> <quote><cite>WrkHrdPlayHrdr posted...</cite> <quote><cite>JustMyOpinion posted...</cite> <quote>Dawkins certainly deserved to be banned, but let's not pretend certain people didn't do their part. There were more than a couple topics created by others about him that were little more than an attempt at circlejerk harassment against him that the mods did nothing about.</quote> How do you police that though? They let him get away with more stuff than they would with most other people. The rules are pretty simple. He couldn't follow them and didn't get punished (that much) for not following them so it turned into a circle jerk.</quote> Just delete/lock the topic. It's that simple. Then let him get himself banned without others helping him get said ban along the way.</quote> I mean no one told him to threaten a DDOS attack on an individual and a giant company. So that worked out perfectly. What it comes down to is he was mentally unstable with no ability to respect or listen to authority. He can't function on his own as an adult (based on his behavior and psychologist notes he provided) He never should have been allowed to post here to begin with.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#264	Post #264 was unavailable or deleted.
KingCrabCake 01/10/18 10:16:07 AM #265:	SpiralDrift posted... The vast majority tried to help him but he was always just abusive and made threats in return. He brought the ban on himself by trying to turn our negative reactions into a legal issue for the site, though he actually brought that negativity himself and constantly fed it. I sincerely hope this is a permanent ban and he'll take it as proof that he needs to change the way he deals with others. Yes a gamefaqs ban will change him...but jail wouldn't --- Waaaah. <cite>KingCrabCake posted [p:893765961] in Dawkins ha... [t:76183741]...</cite> <quote><cite>SpiralDrift posted...</cite> <quote>The vast majority tried to help him but he was always just abusive and made threats in return. He brought the ban on himself by trying to turn our negative reactions into a legal issue for the site, though he actually brought that negativity himself and constantly fed it. I sincerely hope this is a permanent ban and he'll take it as proof that he needs to change the way he deals with others.</quote> Yes a gamefaqs ban will change him...but jail wouldn't</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#266	Post #266 was unavailable or deleted.
Muffinz0rz 01/10/18 10:28:02 AM #267:	Can someone tl;dr the last 4 pages? --- Not removing this until Pat Benatar is in Super Smash Bros. (Started 8/31/2010) FantaCE Football Squad: ELIMINATED. <cite>Muffinz0rz posted [p:893766463] in Dawkins ha... [t:76183741]...</cite> <quote>Can someone tl;dr the last 4 pages?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
thelovefist 01/10/18 10:38:00 AM #268:	Muffinz0rz posted... Can someone tl;dr the last 4 pages? Dawkins/Xsquader was threatening to both sue gamefaqs and perform cyber attacks on it. He got banned. --- N/A <cite>thelovefist posted [p:893766872] in Dawkins ha... [t:76183741]...</cite> <quote><cite>Muffinz0rz posted...</cite> <quote>Can someone tl;dr the last 4 pages?</quote> Dawkins/Xsquader was threatening to both sue gamefaqs and perform cyber attacks on it. He got banned.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#269	Post #269 was unavailable or deleted.
#270	Post #270 was unavailable or deleted.
thelovefist 01/10/18 10:43:52 AM #271:	JustMyOpinion posted... ClunkerSlim posted... JustMyOpinion posted... Dawkins certainly deserved to be banned, but let's not pretend certain people didn't do their part. There were more than a couple topics created by others about him that were little more than an attempt at circlejerk harassment against him that the mods did nothing about. That is fucking bullshit. Dustin was not harassed here. Calling him out on his hateful garbage is NOT harassment. If anything, Dustin was the harasser. He was known for being a bully (threatening to DoS people or leak information about them). He is also the prime suspect for flooding the chat room with child porn because he didnt get his way. In no shape or form is Dustin the victim here. I already said he derserved to be banned. Just because he was bad doesn't mean no one else could possibly have been bad when dealing with him. Making topics about his stupid videos just to incite a circlejerk is pretty much harassment, although I doubt those ever got modded. The only person who ever made topics about his videos was himself... --- N/A <cite>thelovefist posted [p:893767101] in Dawkins ha... [t:76183741]...</cite> <quote><cite>JustMyOpinion posted...</cite> <quote><cite>ClunkerSlim posted...</cite> <quote><cite>JustMyOpinion posted...</cite> <quote>Dawkins certainly deserved to be banned, but let's not pretend certain people didn't do their part. There were more than a couple topics created by others about him that were little more than an attempt at circlejerk harassment against him that the mods did nothing about.</quote> That is fucking bullshit. Dustin was not harassed here. Calling him out on his hateful garbage is NOT harassment. If anything, Dustin was the harasser. He was known for being a bully (threatening to DoS people or leak information about them). He is also the prime suspect for flooding the chat room with child porn because he didnt get his way. In no shape or form is Dustin the victim here.</quote> I already said he derserved to be banned. Just because he was bad doesn't mean no one else could possibly have been bad when dealing with him. Making topics about his stupid videos just to incite a circlejerk is pretty much harassment, although I doubt those ever got modded.</quote> The only person who ever made topics about his videos was himself...</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
FrankIin 01/10/18 10:47:24 AM #272:	ITT: GameFAQs users hunt down and harass man with a mental disorder, mods ignore it, man gets driven insane, and then is banned for lashing out. Following this, the people who harassed him and/or delighted in his harassment further slander the man to troll people who are like "yo wtf?". --- I love my iPhone X: https://imgur.com/a/ByHi0 \| https://i.imgur.com/6il7Dte.jpg No need to be jealous. <cite>FrankIin posted [p:893767231] in Dawkins ha... [t:76183741]...</cite> <quote>ITT: GameFAQs users hunt down and harass man with a mental disorder, mods ignore it, man gets driven insane, and then is banned for lashing out. Following this, the people who harassed him and/or delighted in his harassment further slander the man to troll people who are like "yo wtf?".</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Muffinz0rz 01/10/18 10:51:17 AM #273:	JustMyOpinion posted... ClunkerSlim posted... JustMyOpinion posted... Dawkins certainly deserved to be banned, but let's not pretend certain people didn't do their part. There were more than a couple topics created by others about him that were little more than an attempt at circlejerk harassment against him that the mods did nothing about. That is fucking bullshit. Dustin was not harassed here. Calling him out on his hateful garbage is NOT harassment. If anything, Dustin was the harasser. He was known for being a bully (threatening to DoS people or leak information about them). He is also the prime suspect for flooding the chat room with child porn because he didnt get his way. In no shape or form is Dustin the victim here. I already said he derserved to be banned. Just because he was bad doesn't mean no one else could possibly have been bad when dealing with him. Making topics about his stupid videos just to incite a circlejerk is pretty much harassment, although I doubt those ever got modded. Like your losses in our argument, it is just your opinion. --- Not removing this until Pat Benatar is in Super Smash Bros. (Started 8/31/2010) FantaCE Football Squad: ELIMINATED. <cite>Muffinz0rz posted [p:893767399] in Dawkins ha... [t:76183741]...</cite> <quote><cite>JustMyOpinion posted...</cite> <quote><cite>ClunkerSlim posted...</cite> <quote><cite>JustMyOpinion posted...</cite> <quote>Dawkins certainly deserved to be banned, but let's not pretend certain people didn't do their part. There were more than a couple topics created by others about him that were little more than an attempt at circlejerk harassment against him that the mods did nothing about.</quote> That is fucking bullshit. Dustin was not harassed here. Calling him out on his hateful garbage is NOT harassment. If anything, Dustin was the harasser. He was known for being a bully (threatening to DoS people or leak information about them). He is also the prime suspect for flooding the chat room with child porn because he didnt get his way. In no shape or form is Dustin the victim here.</quote> I already said he derserved to be banned. Just because he was bad doesn't mean no one else could possibly have been bad when dealing with him. Making topics about his stupid videos just to incite a circlejerk is pretty much harassment, although I doubt those ever got modded.</quote> Like your losses in our argument, it is just your opinion.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
KingCrabCake 01/10/18 10:51:27 AM #274:	FrankIin posted... ITT: GameFAQs users hunt down and harass man with a mental disorder, mods ignore it, man gets driven insane, and then is banned for lashing out. Following this, the people who harassed him and/or delighted in his harassment further slander the man to troll people who are like "yo wtf?". Dawkins alt tbh --- Waaaah. <cite>KingCrabCake posted [p:893767405] in Dawkins ha... [t:76183741]...</cite> <quote><cite>FrankIin posted...</cite> <quote>ITT: GameFAQs users hunt down and harass man with a mental disorder, mods ignore it, man gets driven insane, and then is banned for lashing out. Following this, the people who harassed him and/or delighted in his harassment further slander the man to troll people who are like "yo wtf?".</quote> Dawkins alt tbh</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#275	Post #275 was unavailable or deleted.
fusespliff 01/10/18 11:38:31 AM #276:	thelovefist posted... JustMyOpinion posted... ClunkerSlim posted... JustMyOpinion posted... Dawkins certainly deserved to be banned, but let's not pretend certain people didn't do their part. There were more than a couple topics created by others about him that were little more than an attempt at circlejerk harassment against him that the mods did nothing about. That is fucking bullshit. Dustin was not harassed here. Calling him out on his hateful garbage is NOT harassment. If anything, Dustin was the harasser. He was known for being a bully (threatening to DoS people or leak information about them). He is also the prime suspect for flooding the chat room with child porn because he didnt get his way. In no shape or form is Dustin the victim here. I already said he derserved to be banned. Just because he was bad doesn't mean no one else could possibly have been bad when dealing with him. Making topics about his stupid videos just to incite a circlejerk is pretty much harassment, although I doubt those ever got modded. The only person who ever made topics about his videos was himself... No, there are actually several posters who did create topics regarding his vids. IIRC @LightningAce11 made the last one and @Sparksfanboy made a few. I'm aboard the "fuck Dawkins" train we're on, but let's not pretend this train didn't have a rotating schedule of conductors over the years. --- ... <cite>fusespliff posted [p:893769530] in Dawkins ha... [t:76183741]...</cite> <quote><cite>thelovefist posted...</cite> <quote><cite>JustMyOpinion posted...</cite> <quote><cite>ClunkerSlim posted...</cite> <quote><cite>JustMyOpinion posted...</cite> <quote>Dawkins certainly deserved to be banned, but let's not pretend certain people didn't do their part. There were more than a couple topics created by others about him that were little more than an attempt at circlejerk harassment against him that the mods did nothing about.</quote> That is fucking bullshit. Dustin was not harassed here. Calling him out on his hateful garbage is NOT harassment. If anything, Dustin was the harasser. He was known for being a bully (threatening to DoS people or leak information about them). He is also the prime suspect for flooding the chat room with child porn because he didnt get his way. In no shape or form is Dustin the victim here.</quote> I already said he derserved to be banned. Just because he was bad doesn't mean no one else could possibly have been bad when dealing with him. Making topics about his stupid videos just to incite a circlejerk is pretty much harassment, although I doubt those ever got modded.</quote> The only person who ever made topics about his videos was himself...</quote> No, there are actually several posters who did create topics regarding his vids. IIRC @LightningAce11 made the last one and @Sparksfanboy made a few. I'm aboard the "fuck Dawkins" train we're on, but let's not pretend this train didn't have a rotating schedule of conductors over the years.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#277	Post #277 was unavailable or deleted.
FrankIin 01/10/18 11:43:39 AM #278:	fusespliff posted... thelovefist posted... JustMyOpinion posted... ClunkerSlim posted... JustMyOpinion posted... Dawkins certainly deserved to be banned, but let's not pretend certain people didn't do their part. There were more than a couple topics created by others about him that were little more than an attempt at circlejerk harassment against him that the mods did nothing about. That is fucking bullshit. Dustin was not harassed here. Calling him out on his hateful garbage is NOT harassment. If anything, Dustin was the harasser. He was known for being a bully (threatening to DoS people or leak information about them). He is also the prime suspect for flooding the chat room with child porn because he didnt get his way. In no shape or form is Dustin the victim here. I already said he derserved to be banned. Just because he was bad doesn't mean no one else could possibly have been bad when dealing with him. Making topics about his stupid videos just to incite a circlejerk is pretty much harassment, although I doubt those ever got modded. The only person who ever made topics about his videos was himself... No, there are actually several posters who did create topics regarding his vids. IIRC @LightningAce11 made the last one and @Sparksfanboy made a few. I'm aboard the "fuck Dawkins" train we're on, but let's not pretend this train didn't have a rotating schedule of conductors over the years. Bio1590 also googled him and posted about him getting arrested. This whole thing about "we only posted about stuff Xsquader himself posted!" is a lie. --- I love my iPhone X: https://imgur.com/a/ByHi0 \| https://i.imgur.com/6il7Dte.jpg No need to be jealous. <cite>FrankIin posted [p:893769774] in Dawkins ha... [t:76183741]...</cite> <quote><cite>fusespliff posted...</cite> <quote><cite>thelovefist posted...</cite> <quote><cite>JustMyOpinion posted...</cite> <quote><cite>ClunkerSlim posted...</cite> <quote><cite>JustMyOpinion posted...</cite> <quote>Dawkins certainly deserved to be banned, but let's not pretend certain people didn't do their part. There were more than a couple topics created by others about him that were little more than an attempt at circlejerk harassment against him that the mods did nothing about.</quote> That is fucking bullshit. Dustin was not harassed here. Calling him out on his hateful garbage is NOT harassment. If anything, Dustin was the harasser. He was known for being a bully (threatening to DoS people or leak information about them). He is also the prime suspect for flooding the chat room with child porn because he didnt get his way. In no shape or form is Dustin the victim here.</quote> I already said he derserved to be banned. Just because he was bad doesn't mean no one else could possibly have been bad when dealing with him. Making topics about his stupid videos just to incite a circlejerk is pretty much harassment, although I doubt those ever got modded.</quote> The only person who ever made topics about his videos was himself...</quote> No, there are actually several posters who did create topics regarding his vids. IIRC @LightningAce11 made the last one and @Sparksfanboy made a few. I'm aboard the "fuck Dawkins" train we're on, but let's not pretend this train didn't have a rotating schedule of conductors over the years.</quote> Bio1590 also googled him and posted about him getting arrested. This whole thing about "we only posted about stuff Xsquader himself posted!" is a lie.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#279	Post #279 was unavailable or deleted.
#280	Post #280 was unavailable or deleted.
#281	Post #281 was unavailable or deleted.
#282	Post #282 was unavailable or deleted.
fusespliff 01/10/18 8:11:56 PM #283:	ClunkerSlim posted... fusespliff posted... No, there are actually several posters who did create topics regarding his vids. Lots of people did, but only after Dawkins had already posted them himself. As soon as Dawkins posted a video on YouTube then hed advertise it on GameFAQs. He whored this forum for views. Dont act like people scoured the internet for his videos. How am I acting anything like that? If you'd read the rest of my post, you'd notice there is no need to get defensive and go putting words in my mouth. And you're still wrong at that. There have been several times Dawkins was suspended/warned when he uploaded a new video which caused someone to create a topic regarding them. What likely happened is that those posters, amused by his antics, subscribed to his channel or had it show up in their feed due to watch history. --- ... <cite>fusespliff posted [p:893797673] in Dawkins ha... [t:76183741]...</cite> <quote><cite>ClunkerSlim posted...</cite> <quote><cite>fusespliff posted...</cite> <quote>No, there are actually several posters who did create topics regarding his vids.</quote> Lots of people did, but only after Dawkins had already posted them himself. As soon as Dawkins posted a video on YouTube then hed advertise it on GameFAQs. He whored this forum for views. Dont act like people scoured the internet for his videos.</quote> How am I acting anything like that? If you'd read the rest of my post, you'd notice there is no need to get defensive and go putting words in my mouth. And you're still wrong at that. There have been several times Dawkins was suspended/warned when he uploaded a new video which caused someone to create a topic regarding them. What likely happened is that those posters, amused by his antics, subscribed to his channel or had it show up in their feed due to watch history.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
thelovefist 01/10/18 9:18:23 PM #284:	Sparksfanboy posted... I used to but I stopped after he made that one video that could be construed as making terrorist threats. Didn't want to give a potential mass shooter/murderer anymore views. The one where he said he was going to blow up the city he lives in? --- N/A <cite>thelovefist posted [p:893801673] in Dawkins ha... [t:76183741]...</cite> <quote><cite>Sparksfanboy posted...</cite> <quote>I used to but I stopped after he made that one video that could be construed as making terrorist threats. Didn't want to give a potential mass shooter/murderer anymore views.</quote> The one where he said he was going to blow up the city he lives in?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BlueTigerLion 01/10/18 9:23:10 PM #286:	thelovefist posted... Sparksfanboy posted... I used to but I stopped after he made that one video that could be construed as making terrorist threats. Didn't want to give a potential mass shooter/murderer anymore views. The one where he said he was going to blow up the city he lives in? Wtf I had no idea he made a video like that. Shouldn't it be reported to protect the people he was threatening to the FBI or whoever deals with that. Bomb threats should be taken seriously --- Hey now. <cite>BlueTigerLion posted [p:893801970] in Dawkins ha... [t:76183741]...</cite> <quote><cite>thelovefist posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Sparksfanboy posted...</cite> <quote>I used to but I stopped after he made that one video that could be construed as making terrorist threats. Didn't want to give a potential mass shooter/murderer anymore views.</quote> The one where he said he was going to blow up the city he lives in?</quote> Wtf I had no idea he made a video like that. Shouldn't it be reported to protect the people he was threatening to the FBI or whoever deals with that. Bomb threats should be taken seriously</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
FrankIin 01/10/18 9:44:43 PM #287:	People on this board say I'm a horrible person, but look at how many people are literally defending an organized campaign to harass someone with a mental disorder. And I can see why the mods are so popular with these trolls; not only are people basically confessing to harassing him, and victim blaming him, but the mods are perfectly okay with not even giving them a 3KL for harassment. --- I love my iPhone X: https://imgur.com/a/ByHi0 \| https://i.imgur.com/6il7Dte.jpg No need to be jealous. <cite>FrankIin posted [p:893803337] in Dawkins ha... [t:76183741]...</cite> <quote>People on this board say I'm a horrible person, but look at how many people are literally defending an organized campaign to harass someone with a mental disorder. And I can see why the mods are so popular with these trolls; not only are people basically confessing to harassing him, and victim blaming him, but the mods are perfectly okay with not even giving them a 3KL for harassment.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
UnfairRepresent 01/11/18 3:15:11 AM #288:	FrankIin posted... People on this board say I'm a horrible person, but look at how many people are literally defending an organized campaign to harass someone with a mental disorder. There was no shortage of people offering help and really really really good advice. Every time they were threatened and insulted. --- ^ Hey now that's completely unfair. https://imgtc.com/i/14JHfrt.jpg <cite>UnfairRepresent posted [p:893818018] in Dawkins ha... [t:76183741]...</cite> <quote><cite>FrankIin posted...</cite> <quote>People on this board say I'm a horrible person, but look at how many people are literally defending an organized campaign to harass someone with a mental disorder. </quote> There was no shortage of people offering help and really really really good advice. Every time they were threatened and insulted.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Rika_Furude 01/11/18 3:23:34 AM #289:	FrankIin posted... organized campaign to harass someone with a mental disorder. yeah theres totally like, ringleaders, secret meetings, etc etc lmao No. Dawkins just became a criminal, posted all his criminal activities here along with news articles to prove it, and brought all this hate on himself. And none of it is undeserved --- http://www.imgur.com/oQHLBrx.jpg http://www.imgur.com/ah5IE8D.jpg http://www.imgur.com/USV84z9.jpg http://www.imgur.com/PSjlohO.jpg <cite>Rika_Furude posted [p:893818211] in Dawkins ha... [t:76183741]...</cite> <quote><cite>FrankIin posted...</cite> <quote>organized campaign to harass someone with a mental disorder.</quote> yeah theres totally like, ringleaders, secret meetings, etc etc lmao No. Dawkins just became a criminal, posted all his criminal activities here along with news articles to prove it, and brought all this hate on himself. And none of it is undeserved</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Third_Eye 01/11/18 3:24:08 AM #290:	sry i dont let ce become a social media site for me so i dont understand this topic --- Gen 1 is the only good Pokemon generation <cite>Third_Eye posted [p:893818223] in Dawkins ha... [t:76183741]...</cite> <quote>sry i dont let ce become a social media site for me so i dont understand this topic</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Offworlder1 01/11/18 3:28:07 AM #291:	Did not know him and it seems like he had a meltdown before they banned him. --- "Always two there are, a master and an apprentice" <cite>Offworlder1 posted [p:893818296] in Dawkins ha... [t:76183741]...</cite> <quote>Did not know him and it seems like he had a meltdown before they banned him.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
gnomefromnome 01/11/18 3:31:42 AM #292:	Offworlder1 posted... Did not know him and it seems like he had a meltdown before they banned him. He was Purged for 2 weeks prior to this...for basically the same thing --- Oh my God... That was the dumbest collection of dumbosity I've ever seen! - Famine https://youtu.be/pOtTxMC1ZZQ <cite>gnomefromnome posted [p:893818380] in Dawkins ha... [t:76183741]...</cite> <quote><cite>Offworlder1 posted...</cite> <quote>Did not know him and it seems like he had a meltdown before they banned him.</quote> He was Purged for 2 weeks prior to this...for basically the same thing</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
thelovefist 01/11/18 5:10:33 AM #293:	gnomefromnome posted... Offworlder1 posted... Did not know him and it seems like he had a meltdown before they banned him. He was Purged for 2 weeks prior to this...for basically the same thing He wasn't threatening legal action and cyber attacks against the site 2 weeks ago. --- N/A <cite>thelovefist posted [p:893820351] in Dawkins ha... [t:76183741]...</cite> <quote><cite>gnomefromnome posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Offworlder1 posted...</cite> <quote>Did not know him and it seems like he had a meltdown before they banned him.</quote> He was Purged for 2 weeks prior to this...for basically the same thing</quote> He wasn't threatening legal action and cyber attacks against the site 2 weeks ago.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LightningAce11 01/11/18 5:13:51 AM #294:	I've never actually seen unfair debate with dawkins. Would be the stuff of legends. --- "I'm an atheist too but still believe in hell. That's where you're headed pal." - Mr_Karate_II <cite>LightningAce11 posted [p:893820414] in Dawkins ha... [t:76183741]...</cite> <quote>I've never actually seen unfair debate with dawkins. Would be the stuff of legends.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
PositiveReview 01/11/18 10:37:30 AM #295:	somebody should make a big infographic of xsquaders crusade and post it on /r/cringepics, or some of his videos on /r/cringe also, now he will have more time to work on his youtube channel since he can't post here --- I'd give myself... *... A POSITIVE REVIEW* <cite>PositiveReview posted [p:893830191] in Dawkins ha... [t:76183741]...</cite> <quote>somebody should make a big infographic of xsquaders crusade and post it on /r/cringepics, or some of his videos on /r/cringe also, now he will have more time to work on his youtube channel since he can't post here</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
iClockwork 01/11/18 10:39:12 AM #296:	PositiveReview posted... somebody should make a big infographic of xsquaders crusade and post it on /r/cringepics, or some of his videos on /r/cringe I remember seeing his video on r/publicfreakout before I even came to this board. It tripped me out when I saw him posting here. --- Sometimes people come along and they want to change things. I am one of those people and I will assist in furthering our country for the better. - Xsquadder <cite>iClockwork posted [p:893830296] in Dawkins ha... [t:76183741]...</cite> <quote><cite>PositiveReview posted...</cite> <quote>somebody should make a big infographic of xsquaders crusade and post it on /r/cringepics, or some of his videos on /r/cringe</quote> I remember seeing his video on r/publicfreakout before I even came to this board. It tripped me out when I saw him posting here.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
thelovefist 01/11/18 10:39:24 AM #297:	I am hoping he makes a video on his youtube channel discussing his ban here. --- N/A <cite>thelovefist posted [p:893830312] in Dawkins ha... [t:76183741]...</cite> <quote>I am hoping he makes a video on his youtube channel discussing his ban here.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
nicklebro 01/12/18 9:31:32 AM #298:	thelovefist posted... The only person who ever made topics about his videos was himself... How would you even know that? Are you on CE 24 hours a day? Lol well if anyone is, it'd be you. FrankIin posted... Bio1590 also googled him and posted about him getting arrested. This whole thing about "we only posted about stuff Xsquader himself posted!" is a lie. And the fact people lied about that shows that they believe they have something to hide. I was getting a massive amount of shit for saying that people who do that kind of thing are shitty people. Its becoming clear that the reason they were so defensive is because they were realizing their actions were absolutely abhorrent, which they had never realized before because they lived in an echo chamber. --- Now you can't call me a sigless user. <cite>nicklebro posted [p:893898310] in Dawkins ha... [t:76183741]...</cite> <quote><cite>thelovefist posted...</cite> <quote>The only person who ever made topics about his videos was himself... </quote> How would you even know that? Are you on CE 24 hours a day? Lol well if anyone is, it'd be you. <cite>FrankIin posted...</cite> <quote>Bio1590 also googled him and posted about him getting arrested. This whole thing about "we only posted about stuff Xsquader himself posted!" is a lie. </quote> And the fact people lied about that shows that they believe they have something to hide. I was getting a massive amount of shit for saying that people who do that kind of thing are shitty people. Its becoming clear that the reason they were so defensive is because they were realizing their actions were absolutely abhorrent, which they had never realized before because they lived in an echo chamber.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
WrkHrdPlayHrdr 01/12/18 9:36:57 AM #299:	I just saw on a another website (which I won't mention) someone went out of their way to publicly post his name, DOB, and all past addresses they could find for him. It was kind of freaky. And it was someone here because they had screen caps of posts. --- "I also advised their executives through e-mail that further behavior could result in a cyber attack[...]" <cite>WrkHrdPlayHrdr posted [p:893898524] in Dawkins ha... [t:76183741]...</cite> <quote>I just saw on a another website (which I won't mention) someone went out of their way to publicly post his name, DOB, and all past addresses they could find for him. It was kind of freaky. And it was someone here because they had screen caps of posts.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#300	Post #300 was unavailable or deleted.
thelovefist 01/12/18 9:52:53 AM #301:	nicklebro posted... thelovefist posted... The only person who ever made topics about his videos was himself... How would you even know that? Are you on CE 24 hours a day? Lol well if anyone is, it'd be you. FrankIin posted... Bio1590 also googled him and posted about him getting arrested. This whole thing about "we only posted about stuff Xsquader himself posted!" is a lie. And the fact people lied about that shows that they believe they have something to hide. I was getting a massive amount of shit for saying that people who do that kind of thing are shitty people. Its becoming clear that the reason they were so defensive is because they were realizing their actions were absolutely abhorrent, which they had never realized before because they lived in an echo chamber. You're trying too hard --- N/A <cite>thelovefist posted [p:893899213] in Dawkins ha... [t:76183741]...</cite> <quote><cite>nicklebro posted...</cite> <quote><cite>thelovefist posted...</cite> <quote>The only person who ever made topics about his videos was himself... </quote> How would you even know that? Are you on CE 24 hours a day? Lol well if anyone is, it'd be you. <cite>FrankIin posted...</cite> <quote>Bio1590 also googled him and posted about him getting arrested. This whole thing about "we only posted about stuff Xsquader himself posted!" is a lie. </quote> And the fact people lied about that shows that they believe they have something to hide. I was getting a massive amount of shit for saying that people who do that kind of thing are shitty people. Its becoming clear that the reason they were so defensive is because they were realizing their actions were absolutely abhorrent, which they had never realized before because they lived in an echo chamber.</quote> You're trying too hard</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
nicklebro 01/12/18 10:07:21 AM #302:	ClunkerSlim posted... WrkHrdPlayHrdr posted... I just saw on a another website (which I won't mention) someone went out of their way to publicly post his name, DOB, and all past addresses they could find for him. It was kind of freaky. And it was someone here because they had screen caps of posts. Thats definitely WAY over the line. But Dawkins brought this crap on himself. Hes the one who takes every opportunity to post his own personal documents. Its not really our fault that one crazy nutter collected all his personal information. Dont post your shit on the internet. He definitely brought it on himself, and CE isn't to blame for his problems. But we can at least agree that the people who do that kind of thing are shitty people right? Its just like giving tips to women so they don't become victims of sexual assault. Y'know things like be careful to not accept drinks from strangers, try to have a friend with you at all times, basically just don't put yourself in vulnerable situations. Now if a woman ignores all of those things and acts incredibly recklessly and is sexually assaulted, the guy who did the assaulting is still a piece of shit no matter what. Of course online harassment isn't comparable to rape, which I know would be the first thing trolls would like to point out, but as usual the severity and level of heinousness of the act committed isn't relevant to the analogy at all. So moving past that, I think its important to acknowledge that just because one side is wrong, doesn't mean the other side is right. --- Now you can't call me a sigless user. <cite>nicklebro posted [p:893899832] in Dawkins ha... [t:76183741]...</cite> <quote><cite>ClunkerSlim posted...</cite> <quote><cite>WrkHrdPlayHrdr posted...</cite> <quote>I just saw on a another website (which I won't mention) someone went out of their way to publicly post his name, DOB, and all past addresses they could find for him. It was kind of freaky. And it was someone here because they had screen caps of posts.</quote> Thats definitely WAY over the line. But Dawkins brought this crap on himself. Hes the one who takes every opportunity to post his own personal documents. Its not really our fault that one crazy nutter collected all his personal information. Dont post your shit on the internet.</quote> He definitely brought it on himself, and CE isn't to blame for his problems. But we can at least agree that the people who do that kind of thing are shitty people right? Its just like giving tips to women so they don't become victims of sexual assault. Y'know things like be careful to not accept drinks from strangers, try to have a friend with you at all times, basically just don't put yourself in vulnerable situations. Now if a woman ignores all of those things and acts incredibly recklessly and is sexually assaulted, the guy who did the assaulting is still a piece of shit no matter what. Of course online harassment isn't comparable to rape, which I know would be the first thing trolls would like to point out, but as usual the severity and level of heinousness of the act committed isn't relevant to the analogy at all. So moving past that, I think its important to acknowledge that just because one side is wrong, doesn't mean the other side is right.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SpiralDrift 01/12/18 10:46:44 AM #303:	WrkHrdPlayHrdr posted... I just saw on a another website (which I won't mention) someone went out of their way to publicly post his name, DOB, and all past addresses they could find for him. It was kind of freaky. And it was someone here because they had screen caps of posts. I wouldn't be surprised if it was just Dawkins himself trying to fabricate evidence against the site. --- Do unto others what your parents did to you. <cite>SpiralDrift posted [p:893901731] in Dawkins ha... [t:76183741]...</cite> <quote><cite>WrkHrdPlayHrdr posted...</cite> <quote>I just saw on a another website (which I won't mention) someone went out of their way to publicly post his name, DOB, and all past addresses they could find for him. It was kind of freaky. And it was someone here because they had screen caps of posts.</quote> I wouldn't be surprised if it was just Dawkins himself trying to fabricate evidence against the site.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BeyondWalls 01/12/18 11:43:19 PM #304:	FrankIin posted... Bio1590 also googled him and posted about him getting arrested. So what? I googled him and posted an article before too. The guy announced he had a court date and then went MIA for like 60 days. Of course we fucking googled him to see what happened with his case. It's not like we started googling some random person from the forum and started digging into his personal life. Dawkins went out of his way to make us a part of his little life drama. Of course we're going to follow up on it when shit gets interesting. Don't post every little detail about your life and then complain when someone learns some little something that you didn't want them too. No one would have learned about Dawkins charge in NC if he hadn't been posting almost daily updates to his other court case. <cite>BeyondWalls posted [p:893945181] in Dawkins ha... [t:76183741]...</cite> <quote><cite>FrankIin posted...</cite> <quote>Bio1590 also googled him and posted about him getting arrested. </quote> So what? I googled him and posted an article before too. The guy announced he had a court date and then went MIA for like 60 days. Of course we fucking googled him to see what happened with his case. It's not like we started googling some random person from the forum and started digging into his personal life. Dawkins went out of his way to make us a part of his little life drama. Of course we're going to follow up on it when shit gets interesting. Don't post every little detail about your life and then complain when someone learns some little something that you didn't want them too. No one would have learned about Dawkins charge in NC if he hadn't been posting almost daily updates to his other court case.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
nicklebro 01/13/18 4:49:38 AM #305:	BeyondWalls posted... FrankIin posted... Bio1590 also googled him and posted about him getting arrested. So what? I googled him and posted an article before too. The guy announced he had a court date and then went MIA for like 60 days. Of course we fucking googled him to see what happened with his case. It's not like we started googling some random person from the forum and started digging into his personal life. Dawkins went out of his way to make us a part of his little life drama. Of course we're going to follow up on it when shit gets interesting. Don't post every little detail about your life and then complain when someone learns some little something that you didn't want them too. No one would have learned about Dawkins charge in NC if he hadn't been posting almost daily updates to his other court case. You keep saying "of course" as if that's obviously the same course of action everyone would take. It's not. And as much as dawkins went out of his way to make you a part of his little life drama, you went out of your way to entrench yourself in his unstable life. --- Now you can't call me a sigless user. <cite>nicklebro posted [p:893955267] in Dawkins ha... [t:76183741]...</cite> <quote><cite>BeyondWalls posted...</cite> <quote><cite>FrankIin posted...</cite> <quote>Bio1590 also googled him and posted about him getting arrested. </quote> So what? I googled him and posted an article before too. The guy announced he had a court date and then went MIA for like 60 days. Of course we fucking googled him to see what happened with his case. It's not like we started googling some random person from the forum and started digging into his personal life. Dawkins went out of his way to make us a part of his little life drama. Of course we're going to follow up on it when shit gets interesting. Don't post every little detail about your life and then complain when someone learns some little something that you didn't want them too. No one would have learned about Dawkins charge in NC if he hadn't been posting almost daily updates to his other court case.</quote> You keep saying "of course" as if that's obviously the same course of action everyone would take. It's not. And as much as dawkins went out of his way to make you a part of his little life drama, you went out of your way to entrench yourself in his unstable life.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1 ... 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

Current Events > Dawkins has been banned. (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > Dawkins has been banned.