Current Events > I kinda hope Chris Pratt plays Stanley in It Chapter 2.

(+) Yeah! (+)

Because the kid who played Stanley was the young Peter Quill in GotG.
---

Uhh
Stanley is dead in part 2 from the beginning.

What is this spoilers for?
---

3khc posted...

What is this spoilers for?

A spoiler for something likely in the second movie. Dick move not to warn people about it...
---

MuayThai85 posted...

3khc posted...

What is this spoilers for?

A spoiler for something likely in the second movie. Dick move not to warn people about it...

The fucking purpose for spoiler tags is to put spoilers in them, why the fuck would I need to include any other warning? Jesus christ.

Maybe because people aren't expecting you spoil a fucking movie that hasn't even been made yet...
---

MuayThai85 posted...

Maybe because people aren't expecting you spoil a fucking movie that hasn't even been made yet...

Don't try to defend your idiocy.

ImPickleRick posted...

The fucking purpose for spoiler tags is to put spoilers in them, why the fuck would I need to include any other warning? Jesus christ.

Spoiler Tags only cover up a spoiler. A Spoiler Warning is to tell people the subject of who you will be spoiling. It's just the polite thing to do.
---

Bandit_Keith posted...

ImPickleRick posted...

The fucking purpose for spoiler tags is to put spoilers in them, why the fuck would I need to include any other warning? Jesus christ.

Spoiler Tags only cover up a spoiler. A Spoiler Warning is to tell people the subject of who you will be spoiling. It's just the polite thing to do.

Spoiler Tags only cover up a spoiler

Okay so we've reasoned so far that it is confirmed a spoiler, now we just entered a topic concerning a character in a series of movies. How much common sense do you have to be lacking to not know that the spoiler tag in this topic is being used for FUCKING SPOILERS.

People could have presumed it was a spoiler for the movie instead of the book.
---

Darmik posted...

People could have presumed it was a spoiler for the movie instead of the book.

It's a major plot point that is effectively guaranteed to be in the movie though.
---

TrevorBlack79 posted...

Darmik posted...

People could have presumed it was a spoiler for the movie instead of the book.

It's a major plot point that is effectively guaranteed to be in the movie though.

I get that. I mean people could be thinking it was a spoiler from the first It movie and not realizing that it's spoiling book stuff that will be adapted in the second movie.

I personally don't care. But it does always help to throw in exactly what you're spoiling just in case.

It's sorta like people theorizing what's going on in Game of Thrones and then replying with a book spoiler that the show hadn't reached yet. Which people did all the time.
---

Darmik posted...

But it does always help to throw in exactly what you're spoiling just in case.

The topic title literally says "It Chapter 2."
---

TrevorBlack79 posted...

Darmik posted...

But it does always help to throw in exactly what you're spoiling just in case.

The topic title literally says "It Chapter 2."

And it's talking about casting an adult version of one of the characters. That's it. People who haven't read the book could speculate about the same thing.
---

Darmik posted...

TrevorBlack79 posted...

Darmik posted...

But it does always help to throw in exactly what you're spoiling just in case.

The topic title literally says "It Chapter 2."

And it's talking about casting an adult version of one of the characters. That's it. People who haven't read the book could speculate about the same thing.

People who haven't read the book shouldn't be clicking on spoiler tags in discussions about the second movie. That's a good way to spoil the movie for themselves.
---

TrevorBlack79 posted...

People who haven't read the book shouldn't be clicking on spoiler tags in discussions about the second movie. That's a good way to spoil the movie for themselves.

If it was clear what was being spoiled they could pick and choose which spoiler tag to click. That's the point.
---

Darmik posted...

TrevorBlack79 posted...

People who haven't read the book shouldn't be clicking on spoiler tags in discussions about the second movie. That's a good way to spoil the movie for themselves.

If it was clear what was being spoiled they could pick and choose which spoiler tag to click. That's the point.

TrevorBlack79 posted...

The topic title literally says "It Chapter 2."

---

Godnorgosh posted...

ImPickleRick posted...

Uhh
Stanley is dead in part 2 from the beginning.

I have a feeling the sequel isn't going to be very faithful to the book, just like this one kinda wasn't.

in the new adaptation, Henry dies in Part I, Bev kills her dad, Ben is looking to be the librarian rather than Mike, etc.

Henry isn't dead. No way.
---

Godnorgosh posted...

_Goggalor_ posted...

Henry isn't dead. No way.

If he's not then that's pretty crazy. How does that fall not kill you?

If they wanted to really mess with our heads, they could have written it so Pennywise saved Henry before he presumably would have hit the bottom of that well. If Pennywise kept him as a demented henchman-plaything and then revealed the adult version of Henry, it would be an absolute shock to the Losers. I'm thinking that could be how they explain Pennywise still being able to feed, at least enough to survive, since Henry could've been down in that hole with him.
---

I think Pennywise will have saved Henry and use him to try to kill the losers like in the book.
---