Current Events > is it racist to not be attracted to black people?

(+) Yeah! (+)

Waluigi7 posted...

I don't know anybody who considers George Zimmerman a white man.

News agencies called him "white hispanic" I think.
---

darkjedilink posted...

Tiger Woods is half Asian, quarter White, quarter Black - black man.
Barack Obama is half White, half Black - black man.
George Zimmerman is half White, half Hispanic (Puerto Rican?) - white man.

That's somehow not racist, but preferring pale skin in sexual partners is?

Obama isn't black. This one drop rule is cancer and should be abolished. It's too stupid. I got suspended on listing black features lmao. Good shit, Mods.

Waluigi7 posted...

I don't know anybody who considers George Zimmerman a white man.

You didn't follow any mainstream media coverage of the investigation or trial, then.

The story broke as 'WHITE MAN GUNS DOWN BLACK TEEN IN COLD BLOOD!!!!’ Read that way for months, too.

When his attorney announced he was Hispanic, news channels referred to him as 'a white man who identifies as Latino.'

Nobody ever called President Obama a 'white man who identifies as black.'

Liberal racism.
---

Racism is about superiority, not attraction. So no unless that is the reason why you aren't. Black guy here as well and personally, while I do find Black women attractive and prefer darker skinned Black women to lighter skinned ones, I ultimately prefer pale blue eyed freckled redhead White women over anything else. Never understood it, just my weakness.

I don't find most Asians attractive, I don't find most Polynesians attractive, I don't find most Arab women attactive, I don't find most Latinas attractive and prefer the ones that look more European or have African ancestry as opposed to the ones that look more Asian and, when it comes to Europeans, I'm a rarity in not caring for the Southern and Eastern Europeans because their phenotypes have too many Arab and Asian influences for me and they mostly just don't look White enough for me to care in terms of being attracted to Europeans. Plus even with the western and central Europeans, I have preferences among them and snub the ones that aren't pale enough and lack blue or gray eyes. Also, I find English women mostly butt ugly and some of the ugliest women on the planet so tend to avoid them outright despite being Western Europeans.

Also not a fan of their languages, foods, traditional dress or cultures of SE and EE like I am with Western and Central Europe. Although that point applies to most every culture for me that isn't West or Central European save the Asian Sinosphere. I have little to no desire in anything African and identify as American above being Black and people outside America treat me that way primarily anyway which is nice since America is OBSESSED with race in nearly everything and I've grown tired of it. The reason why I'm currently in the process of immigrating to Australia.
---

xOmniCloudx posted...

Racism is about superiority,

"Black women are ugly" is a statement about superiority and inferiority.
---

Yes
---

Asherlee10 posted...

donkeyjack posted...

Asherlee10 posted...

donkeyjack posted...

Asherlee10 posted...

There are some serious racists on CE...

Asher, why do you have to pretend that people don't have preferences? I don't tell shame women who likes tall and muscular guys but it is to shame people who doesn't find a race attractive. Also, these so-called dime pieces black women to the ones who don't find the race attractive will have a hard time locking them down anyways.

I find it very telling that you decided to quote this post, it is as if you know you are racist.

There is nothing wrong with preferences and this concept is not hard to understand.

Categorically dismissing an entire race (which has almost limitless variations) is racist. That is way outside of having preferences.

How am I racist? I'm black. You're supposed to say "Sellout". What do you call a white person who says some races don't like white features that includes thin lips, pointy noses, and blue/green eyes? Like would you call that guy or gal racist?

Black people don't have variations like how white people do. You probably think Blasians and mulattoes are black. So, whatever, there is no helping you. Like for me, I don't like Asians that much, I just don't. So, am I racist? They are cute asian chicks but I like black and white women more. It's a preference, dear.

Yes I would call that person a racist. You can be of the same race that you are racist towards. It just makes it that much more ridiculous.

Black people absolutely have a lot of variation.

Look at Jesse Williams or Alicia Keys compared to Beyonce compared to Gabrielle Union. We could even bring in the Melanese who are black with blonde hair.

*Dead* You basically proved my point. Beyonce is more black due to her father and her mother is like creole. Now, if Beyonce had a white mama or asian then she would be considered black. Jesse Williams is not black and neither is Alicia Keys.

That_Happened posted...

xOmniCloudx posted...

Racism is about superiority,

"Black women are ugly" is a statement about superiority and inferiority.

No, that's an opinion. Attractive qualities doesn't make someone inferior or superior. I think all fat women are ugly, all overly skinny women are ugly and a million other things I can add in there. I don't hate them or find them inferior, I'm just not attracted to them. The word racist lost all meaning today because people literally throw it at anything that hurts their feelings now.

Actual racism is a VERY extreme display of superiority and dislike of someone for racial based reasons alone. Just saying you find a race unattractive being compared to that is laughable and again, Black man here saying this. Also, read my post, I added a lot to it shortly after since it got cut off the first time.
---

xOmniCloudx posted...

Actual racism is a VERY extreme display

No reason to continue reading your posts if you believe this. Racism is more than the KKK and the black panthers, child.
---

That_Happened posted...

Waluigi7 posted...

I don't know anybody who considers George Zimmerman a white man.

News agencies called him "white hispanic" I think.

That's because Hispanic is not a race, it's a cultural grouping term that applies to anyone from a Spanish speaking country so, even people from Spain who are White Europeans are Hispanic. Hispanics come in all races and colors and Zimmerman is a White man. If you look at any census or race paper, they will have Hispanic or Latino options asking what kind they are and most will have Black and White Hispanic there.

I live in Massachusetts and most of our Hispanic community are from the Caribbean and Central America, with Puerto Ricans and Dominicans being the dominant Latino groups. They come anywhere from stereotypically African dark to stereotypically western European pale and every hair and eye color type there is with a wide array of facial phenotypes. Many are also very clearly mixed White and Black Hispanics too.

Also in their countries they have races system that includes Black and White and if you watch Latin TV, they pick the Whitest people of their populations for nearly everything. I have a friend from DR that has a Mediterranean European look with olive skin, dark eyes, and black hair, and he explained the race system in Dominican Republic. In DR he is considered a blonde White man legally despite those features of his. Look it up.

Plus in some of them, someone considered a "stereotypical" looking Hispanic would be considered White in their country and there's even many cases of people there that aren't considered Black being considered Black once they come here and I have a number of friends from Panama and Honduras that has happened to.
---

That_Happened posted...

xOmniCloudx posted...

Actual racism is a VERY extreme display

No reason to continue reading your posts if you believe this. Racism is more than the KKK and the black panthers, child.

I never said that, you did. I'm a Black man and I've dealt with a fair share of prejudice (which is what most people throwing racism out means 90% of the time) but little ACTUAL racism. That's because I actually knows what the word means. In any case, have preferences and finding races ugly isn't racism, period. No point in arguing further if you believe it is.
---

Asherlee10 posted...

Ghost_Of_Donkey posted...

Asherlee10 posted...

donkeyjack posted...

Asherlee10 posted...

donkeyjack posted...

Asherlee10 posted...

There are some serious racists on CE...

Asher, why do you have to pretend that people don't have preferences? I don't tell shame women who likes tall and muscular guys but it is to shame people who doesn't find a race attractive. Also, these so-called dime pieces black women to the ones who don't find the race attractive will have a hard time locking them down anyways.

I find it very telling that you decided to quote this post, it is as if you know you are racist.

There is nothing wrong with preferences and this concept is not hard to understand.

Categorically dismissing an entire race (which has almost limitless variations) is racist. That is way outside of having preferences.

How am I racist? I'm black. You're supposed to say "Sellout". What do you call a white person who says some races don't like white features that includes thin lips, pointy noses, and blue/green eyes? Like would you call that guy or gal racist?

Black people don't have variations like how white people do. You probably think Blasians and mulattoes are black. So, whatever, there is no helping you. Like for me, I don't like Asians that much, I just don't. So, am I racist? They are cute asian chicks but I like black and white women more. It's a preference, dear.

Yes I would call that person a racist. You can be of the same race that you are racist towards. It just makes it that much more ridiculous.

Black people absolutely have a lot of variation.

Look at Jesse Williams or Alicia Keys compared to Beyonce compared to Gabrielle Union. We could even bring in the Melanese who are black with blonde hair.

*Dead* You basically proved my point. Beyonce is more black due to her father and her mother is like creole. Now, if Beyonce had a white mama or asian then she would be considered black. Jesse Williams is not black and neither is Alicia Keys.

None of what you said makes any sort of sense.

I forgot to put "not", I'm sorry. If Beyonce had a white mama or Asian mama instead of Creole, I wouldn't call her black, that's important there. No one in the western hemisphere is 100% black, heck, I'm not 100% black despite me being a dark-skinned male with two black parents. I'm mostly black, obviously. Jesse Williams and Alicia Keys aren't black because one of their parents is white, if they were asian, it would be the same. That's all I'm saying.

xOmniCloudx posted...

I'm a Black man and I've dealt with a fair share of prejudice (which is what most people throwing racism out means 90% of the time) but little ACTUAL racism. That's because I actually knows what the word means.

Clearly you don't. Racism can be extreme or it can be subtle. It's USUALLY subtle. And prejudices based on the subject of race is racism.
---

Beyonce goes out of her way to look Whiter all the time in real life and even on any material that advertises her and she never says shit about how it's edited to make her look lighter and have softer features than she actually has. She clearly isn't 100% Black anyway given it's a no brainer non-African ancestry is in her family. The only Africans that will resemble her are the ones with Arab and European ancestry.

Black America is hypocritial about what they consider Black anyway as it's all about what agenda they need to push. They'll consider Obama Black when it suits them but then someone like Vanessa Williams isn't Black enough to represent Black people in beauty contests and is just used to tell people "real" Black women ugly or lesser.

They'll complain about mixed race Black people snubbing their Black side and conforming to Blackness being inferiority unless, they look like Sofia Ritchie, in which case she's just trying to benefit from her Black side and is disrespecting Black people by acknowledging her Blackness.

Fact is, Blacks outside Africa have absolutely ZERO authority on what is considered Black or not and are the Whitest people culturally save actual White people. They speak a White language mostly exclusive, have White names, raised in and consume White culture daily, live in primarily White countries, wear primarily if not exclusively White clothing, primarily eat and cook foods in ways associated with Whites. Many are even mixed with White DNA at this point and look NOTICEABLY different from most Africans.

So, what about them is actually African save genetic links and do they know about being African? Little to nothing and most are never going to move there and assimilate to the culture, pick up on any of it let alone make it their primary one anywhere they are. Meanwhile there are PLENTY of White Africans that lack the genetic links but everything else about them is as African as it gets. Fact is, they're "more Black" than Blacks outside of Africa.

It's the same with Whites outside Europe claiming all of this ancestry despite having no links to these places besides genetic. Primarily, you are what you are raised of and in American, that means American. That's why people in those countries snub, discredit and often mock people that go to their "homelands" and claim they're one of them because they know genetics alone doesn't make you one of them and that you ultimately identify with the culture that you were raised in.

Tl;dr Black people's opinions about Blackness are irrelevant if not raised in Africa, same as everyone else not raised in Africa. You're what you were raised as culturally and culture > race.
---

Asherlee10 posted...

Ghost_Of_Donkey posted...

I forgot to put "not", I'm sorry. If Beyonce had a white mama or Asian mama instead of Creole, I wouldn't call her black, that's important there. No one in the western hemisphere is 100% black, heck, I'm not 100% black despite me being a dark-skinned male with two black parents. I'm mostly black, obviously. Jesse Williams and Alicia Keys aren't black because one of their parents is white, if they were asian, it would be the same. That's all I'm saying.

You have absurd goal posts that are not logical in the slightest. It's as if you are arbitrarily deciding who is not white based your subjective opinion.

Why? Because you grew up in an era where people are still propping up the one-drop rule? By definition, everyone is black because we were the origin humans anyways. Like you see how goofy this sounds? I'm sorry but I'm not pathetic enough to claim Jesse Williams and Alicia Keys as black to prove to people who don't like conventional black people that blacks are attractive. Let them have their stances, what happened to saying you don't like this without being called a racist? This shit is disgusting and you're smarter than that.

It's simple percentages, it's not subjective. By your definition, my cousin is not mulatto, she is black. Like come the fuck on. They are mixed PERIOD.

That_Happened posted...

xOmniCloudx posted...

I'm a Black man and I've dealt with a fair share of prejudice (which is what most people throwing racism out means 90% of the time) but little ACTUAL racism. That's because I actually knows what the word means.

Clearly you don't. Racism can be extreme or it can be subtle. It's USUALLY subtle. And prejudices based on the subject of race is racism.

You're a SJW, you think with your feelings and are overly sensitive so the fact I used the dictionary term of what ACTUAL racism is doesn't mean anything to you. That's why you keep ignoring it.
---

xOmniCloudx posted...

Tl;dr Black people's opinions about Blackness are irrelevant if not raised in Africa, same as everyone else not raised in Africa. You're what you were raised as culturally and culture > race.

Lol holy shit.
---

Ghost_Of_Donkey posted...

darkjedilink posted...

Tiger Woods is half Asian, quarter White, quarter Black - black man.
Barack Obama is half White, half Black - black man.
George Zimmerman is half White, half Hispanic (Puerto Rican?) - white man.

That's somehow not racist, but preferring pale skin in sexual partners is?

Obama isn't black. This one drop rule is cancer and should be abolished. It's too stupid. I got suspended on listing black features lmao. Good shit, Mods.

?
---

That_Happened posted...

xOmniCloudx posted...

I'm a Black man and I've dealt with a fair share of prejudice (which is what most people throwing racism out means 90% of the time) but little ACTUAL racism. That's because I actually knows what the word means.

Clearly you don't. Racism can be extreme or it can be subtle. It's USUALLY subtle. And prejudices based on the subject of race is racism.

OmniCloud has a point here. Racism would be like someone denying me a job because I'm black. Someone thinking I'm stupid because I'm black but otherwise having no direct power over me is an example of bigotry, not racism. Most people use the word racist to cover it all these days though.
---

That_Happened posted...

xOmniCloudx posted...

Tl;dr Black people's opinions about Blackness are irrelevant if not raised in Africa, same as everyone else not raised in Africa. You're what you were raised as culturally and culture > race.

Lol holy shit.

Seriously To be THIS wrong, one has to exert some effort
---

I disagree, Omni, but I guess. I don't look down on mixed black people at all but when they start that 'sellout' talk. I always throw that back in their faces because they are trying to be dicks.

ChaoticKnuckles posted...

Someone thinking I'm stupid because I'm black but otherwise having no direct power over me is an example of bigotry, not racism.

No, it's an example of racism. Racism is an intolerance of other races, a belief that you are superior to someone because of their race, or a governmental system put in place to affect either of those things.

Bigotry is an intolerance of someone else because of their opinions or religious beliefs.
Prejudice is a catch-all for any kind of negative pre judging of someone before you know them, for whatever reason.
---

Skye Reynolds posted...

Whether it's racist or not, it's surely a sign of lacking in taste.

The first two are the best, the third one is meh, fourth is is reaching ugly territory, the fifth one IS ugly and the last one I'm split on since she has the most make up, editing and angle manipulation so chances are, she's not actually that attractive if even with all that I'm split on her. All that make up and photo editing and still NONE of them wow me which is very telling.

Thing is that to a lot of people that are attracted to Black women the most or don't have any true racial preferences, I can tell that these are top tier women and if we're using the scale system, knock out 10s. Even the most attractive one here is just average at best to me and more 6.5 territory and again, this is with them looking their best so they CAN drop lower than that number.

These are the type of women where if I was horny I'd have sex with them but afterward I wouldn't want anything to do with them and question if I actually found them attractive. The best thing about these women are their bodies and skin tone which are BEAUTIFUL but their faces leave much to be desired.
---

Lola Luv is bad. Come on, Omni. You don't remember where she was in every top urban magazine?

FrisbeeDude posted...

That_Happened posted...

xOmniCloudx posted...

Tl;dr Black people's opinions about Blackness are irrelevant if not raised in Africa, same as everyone else not raised in Africa. You're what you were raised as culturally and culture > race.

Lol holy shit.

Seriously To be THIS wrong, one has to exert some effort

I agree, but it hasn't stopped you anyway ;)
---

ChaoticKnuckles posted...

Ghost_Of_Donkey posted...

darkjedilink posted...

Tiger Woods is half Asian, quarter White, quarter Black - black man.
Barack Obama is half White, half Black - black man.
George Zimmerman is half White, half Hispanic (Puerto Rican?) - white man.

That's somehow not racist, but preferring pale skin in sexual partners is?

Obama isn't black. This one drop rule is cancer and should be abolished. It's too stupid. I got suspended on listing black features lmao. Good shit, Mods.

?

President Obama and George Zimmerman are both half white. Why is only one of them considered white (and that person claims Latino)?
---

darkjedilink posted...

ChaoticKnuckles posted...

Ghost_Of_Donkey posted...

darkjedilink posted...

Tiger Woods is half Asian, quarter White, quarter Black - black man.
Barack Obama is half White, half Black - black man.
George Zimmerman is half White, half Hispanic (Puerto Rican?) - white man.

That's somehow not racist, but preferring pale skin in sexual partners is?

Obama isn't black. This one drop rule is cancer and should be abolished. It's too stupid. I got suspended on listing black features lmao. Good shit, Mods.

?

President Obama and George Zimmerman are both half white. Why is only one of them considered white (and that person claims Latino)?

You can consider Zimmerman Latino and he's still a racist murderer that's been thrown out of bars for calling people n-word lovers

Axiom posted...

Nazanir posted...

Dash_Harber posted...

OEIO999 posted...

Yes, you should be tied down and forced to watch black porn.

No, that is not the point.

If you are not attracted to one race on the single fact that they are that race, that is racist.

So, are gays sexist for not liking women?

Are you biologically wired to not get hard when you see a hot naked black woman like gay men are for naked women

Nobody is biologically wired to be gay as it serves no biological purpose.. literally the entire point of life biologically speaking is to live, fuck, have babies, keep them alive until they're old enough to have babies themselves, then you fuck off and die, rinse repeat. If it was biological we'd be able to find the so called "gay gene" but we haven't and never will because it's not there. Just like other personality traits it's a mix of both biological and environmental factors that lead to you being there way you are, there's nothing in biology that causes you to cross wires and for whatever reason see your own sex as the way you're biologically designed to see the other sex.
And also if you look at polling data, literally every single demographic of men find black women to be the least attractive race of women.
Although it's probably sketchy if you're a straight dude who finds literally the entire race unattractive, but it's not inherently racist.
---

RockRapDubstep posted...

Nobody is biologically wired to be gay as it serves no biological purpose..

Stupid argument. There are lots of traits that serve no biological purpose yet we're still born that way.
---

Racism is a form or prejudice, but prejudice is not always racism. Also, bigotry is also one of the most misused words EVER. Bigotry isn't about race, it's a general term for being intolerant about differing beliefs.

Example A
Man 1: I don't like Black people because they're dangerous.
Me: What makes you say that?
Man 1: Personal experiences, statistics and talking with other people
Me: So what about Black people that aren't actually dangerous and are constructive members of society
Man 1: I have no problem with them but unfortunately they seem to be an exception from experience or the rates being too high to default to a Black person not being dangerous.

Anyone that would call that man racist is clueless on what the term racist means. The man has bias against Blacks due to bad experiences, NOT because they're Black. I know plenty of people who have flip flopped after actual experience with Blacks being their defenders and then once living among them started to be like Man 1 eventually.

Man 1 doesn't think he's better than Black people, he's just drawing conclusions based off experiences that line it up for him to feel that way. He'd have NO problems being among any Black people that weren't dangerous and is someone who would like for them to stop being dangerous. He WANTS them to do well. A racist doesn't think like that or care because their reasoning isn't based on those things, it's based SOLELY on their race.

Example B
Man 2: I don't like Black people because they're not as smart as my race due to having smaller and less evolved brains, they contribute nothing good, they're ugly, they're sub-human and so many things just because they're Black and they're ALL the same. There's no such thing as a Black person on par with someone of my race.
Me: Yeah, there's not point in even trying with you. You're set in your ways, period.

That's an actual racist here, this is racial SUPREMACY here. He believes that RACE dictates your worth in life and that people are lesser or better due to race. This is the ACTUAL definition in the dictionary about a racist. If you're going to say man 1 and man 2 are the same, you are an idiot plain and simple lol.

If we're going to go by such screwed up definitions of racism, then I would say that not all racists are bad and some are just using their brains properly. That's because the so called racism of man 1 are things EVERYONE does everyday toward everyone regardless of race or gender whether they're consciously aware of it or not because, your brain is always going to attribute certain things and behaviors to people based on experiences and knowledge you already have.
---

darkjedilink posted...

ChaoticKnuckles posted...

Ghost_Of_Donkey posted...

darkjedilink posted...

Tiger Woods is half Asian, quarter White, quarter Black - black man.
Barack Obama is half White, half Black - black man.
George Zimmerman is half White, half Hispanic (Puerto Rican?) - white man.

That's somehow not racist, but preferring pale skin in sexual partners is?

Obama isn't black. This one drop rule is cancer and should be abolished. It's too stupid. I got suspended on listing black features lmao. Good shit, Mods.

?

President Obama and George Zimmerman are both half white. Why is only one of them considered white (and that person claims Latino)?

Latino isn't a race and most Latinos ARE heavily mixed.
---

xOmniCloudx posted...

Racism is a form or prejudice, but prejudice is not always racism. Also, bigotry is also one of the most misused words EVER. Bigotry isn't about race, it's a general term for being intolerant about differing beliefs.

Example A
Man 1: I don't like Black people because they're dangerous.
Me: What makes you say that?
Man 1: Personal experiences, statistics and talking with other people
Me: So what about Black people that aren't actually dangerous and are constructive members of society
Man 1: I have no problem with them but unfortunately they seem to be an exception from experience or the rates being too high to default to a Black person not being dangerous.

Anyone that would call that man racist is clueless on what the term racist means. The man has bias against Blacks due to bad experiences, NOT because they're Black. I know plenty of people who have flip flopped after actual experience with Blacks being their defenders and then once living among them started to be like Man 1 eventually.

Man 1 doesn't think he's better than Black people, he's just drawing conclusions based off experiences that line it up for him to feel that way. He'd have NO problems being among any Black people that weren't dangerous and is someone who would like for them to stop being dangerous. He WANTS them to do well. A racist doesn't think like that or care because their reasoning isn't based on those things, it's based SOLELY on their race.

Example B
Man 2: I don't like Black people because they're not as smart as my race due to having smaller and less evolved brains, they contribute nothing good, they're ugly, they're sub-human and so many things just because they're Black and they're ALL the same. There's no such thing as a Black person on par with someone of my race.
Me: Yeah, there's not point in even trying with you. You're set in your ways, period.

That's an actual racist here, this is racial SUPREMACY here. He believes that RACE dictates your worth in life and that people are lesser or better due to race. This is the ACTUAL definition in the dictionary about a racist. If you're going to say man 1 and man 2 are the same, you are an idiot plain and simple lol.

If we're going to go by such screwed up definitions of racism, then I would say that not all racists are bad and some are just using their brains properly. That's because the so called racism of man 1 are things EVERYONE does everyday toward everyone regardless of race or gender whether they're consciously aware of it or not because, your brain is always going to attribute certain things and behaviors to people based on experiences and knowledge you already have.

Example A sounds a lot like YouTube.
---

xOmniCloudx posted...

Latino isn't a race and most Latinos ARE heavily mixed.

most african americans are heavily mixed
---

Balrog0 posted...

xOmniCloudx posted...

Latino isn't a race and most Latinos ARE heavily mixed.

most african americans are heavily mixed

Not like latinos. Like D.R. it is mostly mulattoes who are the norm there. Blacks in the west are but not as much as Dominicans or Brazillians. You are out of your mind if you think this.

most african americans are approximately 25% european
---

xOmniCloudx posted...

Man 1: I don't like Black people because they're dangerous.
Me: What makes you say that?
Man 1: Personal experiences, statistics and talking with other people
Me: So what about Black people that aren't actually dangerous and are constructive members of society
Man 1: I have no problem with them but unfortunately they seem to be an exception from experience or the rates being too high to default to a Black person not being dangerous.

Anyone that would call that man racist is clueless on what the term racist means.

"I had a limited amount of bad experiences with black people, I looked up their crime rate statistics and found that although their rates are higher still very very very few black people commit crime and I talked to some people who agree with me. I therefore default to the idea that most black people are dangerous, and the exceptions are the black people who are good and helpful members of society."

And you say the above is NOT racist.

This is all golden. And very CE like.

If you're going to say man 1 and man 2 are the same, you are an idiot plain and simple lol.

I wouldn't say man 1 and man 2 are the same. They're both racist, but the first guy is somewhat racist, whereas the second guy is an extreme racist.
---

Can someone close this dumpster fire of a topic already?
---

Seems this has been answered weekly on CE, and the answer is always NO.

Your preference does not make you racist.
---

Ghost_Of_Donkey posted...

Lola Luv is bad. Come on, Omni. You don't remember where she was in every top urban magazine?

This started out as a paragraph but then evolved into a life story of sorts *shrugs*

Not only do I not know that name, I was never a magazine reader even in the 90s and 00s. Here are some top tier Black women to me. Jill Marie Jones, Naomie Harris, Sharon Leal (half Filipino), Garcelle Beauvais, Keisha Sharp and Tabria Majors (half White) off the top of my head. They smoke ALL the Black women posted there and save Tabria, are all dark skinned too. These days Candice Patton is a VERY popular choice for hot Black women as I see even White dudes drool over her and say she's an exception for them. Personally, she does nothing for me and she's Half-White too IIRC.

Despite those women being gorgeous to me, to make it simple and use the classic superficial scale system, I wouldn't put any of them above 8.5. Again, when my ultimate preference are pale blue eyed redhead women with freckles (and heights between 5'9-5'11), or having any of those features, it should be no surprise why I find girls like Cintia Dicker, Elizabeth Ostrander, Jessica Chastain, Audrey Fleurot, Amy Adams, Bryce Dallas Howard and Austin White top of the top. Even outside redheads women that look like Doutzen Kroes, Kay Morgan and Christina Hendricks (dyed redhead) drive me wild.

It's funny because as attractive as those women are seen by many I also see them constantly shit on since gingerism is rampant in places, some are seen as too tall, some as too pale, some as too freckly and some as not curvy or too curvy. Redheads especially like that I like them due to many getting shit through childhood and even as adults, especially the UK and Australian ones.

And outside women that are European or of European descent, there's been some Japanese women that at first sight I was stunned by even though I don't find most Asians attractive. Although, I do find Japanese women to be the most attractive overall with ease it doesn't change the fact that most Japanese women do nothing for me anyway. Most say will say Korean women when it comes to Asians but I personally think most Korean woman look strange and am not into them or Korean food or culture.

In terms of Asian countries with women I find attractive it's in order of Japan, Vietnam, Philippines, China (though they BARELY made it) as well as the SAR and independent Asian countries that have a majority ethnic Chinese population like Taiwan for example. Culturally though, the Philippines isn't relevant to me and food wise, I would include Thailand as they have the best cuisine in Asia and some of the best in the world.

Anyway, back to women, I have an ex that looks like a redhead Taylor Swift (but traded height for a curvy hourglass body a big butt and American for being Australian) and another redhead ex that looks like a 1950s pinup model (and is is German) so the fact I can get the women that attract me the most is only going to push me closer toward them as well and fact is, the women that physically drive me the most wild are the polar opposite of Black women.

To this day I don't know why Western and Central European features in women are the best to me since I felt this way even in kindergarden when I was attracted to the White student teacher and I told her lol. People that prefer White women rave about Southern and Eastern Europeans as being the hottest whereas I largely don't like the Europeans from that part of the continent or of that descent.

Anyway, I long stopped feeling guilty about it and accepted it because I realized it was stupid to feel bad about about having preferences when EVERYONE has them. Plus, you don't have to put down other races just because you have preferences (and having an opinion that isn't positive is not automatically putting anyone down) like so many others do when they express that.
---

Ghost_Of_Donkey posted...

Balrog0 posted...

xOmniCloudx posted...

Latino isn't a race and most Latinos ARE heavily mixed.

most african americans are heavily mixed

Not like latinos. Like D.R. it is mostly mulattoes who are the norm there. Blacks in the west are but not as much as Dominicans or Brazillians. You are out of your mind if you think this.

This. Latinos can look like almost everyone since nearly every form of genetic material is heavily hanging around in Latin American countries. It's the most genetically diverse group of people in the world solely because they AREN'T a race which is why it's ironic that they of all people are stereotyped to only look a certain way.

EDIT:

Most people don't know the difference between Hispanic and Latino. They are overlapping terms and in most cases are interchangeable but not always. People also commonly confuse other terms with them so I'll break it all down now.

Hispanic: Any Spanish speaking country

Latino: Brazil and all Hispanic countries besides Spain

Spaniard: Anyone from Spain

Spanish: Depends on who you ask since some see it as interchangeable with Hispanic while others argue that it's the updated form of Spaniard and only refers to people from Spain.

Latin: Depends on who you ask as it also refers to the non-Hispanic and non-Latino countries of Italy, France, Portugal and Romania.
---

This is the most CE topic I've seen on here in a while

@DKFjalfe posted...

This is the most CE topic I've seen on here in a while

What does CE mean in this context? Does the C stand for culturally?
---

GOATSLAYER posted...

Can someone close this dumpster fire of a topic already?

It's a raging fire of shitposts
---

That_Happened posted...

RockRapDubstep posted...

Nobody is biologically wired to be gay as it serves no biological purpose..

Stupid argument. There are lots of traits that serve no biological purpose yet we're still born that way.

It's not a fair comparison to something as critical to biology as sexuality is. Like I said biologically speaking, reproduction is the entire purpose of our species.
Considering that biology doesn't factor in things like artificial insemination or forcing yourself to fuck the opposite sex for the purpose of reproduction, being gay effectively makes you worthless in the grand scheme of things. Again just biologically speaking.
---

That_Happened posted...

xOmniCloudx posted...

Man 1: I don't like Black people because they're dangerous.
Me: What makes you say that?
Man 1: Personal experiences, statistics and talking with other people
Me: So what about Black people that aren't actually dangerous and are constructive members of society
Man 1: I have no problem with them but unfortunately they seem to be an exception from experience or the rates being too high to default to a Black person not being dangerous.

Anyone that would call that man racist is clueless on what the term racist means.

"I had a limited amount of bad experiences with black people, I looked up their crime rate statistics and found that although their rates are higher still very very very few black people commit crime and I talked to some people who agree with me. I therefore default to the idea that most black people are dangerous, and the exceptions are the black people who are good and helpful members of society."

And you say the above is NOT racist.

This is all golden. And very CE like.

If you're going to say man 1 and man 2 are the same, you are an idiot plain and simple lol.

I wouldn't say man 1 and man 2 are the same. They're both racist, but the first guy is somewhat racist, whereas the second guy is an extreme racist.

It's not limited experiences just because you say so. Many non-Blacks have EXTENSIVE LIFELONG experience. I'm a Black man that's lived and mostly associated among mostly Blacks all my life and I know it's true myself that the rates are much higher for them to do anything bad because I've seen this be true all my life and I also study other areas where it's almost always true. The dictionary says you're wrong as do factual statistics of why someone would have such bias.

That's a smart man in example A. If he's racist then everybody needs to be racist like that because it's a sign of being aware of your environment and following factual data, as opposed to twisting those things with self made definitions due to a failure to cope with the truth :D
---

xOmniCloudx posted...

Not like latinos. Like D.R. it is mostly mulattoes who are the norm there. Blacks in the west are but not as much as Dominicans or Brazillians. You are out of your mind if you think this.


This. Latinos can look like almost everyone since nearly every form of genetic material is heavily hanging around in Latin American countries. It's the most genetically diverse group of people in the world solely because they AREN'T a race which is why it's ironic that they of all people are stereotyped to only look a certain way.

I'm just saying, the average black person you see is 25% white
---