Poll of the Day > BLM activist writes list of demands for white people *smh*

(+) Yeah! (+)

green dragon posted...

I honestly have no issue with the list of demands

Not sure how, it's asinine to demand property from people who have nothing to do with the actions of their ancestors. I work for everything I have, nobody has given me anything, so they can go fuck themselves if they think they're entitled to my property.
---

While prejudice does, unfortunately, still exist, if you apply yourself and stick to your plan, you can achieve almost anything.

Sure, you may/may not become president of the United States because America may/may not be ready for whatever religion, gender, political affiliation, whatever, but you can do a lot with your life if you stay motivated.

http://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/publication/65766/2000369-Child-Poverty-and-Adult-Success.pdf

These BLM "activists" are just looking for someone to blame for their failures or hardships that they've experienced or inherited from their ancestors.

WastelandCowboy posted...

While prejudice does, unfortunately, still exist,

Of course prejudice exists. They're assuming I'm affluent because I'm white
---

Peterass posted...

This is total bullshit. All of it

Excellent counterpoint. You sure showed me.
---

darkknight109 posted...

Peterass posted...

This is total bullshit. All of it

Excellent counterpoint. You sure showed me.

Nice response. Well-thought-out and articulate.

darkknight109 posted...

Excellent counterpoint. You sure showed me.

Well your initial point was basically supported by "because I said so", so I'm not sure why you're getting all salty about other low effort posts.

Duck-I-Says posted...

darkknight109 posted...

Excellent counterpoint. You sure showed me.

Well your initial point was basically supported by "because I said so", so I'm not sure why you're getting all salty about other low effort posts.

What exactly would you prefer I support it with? It's not like the definition of white privilege is something that's going to show up in a peer-reviewed, scientific journal - this isn't a subject for which you should need sources.

I mean, I can post a whole bunch of sources showing the various ways that whites are better off as a group than non-whites if that's what you really want to see, as well as a bunch of opinion pieces on the subject of privilege, but that's not exactly going to change my point.
---

darkknight109 posted...

What exactly would you prefer I support it with? It's not like the definition of white privilege is something that's going to show up in a peer-reviewed, scientific journal -

You're right about that

darkknight109 posted...

as well as a bunch of opinion pieces on the subject of privilege

Yep. That's basically what this amounts to. A bunch of victim mentality biased opinion pieces.

Duck-I-Says posted...

Well your initial point was basically supported by "because I said so", so I'm not sure why you're getting all salty about other low effort posts.

That's his schtick. He thinks it makes him look more correct if he types out more characters.

darkknight109 posted...

Maybe they specialized in a more lucrative area or their starting wealth roll was good

This sentence alone shows how incredibly asinine your entire argument is. Not simply the fact that you're trying to argue a point by using WoW metaphors but also because you seem to be denying the enormous privilege that a wealthy background affords you in life. And unlike your white privilege argument, that's actually easily proven and backed by vast amounts of data.

darkknight109 posted...

systemic discrimination

You mean like more available scholarships and affirmative action?

darkknight109 posted...

bigotry

You mean like telling me I'm automatically privileged without knowing anything about me

OhhhJa posted...

Yep. That's basically what this amounts to. A bunch of victim mentality biased opinion pieces.

I mean, I can point out things like how badly blacks get screwed over by the justice system, from increased arrest rates, greater rates of being held without bail for the same crime, greater conviction rates, longer sentences, and lower rates of parole:

http://www.crf-usa.org/brown-v-board-50th-anniversary/the-color-of-justice.html

...or the fact that, when applying for a job, "black-sounding names" are significantly less likely to get a call-back when applying for jobs, when compared with "white-named" applicants with the same or lesser qualifications:

http://www.nber.org/digest/sep03/w9873.html

...or even get down to the little things. For instance, did you know that Florida - the state with the fourth most executions in the country - has never executed a white person for killing a black person? Their first is scheduled for tonight:

http://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/real-life/news-life/florida-to-deploy-lethal-cocktail-to-execute-first-inmate-in-18-months/news-story/8dc7138a853a33b28d43c42cced9e8b1

I could keep going, but this really only leads to one simple conclusion: whites are treated differently than blacks in America, and in nearly all cases they are treated better.

Or do you have an alternate explanation you'd like to share?

OhhhJa posted...

That's his schtick. He thinks it makes him look more correct if he types out more characters.

Sorry if I exceed your attention span. I admit I'm poorly suited to the Twitter generation, but some concepts require a bit more elaboration than 140 characters.
---

OhhhJa posted...

This sentence alone shows how incredibly asinine your entire argument is. Not simply the fact that you're trying to argue a point by using WoW metaphors but also because you seem to be denying the enormous privilege that a wealthy background affords you in life. And unlike your white privilege argument, that's actually easily proven and backed by vast amounts of data.

Where did I suggest that wealth doesn't constitute privilege? Of course it does. Wealth is probably the single biggest indicator of privilege there is since we no longer live in the days of peerage.

That said, that's not what we're discussing here. Peterass's initial reference was to "white privilege" specifically; that has to do with race, not wealth.

OhhhJa posted...

You mean like more available scholarships and affirmative action?

Interesting you mention affirmative action, because right now men are benefiting more than women and the most "disadvantaged" group under the program isn't whites - it's Asians.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/who-benefits-from-affirmative-action-white-men/2017/08/11/4b56907e-7eab-11e7-a669-b400c5c7e1cc_story.html?utm_term=.a6e22f8c603e

^For the record, I don't agree with the conclusions of that article, but it does outline some of the facts I'm mentioning here.

OhhhJa posted...

You mean like telling me I'm automatically privileged without knowing anything about me

I don't recall mentioning you in any of my posts thus far.

Given that all I've talked about in this topic is white privilege, I'm guessing you're white by this response. In which case yes, your race does afford you privilege that would not be afforded to a person of colour if they were in your shoes.

Do you have other forms of privilege, like wealth? That I don't know. But, as previously mentioned, that's not the subject of discussion today.
---

darkknight109 posted...

Where did I suggest that wealth doesn't constitute privilege? Of course it does. Wealth is probably the single biggest indicator of privilege there is since we no longer live in the days of peerage.

That said, that's not what we're discussing here. Peterass's initial reference was to "white privilege" specifically; that has to do with race, not wealth.

You vastly downplayed it's role compared to race initially. Wealth is a waaaaayyy bigger factor than race

It's sad that BLM, like so many other well-meaning ideals (hello, feminism), has long since been hijacked by utter fuckwits.
---

darkknight109 posted...

I mean, I can point out things like how badly blacks get screwed over by the justice system, from increased arrest rates, greater rates of being held without bail for the same crime, greater conviction rates, longer sentences, and lower rates of parole:

I won't disagree here but I'm also referencing upstanding citizens not recidivist criminal morons. Don't be a criminal. Don't get convicted of crimes. Simple as that

darkknight109 posted...

...or the fact that, when applying for a job, "black-sounding names" are significantly less likely to get a call-back when applying for jobs, when compared with "white-named" applicants with the same or lesser qualifications:

According to crf-usa.org lol. For good jobs, qualifications speak much louder than names. Employers won't care what your name sounds like if you have
a chemical engineering degree. If you're applying for McDonald's well...

darkknight109 posted...

Sorry if I exceed your attention span. I admit I'm poorly suited to the Twitter generation, but some concepts require a bit more elaboration than 140 characters.

Naw I just think you're overcompensating

OhhhJa posted...

Employers won't care what your name sounds like if you have
a chemical engineering degree.

But black people can't get those because they don't have white privilege.
---

There's a nice secluded continent where she won't have to deal with white people; Antartica.
---

Zareth posted...

OhhhJa posted...

Employers won't care what your name sounds like if you have
a chemical engineering degree.

But black people can't get those because they don't have white privilege.

Black people can get those more because aggressive quotas.
---

OhhhJa posted...

You vastly downplayed it's role compared to race initially.

Because the subject of conversation was "white privilege", bro. Those are the exact words Peterass used, and so that was the subject of my post. I "downplayed" wealth because it wasn't what we were talking about.

That's like me saying your posts are downplaying the horrific aftereffects of World War II on post-war Europe. It's true, your posts say absolutely nothing about that; it's equally true that it's not the subject of the discussion, and therefore it's kind of facetious of me to bring it up as a serious talking point.

OhhhJa posted...

Don't be a criminal. Don't get convicted of crimes. Simple as that

You're oversimplifying the issue, because it *isn't* as simple as that.

Blacks are more likely to be arrested and charged for offences that whites might be let off with a warning; blacks are more likely to be charged with a more serious offence that carries a permanent record; and blacks have higher conviction rates than whites when charged with the same crime, which either implies that innocent blacks are being falsely imprisoned or guilty whites are being let off. Any way you slice it, this is still inequality - the fact that it involves criminals doesn't mitigate that fact in the slightest.

Oh, and if you want the really disgusting part, that "don't be a criminal" advice isn't even as pertinent as you might think. Because whites WITH a criminal record are *still* more likely to get a job callback than blacks without a criminal record.

https://csgjusticecenter.org/reentry/posts/researchers-examine-effects-of-a-criminal-record-on-prospects-for-employment/

OhhhJa posted...

According to crf-usa.org lol.

Wrong link. Which makes me think you didn't even read what you were quoting.

Regardless, If you don't like that source, there's plenty more covering the same phenomenon. Here's one referencing a study from the University of Missouri:
http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/ct-bias-hiring-0504-biz-20160503-story.html

OhhhJa posted...

For good jobs, qualifications speak much louder than names. Employers won't care what your name sounds like if you have
a chemical engineering degree. If you're applying for McDonald's well...

First of all, I'd love to see a source on this, because I've never seen any research that differentiates "good jobs" from the rest in terms of discrimination.

But you know what, just for argument's sake let's assume you're right. Employers don't discriminate "for good jobs." Guess what? They're not all good jobs. They can't all be good jobs. Society would cease to function if we had 100 million people wanting chemical engineering jobs and zero people working elsewhere (to say nothing of the fact that, no matter how hard everyone works, there are a limited number of positions available in engineering schools).

42% of jobs pay less than $15 an hour (source: http://fortune.com/2015/04/13/who-makes-15-per-hour/). Good paying white collar jobs of the sort you're referring to make up a small portion of the economy. Even if you want to assume that a great company won't care if you're black or white, most companies don't fit under your definition of "the good ones".

OhhhJa posted...

Naw I just think you're overcompensating

Believe what you will. I'm long-winded and I have no intention of changing to satisfy someone else's short attention span.
---

Dunno If I should make a new topic for this so I'm just putting this here but another BLM activist is racist yet again:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lVI9Phz_ENo

dioxxys posted...

Dunno If I should make a new topic for this so I'm just putting this here but another BLM activist is racist yet again:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lVI9Phz_ENo

Being black didn't stop her from having plenty of food on the table at least

dioxxys posted...

Dunno If I should make a new topic for this so I'm just putting this here but another BLM activist is racist yet again:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lVI9Phz_ENo

Is this comedy? I love how the camera pans around and shows the audience is all white save for one, maybe two people.

Tbh, what the lady is doing in the second vid is kinda genius. You know there are probably some rich white folk out there who suffer from white guilt, and she's tapping into that market and allowing them to absolve their guilt by giving her money via paypal

green dragon posted...

Tbh, what the lady is doing in the second vid is kinda genius. You know there are probably some rich white folk out there who suffer from white guilt, and she's tapping into that market and allowing them to absolve their guilt by giving her money via paypal

She's gotta support that nacho and Ben and jerry's diet somehow

OhhhJa posted...

green dragon posted...

Tbh, what the lady is doing in the second vid is kinda genius. You know there are probably some rich white folk out there who suffer from white guilt, and she's tapping into that market and allowing them to absolve their guilt by giving her money via paypal

She's gotta support that nacho and Ben and jerry's diet somehow

Obviously it's working for her

green dragon posted...

OhhhJa posted...

green dragon posted...

Tbh, what the lady is doing in the second vid is kinda genius. You know there are probably some rich white folk out there who suffer from white guilt, and she's tapping into that market and allowing them to absolve their guilt by giving her money via paypal

She's gotta support that nacho and Ben and jerry's diet somehow

Obviously it's working for her

She looked different 5 years ago.

1) No. I don't own any land and my material goods already have an heir picked out with a sizable chunk being donated to things like libraries. I'm not going to suddenly turn around and confine that to a single black/brown family just because you want ti.

2) Phahaha! No.

3) Do you have any idea how city zoning, construction, and what-not costs? Land isn't infinite. You can't just 'build' a complex, especially in cities where most of the land is being utilized. In order to build a complex you'd need to tear down multiple houses in these neighborhoods JUST to have the space to build these complex's! Sure, there will be occasionally abandoned/blighted/whatnot properties but most of the time this won't be the case! And this is assuming that the properties, supplies, permits, and labor are being donated freely! Building a project like this isn't cheap. Even for terrible housing you still need to pay for supplies, labor, permits, property to build on, meet standards, and so-forth... Only to NOT make ANY money off it to even remotely off-set the cost! No one would build any multi-family housing anywheres anymore because they'd quite literally have their costs doubled! Not to mention that they'd basically have to double the price on the houses that they DO make money off of just to say afloat! So no one but the very wealthy could consider even buying these properties! You fail economics forever!

4) Except you can ALWAYS 'downsize'! After all, homeless people survive and have families. So clearly a white person having a home means he can be downsized. Even if it isn't taken to that extreme this would result in nothing more than a caste of people unable to purchase property beyond the most basic levels since, the moment they did, it would have to be 'downsized' and given to a black family. They would still have to work to survive and the like but could never see the benefits or have any hopes or dreams for the future of moving out of their tiny and cramped homes because, the moment they do, DOWNSIZE! OH! Plus if this actually HAPPENED there would be no more 'black neighborhoods' or the like because they'd all be in the now vacant houses that are now mostly empty while white people huddle together in tiny and cramped quarters. So the contractors in point 3 would be building expensive houses for a group of people who can't buy them because they'd be instantly downsized while then building redundant free homes in neighborhoods that don't exist for people who already have well-off homes and the people who *do* want them have to be denied on grounds of race (since these homes are for black/brown people only). YOU FAIL LOGIC FOREVER!

5) I can't. Ignoring that people's attitudes can change in the years after I've died or that, if I leave it to friends/relatives I haven't seen in years (not uncommon) I have no way to influence or decide their behavior... What's the point? If they sell it the money goes to a black or brown family. If it's property and not going to the family it goes to a black or brown family. Assuming by 'property' you mean 'land and/or house' (and I'm 99.99999% positive you don't) and not 'any material goods or wealth you own'. So basically I can only give small bits of property to my family on the grounds that they don't use it and now have to ensure that they haven't become 'racist assholes'? And, let's be honest, they are racist assholes on the grounds of being white.
---

6) So... In addition to giving you my house, my land, pretty much everything I own (if I don't have family), you now want me to give you my money too? This is a freaking RACIAL SLAVE CASTE! Just with nicer words! We basically can't own a house, have to provide free housing for you, give you money, and can't even leave our stuff to family you deem 'unacceptable'. Yet we still have to work to provide you with money, goods, and services that we'll never get to see? And, let's be honest, these aren't 'donations'. They are 'donate or else lose everything you own and likely get beaten up and sent to jail or at least be ruined for life'.

7) So even if we have a job; if we make the mistake of running afoul of whatever is considered 'racist', we can be fired? We don't even have to be racist. If we have a subordinate who is 'racist', it doesn't matter if we knew or not, we are fired too. And we HAVE to rat out anyone who is dissatisfied with the system now or else we're complacent and lose our jobs?

8) So... just 'looking suspicious while white', doesn't matter where I am, political alignment, or anything of the sort, should resort in me getting fired? Sure. Do so. Because I've probably quit a long time ago to become a wandering hobo intend on seeing the world and financing my way via jugband skills because why would I ever want to be involved in this system? Course I'd probably be arrested ASAP for being white and not donating to help black people, but sounds like that will happen no matter what. Least I downsized.

9) So... Beat up white people who disagree with you? Heck, this doesn't even specify which side they were ON! Just beat them up. Doesn't matter if they were on BLM's side and praising it as a success. BEAT THEIR ASS UP!

10) At this point, whatever. We're now homeless or living in squalor, struggling to hold property, getting fired on whims, giving up money to help black and brown people, punished for basically looking funny, and encouraged to rat out anyone who might disagree. I'd make a joke about how this is an authoritarian dystopia but North Korea has a less oppressive government at this point.
---

darkknight109 posted...

privilege would be the difficulty setting, and "straight white male" is the lowest setting.

The fact that you genuinely believe this bullshit is truly saddening.
---

Rasmoh posted...

darkknight109 posted...

privilege would be the difficulty setting, and "straight white male" is the lowest setting.

The fact that you genuinely believe this bullshit is truly saddening.

It's true, but the difficulty gap is very minor and/or applied by the parent's mindset.
---

Kyuubi4269 posted...

It's true, but the difficulty gap is very minor and/or applied by the parent's mindset.

It really isn't. There is only one privilege, and that is being rich.
---

dioxxys posted...

Dunno If I should make a new topic for this so I'm just putting this here but another BLM activist is racist yet again:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lVI9Phz_ENo

She's half serious, half joking. She's exaggerating and using humor to make a serious point. I don't see the issue with her, like I was expecting an angry tirade. The video was pretty benign.
---

Rasmoh posted...

Kyuubi4269 posted...

It's true, but the difficulty gap is very minor and/or applied by the parent's mindset.

It really isn't. There is only one privilege, and that is being rich.

You can be privileged with a good upbringing, and being white you don't typically have a scorned parent telling you people will hate you for your skin colour falsely.
---

Kyuubi4269 posted...

being white you don't typically have a scorned parent telling you people will hate you for your skin colour falsely.

Instead you have media conglomerates, college professors, college administrators, talk show hosts, celebrities and politicians telling you that being white is bad and that there needs to be less white people in pretty much every aspect of life.
---

Golden Road posted...

She's half serious, half joking. She's exaggerating and using humor to make a serious point. I don't see the issue with her, like I was expecting an angry tirade. The video was pretty benign.

You just always wanna have the contrarian opinion. This lady sucks

I have a hard time believing this is anything more than a trolling attempt or an orchestrated statement to make BLM look ridiculous.
---

Rasmoh posted...

Instead you have media conglomerates, college professors, college administrators, talk show hosts, celebrities and politicians telling you that being white is bad and that there needs to be less white people in pretty much every aspect of life.

No, the media conglomerates don't talk about how evil white people are. No, talk show hosts don't, celebrities don't, and politicians don't, either. Maybe an occasional college professor or administrator has, I don't know, they're not public enough figures to know for the most part, but it's not nearly as pervasive as you're imagining it.
---

Rasmoh posted...

Kyuubi4269 posted...

being white you don't typically have a scorned parent telling you people will hate you for your skin colour falsely.

Instead you have media conglomerates, college professors, college administrators, talk show hosts, celebrities and politicians telling you that being white is bad and that there needs to be less white people in pretty much every aspect of life.

I don't know about you, but family influenced me more than TV in my childhood.
---

Mead posted...

I have a hard time believing this is anything more than a trolling attempt or an orchestrated statement to make BLM look ridiculous.

She has a website. I can't tell if she expects viewers to take it seriously or if it is some weird art experiment.

lol i didn't fully read but i'd love if one of these people would say some of that uppity shit to my face irl

or any white person's face, really

funny how they never do that. it sure is a safe place to share your own worthless opinions on the internet where you're out of face-punching range
---

Shenti_Reborn posted...

lol i didn't fully read but i'd love if one of these people would say some of that uppity shit to my face irl

or any white person's face, really

funny how they never do that. it sure is a safe place to share your own worthless opinions on the internet where you're out of face-punching range

...do you really believe all white people have such thin skin that they would punch a black person for saying something they don't agree with?
---

Rasmoh posted...

darkknight109 posted...

privilege would be the difficulty setting, and "straight white male" is the lowest setting.

The fact that you genuinely believe this bullshit is truly saddening.

Prove me wrong then. What demographic has an easier time of things? Women, with under-representation, higher rates of sexual violence, and having to put up with a legion of misogynistic gutter-spawn that rears their head in the comment section of any website where a woman has the temerity to do something controversial? Kind of hard to make the case for non-whites given that we just had a high profile killing by a white supremacist, the latest in a line of such crimes that stretches back to before the nation's founding and that dwarfs the numbers (both in number of adherents and number of violent incidents) of racial supremacy groups for all other non-white races. Or perhaps you think it's easier to be non-straight, where you can still, for some dumb reason, have good reason to fear for your well-being should you want to be affectionate in public, walk with your partner in public, or even just admit your sexual orientation to your family.

I don't see why people have such a difficult time of admitting that, in much of the western world, straight white men have things really fucking good. I'm one myself - being straight, white, and male doesn't make me any less proud of my accomplishments in life, it doesn't make me feel that I owe redress to someone who wasn't born with the same chromosomes or melanin content as me; it simply offers the perspective that there are problems in the world beyond the ones affecting me directly and that I should do my part to see those problems eliminated.

Rasmoh posted...

Instead you have media conglomerates, college professors, college administrators, talk show hosts, celebrities and politicians telling you that being white is bad and that there needs to be less white people in pretty much every aspect of life.

*citation needed*
---

Golden Road posted...

Shenti_Reborn posted...

lol i didn't fully read but i'd love if one of these people would say some of that uppity shit to my face irl

or any white person's face, really

funny how they never do that. it sure is a safe place to share your own worthless opinions on the internet where you're out of face-punching range

...do you really believe all white people have such thin skin that they would punch a black person for saying something they don't agree with?

come on buddy it's me, do you really think it's necessary to try and analyze the bs i say so intently?

it's mostly just a shtick to make myself feel strong and powerful by making idle threats against nobodies on the internet

But there's a reason why I said it: it's annoying how these dumb pointless race groups won't go the fuck away, continuing to spout a bunch of bs about race that just divides us further

come to think of it though yes, i might get physical if someone said some dumb shit to me irl, so yeah bro what of it
---

Shenti_Reborn posted...

Golden Road posted...

Shenti_Reborn posted...

lol i didn't fully read but i'd love if one of these people would say some of that uppity shit to my face irl

or any white person's face, really

funny how they never do that. it sure is a safe place to share your own worthless opinions on the internet where you're out of face-punching range

...do you really believe all white people have such thin skin that they would punch a black person for saying something they don't agree with?

come on buddy it's me, do you really think it's necessary to try and analyze the bs i say so intently?

it's mostly just a shtick to make myself feel strong and powerful by making idle threats against nobodies on the internet

But there's a reason why I said it: it's annoying how these dumb pointless race groups won't go the fuck away, continuing to spout a bunch of bs about race that just divides us further

come to think of it though yes, i might get physical if someone said some dumb shit to me irl, so yeah bro what of it

Gotta say, when you drop the shtick you're actually a pretty good poster.
---

i have my moments bro
---

darkknight109 posted...

Rasmoh posted...

Instead you have media conglomerates, college professors, college administrators, talk show hosts, celebrities and politicians telling you that being white is bad and that there needs to be less white people in pretty much every aspect of life.

*citation needed*

You really havent seen any of them? They are everywhere.

I would find all the sources for you but this stuff has been posted on gamefaqs over time and would take a lot of effort to gather all of the sources.

From googling "college professor white guilt" I was able to find this story in about 5 seconds:
http://nypost.com/2016/07/01/elite-k-8-school-teaches-white-students-theyre-born-racist/

so, basically give us stuff for free cuz working is hard

yeah that's BLM alright
---

darkknight109 posted...

higher rates of sexual violence

lower rates of overall violence including murder though. I'm willing to admit that straight white males overall have it easier than other groups as long as other groups are willing to admit that it isn't entirely a one-way street. There's this pervasive assumption that every societal privilege is always in favor of men and is always in favor of whites and every disprivilege is always against women and always against non-whites; anything that goes against that assumption is always mocked or ignored.

What_The_Chris posted...

so, basically give us stuff for free cuz working is hard

yeah that's BLM alright

It's more of 'my ancestors were probably enslaved so you and all white people own me for generations of genocide and enslavement!' with a whole TON of related stupidity.
---

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6TU50Bz3Ey0

More whites were enslaved by muslims , than blacks were enslaved by whites.
The End of the lie of "white privilege".
---

dioxxys posted...

You really havent seen any of them? They are everywhere.

I would find all the sources for you but this stuff has been posted on gamefaqs over time and would take a lot of effort to gather all of the sources.

From googling "college professor white guilt" I was able to find this story in about 5 seconds:
http://nypost.com/2016/07/01/elite-k-8-school-teaches-white-students-theyre-born-racist/

One school is hardly "everywhere." It also doesn't seem like there's any "you're evil for being white" going on. I mean, the article does start in an alarmist tone, and says the "you're evil for being white" stuff in the beginning--they want something shocking and eye-catching, I guess, and it's not exactly the least biased site out there--but the meat of the article doesn't say that's happening. Sounds more like they're trying to educate about racism, rather than demonizing white kids.
---