Current Events > Are you afraid of North Korea?

(+) Yeah! (+)

Supposedly they have an ICBM capable of hitting targets as far away as Chicago....
---

ahahahahahahaha
---

Im more afraid for NK than I am afraid of them.
---

Not in the least

Piersons_Fox posted...

Im more afraid for NK than I am afraid of them.

---

Axiom posted...

Not in the least

kim jong un's farts travel further than their missiles...
---

As scary as a drawing of Kirby hugging a baby kitten.
---

Are you afraid of North Korea?

Please..

I have seen their "glorious" leader, few times in the news, now. That alone should answer the question pretty well. No matter how many big missiles they are supposedly having.

Ugh... ridiculous.

It wouldn't be the first time a crazy leader had access to nukes

I want them to bomb my house
---

Nope.

lol no
---

As someone who lives on the coast of California

not at all
---

chill02 posted...

ahahahahahahaha

---

i have a family history of diabetes and prostate cancer

my car's been making funny noises the last few days

i saw a centipede in my basement the other day

i may have eaten bad fish for dinner tonight



those are things that scare me. NK doesn't even enter into the equation
---

Lol no. That fat fuck is a joke. I'm just waiting for somebody to glass that entire area.
---

Absolutely not.
---

Obviously North Korea doesn't have 100s of missiles that they can launch on US cities.

Anyway we would have no choice for the shit to get real on North Korea if it did start getting that far.
---

I'm more afraid of being mauled and killed by my neighbor's beagle than I am of being attacked by North Korea
---

PikachuMaxwell posted...

Supposedly they have an ICBM capable of hitting targets as far away as Chicago....

'Capable' being the key word there. Realistically, they have a far greater chance of accidentally nuking themselves.

Besides, if NK ever did anything to the US or Japan, they would be utterly decimated so quickly that it isn't even funny. Nobody is more aware of this fact than Kim Jong Un. NK has followed the same basic outline for decades now. They make a big fuss, the civilized world gives them some extra humanitarian aid, and they go back to being 'friendly' for a few months. If they ever actually tried to attack someone, KJU would be out of power after a righteous ass fisting, and a tyrant in power's main goal is to stay in power.

TL;DR: North Korea wants attention and the rewards that come with it, not an actual fight. Don't worry about them.
---

FaytlessHearts posted...

Lol no. That fat fuck is a joke. I'm just waiting for somebody to glass that entire area.

We're not agaisnt tge North Korean people we're agaisnt the Un regime.
---

PikachuMaxwell posted...

Supposedly they have an ICBM capable of hitting targets as far away as Chicago....

So they are secretly Canada?
---

It worries me that there has been no effort to extract the chubby faced psychopath.
---

The thing is that this perpetual war thing we got going on has kind of really sated the bloodthirst Americans have traditionally had so NK could level SK and as long as the samsung factory was untouched Americans wouldn't give two shits. But god forbid they affect our consumption. NK will be leveled
---

Not for myself, no.

But worried I suppose, for South Korea and other immediate neighbours they have.
---

No. I'm more afraid of Trump's reaction to any move they make.
---

Not really.

GregShmedley posted...

twitterfriends posted...

FaytlessHearts posted...

Lol no. That fat fuck is a joke. I'm just waiting for somebody to glass that entire area.

We're not agaisnt tge North Korean people we're agaisnt the Un regime.

This.

First off, just because we are comfortably on our asses in the US, that doesn't mean they couldn't bomb any of our allies or bases, including the obvious below them.

Second, I highly doubt we would retaliate with a nuke, at least right away, considering how many brainwashed innocents live there and how it would impact our relationship with China.

This topic reeks of ignorance and privledge.

Don't look now, but Mr. College Educated can't even spell "privilege" right.
---

ThePrinceFish posted...

As someone who lives on the coast of California

not at all

This.
---

GregShmedley posted...

Second, I highly doubt we would retaliate with a nuke, at least right away, considering how many brainwashed innocents live there and how it would impact our relationship with China.

fwiw, i expect we probably would use tactical nuclear weapons to disable the rest of their arsenal/artillery pieces in the event of NK hostile action. the US and NATO in general have not ruled out first strike

but i doubt NK will initiate hostilities.
---

Piersons_Fox posted...

Im more afraid for NK than I am afraid of them.

I'm more afraid for South Korea, when North Korea becomes a large glowing crater about half an hour after starting shit.

GregShmedley posted...

Darkman124 posted...

GregShmedley posted...

Second, I highly doubt we would retaliate with a nuke, at least right away, considering how many brainwashed innocents live there and how it would impact our relationship with China.

fwiw, i expect we probably would use tactical nuclear weapons to disable the rest of their arsenal/artillery pieces in the event of NK hostile action. the US and NATO in general have not ruled out first strike

but i doubt NK will initiate hostilities.

Good point. I'm admittedly not too familiar with the range of our nuclear capabilities so I when I think "nuke," my mind goes straight to a massive blast over a large area.

The real reason tactical nukes never caught on, is because there's just too big a risk, over just using ludicrous conventional weapons like daisy cutters, bunker busters, and MOABs.

Questionmarktarius posted...

The real reason tactical nukes never caught on, is because there's just too big a risk, over just using ludicrous conventional weapons like daisy cutters, bunker busters, and MOABs.

tactical nuclear weapon is probably the wrong term.

in event of NK hostilities i would expect us to launch multiple SRBMs from a variety of sites, some hidden and some not, likely within a few seconds or minutes of the attack. purpose being to destroy any further capacity of theirs to harm SK/Japan.

things like their artillery field and any underground bunkers thought to contain nuclear weapons would be the target.

it would still be a 'huge blast' and MOABs just are not likely to cut it in such a scenario. but i doubt we'd be targeting industrial capacity or population centers.
---

Darkman124 posted...

in event of NK hostilities i would expect us to launch multiple SRBMs from a variety of sites, some hidden and some not.

NK is very likely surrounded by submarines, right now.

Questionmarktarius posted...

Darkman124 posted...

in event of NK hostilities i would expect us to launch multiple SRBMs from a variety of sites, some hidden and some not.

NK is very likely surrounded by submarines, right now.

this seems probable.
---

I am actually. Especially since it would be totally in Kim Jong Un's character to "draw first blood". Sure he'll be decimated after he starts, but the damage that will have been done will be devastating for whoever is unfortunate enough to have been hit.

I'm scared of great white sharks and the deep ocean. Neither of those are North Korea.