It should all be reflected in the price. As in, without the EULA, prices would be higher.
I'm not sure what basic rights are being removed that you're talking about though. Those things you listed are not basic rights in the traditional sense of the term........
There are lots of kinds of property with conditions on them. Like any house with a covenant on it, for example. As for social media passwords, it seems horrible to me, but again there's no basic right here. The employer is saying, work for me and let me see your Facebook page and I'll pay you. Don't they have a right to ask to pay you to see your FB page, and don't you have the right to accept their offer? For tax payment shifting, it seems there's no difference than if the nominal price was changed, so it's nothing really.
--
Congratulations to SuperNiceDog, Guru Winner, who was smart enough to pick your 7 time champion, Link.
Though the best response here is to walk away. If your company is so lame that you ask to see employees' social media pages, I don't want to work for you anyway.
--
Congratulations to SuperNiceDog, Guru Winner, who was smart enough to pick your 7 time champion, Link.
No it isn't. It's an invasion of privacy if you refuse, and they hack into your account anyway.
The company is pressuring you to give up privacy to get a job, which if unreasonable (which access to a Facebook account is) should be illegal, in my opinion.
Though the best response here is to walk away.
I'm sure most people would love the opportunity to walk away from bad jobs, but it's not like everyone has the opportunity to just get a new job or to have some way of making money until that happens.
--
My bracket wasn't good enough to beat SuperNiceDog's in the GameFAQS Rivalry Rumble. Congrats! This is Yesmar.
The company is pressuring you to give up privacy to get a job
And if you don't like that, you don't have to take the job. By this logic, any job that requires anything that most people would not like to do should be illegal. So long, garbagemen!
I'm sure most people would love the opportunity to walk away from bad jobs, but it's not like everyone has the opportunity to just get a new job or to have some way of making money until that happens.
You are not entitled to a job, or to money. Everyone has the opportunity to walk away from jobs. Once again, please explain to me why they can't find any Asparagus pickers in Washington State, given that unemployment is so high. By your reasoning, all of the unemployed are FORCED to take those jobs. And yet, they are not doing so.
--
SmartMuffin - Because anything less would be uncivilized - http://img.imgcake.com/smartmuffin/barkleyjpgde.jpg http://dudewheresmyfreedom.com/
The company is pressuring you to give up privacy to get a job, which if unreasonable (which access to a Facebook account is) should be illegal, in my opinion.
What's unreasonable? Is it unreasonable for Google to keep trying to get me to sign up for Google Plus when I don't want one? Of course, if I were a CEO, I would make sure no one in my company was using such hiring practices. It's stupid, and a classic example of being penny wise and pound foolish.
--
Congratulations to SuperNiceDog, Guru Winner, who was smart enough to pick your 7 time champion, Link.
Once again, please explain to me why they can't find any Asparagus pickers in Washington State, given that unemployment is so high. By your reasoning, all of the unemployed are FORCED to take those jobs. And yet, they are not doing so.
This is a bit of a tangent, but didn't you mention that they are still only offering minimum wage for this job? If it's impossible for them to fill the positions, shouldn't the logic of the free market dictate that they need to increase their offer?
--
From his looks Magus is Macho Man Randy Savage as an anime zombie. The black wind howls, and one of you will snap into a Slim Jim ooh yeeeah! -sonicblastpunch
This is a bit of a tangent, but didn't you mention that they are still only offering minimum wage for this job? If it's impossible for them to fill the positions, shouldn't the logic of the free market dictate that they need to increase their offer?
Yes, that's what the farmers in Georgia did when they passed a tough law against hiring illegal immigrants in that state. Couldn't find legal American residents to work on those farms for minimum wage.
--
Congratulations to SuperNiceDog, Guru Winner, who was smart enough to pick your 7 time champion, Link.
And if I were a CEO, what I would do instead of asking for social media info is simply to lower wages. The privacy to the employee is going to be worth more to them than the extra money I would be able to avoid paying them if I simply didn't ask for social media access.
--
Congratulations to SuperNiceDog, Guru Winner, who was smart enough to pick your 7 time champion, Link.
How exactly would one sell an individual steam game?
WazzupGenius00 posted...
There'd have to be some way to de-activate it from your account and then transfer it over to your buyer.
In the case of Steam, a new version of the program would have to be released that enables you to sell your Steam game. However, this means that Steam would automatically de-activate and delete the game from your computer when you try to sell your Steam game.
-- Luster Soldier --- ~Shield Bearer~ | ~Data Analyst~ Popular at school, but not as cool as SuperNiceDog, Guru Champ!
How exactly would one sell an individual steam game?
WazzupGenius00 posted...
There'd have to be some way to de-activate it from your account and then transfer it over to your buyer.
In the case of Steam, a new version of the program would have to be released that enables you to sell your Steam game. However, this means that Steam would automatically de-activate and delete the game from your computer when you try to sell your Steam game.
They don't have to delete it, just prevent the ability to launch it. Like with free PS+ games on PS3 once your PS+ membership expires.
--
Blitzball fan? Try Captain Tsubasa II (in English) for NES! Game reviews/articles by me: http://betweenlifeandgames.com
It's unreasonable, since a employer is demanding information from a prospective employee's private life that has no bearing on the job.
If it has no bearing on the job, why is the employer asking it? Because the employer is being stupid? Well, that's probably true, but it's not the role of government to protect people from stupidity- because government tends to be more stupid than individuals.
--
Congratulations to SuperNiceDog, Guru Winner, who was smart enough to pick your 7 time champion, Link.