LogFAQs > #986429290

LurkerFAQs, Active Database ( 12.01.2023-present ), DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicRed Hood Series Gets Canceled Because of Trans Writer's Remarks on Charlie Kirk
ImagineUsngAlts
09/16/25 3:40:34 AM
#75:


darkknight109 posted...
Are you saying that people should be allowed to mock a murder victim if they're right-wing or trying to get people to sign on to a revolution? I'm starting to get whiplash trying to piece through this post.

How about "a murder victim can be mocked if they're part of a hate group that actively pushes discrimination for groups to be oppressed and has significantly contributed to systems that do so to the point they've harmed just as much if not more than most criminals"? Dictators are technically not criminals.
darkknight109 posted...
"Thoughts and prayers, bozo" is not what she said, though; "Thoughts and prayers, you Nazi bitch is. That's not amusing or joking, that's just a straight up insult.

If you're going to defend her statement, at least have the intellectual honesty to call it what it is. You're allowed to try and defend her statement as within the bounds of what should be tolerable conduct, but don't try to insult people's intelligence with the, "She was only joking, guys!" angle - again, that's a MAGA trick that they use to defend Trump's bulls*** when he says something outlandish. You're better than that.

It's the same thing. Nazi bitch is just harsher. And saying she feels bad for the bullet is definitely a joke. The difference is that the "jokes" Maga use are just straight endorsement of violence and hate like "we should do them like Hitler did!" while then saying they weren't being serious while this here is just making silly statements like "thoughts and prayers, loser!" or "oh no, anyway". Again, the fact that you think these are equal is more an indication which direction you lean more towards.

darkknight109 posted...
Again, why are you using MAGA as a role model? Why are you looking at the sort of bulls*** that Trump, Tucker Carlson, Nick Fuentes, and, yes, Charlie Kirk himself trafficked in and saying, "Hey, we should do that too, except on the left!"?

Remember when we all pointed at Trump's insane blather and recognized it for what it was? Can we go back to that? Why are we now saying, "They can do it, so we should too!"?

Just because MAGA has done its best to carve out a space where they can behave like rabid baboons doesn't mean you need to emulate them.

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/9/9c897950.jpg

darkknight109 posted...
At no point have I suggested "reaching across the table" to MAGA and the far-right. This is just straw-manning.

Then why are you pearl clutching at a nazi's death getting made fun of? Who's that supposed to appeal to?

darkknight109 posted...
But Kirk's not from my country; he's from the US. And what he said was legal there.

And yes, that does make a difference. He followed the laws as Americans have set them. That means American society, as a gestalt whole, has said that what he did is acceptable - or, at least, not unacceptable enough to face formal punishment. If you disagree, get the laws changed. If American society is as on your side as you seem to believe, that should be very much doable.

Holy shit so you're not even being serious, you're just trying to play devil's advocate. "Um, it's legal in your country so it's not ok to make fun of him due to the laws in your country thus it somehow is morally different than if the laws were changed to make him a criminal. If you don't like it, change your laws" So I guess in places where abortion is illegal you support people getting charged for it? You support LGBT people being arrested in places where it's illegal?
You: https://twitter.com/reactjpg/status/1272042932036603913


---
Don't trust the ones below level 33
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1