LogFAQs > #985246189

htaeD posted...

I dont want this question to seem like its pulled in due to momentum, Ctes.
But what was, and now is, your stance on Sultan?

I don't think asking questions due to momentum would be a bad thing. Anyway

I thought that Sultan was being desperate to go after a lead without having one, so he picked something that worked in Blade "lying" about Sultan not explaining the vote (I don't think Blade lied obviously). When Blade had stated he saw no explanation, I asked for it, since Blade wasn't asking only making the point. Then Sultan quoted a post that had so little explanation that I missed it but I acknowledged it was there. At this point it should be clear to everyone what Sultan meant and how Blade and I misunderstood it. Then it looked to me like he was using this to attack Blade and thought it looked bad because he should have attacked me for it to the same degree (nevermind that the attack wasn't good to begin with, but not necessarily alignment indicative), which made it look not natural or I should have triggered the same reaction. So to sum up my stance was that was probably fake.

I was contemplating while finishing work and going home if I believed Sultan did actually miss those posts. Don't know if I reached any conclusion, but then I opened my PC to Sultan having just made an attack that also seemed fake because the reasoning didn't actually happen. For some reason Sultan insists on a leeching vote despite it being for different reasons and despite being reminded of that, which is too tunnelvisioned and also reminds me of a similar interaction I had with scum Sultan all the way back in Star Trek mafia where he also kept bringing up the the same point and ignoring that it didn't hold. This is important because Sultan does get confused at times. So to sum up my stance now, I like where my vote is.