LogFAQs > #981404718

Yesmar_ posted...

My hot take is that the read that this plays into "Dems in Disarray" is completely wrong. If anything it's the opposite. The stereotype is that Dems are wishy-washy wimps that can't make a decision, but to most people this is going to read as Dems making a decisive, ballsy decision. And it's a decision that poll after poll after poll has shown that the vast majority of voters *wanted* Democrats to make. Kamala Harris might end up being an awful nominee, so it might have been a mistake on that level, but on a narrative/momentum level, I don't see how this doesn't benefit Democrats.

Because youre giving up the advantage of incumbency in favor of someone who was so bad at running for president that Tulsi Gabbard put her into the ground.