LogFAQs > #979922973

Honestly not only am I "fine" with the sequel trilogy on the basis that we probably wouldn't have gotten the (admittedly still hit-and-miss) Disney+ series without it, but there have been plenty of worse franchise revivals this past decade.

I'll admit this was inspired by a YouTuber I follow putting out a short video responding to a question which trilogy was worse between the SW sequel trilogy and the Jurassic World trilogy. I was personally shocked how many in the comments were saying Star Wars until I realized a number of them admitted to having higher hopes for it. Honestly it feels like anyone who had any expectations for the ST higher than "don't be like the prequels" was going to be disappointed, but conversely it also feels like most didn't walk in with any higher expectations to begin with. That was also about the only creative aspect of the trilogy that stayed consistent throughout. Heck, the only other thing that stayed consistent about the trilogy was all three movies generally being aimed at the same people.