LogFAQs > #979899835

NoMeLx22x posted...

This is one of the worst analogies I've ever read in my life. Do you understand the world of difference between the technical capabilities of what a machine can do, and how much more accurate and concise that would be than just some guy trying to remember? I can't understand how you would think this is similar at all.

Honestly? As a massive nerd, I'd much more trust a bunch of people counting paper ballots than a computer when it comes to an election, especially with the stakes as high as they are these days.

The similarity is that whether it's a computer or some rando, you're telling something else your vote and just trusting that they're doing their job properly. In a perfect world a computer would be more precise, but we aren't in that world.