LogFAQs > #979807500

LurkerFAQs, Active Database ( 12.01.2023-present ), DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	What's the consensus on going into Iraq?
DragonClaw01 04/08/24 4:39:52 PM #51:	Trelve posted... There's definitely an argument to be made for going into Afghanistan after 9/11 but not Iraq. We were definitely going into Afghanistan after 9/11, but it should've been a punitive mission to eliminate Bin Laden and other high ranking Al-Qaeda officials, not the whole nation building thing. But I suppose Bush couldn't admit defeat after Bin Laden escaped our clutches after the bungle job that was Tora Bora so needed an alternative goal to work towards. --- <('.'<) <(^.^)> (>'.')> Splendiferous <cite>DragonClaw01 posted [p:979807500] in What's the... [t:80741870]...</cite> <quote>Trelve posted... </cite><quote>There's definitely an argument to be made for going into Afghanistan after 9/11 but not Iraq.</quote>We were definitely going into Afghanistan after 9/11, but it should've been a punitive mission to eliminate Bin Laden and other high ranking Al-Qaeda officials, not the whole nation building thing. But I suppose Bush couldn't admit defeat after Bin Laden escaped our clutches after the bungle job that was Tora Bora so needed an alternative goal to work towards. --- <('.'<) <(^.^)> (>'.')> Splendiferous</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1