LogFAQs > #979474211

LurkerFAQs, Active Database ( 12.01.2023-present ), DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicIt's kinda weird how fitness is obsessed with scientific research, right
pinky0926
03/20/24 5:46:43 PM
#28:


[LFAQs-redacted-quote]


part 1:
Aside from protein (which you're getting enough of, just*) I think fat and carb macros are very individual. You can make academic arguments about what's "optimal" but ultimately what dictates diet success is adherence and what dictates adherence is how much you don't hate your diet. That's why people can a lot of success with a range of diets (vegan, paleo, mediterranean, keto, etc etc). If you try a diet type that people swear by and you hate every second of it, try something else. As long as it adheres to basic principles of nutrition you're good.

Small caveat. "eat whatever if it fits your calorie amount") is easy for bulking. For cutting, you're sort of bound to have to cut fat at some point simply because it's so calorie dense. If you try and eat a small amount of calories while keeping fat high, your meals will be miserably small.

Are you actually trying to bulk and then cut to a reasonable degree in either direction? People tend to plateau early if they aren't actually gaining a reasonable amount of weight for a reasonable amount of time. As far as women are concerned, the principle is still the same, but just scaled down slightly (so instead of 2lbs of gain per week, maybe 1lb per week) and it's harder to track week on week (because your cycle makes water retention kinda fucky).

Basically what I'm saying is, if you set the goal of putting on 20lbs over the course of say 5 months, you'd definitely be stronger and you'd develop a lot of muscle. Even 5lbs of muscle on your frame would be look really significantly different. Then set a goal to cut whatever extra fat you gained in like 6 weeks of dieting (because you can cut much faster than bulk). Caveat here is you sort of have to be ok with being heavier than you'd like, for a time. But if you did it this way you'd absolutely make gains I think.

*This is one area where it seems like women don't actually need less protein per lb than men. They just tend to be a lot lighter in general. 0.6grams to 0.8grams per lb of bodyweight is about right, so your 70grams seems ok there.

---
CE's Resident Scotsman.
http://i.imgur.com/ILz2ZbV.jpg
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1