LogFAQs > #979439915

I guess he thought he could acquit himself, and if things were in jeopardy he'd have Gina pull out the smoke bomb. But that's undermined by him doing nothing when all the jurors vote against him under Ryunosuke. I dunno, how far does his power reach? Maybe he'd interfere with the sentencing, or manage a retrial somehow. It definitely doesn't fully hold up. (Also I'm still wondering why the cubbyhole needed to be emptied in the tampering, as Gina was in it already so that wasn't faked)

Back to the talk of side characters, I suppose most of the named single case characters aren't especially memorable in a positive way, my own exceptions being Jezaille Brett and the Skulkins (though I think they do a decent job with Fairplay and Furst once you realise that you're accidentally framing innocent people). But I love the jurors! In all their wacky, selfish, ignorant ways. Most of them don't get much dialogue and they quieten down when needed, there's no annoying lengthy testimony that undermines the serious business. IMO they're a great way to get a dose of the classic AA absurdity without it being overpowering, I found many of them amusing and always enjoyed the summation examinations. I'm not sure if that's an unpopular opinion!