LogFAQs > #979182354

Toonstrack posted...

Can you cite this? I'm not asking in an argumentative sense but im interested to know where it says this. Because that seems to directly violate the first amendment.

I don't have time to quote it all right now, but may try to later. But, it essentially comes down to the only thing enumerated in the Constitution and subsequent law is that each State will decide on electors to send to the Continental Congress. There are provisions on requirements and disqualifications for whom can be a president, but because national law makes no provision about people actually voting for a president, there are no provisions about how a presidential ballot is run. Already every State has their own organization with differing rules and requirements for being placed on the ballot.

So you were betting on this ruling being so catastrophically bad and resulting in so much chaos that SCOTUS would've been forced to amend the constitution?

Betting? No, the SCOTUS is always self serving and this one doubly so. I'm just continually appalled by the bold faced hypocrisy and that seemingly we will do nothing about until the whole country collapses.