LogFAQs > #979182006

Toonstrack posted...

This decision decides whether or not individual states can try and restrict their citizens from voting for their preferred candidates.

The problem with this, is that is exactly what the Constitution says States can do in plain text. This is the whole reason we don't have a national public election.
Yes, it would have led to insanity, and would have hopefully forced Congress to make a true national election process without electors and State interference bullshit.

I'm mostly sick of "Originalists" on the bench who are happy to find intent the second it suits them, but remain steadfast to the specific words when it will strip people of protections.