LogFAQs > #978975622

NoxObscuras posted...

You're ignoring the possibility of anti-votes handing the win to a 3rd candidate that wouldn't have gotten enough votes to win otherwise.

So? Maybe the first two parties shouldn't have picked candidates despised by 70% of the country each.

Tenlaar posted...

So you want an option that you acknowledge produces the exact same result as the option that you already have.

Yes.

I'd anti-vote Trump in a heartbeat. While you have a better chance of electing Bernie Sanders than of getting me to vote for a Hillary or a Biden.

Basically I'd love to vote against Trump but if it requires explictly saying yes to a foul corporate warmonger or a goofy corporate warmonger becoming/staying leader of the most powerful country in the land then fuck that.

If the closest thing some people can get to anti-voting is voting 3rd party, that's what they'll do.

xlr_big-coop posted...

Agreed. I get there's nothing to do until November, but these threads are childish and stupid

You know damn well the only reason cheeto god has any chance of winning is because this isn't how the election works.