LogFAQs > #978965119

LurkerFAQs, Active Database ( 12.01.2023-present ), DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Study shows 'catastrophic' 10-year low for female representation in film
willythemailboy 02/21/24 1:24:43 PM #2:	Sounds like a selection bias. It should be more accurately titled "10 year low for female representation in successful films". Just because a film isn't in the top 100 doesn't mean it wasn't made, it means it wasn't financially successful. --- There are four lights. <cite>willythemailboy posted [p:978965119] in Study show... [t:80702333]...</cite> <quote>Sounds like a selection bias. It should be more accurately titled "10 year low for female representation in successful films". Just because a film isn't in the top 100 doesn't mean it wasn't made, it means it wasn't financially successful. --- There are four lights.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1