LogFAQs > #978811460

LurkerFAQs, Active Database ( 12.01.2023-present ), DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Should religion alone really be deemed valid for outlawing something,
EPR-radar 02/12/24 8:36:47 PM #48:	ProfOaksAide posted... Of course not. In the US its unconstitutional and against the advice of nearly every founding father. And need I remind any fundamentalists that the original American settlers came here to flee the oppression of the Church of England In some (but not all) cases, that oppression amounted to the English authorities not allowing Puritans to burn witches at the stake. Unreasonable religious zealots have always been a problem, both for the colonies and later on for the US. --- "The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." -- 1984 <cite>EPR-radar posted [p:978811460] in Should rel... [t:80695072]...</cite> <quote>ProfOaksAide posted... </cite><quote>Of course not. In the US its unconstitutional and against the advice of nearly every founding father. And need I remind any fundamentalists that the original American settlers came here to flee the oppression of the Church of England</quote>In some (but not all) cases, that oppression amounted to the English authorities not allowing Puritans to burn witches at the stake. Unreasonable religious zealots have always been a problem, both for the colonies and later on for the US. --- "The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." -- 1984</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1