LogFAQs > #978698766

LurkerFAQs, Active Database ( 12.01.2023-present ), DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	House of Representatives impeachment vote for Secretary Mayorkas
InfinityMonster 02/06/24 10:22:58 PM #38:	darkace77450 posted... They're being "voluntarily apprehended" because requesting asylum requires them to do so. Yeah, that's my point. You brought it up to show that border security is doing great because of all the apprehensions. But all record apprehensions shows is that they're letting in a record amount of people. It has nothing to do with security. darkace77450 posted... That they're released and given a distant court date is a problem with the system, not our enforcement (or lack thereof) of the law. The bipartisan bill would have, among other things, increased our system's capacity to process asylum claims at a more reasonable clip. Republicans shot it down because they don't want to fix the problem they'd rather campaign on. No it wouldn't. It adds zero new judges and just speeds up the initial screening and Title 42 type removal. The NY Times just reported the other day that even if they were to add 1k more judges, the current backlog still wouldn't be complete till 2032. If the system is overwhelmed, you stop, and it's clear several systems involved in this are overwhelmed. --- "It lies between the pit of man's fears and the summit of his knowledge" <cite>InfinityMonster posted [p:978698766] in House of R... [t:80689897]...</cite> <quote>darkace77450 posted... </cite><quote>They're being "voluntarily apprehended" because requesting asylum requires them to do so.</quote>Yeah, that's my point. You brought it up to show that border security is doing great because of all the apprehensions. But all record apprehensions shows is that they're letting in a record amount of people. It has nothing to do with security.darkace77450 posted... </cite><quote>That they're released and given a distant court date is a problem with the system, not our enforcement (or lack thereof) of the law. The bipartisan bill would have, among other things, increased our system's capacity to process asylum claims at a more reasonable clip. Republicans shot it down because they don't want to fix the problem they'd rather campaign on.</quote>No it wouldn't. It adds zero new judges and just speeds up the initial screening and Title 42 type removal.The NY Times just reported the other day that even if they were to add 1k more judges, the current backlog still wouldn't be complete till 2032. If the system is overwhelmed, you stop, and it's clear several systems involved in this are overwhelmed. --- "It lies between the pit of man's fears and the summit of his knowledge"</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1