LogFAQs > #978625210

LurkerFAQs, Active Database ( 12.01.2023-present ), DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicTrial rescheduled because jurors refuse to fine someone for feeding homeless
Enclave
02/02/24 11:37:47 PM
#23:


Fourth Circuit, U.S. v. Moylan, 1969

We recognize, as appellants urge, the undisputed power of the jury to acquit, even if its verdict is contrary to the law as given by the judge, and contrary to the evidence. This is a power that must exist as long as we adhere to the general verdict in criminal cases, for the courts cannot search the minds of the jurors to find the basis upon which they judge. If the jury feels that the law under which the defendant is accused, is unjust, or that exigent circumstances justified the actions of the accused, or for any reason which appeals to their logic or passion, the jury has the power to acquit, and the courts must abide by that decision.

Going to back down now Tyranthraxus or do you still have some more clown make-up to apply?

---
The commercial says that Church isn't for perfect people, I guess that's why I'm an atheist.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1