LogFAQs > #978604312

LurkerFAQs, Active Database ( 12.01.2023-present ), DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Do you believe that had ross perot never run as an independent in the election
Justin2Krelian 02/01/24 7:33:03 PM #20:	SecretBase posted... Bush lost 9 million votes between elections while Dems only gained 3 million votes between those elections. There is no way Perot didn't cause his loss lol. It's unheard of for an incumbent to lose that many fucking votes in a one-on-one. They dropped a failed incumbent for an independent. A lot of that is because Bush did extremely well in 88, better than Obama in 08 in terms of percentage. It's been said that 1992 was the end of the Reagan Democrats, so those margins weren't happening anymore. If you go with the idea Perot took 60-40 percentage wise, you end up with a margin around 50-48 for Clinton, which makes sense. --- -J2K Currently Streaming: The Punisher, Umbrella Academy, Gen V, The Expanse, Reacher, Servant <cite>Justin2Krelian posted [p:978604312] in Do you bel... [t:80685394]...</cite> <quote>SecretBase posted... </cite><quote>Bush lost 9 million votes between elections while Dems only gained 3 million votes between those elections.There is no way Perot didn't cause his loss lol. It's unheard of for an incumbent to lose that many fucking votes in a one-on-one. They dropped a failed incumbent for an independent.</quote>A lot of that is because Bush did extremely well in 88, better than Obama in 08 in terms of percentage. It's been said that 1992 was the end of the Reagan Democrats, so those margins weren't happening anymore.If you go with the idea Perot took 60-40 percentage wise, you end up with a margin around 50-48 for Clinton, which makes sense. --- -J2KCurrently Streaming: The Punisher, Umbrella Academy, Gen V, The Expanse, Reacher, Servant</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1