LogFAQs > #978602986

LurkerFAQs, Active Database ( 12.01.2023-present ), DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Im like the only person that doesnt like the pixel remasters...
uwnim 02/01/24 6:11:42 PM #31:	TheOtherMike posted... Yes they would. "Tacked on" doesn't mean "added but in new areas," it just means "added on." You're adding a qualifier that doesn't exist. Tacking it on, as it were. Nah. It teaches a new water elemental spell, but the game hardly needed that. Just because something was added that didnt exist in the original doesnt mean it was tacked on. If properly integrated so that someone who never played the original but knew there were some additions would be unable to tell that it wasnt there before then it isnt tacked on. Like the ff4 bonus dungeons were absolutely tacked on. They stick out and feel like something that shouldnt exist. --- I want a pet Lavos Spawn. [Order of the Cetaceans: Phocoena dioptrica] <cite>uwnim posted [p:978602986] in Im like th... [t:80684891]...</cite> <quote>TheOtherMike posted... </cite><quote>Yes they would. "Tacked on" doesn't mean "added but in new areas," it just means "added on." You're adding a qualifier that doesn't exist. Tacking it on, as it were.Nah. It teaches a new water elemental spell, but the game hardly needed that.</quote>Just because something was added that didnt exist in the original doesnt mean it was tacked on. If properly integrated so that someone who never played the original but knew there were some additions would be unable to tell that it wasnt there before then it isnt tacked on. Like the ff4 bonus dungeons were absolutely tacked on. They stick out and feel like something that shouldnt exist. --- I want a pet Lavos Spawn.[Order of the Cetaceans: Phocoena dioptrica]</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1